Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 37081 · population 547,940 · part of Greensboro, NC
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,439 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,159 | Guilford County, NC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,213 | Guilford County, NC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,330 | Guilford County, NC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $1,703 | Guilford County, NC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $1,960 | Guilford County, NC | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 37081. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Guilford presents a cash-flow-versus-exit-liquidity tension: the Zillow county observation for 2026-06 puts median home value at $280,198 and median asking market rent at $1,439 monthly, supporting a stated pre-cost gross yield of 6.16%. Investors who can validate unit rent and carrying costs should investigate; buyers relying on easy resale or untested flood exposure should be cautious. These are county medians, not property economics.
Rent grew 2.42% while Zillow home value grew 0.78% in that observation, a favorable directional spread but not a forecast. The FHFA repeat-transaction HPI rose 3.24% in its distinct 2025 annual reading; it corroborates appreciation direction but is an index rather than a dollar value and cannot be merged with Zillow's different vintage or method. HUD FMR is a payment standard, not asking rent. The 0.84% effective property-tax rate is a carrying-cost input against the stated gross yield; property-specific tax assessment, insurance, and operating costs are not published.
In Realtor.com's distinct 2026-06 MLS listing-market snapshot, active listings rose 25.49% and 22.69% of listings had price reductions, signaling visible supply and seller concessions rather than closed-sale pricing or buyer demand alone. Tax-return migration was balanced at 14,859 households moving in and out, while movers-in reported $1,818 less average income than movers-out; this does not establish household demand. Investor purchases were 9.53% of total purchases, indicating participation but not bid intensity, property type, or rent pressure. QCEW is annual covered employment at county workplaces, not resident employment or an unemployment measure.
Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled expected annual climate loss equals 0.12% of building value; this is a modeled county-level ratio, not a property loss estimate. Underwriting needs parcel flood zone and elevation, insurance quote and deductible, condition and replacement-cost review, signed or comparable unit rents, vacancy and turnover, financing, and closed-sale comps. Without them, neither net yield nor a defensible resale basis can be determined. Verify QCEW sector concentration separately: Trade, transportation, and utilities is merely the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole county economy.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
In the selected direct-evidence set, the June 2026 Zillow ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,187 in ZIP 27262 to $2,038 in ZIP 27282. That is an $851 spread around a $1,411.50 set median, while the county ZORI is $1,439. The decision is not simply to select the lower index: it is to determine whether an address’s bedroom count, availability, fees and lease terms make its listing comparable with this ZIP-level index. Where reported, annual changes describe index movement, not forecasts or promised renewal changes.
Keep the evidence universes separate. ACS five-year survey estimates place ZCTA median gross rent between $860 and $1,397; the county ACS measure is a separate survey estimate. They represent survey-based gross-rent estimates rather than a current observed asking-rent index, so a difference from ZORI is not an implied price increase. Separately, FY2026 HUD Fair Market Rent for two-bedroom units ranges from $1,170 to $1,750 in the shown set. A mechanical ZORI-to-HUD two-bedroom comparison ranges from 84.3% to 122.0%; it can supply program or screening context, but does not convert HUD’s administrative, bedroom-specific standard into asking rent. Use each series only for the decision it was designed to inform.
Affordability and availability indicators pose different screening questions. The ZCTA ACS estimates show the share of renter households with gross-rent burdens of 30% or more spans 36.0% to 57.4%, while the county ACS estimate is 52.0%. In ZIP 27405, the packet’s ZORI-based 30% income screen is $58,160 against an ACS median household income of $47,431. This contrast is not a household-level eligibility or burden finding because the inputs have different construction and timing. ACS vacancy estimates range from 3.9% to 15.8%, compared with 7.7% for the county. A higher rate warrants checking availability, concession terms and unit-level asking rent; it neither guarantees a discount nor establishes the terms a particular applicant will receive.
Coverage and geography limit what this display can establish. The selection contains 12 of 14 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches and covers 79,696 renter households; it is not an exhaustive county inventory. ZCTAs are statistical areas and are not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs, while ZIPs may cross county lines. Display assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address county share; the lowest shown share is 81.4%, so a displayed ZIP result should not be assumed to sit entirely within county lines. Before a property-level decision, verify the precise address and county assignment, live advertised rent for the same bedroom count, effective rent after concessions, all utilities and fees, deposit, lease length, availability, and any applicable subsidy rules. Check the current HUD standard for the specific bedroom size separately.
14 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27406 | $1,230 | $1,149 | $1,370 | 48.4% | 7.4% | $49k | 100.0% |
| 27407 | $1,393 | $1,154 | $1,440 | 51.3% | 8.1% | $56k | 100.0% |
| 27405 | $1,454 | $1,047 | $1,260 | 57.4% | 7.4% | $58k | 100.0% |
| 27410 | $1,475 | $1,397 | $1,750 | 56.3% | 8.9% | $59k | 100.0% |
| 27265 | $1,534 | $1,203 | $1,530 | 47.1% | 4.8% | $61k | 81.4% |
| 27409 | $1,430 | $1,280 | $1,410 | 47.2% | 9.2% | $57k | 100.0% |
| 27260 | $1,267 | $860 | $1,180 | 39.5% | 9.8% | $51k | 98.6% |
| 27401 | $1,385 | $948 | $1,170 | 49.3% | 15.8% | $55k | 100.0% |
| 27262 | $1,187 | $1,044 | $1,300 | 43.3% | 9.4% | $47k | 90.2% |
| 27403 | $1,341 | $1,075 | $1,280 | 46.7% | 9.3% | $54k | 100.0% |
| 27455 | $1,442 | $1,336 | $1,500 | 36.0% | 5.2% | $58k | 100.0% |
| 27282 | $2,038 | $1,364 | $1,670 | 38.0% | 3.9% | $82k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 27410 rental reportGuilford County | Greensboro, NC | $1,475 | ▲ 2.0% | 56.3% | 54,921 |
| ZIP 27405 rental reportGuilford County | Greensboro, NC | $1,454 | ▲ 4.1% | 57.4% | 54,303 |
| ZIP 27407 rental reportGuilford County | Greensboro, NC | $1,393 | ▲ 1.8% | 51.3% | 51,697 |
| ZIP 27403 rental reportGuilford County | Greensboro, NC | $1,341 | ▲ 2.8% | 46.7% | 22,557 |
| ZIP 27406 rental reportGuilford County | Greensboro, NC | $1,230 | ▲ 3.8% | 48.4% | 60,651 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.118% of building value expected lost per year
$2,174 median annual bill
14,859 in · 14,859 out
$58,286 arriving · $60,104 leaving
578 of 6,067 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guilford County | 547,940 | $280k | $1,439 | 6.2% | inland flooding |
| Randolph County | 146,348 | $259k | $1,088 | 5.0% | inland flooding |
| Rockingham County | 92,131 | $204k | $1,113 | 6.6% | inland flooding |
Yes. The record publishes median asking market rent and reports a pre-cost gross yield.
No. The supplied tax-return inflow and outflow counts are equal, producing zero net migration.
No. It is MLS listing-market evidence on asking prices, visible supply, marketing time, and seller reductions rather than closed-sale pricing.