Counties / Missouri / Jackson County

Jackson County, MO

FIPS 29095 · population 719,976 · part of Kansas City, MO

$253k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Jackson County, MO?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,434 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,4342026-06 · up 3.8% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,197ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,358FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Jackson County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,095Jackson County, MOHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,197Jackson County, MOHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,358Jackson County, MOHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,769Jackson County, MOHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,103Jackson County, MOHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$253k
▲ 2.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,434
▲ 3.8% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.8%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,358
market rent is 1.06x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+49.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.3%FHFA HPI2025+3.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$231k
Surveyed gross rent$1,197
Rent burden 30%+50.7%
Median year built1970
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.8%vacant
336,288estimated housing units
Occupied tenure40.9% renter
owner 59.1%renter 40.9%
Structure mix71.6% single-family
Single-family 71.6%20+ units 11.4%Mobile home 0.9%Other 16.1%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs374,866▼ 0.2% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments26,200annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,430▲ 3.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services20.3% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.2%WEEKLY WAGE+3.8%Education and health services20.3%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Jackson CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$35k$70k196919972024$4k$60k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Jackson CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI33,14576.4% burdened30–50% HAMFI22,78076.6% burdened50–80% HAMFI27,21034.7% burdened80–100% HAMFI13,95011.3% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI26,8601.7% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Jackson County, MO

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 29095. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,316$1,230$1,1442021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,3162026-07 · +1.6% year over year
Rental vacancy8.4%2026-07 · +0.2 percentage points year over year
Time on market31 days2026-07 · -6.7 days year over year
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Jackson County’s decision tension is a measurable income case against operating and exit-risk checks: published rent yield contrasts with MLS concessions, workplace employment softness, and inland-flood exposure. Investors able to verify rent, tax, insurance, and flood conditions should investigate; those relying on easy resale or countywide averages should be cautious. Zillow’s county median home value rose to $252,636 in 2026-06. FHFA’s 2025 HPI also rose, by 3.15%, but it is a repeat-transaction index, not a value; the distinct vintages and methods cannot be blended.

02Housing economics

Median asking market rent is $1,434 per month, rising 3.77% year over year; the supplied 6.81% gross yield is before expenses. HUD’s two-bedroom $1,358 Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent or a yield input. The 1.12% effective property-tax rate is a carrying-cost consideration alongside the price-rent relationship. Insurance, maintenance, vacancy, and other operating costs are not published, preventing a net-yield calculation.

03Demand & competition

At the matching Realtor.com listing vintage, median MLS listing price was essentially flat, active supply was lower, marketing time shortened, and price reductions were present. This is visible asking-market supply, concessions, and marketing time—not a closed-sale price or proof of buyer demand. Tax-return households produced net migration of 644, yet incoming movers’ average AGI was $4,222 below outgoing movers’. Investor purchases were 1,358 of 9,886 purchase mortgages, or 13.74%, indicating non-owner participation within the recorded purchase pool rather than all transactions. Annual QCEW covered workplace employment declined while average weekly wage increased; Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy.

04Risk & next checks

The modeled climate loss ratio is 0.11% of building value per year, alongside inland flood as the dominant hazard. It is a county-level model, not a property flood determination. Address-level flood mapping, prior claims, drainage condition, and insurance quotes are the next checks because they determine whether modeled risk translates into a specific carrying cost. Closed-sale comparables, vacancy, operating expenses, lease-level rent comparables, and debt terms are not published; their absence prevents conclusions on net yield, resale value, or debt coverage.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Jackson County, MO

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,218$1,790Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$572highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range38.7%61.7%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered58,731across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.64106$1,79064134$1,48364055$1,43064133$1,42764138$1,42664030$1,39864130$1,36964111$1,34164131$1,27764050$1,25664127$1,21964052$1,218
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.64.2%57.2%50.2%43.2%36.2%641116403064133640506413164055641066413064134640526413864127Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.64030+125.9%64106+120.1%64050+119.6%64130+118.0%64055+116.3%64127+113.9%64138+113.2%64133+111.5%64134+104.4%64052+99.0%64131+91.2%64111+84.9%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the displayed direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA set, Zillow’s June 2026 ZORI—a typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,218 in 64052 to $1,790 in 64106. This $572 range makes local screening more useful than a single county figure. The selected-set median is $1,383.50, below Jackson County’s $1,434 ZORI. The decision question is not which ZIP is universally preferable; it is whether a prospective unit’s current price, bedroom count, and terms fit a household’s budget and search needs, recognizing that the index represents a typical asking-rent signal rather than every listing.

Zillow, ACS, and HUD should be read side by side, not blended. ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rents in the displayed records span $928 to $1,308; these are survey estimates of a different measure and period, not current listings. HUD’s bedroom-specific FMR is an administrative standard: it is $1,358 at the county level and $1,050 to $1,580 among the displayed ZIP assignments. The supplied ZORI-to-HUD comparisons range from 84.9% to 125.9%. Those percentages describe the relation between distinct benchmarks; they do not make FMR an observed asking rent or ACS gross rent a substitute for ZORI.

