ZIP reports / AZ / 85044
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 85044, Phoenix, AZ

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 85044?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 85044 is $1,540 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,5402026-06 · down 5.1% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,874ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$51 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,250Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 85044
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,218ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,780HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,328ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,940HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,540ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,250HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,053ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,000HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,279ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,330HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$96,820ACS 2024 5-year · ±$4,064 MOE
Renter share37.6%6,699 renter households
Rent burden 30%+51.4%3,445 observed households
Housing vacancy4.8%898 of 18,731 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 85044Zillow asking-rent index$1,540ACS median gross rent$1,874HUD two-bedroom standard$2,250

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 85044ACS median household income$96,820Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$61,600

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 85044Studio$1,218One bedroom$1,328Two bedrooms$1,540Three bedrooms$2,053Four bedrooms$2,279

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8504430% or more of income3,445 householdsBelow 30%3,254 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 85044ZIP 85044$1,540Phoenix city$1,569Maricopa County county$1,729Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro$1,733

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 85044; missing months remain gaps$1,734$1,649$1,563$1,4772021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
1.4%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
9.0%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.2%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 85044

In 85044, the current rental signal is a cooling asking-rent index rather than a measured lease-comps series. At the stated Zillow endpoint, ZIP ZORI was $1,540 per month, down 5.1% from the same month a year earlier. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, so it is useful as a ZIP-wide asking-rent benchmark but does not describe every building, lease term, or utility arrangement. The immediate decision tension is that the current rent snapshot has weakened, while the separate resale evidence shows a more mixed picture of pricing and market activity.

The backward-looking ZORI path reinforces the recent cooling signal. Exact same-month change was -5.1% over one year and -2.0% annualized over three years, while the five-year annualized change remained slightly positive at 0.3%. Thus, the latest decline confirms the intermediate cooling path but breaks from the modest net gain visible across the longer window. Monthly ZORI returns imply 3.2% annualized variability, meaning a single current reading deserves moderate rather than absolute confidence. Separately, the historical maximum drawdown was 9.0%, documenting that the index has experienced a meaningful prior retreat. Coverage was 100% across 138 observations. Transparent national discovery ranks were 2,886 for momentum, 1,946 for stability, and 2,792 for the balanced measure, where a lower rank is higher; these are descriptive history tools, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The five-digit label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rent was $1,874, a survey measure for occupied renter homes that includes selected utilities, unlike Zillow’s asking-rent index. HUD FMR or SAFMR is instead an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent; current ZORI equals 68.4% of the local HUD two-bedroom standard. For wider rent context, the City of Phoenix value was $1,569, the Maricopa County value was $1,729, and the Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro value was $1,733; each is a broader-geography comparison, not a ZIP observation.

The bedroom figures should be read as modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents. Scaling ZIP ZORI through the local HUD bedroom ladder produces estimates of $1,218 for a studio, $1,328 for one bedroom, $1,540 for two bedrooms, $2,053 for three bedrooms, and $2,279 for four bedrooms. This approach preserves the local HUD size relationship while anchoring the level to ZIP ZORI. It does not establish what a particular unit is asking, because a property’s type, lease structure, included utilities, condition, and timing can differ from both the ZIP index and the standardized ladder.

Income and burden evidence provide a second, distinct affordability screen. The matched ACS ZCTA median household income was $96,820. Applying the 30% required-income screen to the current ZORI produces $61,600, and the index equals 19.1% of that median household income on an annualized basis. That calculation is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. In the ACS renter-household survey, 3,445 of 6,699 renter households, or 51.4%, were paying 30% or more of income toward rent. That burden share describes surveyed renter households in aggregate; it cannot prove affordability, financial stress, or occupancy conditions for any particular unit.

Housing stock data add scale but not a direct availability verdict. The ACS ZCTA counted 18,731 housing units, with a 4.8% vacancy rate and a renter share of 37.6%. It also classified 467 units as vacant for rent. Single-family units were the larger measured structure category, while large multifamily buildings were a smaller segment of the recorded stock. These counts help frame the renter base and stock composition, but vacancy classification does not show whether a vacant unit is suitable, currently marketed, priced near ZORI, or available under a given household’s lease terms.

The direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation belongs exclusively to the for-sale market, not rental transactions. Median sold price was $474,893, down 2.1% year over year; 153 homes sold with a median 45 days on market. Inventory stood at 125 homes and months of supply at 2.5. The average sale-to-list ratio was 97.5%, while 16.1% of sales closed above list price. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price yields a 3.9% cross-source screening ratio only; it is not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. The resale price decline confirms a same-direction cooling signal with rent, but its coexistence with the reported supply and sale-to-list measures challenges any simple conclusion that all housing-market indicators are moving uniformly.

