ZIP reports / CA / 91739
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 91739, Rancho Cucamonga, CA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 91739?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 91739 is $2,798 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$2,7982026-06 · up 0.9% year over year
ACS median gross rent$2,535ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$179 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,201Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 91739
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$2,151ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,692HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$2,259ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,777HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$2,798ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,201HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$3,702ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,912HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$4,467ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,514HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$143,265ACS 2024 5-year · ±$8,448 MOE
Renter share27.7%3,321 renter households
Rent burden 30%+54.0%1,793 observed households
Housing vacancy4.2%522 of 12,512 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 91739Zillow asking-rent index$2,798ACS median gross rent$2,535HUD two-bedroom standard$2,201

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 91739ACS median household income$143,265Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$111,920

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 91739Studio$2,151One bedroom$2,259Two bedrooms$2,798Three bedrooms$3,702Four bedrooms$4,467

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9173930% or more of income1,793 householdsBelow 30%1,528 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 91739ZIP 91739$2,798Rancho Cucamonga city$2,813San Bernardino County county$2,489Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro$2,539

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 91739; missing months remain gaps$2,871$2,694$2,517$2,3402021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
15.5%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
4.0%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.5%123 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%124 of 124 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 91739

ZIP 91739 enters June 2026 with a Zillow ZORI of $2,798 per month, a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. The index was 0.85% higher than the same month a year earlier. That is a positive current reading, but its modest pace is the core initial tension: the asking-rent snapshot remains substantial while recent growth is comparatively restrained. Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index, not a survey median, a utility-inclusive household cost, or a bedroom-specific lease observation. It should therefore be read as a current market indicator rather than as a quote for any particular available home.

The backward-looking ZORI history shows a slowing pattern rather than a fresh acceleration. Exact same-month annualized change was 0.85% over one year, 1.75% over three years, and 2.92% over five years. Recent direction remains upward, but it breaks from the longer path by running below both longer-run annualized rates. This history is fully covered by 124 observations and 123 consecutive monthly returns. Annualized monthly-return variability reached 3.48%, placing this ZIP in the supplied high-variability category, so one current rent reading deserves measured confidence rather than heavy extrapolation. Its largest prior peak-to-trough decline was 4.03%, showing that the observed rent path has experienced material reversals. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 1,881 for momentum, 2,214 for stability, and 2,387 for the balanced measure; lower ranks indicate stronger placement. These are historical measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The five-digit label is both Zillow's ZIP market identifier and a match to a Census ZCTA. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the matched ACS 2024 five-year survey, median gross rent was $2,535, with gross rent representing occupied renter homes and including selected utilities. Zillow's current asking-rent index is therefore 10.4% above that survey median, a difference that is expected to reflect distinct populations and definitions rather than a direct contradiction. The same ACS survey reports median household income of $143,265 with a $8,448 margin of error. Survey values describe resident households over a multiyear period; ZORI captures the asking-rent market and must remain in its own evidence universe.

The bedroom ladder is a model, not a set of measured ZIP bedroom rents. It scales the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder to produce modelled monthly estimates of $2,151 for a studio, $2,259 for one bedroom, $2,798 for two bedrooms, $3,702 for three bedrooms, and $4,467 for four bedrooms. The local HUD two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR benchmark is $2,201, making the modelled two-bedroom estimate 27.1% higher. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent, so neither the HUD amount nor the scaled estimates should be substituted for observed listings, executed leases, or unit-level comparable rents.

A simple affordability screen creates another important contrast. Applying the 30% rule arithmetically to the current ZORI produces a required annual income of $111,920; that is a screen, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. Annualized asking rent equals 23.4% of the reported median household income in this aggregate comparison. Yet the ACS burden measure reports 1,793 of 3,321 renter households, or 54.0%, paying at least 30% of income toward gross rent. That burden statistic does not prove affordability or unaffordability for a particular unit or applicant. The housing base contains 12,512 units, of which 522 were vacant, a 4.2% vacancy rate, and its stock is weighted toward single-family homes rather than large multifamily structures. Vacancy likewise cannot establish availability or pricing for an individual rental.

Broader geography offers context but not a replacement for ZIP evidence: the wider Rancho Cucamonga city asking-rent context is $2,813, the wider San Bernardino County asking-rent context is $2,489, and the wider Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA metro asking-rent context is $2,539. The ZIP reading is close to the city context but above the county and metro contexts. Those comparisons describe different geographic scopes and should not be blended with the ZIP's ZORI, ACS ZCTA survey, or HUD ladder. In particular, city, county, and metro figures may represent different housing mixes and populations, while the ZIP-level evidence is the relevant starting point for this report.

The direct rolling-three-month Redfin ZIP resale observation presents a stronger for-sale signal than the rent trend. Median sold price was $986,777, up 5.54% year over year, with 75 homes sold and a median 45 days on market. Redfin separately reports 196 active listings and inventory of 99 homes, alongside 4.0 months of supply. Average sale-to-list was 99.84%, while 35.65% of sales closed above list, indicating that the resale evidence includes both near-list execution and a meaningful above-list share. This is for-sale market evidence, not rental transactions or rental comparables. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is 3.40%, but that is only a cross-source screening ratio, not a cap rate, property yield, net return, or expected return. Rising resale prices challenge the slower rent-growth and burden screen rather than resolving it.

