Counties / Texas / Edwards County

Edwards County, TX

FIPS 48137 · population 1,290 · outside every metro area

n/a
home value · n/a
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
n/a
no home-value estimate published here
n/a
ACS median gross rent
$713
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,015
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Owner-reported valuen/a
Surveyed gross rent$713
Rent burden 30%+22.4%
Median year built1975
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
50.4%vacant
815estimated housing units
Occupied tenure12.1% renter
owner 87.9%renter 12.1%
Structure mix75.3% single-family
Single-family 75.3%20+ units 0.0%Mobile home 23.6%Other 1.1%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs490▼ 12.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments68annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$856▲ 11.3% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services30.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−12.8%WEEKLY WAGE+11.3%Education and health services30.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Edwards County’s tension is rising covered wages and higher average AGI among inbound movers against a sharp contraction in locally located covered jobs. Investors needing tenant depth or resale liquidity should be cautious; investigators should validate unit-level demand. In the 2025 QCEW record, the county has 1,290 residents and 490 annual-average covered jobs; employment fell 12.81% from its prior annual average. This measures jobs at county workplaces, not resident employment or unemployment.

02Housing economics

Housing economics cannot yet establish purchase economics. No county market rent, home price, gross yield, effective property-tax rate, or median property tax is published, so gross yield and carrying-cost burden cannot be computed. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,015 per month, but it is a payment standard rather than measured asking rent. The covered-worker average weekly wage was $856, up 11.31%; this is not household income or an affordability conclusion. Education and health services, the largest disclosed private supersector, had 104 covered jobs, or 30.14% of total private covered employment, not of the whole economy.

03Demand & competition

Migration and purchase evidence argue against treating the labor trend alone as a complete demand measure, but both samples are thin. Forty-six tax-return households moved in and 64 moved out, for net migration of -18; inbound movers’ average AGI exceeded outbound movers’ by a calculated $5,531. Of eight recorded purchase mortgages, one was to a non-occupant, a 12.5% investor share. That is participation evidence, not total transaction volume or future buyer demand. The supplied Realtor.com inventory period is 2026-06, yet no MLS median listing price, active listings, days on market, or price-reduced share is published; sale-price direction and visible supply cannot be assessed.

04Risk & next checks

Risk limits are material. The modeled climate loss ratio is 0.08% of building value per year, and inland flood is the dominant hazard; this county-level model requires property-specific flood-zone, loss-history, mitigation, and insurance review. No county Zillow observation or FHFA annual repeat-transaction HPI is supplied, so price direction cannot be checked across their distinct methods or used with rent. Next checks are actual asking rents, comparable-sale and MLS evidence, effective taxes, insurance quotes, lease-up and vacancy, and subject-site flood exposure.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Edwards County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Rocksprings town625Barksdale CDP0
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

2 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Rocksprings townIncorporated place
    625
  2. 02
    Barksdale CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.081% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property taxn/a

Annual bill n/a

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-18

46 in · 64 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$5,531

$68,109 arriving · $62,578 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors12.5%

1 of 8 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. County workplace employment may not reflect the tenant base for a specific property.
  2. Small migration and purchase-mortgage counts may not demonstrate durable rental demand or buyer competition.
  3. Actual rent, home price, taxes, insurance, and property-level flood exposure are unreported, preventing full carrying-cost and yield underwriting.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from the HUD FMR?

No. County market rent and home price are not published, and HUD FMR is a payment standard rather than asking rent.

Does the QCEW employment figure measure resident employment?

No. It is annual average covered employment at workplaces located in the county, not resident employment or unemployment.

What do the purchase data establish about investor participation?

They show one non-occupant mortgage among eight recorded purchase mortgages, but do not establish total transaction volume or future buyer demand.