States / Nevada
State rental intelligence

Nevada rental market data

A source-traced view across 6 metro markets and 17 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

6/6 metros scored17/17 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro59.5out of 100 · 6 measured metros
Nevada identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$463kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,780monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield4.5%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 1.9%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Nevada rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,4272026-07 · ▼ 1.8% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index6.9%2026-07 · +0.5 pp in 12 months
Time on market27 days2026-07 · −2 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,621$1,248$875Rental Vacancy Index7.9%4.9%1.8%2017-012021-102026-07NevadaUnited States
State research brief

In the six-metro distributions, median asking-rent growth exceeds home-value growth by 4.6 percentage points, yet Nevada’s statewide recent-lease rent is falling while vacancy rises.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Zillow’s six measured metros show median asking-rent growth of 5.6% against 1.0% home-value growth. Apartment List provides a counter-signal: its separate statewide recent-lease rent index fell 1.8%, while its Vacancy Index rose 0.5 percentage point to 6.9%. The divergence makes property-level lease evidence more important than either headline alone.

Rental listings also moved faster, declining from 29.3 to 27 days on market, so the statewide picture is not uniformly soft. Screening should distinguish achievable lease rent, occupancy and marketing speed, then test resale liquidity and tenant affordability locally. The packet cannot establish a Nevada-wide investment score, net property returns or conditions in every locality covered imperfectly by the six-metro distributions.

01

Median Zillow metro rent growth of 5.6% versus 1.0% value growth → investigate where lease comps confirm the 4.6-point spread rather than treating the distribution as statewide performance

02

Apartment List recent-lease rent down 1.8% and vacancy up 0.5 percentage point → underwrite current achievable rent and occupancy without automatic rent growth

03

Apartment List time on market down 2.3 days → treat faster leasing as a counter-signal rather than reading rising vacancy as uniform demand weakness

04

Pahrump at 87 days on market and 6.4 months of supply → apply greater scrutiny to resale timing and exit-price assumptions

05

Median measured-metro job growth of 1.9% plus net migration of 8,922 → test whether the positive demand backdrop converts into household and lease demand locally

01
Price and rent momentum

Metro asking rents outrun values, especially in Gardnerville Ranchos

Across six measured metros, median Zillow rent growth was 5.6%, compared with 1.0% for home values, a supplied difference of 4.6 percentage points. The rent-growth distribution ran from 0.4% at the 10th percentile to 9.4% at the 90th, while value growth ranged from -1.4% to 1.8%. This is a meaningful separation in the measured distribution, not proof that every property can realize the median rent increase.

Gardnerville Ranchos had 12.2% rent growth versus 2.1% value growth. Reno recorded 6.5% versus 0.4%, and Carson City recorded 5.8% versus 0.1%. Their gross-yield proxies were 4.43%, 4.19% and 4.38%, respectively, showing that stronger rent momentum did not automatically produce a high going-in gross yield.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Direct state rental dynamics

Recent leases soften even as listings move faster

Apartment List’s statewide recent-lease rent fell from $1,453 to $1,427, a 1.8% year-over-year decline. Its separate Vacancy Index increased from 6.4% to 6.9%, a rise of 0.5 percentage point. Together, those measures argue against assuming that Zillow’s metro asking-rent momentum will flow directly into new leases.

The genuine counter-signal is marketing speed: statewide time on market declined by 2.3 days, from 29.3 to 27 days. Rent, vacancy and time on market are separate Apartment List series with different coverage, so they should be tested independently rather than blended into one occupancy indicator.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

03
Supply and resale conditions

Pahrump shows the clearest measured resale exit friction

Pahrump had 6.4 months of supply, 87 median days on market and price drops on 29.9% of listings, compared with measured-metro medians of 3.1 months, 42.5 days and 21.5%. Its sale-to-list ratio was 98.8%. Those readings identify greater resale friction and should be reflected in the exit-liquidity screen.

Las Vegas also showed softer resale conditions, with 4 months of supply, 55 median days on market, a 28.3% price-drop share and a 98.4% sale-to-list ratio. By contrast, Carson City and Reno each had 2.8 months of supply and median marketing times of 42 and 39 days. Pahrump recorded 234 permitted units, or 4.31 per 1,000 residents, but permits do not identify completed rental units and cannot establish the cause of its resale conditions.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Clark renter strain contrasts with tiny counties’ high vacancy

Across 17 county ACS records, the median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 49.6%. Clark County had a 57.7% burden rate, a 42.2% renter share and 9.1% ACS vacancy across a population of 2,329,548. That combination makes tenant affordability a material constraint even where the county vacancy reading is below the county distribution’s median.

The county ACS vacancy median was 13.6%, reaching 28.5% at the 90th percentile. Esmeralda County combined 27.1% vacancy with a 75.5% renter-burden rate but had only 1,028 residents; Lincoln County had 30.5% vacancy, a 58.9% burden rate and 4,405 residents. These small-county extremes do not establish scalable rental availability. ACS housing vacancy also should not be compared one-for-one with Apartment List’s separate rental Vacancy Index.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

05
Employment and household movement

Positive jobs and migration provide a demand counterweight

Employment growth was positive across the measured-metro distribution: the six-metro median was 1.9%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 1.3% to 3.5%. Gardnerville Ranchos registered 4.7%, Pahrump 2.2% and Reno 1.9%. These figures are a demand counterweight to the softer statewide recent-lease indicators.