Several limits should remain active when using this ZIP screen. Zillow asking-rent history is not a record of signed leases, ACS values are survey estimates for a ZCTA rather than USPS delivery ZIP boundaries, HUD standards are administrative benchmarks, and Redfin measures completed ZIP resale activity. Property-level review should separately verify current asking terms, bedroom and property type, included utilities, concessions, listing dates, and the comparability of recent sales by physical characteristics and transaction timing. It should also confirm whether the applicable HUD geography and program standard match the intended use. The practical question is whether those address-level facts support or materially depart from the ZIP-level rent, burden, stock, and resale screens described here.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Cooling rent history is clear, but the five-year path is not wholly negative

ZIP ZORI declined 5.1% over one year and 2.0% annualized over three years, establishing a backward-looking cooling pattern. The five-year annualized change was still positive at 0.3%, so the current retreat reverses a modest longer-run gain rather than describing an uninterrupted five-year decline. Historical variability and drawdown support caution around any single current index reading.

The rent benchmarks answer different questions

Zillow ZORI is a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index, ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes with selected utilities, and HUD FMR or SAFMR is an administrative bedroom standard. The difference among these values is expected because their populations, timing, and intended uses differ. They should not be blended into one measure of current lease pricing.

Aggregate burden remains substantial despite the lower ZORI income screen

The 30% screen based on current ZORI requires $61,600 of annual income, below the ZCTA median household income of $96,820. Yet ACS reports that 51.4% of renter households paid at least 30% of income toward rent. This contrast shows why ZIP-wide median income arithmetic cannot substitute for the income distribution, housing costs, and utility obligations of individual renter households.

Resale pricing and resale market signals are mixed

The direct ZIP resale observation shows a 2.1% year-over-year decline in median sold price, consistent in direction with cooling asking rent. At the same time, recorded sales, months of supply, and sale-to-list measures provide separate evidence about for-sale market activity. These observations are not rental comps, and the annualized-rent-to-price figure remains only a cross-source screening ratio.

  • A ZIP ZORI value is a blended asking-rent index across rental types, so a property with unusual condition, included utilities, concessions, or lease length may differ materially from the ZIP snapshot.
  • The matched Census ZCTA is a statistical area rather than a USPS delivery ZIP, and ACS five-year survey estimates describe occupied renter homes over a survey period rather than current available listings.
  • Modelled bedroom estimates inherit the local HUD ladder and ZIP ZORI level. They are not observed bedroom rents and should not be used as proof of a unit’s achievable asking rent.
  • Redfin resale data describe completed for-sale transactions in a rolling ZIP window. They do not establish rental demand, operating costs, financing terms, property expenses, or economics for a specific home.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 85044

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$474,893-2.1% year over year
Homes sold153rolling three-month observation
Median days on market45 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply2.5resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 85044Active listings282Inventory125Pending sales142Homes sold153

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

125 observed inventory · -13.4% year over year.

Price realization

97.5% average sale-to-list ratio · 16.1% sold above original list.

Early absorption

33.6% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 45 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Maricopa County listing conditions

16,056 active Realtor.com listings · 64 median days on market · 28.9% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ resale supply

3.5 months of supply · 61 median days on market · 32.9% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.1% reported apartment vacancy · 33 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 85044. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why can the ZIP label and the Census geography both be used here?

The label 85044 is supplied as both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match, allowing the report to present both evidence sets with clear source boundaries. The ZCTA remains a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP, so geographic alignment is useful but not exact delivery-boundary equivalence.

What does the required-income figure actually mean?

The required-income figure applies a 30% arithmetic screen to annualized ZIP ZORI. It indicates the income level produced by that formula, not a recommended budget, underwriting conclusion, tenant qualification standard, or statement about whether any household can afford a particular available unit.

Why is ACS median gross rent higher than current Zillow ZORI?

The measures observe different universes. Zillow ZORI tracks a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, while ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. Timing, renter occupancy, utility treatment, and survey methodology can all create a difference without a contradiction.

How should the resale information be used alongside the rent data?

Redfin’s ZIP resale observation can describe for-sale pricing, sales volume, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes, but it is not rental evidence. The annualized ZORI-to-sale-price result is only a cross-source screen. Any property-level assessment would still need current rental terms and comparable physical sale characteristics.