ZIP reports / CO / 80537
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 80537, Loveland, CO

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 80537?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 80537 is $1,713 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,7132026-06 · up 2.3% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,684ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$73 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,732Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 80537
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,492ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,509HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,520ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,537HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,713ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,732HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,359ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,385HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,512ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,540HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$86,325ACS 2024 5-year · ±$4,648 MOE
Renter share36.5%7,100 renter households
Rent burden 30%+49.8%3,534 observed households
Housing vacancy3.1%627 of 20,101 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 80537Zillow asking-rent index$1,713ACS median gross rent$1,684HUD two-bedroom standard$1,732

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 80537ACS median household income$86,325Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$68,520

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 80537Studio$1,492One bedroom$1,520Two bedrooms$1,713Three bedrooms$2,359Four bedrooms$2,512

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8053730% or more of income3,534 householdsBelow 30%3,566 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 80537ZIP 80537$1,713Loveland city$1,859Larimer County county$1,950Fort Collins, CO metro$1,950

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 80537; missing months remain gaps$1,774$1,620$1,467$1,3132021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
25.7%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.2%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.2%113 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
99.1%115 of 116 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 80537

At $1,713 in June 2026, the Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI) is the current ZIP asking-rent snapshot. It is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a lease quote or bedroom-specific reading. The five-digit 80537 label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The matched ACS 2024 five-year survey puts median gross rent at $1,684 for occupied renter homes. ACS gross rent includes selected utilities, unlike an asking-rent index. The numerical gap is narrow, but these sources are not interchangeable benchmarks: they cover different populations, costs, and time frameworks.

History points to deceleration within a still-positive path, not a reversal call. Same-month ZORI growth was 2.27% over one year, against annualized gains of 3.07% over three years and 4.68% over five years. Recent direction therefore confirms the longer upward path but breaks from its faster multiyear pace. Annualized monthly-return variability was 2.15%, modest enough to give more confidence in a current index reading than a highly erratic series would warrant. Maximum drawdown reached 1.25%; past downward episodes remain relevant even though the endpoint is higher. Coverage is 99.1%. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 1,170 for momentum, 255 for stability, and 406 for the balanced measure; lower rank is higher. These are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

For bedroom planning, ZORI has been scaled by the local HUD ladder to produce modelled, not measured, monthly estimates: $1,492 for a studio, $1,520 for one bedroom, a two-bedroom estimate equal to the current ZORI, $2,359 for three bedrooms, and $2,512 for four bedrooms. The FY2026 two-bedroom HUD FMR/SAFMR standard in that ladder is $1,732. The packet identifies the ladder as ZIP SAFMR or county-derived; HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. Accordingly, it is a scaling device for the modelled estimates, not proof that a unit in any bedroom category was listed or leased at those amounts.

A household-level screen reveals a second tension. Arithmetic at the 30% standard makes the annual income associated with the current index $68,520, versus $86,325 ACS median household income. Annualized asking rent is 23.8% of that income estimate. This is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant qualification rule, and the ACS income figure is a survey estimate rather than a property-level income record. Yet the same ACS five-year evidence records 3,534 of 7,100 renter households, or 49.8%, as paying at least the threshold share of income toward gross rent. Because this burden measure concerns occupied renter homes and gross rent with selected utilities, it neither determines costs for a newly listed home nor proves burden for a particular household or unit.

The ZCTA stock data show why vacancy needs careful handling. There are 20,101 housing units, a calculated 3.1% vacancy rate, and a renter share of 36.5% among occupied homes. The stock is predominantly 14,983 single-family units, alongside 1,560 units in large multifamily structures. Vacancies include classifications for rent, sale, and seasonal use, so the aggregate rate cannot demonstrate availability, condition, price, or terms for any particular rental. For wider context only, the Loveland city context has a $1,859 rent, the Larimer County context has a $1,950 rent, and the Fort Collins, CO metro context has a $1,950 rent. Those named city, county, and metro values are wider-scope comparisons, not substitutes for a ZIP asking-rent index or ZCTA survey result.

Resale evidence is direct to the ZIP but belongs to a different market. Redfin's direct rolling-three-month ZIP for-sale observation through June 30, 2026 shows a $501,387 median sold price, down 1.69% from a year earlier, across 215 homes sold. Median marketing time was 51 days. Active listings were 454. A separate inventory count stood at 227 homes, 9.6% higher year-over-year, or 3.2 months of supply. Sale-to-list outcomes averaged 98.73%; 13.41% of homes sold above list, while 40.81% went off market within two weeks. These are direct ZIP resale pricing and liquidity observations, not rental transactions, rental comparables, or property-level operating economics.