Several limits matter before applying these signals to a property. ZORI is a blended asking-rent index; ACS gross rent is a surveyed, utility-inclusive resident measure; HUD is an administrative benchmark; and Redfin tracks resale activity. None supplies a unit-specific lease, operating-cost record, or direct rental transaction comparison. A property-level review would need the exact bedroom count, advertised and achieved rent, lease term, utility responsibility, concessions and fees, unit condition, property type, listing status, and truly comparable recent sales or rentals. It should also verify whether the unit's timing aligns with the stated source periods. The unresolved question is whether a specific unit's documented rent and terms support the ZIP-level snapshot without assuming that broader survey, modelled, or resale evidence applies unchanged.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent growth has slowed despite a still-elevated asking-rent level

The current Zillow asking-rent index remains substantial, but the latest same-month gain trails the three-year and five-year annualized growth rates. That pattern is positive rather than declining, yet it does not confirm a renewed acceleration. High historical variability and a prior drawdown further limit the confidence that should be placed in a single current rent observation.

Survey rent, asking rent, and HUD standards answer different questions

The ACS ZCTA median gross-rent estimate describes occupied renter households and includes selected utilities, while Zillow ZORI tracks a typical asking-rent index. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard. The gap among these values should be interpreted as a source-definition and population difference, not as evidence that one source is incorrect or interchangeable with another.

Aggregate income screen conflicts with renter burden evidence

The arithmetic income screen places the current asking-rent index below the reported area median household income on an aggregate basis. However, more than half of surveyed renter households report gross-rent burdens at or above the stated threshold. That contrast makes household-level income distribution, actual utilities, lease terms, and unit rent essential checks rather than assumptions.

Resale conditions are firmer than the recent rent-growth signal

The direct ZIP resale observation records rising sold prices, near-list average execution, and a material share of transactions above list. Meanwhile, recent asking-rent growth is much slower than its longer-run annualized pace. The resulting rent-price screen is useful only as a cross-source comparison; resale data cannot establish rental revenue, expenses, or economics for a specific property.

  • A current Zillow ZORI reading can differ materially from a particular listing because it is a blended asking-rent index across rental types, not a measured rent for a specified bedroom count, lease term, or utility arrangement.
  • The historical path is classified as high variability, and the recorded drawdown shows that prior rent gains were not uninterrupted. Treating the latest positive annual change as a durable trend would exceed the supplied backward-looking evidence.
  • Redfin resale figures describe a rolling-three-month for-sale observation, not rental transactions. Median sale price, days on market, inventory, and sale-to-list outcomes cannot determine achievable rent, operating costs, or property-specific pricing.
  • ACS ZCTA values are multiyear survey estimates for occupied households, with reported margins of error, and the ZCTA is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Survey burden and vacancy statistics cannot prove conditions for one unit.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 91739

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$986,777+5.5% year over year
Homes sold75rolling three-month observation
Median days on market45 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply4.0resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 91739Active listings196Inventory99Pending sales84Homes sold75

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

99 observed inventory · +7.5% year over year.

Price realization

99.8% average sale-to-list ratio · 35.6% sold above original list.

Early absorption

27.4% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 45 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

San Bernardino County listing conditions

5,846 active Realtor.com listings · 58 median days on market · 16.4% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA resale supply

4.0 months of supply · 49 median days on market · 25.7% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

5.2% reported apartment vacancy · 23 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 91739. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the Zillow asking-rent index exceed the ACS median gross-rent estimate?

The measures cover different evidence universes. Zillow ZORI is a current typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, while ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey statistic for occupied renter homes that includes selected utilities. Differences can reflect timing, household occupancy, utility treatment, rental composition, and survey versus asking-market methodology.

Are the studio through four-bedroom figures observed rents?

No. They are modelled monthly ZIP estimates created by scaling the ZIP Zillow ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific benchmark, not an asking-rent measure. The resulting figures are useful for structured comparison, but actual bedroom rents require listing-level or lease-level evidence.

What does the 30% required-income figure mean?

It is a mechanical calculation that converts the current monthly Zillow asking-rent index into an annual income amount using a 30% housing-cost share. It is not financial advice, a recommendation, a tenant-screening criterion, or an applicant qualification rule. Actual affordability depends on household income, utilities, debts, lease terms, fees, and the specific unit.

How should the rent-price screening ratio be used?

The ratio divides annualized ZIP Zillow ZORI by the direct ZIP median sold price from Redfin. It is only a cross-source screening ratio that places an asking-rent indicator beside a resale-price indicator. It excludes expenses, financing, vacancies, property condition, achieved rent, and unit comparability, so it is not a cap rate, yield, net return, or forecast.