Counties / North Carolina / Cumberland County

Cumberland County, NC

FIPS 37051 · population 338,545 · part of Fayetteville, NC

$234k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Cumberland County, NC?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,407 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,4072026-06 · up 3.5% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,222ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,251FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Cumberland County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,090Cumberland County, NCHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,113Cumberland County, NCHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,251Cumberland County, NCHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,667Cumberland County, NCHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,068Cumberland County, NCHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$234k
▲ 0.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,407
▲ 3.5% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
7.2%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,251
market rent is 1.13x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+66.7%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.3%FHFA HPI2025+4.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$199k
Surveyed gross rent$1,222
Rent burden 30%+51.9%
Median year built1988
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
9.8%vacant
143,798estimated housing units
Occupied tenure45.0% renter
owner 55.0%renter 45.0%
Structure mix67.1% single-family
Single-family 67.1%20+ units 4.8%Mobile home 7.8%Other 20.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs122,284▼ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments7,416annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,102▲ 2.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities27.3% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+2.7%Trade, transportation, and utilities27.3%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Cumberland CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$30k$60k196919972024$4k$52k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Cumberland CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI11,13073.3% burdened30–50% HAMFI8,33087.6% burdened50–80% HAMFI12,95067.8% burdened80–100% HAMFI7,15533.8% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI20,4605.1% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Cumberland County, NC

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 37051. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,228$1,158$1,0882021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,1882026-07 · -0.2% year over year
Rental vacancy7.2%2026-07 · +0.8 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Cumberland County presents an income-versus-demand decision. In Zillow’s June 2026 county record, median home value is $233,873, up 0.31%, while median asking rent is $1,407, up 3.49%; the supplied gross yield is 7.22% before operating costs. That supports a cash-flow screen, but not an appreciation thesis: FHFA’s separate 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 4.04%. These are different vintages and methods, so they should not be blended. Investors relying on resale appreciation, or those unwilling to investigate flood exposure and tenant demand, should be cautious.

02Housing economics

Measured market rent must be kept separate from HUD’s two-bedroom FMR: the $1,251 standard is a payment standard, not asking-rent evidence. Rent therefore sits above that benchmark, but it does not establish achieved rent, occupancy, or affordability. The 0.93% effective property-tax rate and $1,850 median annual tax are explicit carrying costs; the gross yield remains pre-tax, insurance, maintenance, vacancy, management, financing, and other expenses. Price, rent, and taxes can support an initial screen, yet the record cannot produce a net yield or property-level cash flow.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed. QCEW’s 2025 covered-workplace record shows employment down 0.58% while average weekly wage rose 2.70%; the largest disclosed private supersector is Trade, transportation, and utilities, not the whole economy. Net migration is -738, and average income was $46,506 for incoming mover households versus $54,234 for outgoing households. That combination warrants checking tenant depth and income sensitivity rather than assuming county population alone creates demand. Investor purchases were 478 of 4,816 total purchases, a minority share; they do not establish bidding pressure or buyer demand.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled climate-loss ratio is 0.13% of building value per year; that is not an insurance quote or parcel loss estimate. Next checks are parcel flood maps and elevation, insurance terms and deductibles, actual leases and concessions, operating expenses, and comparable closed sales. Realtor.com listing-market fields are not supplied, so visible supply, marketing time, price reductions, and pending activity cannot be assessed. Missing evidence prevents a net-return, liquidity, or property-specific flood conclusion.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Cumberland County, NC

This view uses 10 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,249$1,801Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$552highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range38.9%52.4%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered54,422across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.28306$1,80128348$1,66528305$1,46028301$1,41128390$1,40728303$1,39728314$1,39028304$1,39028311$1,33028312$1,249
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.54.9%50.2%45.6%41.0%36.4%28314283032831128304283062830128390283482831228305Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.28306+160.2%28348+148.1%28305+129.9%28301+125.5%28390+125.2%28303+124.3%28314+123.7%28304+123.7%28311+118.3%28312+111.1%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Cumberland County’s selected direct-evidence set shows a varied Zillow ZORI asking-rent landscape rather than a single ZIP figure. Across 10 matched ZIPs covering 54,422 renter households, the typical observed asking-rent index ranges from $1,249 to $1,801, a $552 spread, with a $1,402 median. Seven ZIPs sit within a $1,330$1,460 central band; 28348 and 28306 make up the higher-rent edge, while 28312 establishes the lower end. The practical question is whether a specific available unit competes with that central band or needs testing against the limited upper edge. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, not a signed-lease rent, an all-bedroom quote, or a property appraisal.