Affordability pressure and vacancy require separate caution. The county’s ACS rent-burden share is 50.7%, alongside an 8.8% housing vacancy rate. In the selected ZIP/ZCTA estimates, burden ranges from 38.7% to 61.7%, while vacancy ranges from 5.8% to 19.2%. At the high-vacancy end of the displayed range, 64130 also has a 51.0% burden share. Its $1,369 ZORI implies $54,760 of annual income under a 30% screen, versus a $42,221 ACS median household income. That contrast is a directional budget screen only: median income does not describe a renter’s income, and an area vacancy estimate neither identifies an available unit nor determines a tenant’s burden.

Geography and selection limit how far these comparisons travel. ACS ZIP figures are ZCTA five-year survey estimates, and ZCTAs are not USPS delivery ZIPs. A ZIP may cross county lines; the packet places each displayed ZIP in Jackson County using the largest HUD residential-address share rather than a property-level county determination. The direct-evidence selection is not an exhaustive county or listing inventory, so it cannot establish a full county ranking. For any property, verify the street address and county, listed asking price, bedroom count, utilities and fees, lease length, move-in availability, qualification rules, and the applicable HUD standard directly from current property and program materials.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

34 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
64111$1,341$1,258$1,58045.1%12.0%$54k100.0%
64030$1,398$1,033$1,11050.0%6.1%$56k100.0%
64133$1,427$1,217$1,28045.8%8.0%$57k100.0%
64050$1,256$948$1,05047.8%8.9%$50k100.0%
64131$1,277$1,168$1,40047.2%10.8%$51k100.0%
64055$1,430$1,166$1,23061.5%7.0%$57k100.0%
64106$1,790$1,308$1,49043.1%10.5%$72k100.0%
64130$1,369$1,081$1,16051.0%19.2%$55k100.0%
64134$1,483$1,308$1,42046.8%6.9%$59k100.0%
64052$1,218$1,128$1,23038.7%10.9%$49k100.0%
64138$1,426$1,152$1,26047.4%5.8%$57k100.0%
64127$1,219$928$1,07061.7%15.6%$49k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

ACS figures are five-year estimates reported for ZCTAs, which are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. They are not current property-level observations and should not be mapped mechanically to a specific listing.

ZIP assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address share even where ZIP geography can cross county lines, and the selected direct-evidence set is not exhaustive. Verify the precise address, county, program rules, and current listing facts before relying on a comparison.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Jackson County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Kansas City city*510.6KIndependence city*121.7KLee's Summit city*103.7KBlue Springs city60KRaytown city29.4KGrandview city26.5KGrain Valley city16.3KPleasant Hill city*8.8K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

21 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Kansas City cityIncorporated place · spans 4 counties
    510,612
  2. 02
    Independence cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    121,740
  3. 03
    Lee's Summit cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    103,656
  4. 04
    Blue Springs cityIncorporated place
    59,965
  5. 05
    Raytown cityIncorporated place
    29,445
  6. 06
    Grandview cityIncorporated place
    26,527
  7. 07
    Grain Valley cityIncorporated place
    16,271
  8. 08
    Pleasant Hill cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    8,847
  9. 09
    Oak Grove cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    8,538
  10. 10
    Greenwood cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    6,013
  11. 11
    Sugar Creek cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    3,249
  12. 12
    Buckner cityIncorporated place
    2,914
Show 9 more places
  1. 13
    Lake Lotawana cityIncorporated place
    2,442
  2. 14
    Lone Jack cityIncorporated place
    1,412
  3. 15
    Blue Summit CDPCensus-designated place
    1,156
  4. 16
    Lake Tapawingo cityIncorporated place
    706
  5. 17
    Sibley villageIncorporated place
    369
  6. 18
    Tarsney Lakes CDPCensus-designated place
    214
  7. 19
    Unity Village villageIncorporated place
    121
  8. 20
    Levasy cityIncorporated place
    104
  9. 21
    River Bend villageIncorporated place
    4

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.114% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.12%

$2,575 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+644

20,295 in · 19,651 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$4,222

$63,125 arriving · $67,347 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors13.7%

1,358 of 9,886 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings2,048▼ 0.7% year over year
Median days on market44▼ 2.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.6%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 0.0% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Kansas City, MO

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Jackson County719,976$253k$1,4346.8%inland flooding
Johnson County620,631$469k$1,8154.7%inland flooding
Clay County258,122$324k$1,5655.8%inland flooding
Wyandotte County167,654$213k$1,3177.4%inland flooding
Cass County110,773$345k$1,6975.9%inland flooding
Platte County110,371$396k$1,6465.0%inland flooding
Leavenworth County83,123$355k$1,3294.5%inland flooding
Miami County34,938$384k$1,9106.0%inland flooding
Lafayette County33,115$252kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-level flood exposure and insurance costs may be materially different from the county modeled loss ratio.
  2. Unpublished vacancy and operating expenses may reduce gross yield materially.
  3. MLS listing evidence does not establish closed-sale liquidity or an individual property's exit price.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is market rent published separately from HUD Fair Market Rent?

Yes. The record publishes median asking market rent and separately identifies HUD Fair Market Rent as a payment standard.

Does the Realtor.com evidence prove closed-sale pricing or buyer demand?

No. It covers MLS listing price, visible supply, marketing time, and price reductions rather than closed sales or buyer demand.

What does the QCEW employment measure represent?

It is annual covered employment at workplaces located in Jackson County, not resident employment or an unemployment measure.