The rent and resale snapshots pull in different directions. The annualized current ZORI divided by the median sold price is a 4.10% cross-source screening ratio only, not a property-level return measure or forecast. The rent index has a positive same-month change and low observed variation, while median resale pricing declined and resale inventory increased. At the same time, the reported supply figure and the within-two-weeks result prevent a simple weak-liquidity label. This mixed resale picture challenges any conclusion drawn from rent history or the household-income screen alone. It confirms only that separate rental and for-sale measurements should be read together as a tension, without claiming that one caused the other.

Decision use should begin with direct property checks rather than a mechanical ZIP conclusion. Verify the actual home's bedroom count, stated asking rent, included utilities, lease term, concessions, deposits and fees, availability date, property type, and the listing's precise location. For a purchase-oriented comparison, examine relevant sale or listing documents rather than transferring ZIP median-sale signals to the subject home. Confirm that the address maps to the market identifier and ZCTA match used here, since neither data universe describes a particular property. ZORI is blended, ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes, HUD is an administrative standard, and Redfin is a resale observation. Those boundaries, plus the history's backward-looking nature, are why this report offers no forecast, recommendation, or claim about an individual unit.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Positive rent path, slower latest pace

The current asking-rent index remains above its prior same-month reading, but its latest pace is below the longer annualized paths. Low recorded variability and a limited historical drawdown make the snapshot more internally stable than a volatile series, while still leaving a visible moderation. The history is descriptive only and should not be recast as a forecast.

Affordability signals do not fully align

Income arithmetic looks less strained at the ZIP median household-income comparison than the burden survey alone might suggest. Nearly half of surveyed renter households met the burden threshold, so the median-income comparison should not be used to describe individual households. It also joins a current asking-rent index to a survey measure of occupied homes with selected utilities.

Vacancy is not unit availability

ZCTA housing stock is weighted toward single-family units, and its aggregate vacancy measure spans several vacancy classifications. That means neither the vacancy rate nor the count of rental vacancies identifies a comparable available unit. The city, county, and metro figures provide scale around the ZIP, but they remain wider geographies with different observational roles.

Resale data provide a counterweight

Direct ZIP resale data show lower median sale pricing alongside higher inventory, even as supply and rapid off-market activity do not fit a simple weak-market label. This challenges a one-signal reading based on rents alone. Annualized ZORI divided by sold price is useful only as a cross-source screen, because it omits property costs, transaction terms, and unit-level matching.

  • ZORI, ACS gross rent, and HUD standards each use different populations, timing, and included-cost concepts; numerical proximity between them does not establish a rent comparable, lease quote, or unit-level market price.
  • The ACS ZCTA is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes, with survey uncertainty, whereas ZORI is a current asking-rent index; neither source confirms costs, burden, or availability at a particular address.
  • Historical growth, variability, drawdown, coverage, and discovery ranks summarize prior ZIP index behavior only. They cannot establish future rent direction, investment outcomes, or the performance of a property selected today.
  • Redfin's rolling-three-month resale observation aggregates for-sale outcomes. A subject property's condition, bedroom count, list terms, concessions, utilities, and precise location can materially differ from both the rent index and sold-price median.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 80537

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$501,387-1.7% year over year
Homes sold215rolling three-month observation
Median days on market51 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.2resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 80537Active listings454Inventory227Pending sales227Homes sold215

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

227 observed inventory · +9.6% year over year.

Price realization

98.7% average sale-to-list ratio · 13.4% sold above original list.

Early absorption

40.8% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 51 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Larimer County listing conditions

1,834 active Realtor.com listings · 46 median days on market · 23.9% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Fort Collins, CO resale supply

3.6 months of supply · 56 median days on market · 27.7% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

7.0% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 80537. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What does the current rent snapshot represent?

The current figure is Zillow ZORI, a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. It is not a measured bedroom rent or a signed lease amount. ACS median gross rent is a distinct five-year survey result for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, so the close figures are contextual rather than interchangeable.

Are the bedroom figures observed market rents?

No. The studio-through-four-bedroom figures are modelled monthly estimates obtained by scaling the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, either ZIP SAFMR or county-derived in this packet, not asking rent. The resulting amounts organize comparisons by size but are not observed rental transactions.

How should the required-income screen and burden result be read?

The income screen simply divides annualized asking rent by the stated threshold, then compares it with ACS median household income. It is neither advice nor an applicant eligibility test. The burden share reports survey results for occupied renter households paying at least the threshold portion of income toward gross rent; it cannot identify burden for a particular tenant or home.

What does the Redfin evidence add?

Redfin reports direct ZIP for-sale activity over a rolling three-month period, including prices, sales, exposure time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes. It does not report rental transactions. The annualized rent-index-to-price calculation is therefore a cross-source screening ratio; it does not measure property economics, returns, or future performance.