States / Pennsylvania
State rental intelligence

Pennsylvania rental market data

A source-traced view across 29 metro markets and 67 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

22/29 metros scored67/67 counties with FEMA risk13 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro69.5out of 100 · 22 measured metros
Pennsylvania identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$242kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,293monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield6.0%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.1%trailing 12-month metro employment
State research brief

The measured metro rent-growth median exceeds home-value growth even as employment is nearly flat and statewide net migration is negative, making tenant-income durability more important than headline yield in Pennsylvania screening.

Updated 2026-07-31 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Median asking-rent growth was 4.5% across 22 measured metros, compared with 3.3% median home-value growth across 29. The packet reports a 1.1 percentage-point gap, but the differing coverage means it is not a paired result for every metro. Meanwhile, median payroll growth was 0.1% across 29 metros, and the 67-county migration total was negative by 12,099 people, or 0.9 per 1,000 residents.

The decision-useful reading is selective rather than statewide: verify whether local jobs, renter incomes and leasing results support the rent measure, then test acquisition pricing against the market's resale speed and price reductions. Positive job growth in the highlighted metros is a genuine counter-signal to the flat employment median. The packet does not establish future rent growth, property-level occupancy, tenant turnover, operating expenses or net cash flow.

01

4.5% measured metro median rent growth versus 3.3% value growth → verify whether leases and renewals capture the apparent 1.1 percentage-point advantage

02

0.1% median metro job growth and negative 0.9 net migration per 1,000 residents → require local evidence of renter demand rather than relying on the statewide rent pattern

03

2.8 months of median supply and 18.5 median days on market alongside 29.2% price drops → allow for fast resale but test acquisition pricing for seller resistance

04

5.0% to 8.5% 10th-to-90th percentile gross yields → treat yield as a locality-level screen and rebuild it after expenses

05

43.9% median renter burden and a 1969 median year built → stress both tenant affordability and property-condition costs

01
Price and rent momentum

Rent growth leads value growth, but not on fully matched coverage

Across measured metros, the median rent-growth reading was 4.5%, versus 3.3% for home values. The 10th-to-90th percentile interval was 3.3% to 8.4% for rent growth and 1.0% to 6.7% for value growth. Because rent growth covers 22 metros while value growth covers 29, these distributions show a statewide screening pattern rather than a matched result for every locality.

The paired examples make the separation more concrete. Indiana recorded 25.2% rent growth and 7.2% value growth; Johnstown recorded 8.8% rent growth while its value measure declined 0.5%; and Pottsville recorded 8.4% rent growth against 5.0% value growth. These readings warrant local lease and renewal checks, but rent indexes do not establish achieved rent, concessions, occupancy or the durability of a one-year change.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Employment and household movement

Flat employment and net outflow weaken the broad demand case

Median year-over-year employment growth across 29 metros was 0.1%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile interval from a 0.7% decline to 1.0% growth. Across all 67 counties, 273,936 people moved in and 286,035 moved out, producing net migration of negative 12,099, or negative 0.9 per 1,000 residents. Aggregate mover income provides a small counter-directional reading: inflowing adjusted gross income exceeded outflowing adjusted gross income by $26,361.

Local job results are a stronger counter-signal. Employment grew 2.3% in State College, 1.4% in Lebanon and 1.1% in Allentown, each above the measured metro 90th-percentile reading of 1.0%. Screening should therefore remain metro-specific. These employment figures do not reveal how many added workers rent, while the migration data cover a different period and cannot validate current leasing conditions by themselves.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

03
Supply and resale conditions

High-permit metros remain tight while slower markets linger

The measured metro median was 2.8 months of supply and 18.5 days on market, but the 10th-to-90th percentile intervals extended from 1.3 to 4.4 months and from 8 to 55.5 days. The median sale-to-list ratio was 98.9%, while 29.2% of listings had price drops. That combination describes generally quick resale with meaningful price resistance, not uniformly strong seller leverage.

