There is no across-the-board winner. Midland is the more compelling first screen for a cash-flow and lower-basis mandate. Its Zillow city home-value index is $260,028.88 against $374,551.70 in West Lafayette, while the corresponding city rent indexes are $1,483 and $1,840.61 for Midland and West Lafayette, respectively. Midland’s 6.84% gross yield exceeds West Lafayette’s 5.90%, but that yield is only annual Zillow rent divided by Zillow value before vacancy, management, repairs, taxes, insurance, utilities, financing, and capital work. Zillow’s indexes are market indicators, not property appraisals.
For renter pressure, the evidence is mixed rather than a clean West Lafayette endorsement. West Lafayette’s renter share is 70.63%, versus 32.90% in Midland, and its rent-burden measure is 73.05%, versus 50.41%. Yet Midland’s 4.75% vacancy rate is below West Lafayette’s 10.47%, indicating less slack in the ACS city record. Stock also directs the asset choice: Midland is 73.18% single-family, whereas West Lafayette is 29.65% large multifamily. ACS survey measures describe households and units; they should not be blended with Zillow indexes or treated as competing rent or value appraisals.
For local-demand risk, Midland has population change of 1.92%, while West Lafayette has -6.99%, across overlapping ACS vintages; this comparison is not annualized. That favors Midland for a conventional local-demand screen, while West Lafayette may still suit a renter-dense, large-multifamily thesis. Underwrite the actual address next: verify achievable lease rent, vacancy and concessions, unit condition and capital scope, property taxes and insurance, and the tenant or employer exposure that city aggregates cannot show.

