Counties / Pennsylvania / Lancaster County

Lancaster County, PA

FIPS 42071 · population 557,931 · part of Lancaster, PA

$393k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Lancaster County, PA?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,533 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,5332026-06 · up 3.7% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,357ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,526FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Lancaster County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,102Lancaster County, PAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,220Lancaster County, PAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,526Lancaster County, PAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,980Lancaster County, PAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,020Lancaster County, PAHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$393k
▲ 4.7% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,533
▲ 3.7% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.7%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,526
market rent is 1.00x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+58.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.7%FHFA HPI2025+5.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$301k
Surveyed gross rent$1,357
Rent burden 30%+46.4%
Median year built1978
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
2.9%vacant
219,224estimated housing units
Occupied tenure30.2% renter
owner 69.8%renter 30.2%
Structure mix76.3% single-family
Single-family 76.3%20+ units 5.6%Mobile home 3.7%Other 14.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs254,215▲ 0.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments14,746annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,201▲ 4.2% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities24.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.9%WEEKLY WAGE+4.2%Trade, transportation, and utilities24.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Lancaster CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$35k$70k196919972024$4k$69k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Lancaster CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI11,53082.0% burdened30–50% HAMFI10,63583.6% burdened50–80% HAMFI13,73039.3% burdened80–100% HAMFI8,56015.7% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI18,3506.0% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Lancaster County, PA

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 42071. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,460$1,285$1,1102021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,4232026-07 · +0.0% year over year
Rental vacancyn/an/a
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lancaster County presents a narrow underwriting tension: reported market rent supports a measurable entry yield, while property taxes, inland-flood exposure and a softer visible listing backdrop can erode it. It merits investigation by owners able to obtain property-level flood and expense evidence; buyers relying on appreciation or minimal carrying costs should be cautious. At Zillow’s county observation, median home value was $392,780 and median asking rent was $1,533 per month, with reported gross yield of 4.68% before costs.

02Housing economics

Zillow county value rose 4.67% year over year while asking rent grew 3.69%, a current yield-screen tension rather than a forecast. Separately, FHFA’s annual repeat-transaction HPI increased 5.02% and 58.58% cumulatively over five years; it supports positive price direction but is not a dollar home value and cannot be blended with Zillow because the observations have distinct vintages and methods. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent; the record’s rent-to-FMR ratio places market rent 0.5% above it. The 1.32% effective tax rate and $3,975 median annual tax make gross yield insufficient for a cash-flow conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS snapshot showed 538 active listings, up 8.81%, while median listing price was down 0.3% and 11.3% of listings had a price reduction. These are asking-price, visible-supply and seller-concession indicators—not closed-sale prices or standalone proof of buyer demand. Net migration was negative, while inbound movers had higher average AGI than outbound movers, giving a mixed household-demand signal. Investor purchase mortgages represented 10.45% of 4,708 purchases, indicating non-occupant participation without describing every transaction type or neighborhood.

04Risk & next checks

Annual QCEW workplace employment grew 0.86%, and the covered-worker average weekly wage was $1,201; neither measure is resident employment, household income, unemployment or a forecast. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole county economy. Modeled climate loss equals 0.13% of building value per year, consistent with inland-flood risk, but is not property-specific insurance pricing. Missing vacancy, operating costs, debt terms, property-level flood zones and insurance quotes, unit-level rent comparables, and closed-sale comparables prevent calculation of NOI or cap rate and limit hazard, leveraged-return and resale underwriting.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Lancaster County, PA

This view uses 11 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,281$1,970Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$689highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range34.1%52.6%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered48,468across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.17601$1,97017543$1,89817540$1,62717557$1,55817545$1,47917603$1,47017552$1,40917022$1,40417602$1,37717522$1,33317512$1,281
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.55.1%49.2%43.3%37.4%31.6%1760317602176011752217543170221751217552175451755717540Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.17601+129.1%17543+124.4%17540+106.6%17557+102.1%17545+96.9%17603+96.3%17022+93.6%17552+92.3%17602+90.2%17522+87.4%17512+83.9%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected current ZIP evidence, Zillow’s ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—ranges from $1,281 to $1,970, with a selected-set median of $1,470 and a $689 spread. That dispersion frames the practical search question: whether a household’s budget aligns with the lower-index portion of the selected market or must reach the higher-index portion. The county ZORI is $1,533, up 3.7% year over year. ZIP 17601 anchors the high end and ZIP 17512 the low end of this selected distribution. These are index readings, not quotes for a particular unit, lease term, or bedroom count.