Chambersburg had 5.2 permits per 1,000 residents, 2.4 months of supply, 21 days on market and price drops on 36.3% of listings. State College paired 4.3 permits per 1,000 with 1.5 months of supply and 8 days on market; Gettysburg paired 4.1 permits per 1,000 with 2.4 months and 14 days. In contrast, Lewisburg took 65 days with 4.5 months of supply, Selinsgrove took 62 days with 3.4 months, and Sunbury took 59 days with 4.0 months. Permits are not completed units and do not identify rental tenure, so they cannot establish future rental competition.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Housing stock and tenant conditions

High renter burden coexists with vacancy readings that can mislead

Across 67 counties, the median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 43.9%, and the 90th-percentile reading was 51.3%. The selected high-burden counties were Centre at 57.0%, Monroe at 57.0% and Lehigh at 55.0%. Their renter shares differed materially—38.2%, 19.8% and 34.4%, respectively—as did their vacancy readings of 11.2%, 23.1% and 4.5%. High burden supports demand for lower-cost units but also limits how safely further rent increases can be assumed.

The county median housing unit dates to 1969, while the median stock is 79.2% single-family and only 2.7% large multifamily. The median ACS vacancy rate was 11.6%, rising to 26.2% at the 90th percentile. Forest, Sullivan and Potter posted much higher overall vacancy rates of 72.3%, 54.3% and 43.6%, but renter shares of only 21.7%, 15.1% and 20.3%; each was more than 81% single-family. The packet does not identify these overall vacancies as units available to renters, so they should not be treated as direct rental oversupply.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

05
Entry cost and affordability

Low entry prices coincide with high gross yields, not verified net returns

Across 29 measured metros, gross yield had a 6.0% median and a 10th-to-90th percentile interval from 5.0% to 8.5%. The median price-to-income measure was 3.69, and the median rent-to-income measure was 20.8%. Measured rent was 98.2% of the local two-bedroom HUD Fair Market Rent at the median, but reached 123.4% at the 90th percentile. HUD standards are comparison points, not proof of attainable rent or subsidy revenue.

Pottsville combined a $169,631 value, $1,267 monthly rent and 9.0% gross yield; its rent-to-income measure was 22.3%. Oil City combined $134,454, $982 and 8.8%, with rent at 19.2% of income. Johnstown combined $120,544, $863 and 8.6%, with rent at 17.7% of income. These are useful entry screens, but gross yield excludes financing, taxes, insurance, repairs, management, vacancy and capital work.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

06
Physical risk and property tax

Tax costs vary materially, while the flood label remains county-level

Across 67 counties, the median effective property-tax rate was 1.3%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile interval from 1.0% to 1.6%. The median tax bill was $2,365, compared with $1,502 at the 10th percentile and $4,322 at the 90th. Delaware recorded a 1.8% rate and $6,124 median tax, Monroe 1.7% and $4,447, and Berks 1.6% and $4,239. Those differences can materially change the conversion from gross to net return.

Inland flood is the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for all 67 counties. It is not a statement that every property is flood-exposed. The county climate-loss ratio had a 0.12% median and a 10th-to-90th percentile interval from 0.09% to 0.19%; Cameron, Warren and Potter recorded 0.31%, 0.28% and 0.24%, respectively. The packet lacks parcel flood status, insurance premiums and building-specific mitigation, so county hazard labels cannot complete property underwriting.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

Evidence selected for Pennsylvania

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change1.0%3.3%6.7%Asking-rent change3.3%4.5%8.4%Rent minus price1.1%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.7%0.1%1.0%Net migration / 1k-0.9Net household movement-12,099
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k0.71.43.0Months of supply1.3×2.8×4.4×Days on market8 days19 days56 daysListings with cuts21.2%29.2%36.4%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution22 scored metros · median 69.5
00–19020–39540–591660–79180–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
72%48/67Rent100%67/67Climate100%67/67Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Pottsville9.0%Oil City8.8%Johnstown8.6%DuBois8.5%Warren7.8%Pittsburgh7.8%Altoona7.4%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Pennsylvania

