Counties / Pennsylvania / Crawford County

Crawford County, PA

FIPS 42039 · population 82,716 · part of Meadville, PA

$172k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$172k
▲ 6.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$901
n/a year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.3%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$973
market rent is 0.93x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+49.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+6.4%FHFA HPI2025+4.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$153k
Surveyed gross rent$802
Rent burden 30%+45.4%
Median year built1966
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
19.7%vacant
42,157estimated housing units
Occupied tenure25.3% renter
owner 74.7%renter 25.3%
Structure mix74.8% single-family
Single-family 74.8%20+ units 2.1%Mobile home 11.9%Other 11.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs28,787▼ 0.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments2,114annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,009▲ 3.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorManufacturing27.3% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.3%WEEKLY WAGE+3.8%Manufacturing27.3%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Crawford County presents a yield-versus-durability tension: the supplied Zillow county reading puts median home value at $171,543 after 6.44% year-over-year growth, while FHFA’s separate annual repeat-transaction index rose 3.95%. This is a county for operators willing to verify property-level income and condition, not buyers relying on a single appreciation narrative. The measures point in the same direction but use different methods and vintages; FHFA is not a dollar home value, and neither establishes a closed-sale value for a subject property.

02Housing economics

Median asking rent is $901 per month and supports the published 6.30% gross yield before vacancy, repairs, insurance, financing or tax. It is measured market rent; the $973 HUD two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, although market rent equals 92.60% of that benchmark. Carrying costs warrant direct parcel review: the effective property-tax rate is 1.35%, with median annual tax of $2,064. The record does not publish operating expenses, insurance quotes, vacancy or cap rates, so net yield cannot be underwritten.

03Demand & competition

Labor evidence is mixed. QCEW annual average covered jobs at county workplaces declined 0.29%; the average weekly covered-worker wage was $1,009, and Manufacturing, the largest disclosed private supersector, represented 27.31% of private covered employment. On Realtor.com’s MLS listing market, 135 active listings, 48 median marketing days, and a 15.41% price-reduced share describe visible supply, marketing time and seller concessions—not sales or buyer demand. Tax-return migration showed a net loss of 59 households, with arriving movers reporting lower average income than departing movers. Investor mortgages represented 6.69% of 568 purchases, limiting this measure to mortgage-recorded non-occupant participation.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.10%, a county-level model rather than site-specific flood exposure. That risk shifts diligence toward flood zone, elevation, prior losses, policy availability and insurance pricing. Missing closed-sale comparables, property-level rent rolls, operating costs, insurance and flood-history data prevent a conclusion on net cash flow, replacement cost, resale liquidity or asset-level climate exposure. Confirm lease comps, parcel tax assessments, flood disclosures and financing terms before treating county signals as property economics.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Crawford County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Meadville city12.6KTitusville city5.2KPymatuning Central CDP2.6KCambridge Springs borough2.4KConneaut Lakeshore CDP1.9KLinesville borough1.1KCochranton borough1.1KSaegertown borough828
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

32 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Meadville cityIncorporated place
    12,577
  2. 02
    Titusville cityIncorporated place
    5,189
  3. 03
    Pymatuning Central CDPCensus-designated place
    2,593
  4. 04
    Cambridge Springs boroughIncorporated place
    2,408
  5. 05
    Conneaut Lakeshore CDPCensus-designated place
    1,886
  6. 06
    Linesville boroughIncorporated place
    1,132
  7. 07
    Cochranton boroughIncorporated place
    1,084
  8. 08
    Saegertown boroughIncorporated place
    828
  9. 09
    Conneautville boroughIncorporated place
    748
  10. 10
    Fredericksburg CDP (Crawford County)Census place
    673
  11. 11
    Conneaut Lake boroughIncorporated place
    526
  12. 12
    Hydetown boroughIncorporated place
    505
Show 20 more places
  1. 13
    Springboro boroughIncorporated place
    425
  2. 14
    Blooming Valley boroughIncorporated place
    390
  3. 15
    Spartansburg boroughIncorporated place
    378
  4. 16
    Pymatuning South CDPCensus-designated place
    367
  5. 17
    Townville boroughIncorporated place
    340
  6. 18
    Canadohta Lake CDPCensus-designated place
    290
  7. 19
    Pymatuning North CDPCensus-designated place
    290
  8. 20
    Guys Mills CDPCensus-designated place
    268
  9. 21
    Centerville borough (Crawford County)Census place
    222
  10. 22
    Venango boroughIncorporated place
    199
  11. 23
    Hartstown CDPCensus-designated place
    181
  12. 24
    Geneva CDPCensus-designated place
    138
  13. 25
    Woodcock boroughIncorporated place
    131
  14. 26
    Lincolnville CDPCensus-designated place
    118
  15. 27
    Kerrtown CDPCensus-designated place
    100
  16. 28
    Harmonsburg CDPCensus-designated place
    95
  17. 29
    Adamsville CDPCensus-designated place
    77
  18. 30
    Rockdale Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    61
  19. 31
    Riceville CDPCensus-designated place
    60
  20. 32
    Atlantic CDPCensus-designated place
    56

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.099% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.35%

$2,064 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-59

1,403 in · 1,462 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$194

$49,258 arriving · $49,452 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.7%

38 of 568 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings135▲ 11.6% year over year
Median days on market48▼ 13.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced15.4%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 16.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished operating costs, insurance pricing and flood conditions could erase the gross-yield screen.
  2. County-level price momentum may not transfer to a subject property or support a closing price at current MLS asks.
  3. Covered-job contraction, migration loss and Manufacturing concentration could narrow the tenant and resale pool.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is HUD FMR evidence of the county’s asking rent?

No. The record identifies HUD FMR as a payment standard, while median asking rent is the measured market-rent figure.

Do Realtor.com metrics establish closed-sale prices or buyer demand?

No. They are MLS listing-market evidence: asking prices, visible active supply, marketing time and price reductions.

What does the QCEW employment measure represent?

It is annual average covered employment at workplaces located in the county, not resident employment, unemployment or a forecast.