At county scale, Zillow’s index is $1,407, and annual growth is 3.49%; in selected ZIPs with an available comparison, growth spans 2.34% to 5.94%. Those are Zillow asking-rent measures. Separately, every shown ZIP carries a $1,124 HUD two-bedroom FMR, an administrative program standard rather than an asking-rent estimate; ZIP ZORI values stand 11.1% to 60.2% above it. ACS five-year ZCTA median gross rents instead run from $948 to $1,312. Their timing, housing coverage, and construction differ, so Zillow, ACS, and HUD should be compared as distinct reference points, never fused into a single rent level or interpreted as a common rent-change series.

ACS burden and vacancy figures add a separate affordability-and-availability screen. The share of renter households paying at least thirty percent of income for gross rent spans 38.9% to 52.4% in selected ZCTAs, while vacancy spans 5.2% to 15.5%. The ends do not create a simple ranking: 28348 pairs the lowest vacancy with a 40.9% burden share, whereas 28301 combines a 15.1% vacancy rate with the highest burden share. Vacancy is not a measure of asking-rent affordability, and burden does not establish the rent or availability of a particular unit. For a current listing, use the asking rent and lease costs to test the applicant’s own income and cash requirements; do not substitute the ACS household estimates.

Coverage and geography limit how far these comparisons travel. The direct-evidence selection is not an exhaustive county or local-market inventory, and displayed ZIPs are assigned to Cumberland County using the largest HUD residential-address share; a ZIP can cross county lines. ACS ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, so their estimates do not necessarily map to a mailing address or a listing’s service area. Before acting on a unit, verify address and county assignment, current advertised rent and availability, bedroom count, lease term, utilities and mandatory fees, screening or income rules, and the applicable HUD program standard. Check the actual unit rather than assigning ZIP-level figures to it.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

All 10 eligible direct-evidence ZIP profiles are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
28314$1,390$1,278$1,12446.8%8.1%$56k100.0%
28303$1,397$1,192$1,12445.9%10.3%$56k100.0%
28311$1,330$1,182$1,12447.9%8.7%$53k100.0%
28304$1,390$1,312$1,12451.0%9.3%$56k99.3%
28306$1,801$1,150$1,12448.1%8.7%$72k97.9%
28301$1,411$951$1,12452.4%15.1%$56k100.0%
28390$1,407$1,249$1,12447.6%14.5%$56k51.1%
28348$1,665$1,124$1,12440.9%5.2%$67k100.0%
28312$1,249$948$1,12438.9%8.5%$50k99.0%
28305$1,460$1,071$1,12441.7%15.5%$58k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

ZCTAs are Census statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs, and ZIPs can cross county lines. This packet assigns each displayed ZIP to Cumberland County by its largest HUD residential-address share, which does not make every address in that ZIP county-contained.

The direct-evidence selection contains eligible matched ZIP/ZCTA records and is explicitly not an exhaustive inventory of county rental locations or listings. Zillow, ACS, and HUD measures differ in timing, methodology, geography, and purpose; they cannot establish a listing’s exact rent, availability, or eligibility.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Cumberland County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Fayetteville city210.8KHope Mills town17.9KSpring Lake town11.6KEastover town3.7KVander CDP1.9KStedman town1.7KWade town518Falcon town*272
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

10 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Fayetteville cityIncorporated place
    210,815
  2. 02
    Hope Mills townIncorporated place
    17,939
  3. 03
    Spring Lake townIncorporated place
    11,573
  4. 04
    Eastover townIncorporated place
    3,666
  5. 05
    Vander CDPCensus-designated place
    1,922
  6. 06
    Stedman townIncorporated place
    1,670
  7. 07
    Wade townIncorporated place
    518
  8. 08
    Falcon townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    272
  9. 09
    Godwin townIncorporated place
    203
  10. 10
    Linden townIncorporated place
    129

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.129% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.93%

$1,850 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-738

13,182 in · 13,920 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$7,728

$46,506 arriving · $54,234 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.9%

478 of 4,816 mortgages

investorother financed
Same metro

The other counties in Fayetteville, NC

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Cumberland County338,545$234k$1,4077.2%inland flooding
Hoke County53,835$282k$1,7457.4%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Flood insurance, deductibles, or property damage costs could materially reduce the supplied gross yield.
  2. Net out-migration and lower incoming mover income could limit tenant depth or rent support.
  3. Divergent price signals and missing closed-sale or listing evidence could invalidate a resale or liquidity assumption.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent a market measure or a HUD standard?

It is median asking market rent; HUD FMR is a separate payment standard.

What does QCEW employment represent?

It is annual average covered employment located at county workplaces, not resident employment or unemployment.

Does the investor share prove buyer demand?

No. It measures purchase mortgages to non-occupants and does not establish bidding pressure or overall buyer demand.