The ACS five-year ZCTA survey tells a distinct, backward-looking median gross-rent story: selected medians run from $1,072 to $1,552, versus $1,357 countywide. It cannot be substituted for the Zillow index because gross rent and measurement period differ. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is an administrative standard: $1,526 across most shown ZIP assignments and $1,500 in ZIP 17022. A mechanical ZORI-to-FMR comparison runs from 84% to 129% in the selected set. That comparison can flag where a current asking-rent index sits relative to a two-bedroom program standard, but it is not evidence that a unit meets a program rent, rent-reasonableness, or eligibility requirement.

Affordability and availability need a separate ACS read. The estimated share of renter households spending 30% or more of income on rent ranges from 34.1% in ZIP 17552 to 52.6% in ZIP 17022, compared with 46.4% for the county. Estimated vacancy spans 1.0% in ZIP 17545 to 5.4% in ZIP 17512, against a county rate of 2.95%. That lower-index ZIP combines relatively high vacancy with a burden share above the county benchmark, warning against treating vacancy as affordability or burden as a measure of current asking price. Conversely, a tight vacancy estimate does not establish bidding conditions, concessions, or unit-level availability. These ACS measures are five-year survey estimates, not a contemporaneous count of vacant rentals.

Coverage and geography limit the precision of any ZIP comparison. The shown set contains 11 direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches covering 48,468 renter households in the linked ACS measure, but it is not an exhaustive county inventory. ZIP labels are assigned to Lancaster County by the largest HUD residential-address share; those shares range from 91.1% to 100.0%, and a ZIP may extend beyond county boundaries. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs. For any property decision, verify the actual address and jurisdiction, bedroom count, utilities included in gross rent, lease term and concessions, current asking rent, vacancy, fees, income rules, and applicable HUD program requirements.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

All 11 eligible direct-evidence ZIP profiles are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
17603$1,470$1,355$1,52646.5%4.3%$59k100.0%
17602$1,377$1,326$1,52647.1%3.5%$55k100.0%
17601$1,970$1,552$1,52641.1%2.0%$79k100.0%
17522$1,333$1,240$1,52639.2%1.7%$53k100.0%
17543$1,898$1,440$1,52647.4%3.0%$76k100.0%
17022$1,404$1,546$1,50052.6%3.7%$56k91.1%
17512$1,281$1,072$1,52651.8%5.4%$51k100.0%
17552$1,409$1,360$1,52634.1%3.3%$56k100.0%
17545$1,479$1,314$1,52644.6%1.0%$59k97.1%
17557$1,558$1,216$1,52642.8%3.7%$62k100.0%
17540$1,627$1,441$1,52644.8%3.3%$65k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

ZIP assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address county share, so ZIPs can include addresses outside Lancaster County; Census ZCTAs are statistical approximations rather than USPS delivery ZIP boundaries.

The selected direct-ZORI set is limited to eligible matched ZIPs and is not exhaustive. ACS values are five-year estimates, Zillow indexes do not quote a specific dwelling, and HUD FMR does not determine a listing’s market rent.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Lancaster County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Lancaster city57.7KEphrata borough13.8KElizabethtown borough11.9KColumbia borough10.3KWillow Street CDP9.6KLititz borough9.6KMillersville borough9KMount Joy borough8.3K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