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Indiana, PA87$174k$8736.0%▲ 0.8%
2State College, PA79$356k$1,8096.1%▲ 2.3%
3Williamsport, PA78$242k$1,0775.3%▲ 0.8%
4Chambersburg, PA75$295k$1,3285.4%▲ 0.9%
5Altoona, PA73$180k$1,1177.4%▼ 0.1%
6East Stroudsburg, PA73$319k$1,9107.2%▲ 0.9%
7Sunbury, PA73$177k$1,0377.0%▲ 0.5%
8Lancaster, PA72$393k$1,5334.7%▲ 0.8%
9Lebanon, PA72$324k$1,3625.1%▲ 1.4%
10Pottsville, PA71$170k$1,2679.0%▲ 0.1%
11Allentown, PA70$370k$1,8616.0%▲ 1.1%
12Johnstown, PA69$121k$8638.6%▼ 1.0%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 29. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Pennsylvania

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Philadelphia County, PA1,579,706$237k$1,8149.2%inland flooding
Allegheny County, PA1,238,177$247k$1,5517.5%inland flooding
Montgomery County, PA867,573$504k$2,0815.0%inland flooding
Bucks County, PA647,461$534k$2,2125.0%inland flooding
Delaware County, PA579,222$374k$1,8285.9%inland flooding
Lancaster County, PA557,931$393k$1,5334.7%inland flooding
Chester County, PA547,840$588k$2,2144.5%inland flooding
York County, PA462,924$313k$1,3875.3%inland flooding
Berks County, PA433,015$316k$1,5145.8%inland flooding
Lehigh County, PA378,792$370k$1,8426.0%inland flooding
Westmoreland County, PA352,500$215k$1,0796.0%inland flooding
Luzerne County, PA327,675$226k$1,3447.1%inland flooding
County yield sample48/67counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−12,099IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share8.7%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Sources used in this analysis

Measured releases, not a global source count

Only sources supporting the selected evidence modules are listed here.

Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Coverage is incomplete and mismatched: metro rent growth covers 22 of 29 metros, county rent covers 48 of 67 counties, and county listing data cover 54 of 67.
  2. The sources describe different periods, including older IRS migration and ACS measures alongside newer employment, rent, value and listing data.
  3. Rent indexes, home values and gross yields do not provide achieved lease revenue, concessions, delinquency, turnover, operating expenses or net cash flow.
  4. ACS vacancy is not identified as available rental vacancy, and FEMA's leading-hazard label does not provide parcel-level exposure or insurance cost.
  5. Permitted units may not be completed, may arrive later and are not classified here as owner-occupied or rental housing.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Are rents outpacing home values in every measured Pennsylvania metro?

No. The median rent-growth reading is 4.5% and the median value-growth reading is 3.3%, but rent growth covers 22 metros and value growth covers 29. Indiana, Johnstown and Pottsville show paired rent outperformance, not proof of a universal pattern.

Does weak statewide demand evidence invalidate the rent-growth signal?

No, but it raises the verification threshold. Median metro job growth is 0.1% and net migration is negative, while State College, Lebanon and Allentown show job growth of 2.3%, 1.4% and 1.1%. Local employment and leasing evidence can differ from the statewide distribution.

Does rapid permitting establish that rental supply will soon loosen?

No. Chambersburg, State College and Gettysburg have 4.1 to 5.2 permits per 1,000 residents while carrying only 1.5 to 2.4 months of supply, but permits are not completions and the packet does not identify which units are rentals.

Do the highlighted 8.6% to 9.0% gross yields establish strong cash flow?

No. Those figures for Johnstown, Oil City and Pottsville are gross calculations. The packet supplies no financing, insurance, repair, management, vacancy or capital-expenditure amounts needed for net cash flow.

Does the inland-flood label mean every Pennsylvania property has flood exposure?

No. Inland flood is the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for each of the 67 counties. Parcel flood status, building elevation, mitigation and insurance premiums are not supplied.