IRS movement data showed net migration of 8,922 across 16 covered counties, equal to 2.8 people per 1,000 residents. The job and migration series cover different periods and geographies, however, and neither establishes household formation or rental absorption in a particular submarket. One of Nevada’s 17 counties is also absent from the migration coverage.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

06
Entry cost and affordability

Gross yields cluster tightly while affordability varies

The six-metro gross-yield distribution was narrow: a 4.54% median and a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 4.29% to 4.86%. Affordability varied more. The median price-to-income ratio was 6.28, with a range of 4.99 to 7.31, while rent-to-income ran from 24.2% to 32.3% around a 27.7% median.

Elko combined a 4.85% gross yield with a 4.34 price-to-income ratio and 21.1% rent-to-income. Las Vegas had a similar 4.87% gross yield but ratios of 5.63 and 27.4%; Pahrump posted a 4.64% yield, a 6 price-to-income ratio and 27.8% rent-to-income. Affordability and gross yield therefore do not produce the same market ordering, and none of these gross figures accounts for operating or financing costs.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income and gross rent · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Nevada

The distribution uses 28 current published ZIP reports across 6 cities and 3 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,306$2,468full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income26.6%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 1.0%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered211,208across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.89521$2,46889511$1,96189408$1,89189431$1,67689122$1,60789146$1,59889512$1,58989115$1,41689110$1,40089108$1,39789119$1,36689169$1,306
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.64.5%58.2%51.9%45.6%39.3%891198910889115891108943189169891228951289521891468951189408Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.5.7%4.6%3.4%2.3%1.1%891198910889115891108943189169891228951289521891468951189408Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

The published-report distribution shows material within-state dispersion in Zillow’s observed asking-rent index: $1,306 at the low end, $2,468 at the high end, and a $1,162 span around a $1,735.50 median. This is a useful warning against treating the statewide midpoint as a quote or as a universal household budget. The practical comparison is local: whether the current asking-rent level aligns with household income capacity, and how its recent monthly path compares with other areas in the published set. The range describes current direct-evidence ZIP reports, rather than a complete map of every delivery ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property. It frames a screening question, not a substitute for a particular listing’s terms.

Affordability and renter burden answer related but different questions. The current ZORI asking-rent-to-ACS median-household-income ratio runs from 19.0% in 89511 to 39.9% in 89512, with a 26.6% published-report median. At 89119, the ratio is 34.9%; the income required to hold the index at a 30% share is $54,640, compared with ACS median household income of $46,960. The ACS five-year ZCTA estimate places the share of renter households paying 30% or more of gross rent at 57.1% there. The first lens combines a current asking-rent index and area income; the second summarizes surveyed renter households’ gross-rent burden. It is important to read the two together, but neither converts directly into the other.

The direct monthly ZORI series separates momentum from volatility, even though each measure is calculated from the same observed index. One-year annualized growth ranges from -2.7% to 10.9%, while annualized volatility ranges from 2.1% to 4.7%. The low-volatility Fernley report recorded recent growth, whereas the most volatile displayed Las Vegas report had a -0.4% one-year change and a maximum drawdown of -7.7%. Those are counter-signals: a recent gain does not determine the amount of variation, and a decline does not specify the full historical path. The series supports comparison of measured movement and fluctuation across reports, not a forecast of future asking rents or a claim about an individual property.

HUD FMR/SAFMR is a separate, bedroom-specific administrative comparison rather than a market-rent observation. The HUD two-bedroom standard is $1,735 in Clark County and $1,870 in Washoe and Lyon Counties. In 89521, the ZORI level equals 132.0% of that HUD amount; in 89169 it is 75.3%, while the published-report median is 95.5%. The result is a benchmark gap, not evidence that a particular two-bedroom unit will list, lease, or be available at either figure. ZORI’s index value and HUD’s standard have different constructions, and neither resolves an address’s bedroom count, listing terms, or property-level asking rent. Those details require direct verification for any specific home and cannot be supplied by these area-level measures.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 28 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
89119Las Vegas$1,366▲ 0.2%34.9%57.1%3.0%▲ 78.7%
89108Las Vegas$1,397▼ 1.4%28.2%57.5%3.0%▲ 80.5%
89115North Las Vegas$1,416▲ 0.8%32.9%61.2%3.8%▲ 81.6%
89110Las Vegas$1,400▲ 1.1%27.5%62.0%3.7%▲ 80.7%
89431Sparks$1,676▲ 10.9%30.2%45.5%2.6%▲ 89.6%
89169Las Vegas$1,306▼ 1.5%38.3%57.9%4.0%▲ 75.3%
89122Las Vegas$1,607▼ 2.7%30.2%53.2%2.8%▲ 92.6%
89512Reno$1,589▲ 1.3%39.9%53.5%3.9%▲ 85.0%
89521Reno$2,468▲ 7.1%23.3%41.8%2.9%▲ 132.0%
89146Las Vegas$1,598▼ 0.4%30.5%55.9%4.7%▲ 92.1%
89511Reno$1,961▲ 4.9%19.0%48.7%3.8%▲ 104.9%
89408Fernley$1,891▲ 6.7%25.3%42.9%2.1%▲ 101.1%
READ BEFORE USING

ZORI is an observed asking-rent index based on a monthly ZIP series, not a record of signed leases or an individual listing. It cannot establish a particular home’s bedroom count, lease terms, availability, or current advertised price.