66 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Lancaster cityIncorporated place
    57,719
  2. 02
    Ephrata boroughIncorporated place
    13,772
  3. 03
    Elizabethtown boroughIncorporated place
    11,925
  4. 04
    Columbia boroughIncorporated place
    10,278
  5. 05
    Willow Street CDPCensus-designated place
    9,647
  6. 06
    Lititz boroughIncorporated place
    9,619
  7. 07
    Millersville boroughIncorporated place
    8,982
  8. 08
    Mount Joy boroughIncorporated place
    8,344
  9. 09
    Leola CDPCensus-designated place
    7,448
  10. 10
    New Holland boroughIncorporated place
    5,780
  11. 11
    Manheim boroughIncorporated place
    5,027
  12. 12
    East Petersburg boroughIncorporated place
    4,591
Show 54 more places
  1. 13
    Maytown CDPCensus-designated place
    4,443
  2. 14
    Akron boroughIncorporated place
    4,143
  3. 15
    Denver boroughIncorporated place
    3,771
  4. 16
    Brownstown CDPCensus-designated place
    3,650
  5. 17
    Reamstown CDPCensus-designated place
    3,468
  6. 18
    Salunga CDPCensus-designated place
    3,355
  7. 19
    Strasburg boroughIncorporated place
    3,109
  8. 20
    Mountville boroughIncorporated place
    3,004
  9. 21
    Bowmansville CDPCensus-designated place
    2,959
  10. 22
    Rothsville CDPCensus-designated place
    2,934
  11. 23
    Marietta boroughIncorporated place
    2,886
  12. 24
    Quarryville boroughIncorporated place
    2,856
  13. 25
    Rheems CDPCensus-designated place
    2,426
  14. 26
    Landisville CDPCensus-designated place
    2,168
  15. 27
    Reinholds CDPCensus-designated place
    2,168
  16. 28
    Lampeter CDPCensus-designated place
    2,140
  17. 29
    Gap CDPCensus-designated place
    2,128
  18. 30
    Adamstown boroughIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    2,023
  19. 31
    Swartzville CDPCensus-designated place
    1,799
  20. 32
    Intercourse CDPCensus-designated place
    1,588
  21. 33
    Morgantown CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    1,381
  22. 34
    Bainbridge CDPCensus-designated place
    1,376
  23. 35
    Clay CDPCensus-designated place
    1,362
  24. 36
    Blue Ball CDPCensus-designated place
    1,284
  25. 37
    Brickerville CDPCensus-designated place
    1,257
  26. 38
    Penryn CDPCensus-designated place
    1,257
  27. 39
    Conestoga CDPCensus-designated place
    1,243
  28. 40
    Paradise CDPCensus-designated place
    1,091
  29. 41
    East Earl CDPCensus-designated place
    1,050
  30. 42
    Schoeneck CDPCensus-designated place
    1,018
  31. 43
    Terre Hill boroughIncorporated place
    1,004
  32. 44
    Christiana boroughIncorporated place
    998
  33. 45
    Fivepointville CDPCensus-designated place
    904
  34. 46
    Farmersville CDPCensus-designated place
    870
  35. 47
    Stevens CDPCensus-designated place
    799
  36. 48
    Georgetown CDP (Lancaster County)Census place
    784
  37. 49
    Churchtown CDPCensus-designated place
    763
  38. 50
    Hopeland CDPCensus-designated place
    760
  39. 51
    Rohrerstown CDPCensus-designated place
    706
  40. 52
    Washington Boro CDPCensus-designated place
    663
  41. 53
    Soudersburg CDPCensus-designated place
    592
  42. 54
    Cambridge CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    576
  43. 55
    Wakefield CDPCensus-designated place
    573
  44. 56
    Bird-in-Hand CDPCensus-designated place
    537
  45. 57
    Witmer CDPCensus-designated place
    527
  46. 58
    Falmouth CDPCensus-designated place
    521
  47. 59
    Little Britain CDPCensus-designated place
    439
  48. 60
    Smoketown CDPCensus-designated place
    342
  49. 61
    Refton CDPCensus-designated place
    321
  50. 62
    Gordonville CDPCensus-designated place
    310
  51. 63
    Kirkwood CDPCensus-designated place
    307
  52. 64
    Goodville CDPCensus-designated place
    205
  53. 65
    Ronks CDPCensus-designated place
    202
  54. 66
    Hinkletown CDPCensus-designated place
    181

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.125% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.32%

$3,975 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-23

9,507 in · 9,530 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$5,804

$68,396 arriving · $62,592 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors10.4%

492 of 4,708 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings538▲ 8.8% year over year
Median days on market29▼ 3.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced11.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 0.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Flood-zone status and insurance costs at a target property could differ materially from the county-level climate screen.
  2. Target-unit rents, vacancy and operating costs may not support the reported gross-yield screen.
  3. MLS listings and purchase-mortgage shares may not match closed-sale liquidity or buyer competition in a selected neighborhood.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is HUD Fair Market Rent a measure of Lancaster County asking rent?

No. It is a two-bedroom payment standard; the record separately publishes median asking rent.

Does the record establish a net cap rate?

No. It publishes gross yield but lacks vacancy and operating costs needed to derive NOI.

What labor measure is supplied for the county?

Annual QCEW covered employment at workplaces in the county, with wages for covered workers; it is not resident employment.