Counties / Pennsylvania / Armstrong County

Armstrong County, PA

FIPS 42005 · population 64,622 · part of Pittsburgh, PA

$164k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$164k
▼ 2.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$785
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,002
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+44.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−2.4%FHFA HPI2025+5.9%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$157k
Surveyed gross rent$785
Rent burden 30%+43.3%
Median year built1959
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
12.7%vacant
32,128estimated housing units
Occupied tenure21.2% renter
owner 78.8%renter 21.2%
Structure mix81.5% single-family
Single-family 81.5%20+ units 2.4%Mobile home 9.5%Other 6.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs15,486▼ 1.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,450annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,024▲ 2.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services24.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.0%WEEKLY WAGE+2.8%Education and health services24.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Armstrong County has a valuation-direction conflict that favors buyers who can verify property-level cash flow and warrants caution for those relying on appreciation: in Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation, median home value was $163,764, down 2.44% year over year, while FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI rose 5.85%. The HPI is an index, not a home price; differing methods and vintages bar a blended appreciation conclusion.

02Housing economics

Carrying-cost underwriting is constrained rather than supported by income evidence. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD’s $1,002 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The 1.37% effective property-tax rate and $2,161 median annual tax should enter asset-level expenses, but cannot substitute for rent, insurance, vacancy, or repair evidence.

03Demand & competition

Workplace and mover evidence does not establish tenant demand. QCEW records 15,486 annual average covered jobs located in the county, down 1.05%, while Education and health services, the largest disclosed private supersector, represents 24.07% of private covered employment. This is workplace coverage, not resident employment or unemployment. Net tax-return migration was -17; departing movers’ average income exceeded entrants’ by $1,495, a cautionary migration signal rather than proof of demand. Investor mortgages were 5.13% of 487 purchases, identifying a non-owner-occupant segment but not its bidding behavior.

04Risk & next checks

The dominant hazard is inland flood. Its modeled annual climate-loss ratio is 0.21% of building value, an expected-loss model rather than a parcel-specific insurance bill or damage outcome. No Realtor.com listing price, active-listing, days-on-market, or price-reduction figures are published, preventing a reading of asking-price liquidity, visible supply, or seller concessions. Next checks are parcel flood exposure and insurance, actual market asking rents and leases, tax bills, repair needs, closed-sale comparables, and MLS activity.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Armstrong County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Kittanning borough3.9KFord City borough2.8KLeechburg borough2KFreeport borough1.7KWest Hills CDP1.6KOrchard Hills CDP1.5KApollo borough1.5KWest Kittanning borough1.3K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

30 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Kittanning boroughIncorporated place
    3,902
  2. 02
    Ford City boroughIncorporated place
    2,813
  3. 03
    Leechburg boroughIncorporated place
    1,985
  4. 04
    Freeport boroughIncorporated place
    1,708
  5. 05
    West Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    1,584
  6. 06
    Orchard Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    1,546
  7. 07
    Apollo boroughIncorporated place
    1,488
  8. 08
    West Kittanning boroughIncorporated place
    1,284
  9. 09
    North Apollo boroughIncorporated place
    1,156
  10. 10
    Lenape Heights CDPCensus-designated place
    1,042
  11. 11
    Rural Valley boroughIncorporated place
    1,019
  12. 12
    Pleasant View CDPCensus-designated place
    809
Show 18 more places
  1. 13
    Parker cityIncorporated place
    634
  2. 14
    Distant CDPCensus-designated place
    606
  3. 15
    Spring Church CDPCensus-designated place
    598
  4. 16
    Dayton boroughIncorporated place
    521
  5. 17
    Worthington boroughIncorporated place
    499
  6. 18
    Ford Cliff boroughIncorporated place
    409
  7. 19
    Manorville boroughIncorporated place
    402
  8. 20
    Applewold boroughIncorporated place
    385
  9. 21
    South Bethlehem boroughIncorporated place
    382
  10. 22
    Elderton boroughIncorporated place
    310
  11. 23
    North Vandergrift CDPCensus-designated place
    249
  12. 24
    Templeton CDPCensus-designated place
    213
  13. 25
    Atwood boroughIncorporated place
    160
  14. 26
    Sagamore CDPCensus-designated place
    121
  15. 27
    Kiskimere CDPCensus-designated place
    115
  16. 28
    Clinton CDP (Armstrong County)Census place
    82
  17. 29
    Schenley CDPCensus-designated place
    65
  18. 30
    Yatesboro CDPCensus-designated place
    49

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.213% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.37%

$2,161 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-17

1,174 in · 1,191 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$1,495

$49,560 arriving · $51,055 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.1%

25 of 487 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; for a rent figure, the Pittsburgh, PA page covers the wider market.
Same metro

The other counties in Pittsburgh, PA

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Armstrong County64,622$164kn/an/ainland flooding
Allegheny County1,238,177$247k$1,5517.5%inland flooding
Westmoreland County352,500$215k$1,0796.0%inland flooding
Washington County210,042$243k$1,3096.5%inland flooding
Butler County197,254$337k$1,8206.5%inland flooding
Beaver County166,324$212k$1,0275.8%inland flooding
Fayette County125,997$149k$9447.6%inland flooding
Lawrence County85,024$166k$9496.9%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market rent, vacancy, and property operating costs are absent, so asset cash flow could differ materially from the county frame.
  2. County-level value, employment, and migration measures may not represent a specific neighborhood or property condition.
  3. Parcel flood exposure, insurance availability, and deductibles may differ from the modeled county climate-loss ratio.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can the supplied record support a gross-yield calculation?

No. Market rent is not published, and the HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard rather than market asking rent.

What do the recorded purchase mortgages show about investor participation?

Investor mortgages represented 5.13% of 487 purchases; the record does not provide investor bids, purchase prices, or units acquired.

Which climate risk is identified, and what is the modeled loss measure?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with a modeled annual climate-loss ratio of 0.21% of building value.