ACS figures are 2024 five-year estimates for Census ZCTAs, which do not exactly match USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR figures are administrative two-bedroom standards, not market asking rents, and the published distribution excludes locations without current direct-evidence reports.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Nevada

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-1.4%1.0%1.8%Asking-rent change0.3%5.6%9.4%Rent minus price4.6%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k2.54.17.1Months of supply2.5×3.0×5.2×Days on market41 days43 days71 daysListings with cuts19.7%21.5%29.1%
Housing stock and tenant conditionsWhat kind of housing exists, how much is vacant and how burdened are renters?
10th pct.median90th pct.Vacancy rate7.0%13.6%28.5%Renter share19.5%26.0%39.6%Rent burden 30%+21.1%49.6%58.2%Single-family share39.1%65.5%76.8%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution6 scored metros · median 59.5
00–19020–39340–59360–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
41%7/17Rent100%17/17Climate94%16/17Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Las Vegas4.9%Elko4.9%Pahrump4.6%Gardnerville Ranchos4.4%Carson City4.4%Reno4.2%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Nevada

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Elko, NV69$372k$1,5074.9%▲ 1.6%
2Gardnerville Ranchos, NV66$709k$2,6184.4%▲ 4.7%
3Reno, NV63$574k$2,0044.2%▲ 1.9%
4Carson City, NV56$496k$1,8114.4%▲ 1.0%
5Las Vegas, NV50$430k$1,7484.9%▲ 1.9%
6Pahrump, NV43$364k$1,4084.6%▲ 2.2%
Below the metro line

Largest counties in Nevada

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Clark County, NV2,329,548$430k$1,7484.9%inland flooding
Washoe County, NV497,200$575k$2,0044.2%earthquake
Lyon County, NV61,680$420k$1,9205.5%inland flooding
Carson City, NV58,384$496k$1,8114.4%earthquake
Nye County, NV54,344$364k$1,4084.6%inland flooding
Elko County, NV54,047$376k$1,5074.8%wildfire
Douglas County, NV49,623$709k$2,6184.4%earthquake
Churchill County, NV25,805$397kn/an/ainland flooding
Humboldt County, NV17,289$358kn/an/awildfire
White Pine County, NV8,735$194kn/an/ainland flooding
Pershing County, NV6,487$239kn/an/ainland flooding
Lander County, NV5,770$268kn/an/awildfire
County yield sample7/17counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+8,922IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share5.6%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Zillow asking-rent and Apartment List recent-lease measures cover different market activity, so the apparent rent advantage may not be available to a specific asset.
  2. The Zillow metro distributions contain six records and cannot establish conditions in every Nevada locality or property type.
  3. County ACS figures are period estimates and unweighted distributions; extreme readings from very small counties can mislead a statewide screen.
  4. The selected sources have different periods and geographies, particularly current employment indicators versus earlier migration and ACS evidence.
  5. Gross yields exclude financing, maintenance, insurance, taxes, vacancy and property condition; the packet also supplies no parcel-level operating history.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Are Nevada rents clearly outperforming home values?

Only in the measured Zillow metro distribution: median rent growth was 5.6% versus 1.0% value growth. Apartment List’s separate statewide recent-lease index fell 1.8%, so the answer depends on geography, property coverage and whether asking rents become signed leases.

Where does the packet show the greatest resale friction?

Pahrump: 87 median days on market, 6.4 months of supply and a 29.9% price-drop share. Those are resale indicators for that measured market, not statewide rental-liquidity measures.

Does high county vacancy prove abundant rentable inventory?

No. The county ACS vacancy median was 13.6%, but the largest named readings were in very small counties. ACS housing vacancy does not identify suitable available rentals and is separate from Apartment List’s 6.9% statewide rental Vacancy Index.

Which measured entry market combines lower affordability strain with a competitive gross yield?

Elko had a 4.34 price-to-income ratio, 21.1% rent-to-income and a 4.85% gross yield. Las Vegas had a similar 4.87% yield but higher affordability ratios, while Pahrump’s gross yield was 4.64%. These figures do not establish net return or resale liquidity.

Do demand indicators contradict the rental softness?

They provide a counterweight rather than a contradiction. Median job growth across six metros was 1.9%, and covered counties recorded net migration of 8,922, but those series use different periods and cannot establish current rental absorption in a specific submarket.