Counties / Nevada / Lander County

Lander County, NV

FIPS 32015 · population 5,770 · outside every metro area

$268k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$268k
▲ 4.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
ACS median gross rent
$902
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,236
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulativen/anot annualized · through n/a
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.8%FHFA HPIperiod n/an/a
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$214k
Surveyed gross rent$902
Rent burden 30%+41.3%
Median year built1986
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
22.3%vacant
2,739estimated housing units
Occupied tenure22.6% renter
owner 77.4%renter 22.6%
Structure mix40.7% single-family
Single-family 40.7%20+ units 1.3%Mobile home 50.0%Other 8.0%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs3,696▲ 1.9% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments127annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,992▲ 6.9% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities12.0% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.9%WEEKLY WAGE+6.9%Trade, transportation, and utilities12.0%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lander County is a price-versus-verification case rather than a yield case. The supplied Zillow county median home value, labeled 2026-06, was $267,967, up 4.83% year over year. With no metro context supplied, this is only a county screen. Buyers able to verify insurance, achieved rents and transaction liquidity should investigate; buyers needing demonstrated cash yield or robust closed-sale evidence should be cautious.

02Housing economics

Housing economics remain incomplete. Median asking market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD FMR is $1,236 per month, but it is a payment standard, not an estimate of asking rent, and cannot be substituted into yield. The effective property-tax rate is 0.64%, and median annual property tax is $1,366; they are carrying-cost inputs but do not establish the tax bill on a given acquisition. FHFA annual HPI is not published, so its repeat-transaction price direction cannot confirm or challenge the Zillow observation; the methods must not be combined.

03Demand & competition

Workplace data give a limited demand read. In 2025, annual average covered employment at county workplaces was 3,696, rising 1.93%, and covered-worker average weekly wage was $1,992. Trade, transportation, and utilities represented 11.96% of private covered jobs, the largest disclosed private supersector rather than the county’s entire economy. Net migration was 7 tax-return households, while incoming movers’ average income was $20,381 below outgoing movers’. That combination does not establish broad purchasing power. The investor-share measure was 0% across 65 purchases: no recorded non-owner share in this measure, not proof that no investors participate.

04Risk & next checks

Wildfire is the dominant hazard, with modeled annual climate loss of 0.23% of building value. This is modeled exposure, not an insurance quote or realized loss. The thesis could fail if property-specific insurance and mitigation costs erase unmeasured rent economics, if the migration mix does not translate into tenant or buyer depth, or if unpublished Realtor.com MLS listing price, inventory, marketing-time, reduction and pending data show weak resale conditions. Next checks are property-level insurance and mitigation terms, achieved and asking rents, closed-sale comparables, and MLS supply and concession data; these test coverage, yield and exit without using FMR as rent.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Lander County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Battle Mountain CDP3.5KKingston CDP144Austin CDP64
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

3 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Battle Mountain CDPCensus-designated place
    3,518
  2. 02
    Kingston CDPCensus-designated place
    144
  3. 03
    Austin CDPCensus-designated place
    64

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardwildfire

0.227% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.64%

$1,366 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+7

137 in · 130 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$20,381

$51,642 arriving · $72,023 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors0.0%

0 of 65 mortgages

investorother financed
No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-specific wildfire insurance and mitigation costs could make the unmeasured rental economics unattractive.
  2. Published market rent is absent, so actual income may not support the purchase basis and carrying costs.
  3. County migration and workplace evidence may not translate into sufficient tenant depth or resale liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be computed from the supplied record?

No. Median asking market rent is not published, and HUD FMR cannot be used as market rent.

Does the record provide an FHFA appreciation comparison for Zillow's direction?

No. FHFA annual HPI is not published for this record.

What hazard requires property-level diligence?

Wildfire; the record provides modeled climate loss exposure but not insurance quotes or mitigation costs.