FIPS 32003 · population 2,329,548 · part of Las Vegas, NV
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,748 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,333 | Clark County, NV | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,478 | Clark County, NV | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,735 | Clark County, NV | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $2,413 | Clark County, NV | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $2,764 | Clark County, NV | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 32003. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Clark County’s decision tension is a softer Zillow county value signal alongside positive FHFA index movement. In Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation, median home value was $430,435, down 2.85% year over year; FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI was up 1.63%. These are different vintages and methods, not one appreciation measure. Investors should investigate asset-level income and costs; buyers relying on one price-direction signal should be cautious.
Measured median asking rent is $1,748 per month, and the reported gross yield is 4.87%, an annual market-rent-to-price measure before operating costs. The effective property-tax rate is 0.48%, a carrying cost against that gross screen. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is separately a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate; it cannot replace measured market rent.
In Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS listing market, 10,140 listings were active, median marketing time was 55 days, and 23.32% had price reductions. These are visible supply and seller concessions, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. Net migration was positive and in-movers had higher average income than out-movers. Non-occupant mortgage purchases represented 11.98% of 30,759 purchases, making investors a defined share rather than the whole purchase pool. The 2025 QCEW identifies Leisure and hospitality as the largest disclosed private supersector; it measures annual covered jobs at county workplaces, not resident employment.
Inland flood is the dominant hazard; modeled expected annual climate loss equals 0.12% of building value, a portfolio screen rather than an address-level quote. The price-method split, listing evidence, and countywide migration do not resolve submarket rent, vacancy, building condition, insurance, flood zone, debt terms, or operating expenses. Without those records, underwriting cannot determine NOI, debt coverage, or property-specific flood cost. Next checks are address-level flood and insurance review, executed-rent and lease-up comparables, tax assessment, and actual expense records.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
Among the 12 selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches, Zillow’s ZORI ranges from $1,145 to $1,973, with a $1,406.50 midpoint and an $828 spread. That range is broad relative to Clark County’s $1,748 ZORI, so the practical question is not a countywide rent, but which current asking-rent band a household can carry while weighing separate affordability and vacancy measures. At the lower end, a smaller current asking-rent index can reduce the income screen; at the upper end, it requires a larger income screen. The distribution therefore supports ZIP/ZCTA-level comparison before a household narrows its property search, rather than applying the county figure to every location.
Do not combine Zillow, ACS and HUD values into a single price series. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, and its annual changes in this set extend from a 1.4% decline to a 2.7% increase. ACS five-year ZCTA median gross rent instead ranges from $1,083 to $1,991 and is a survey estimate rather than a current asking-rent quote. HUD’s two-bedroom Fair Market Rent is $1,735 throughout the displayed set, an administrative bedroom-specific standard rather than an asking rent. The ZORI-to-HUD comparison runs from 66.0% to 113.7%, which can frame a program-standard comparison but cannot make these measures interchangeable.
Affordability and availability indicators call for another screen, not a conclusion from rent alone. The ACS five-year share of renter households paying 30% or more of income for rent ranges from 49.3% to 61.2%, against 57.7% countywide. Separately, ACS vacancy ranges from 5.5% to 16.9%, compared with the county’s 9.1%. The annual income implied by allocating 30% to the current ZORI spans $45,800 to $78,920, whereas the ZIP/ZCTA median household-income range is $39,459 to $97,999. These are area measures, not a finding about any applicant: a lower asking-rent index does not by itself resolve burden, and a higher vacancy estimate does not establish a currently available unit.
Coverage and geography limit how far the comparison travels. The 12 shown matches were selected from 56 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches and cover 145,779 renter households; they are not an exhaustive county or local inventory. Each displayed ZIP is assigned to Clark County using the largest HUD residential-address share, but ZIPs can cross county lines. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas, not the same as USPS delivery ZIPs, and ACS estimates are five-year survey estimates. Before choosing a property, confirm the unit’s asking rent, bedroom count, availability date, utilities and mandatory fees, lease term, household eligibility, and any relevant program rules directly with the provider.
56 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89119 → | $1,366 | $1,252 | $1,735 | 57.1% | 11.8% | $55k | 100.0% |
| 89103 | $1,434 | $1,406 | $1,735 | 56.7% | 13.9% | $57k | 100.0% |
| 89108 → | $1,397 | $1,554 | $1,735 | 57.5% | 7.1% | $56k | 100.0% |
| 89115 → | $1,416 | $1,412 | $1,735 | 61.2% | 8.8% | $57k | 100.0% |
| 89101 | $1,145 | $1,083 | $1,735 | 55.0% | 12.8% | $46k | 100.0% |
| 89117 | $1,620 | $1,802 | $1,735 | 57.5% | 8.7% | $65k | 100.0% |
| 89121 | $1,389 | $1,383 | $1,735 | 57.7% | 16.9% | $56k | 100.0% |
| 89147 | $1,747 | $1,807 | $1,735 | 54.0% | 6.0% | $70k | 100.0% |
| 89102 | $1,381 | $1,284 | $1,735 | 56.7% | 10.9% | $55k | 100.0% |
| 89148 | $1,901 | $1,991 | $1,735 | 49.3% | 5.5% | $76k | 100.0% |
| 89052 | $1,973 | $1,961 | $1,735 | 55.9% | 5.8% | $79k | 100.0% |
| 89030 | $1,347 | $1,189 | $1,735 | 51.4% | 8.0% | $54k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 89138 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $3,000 | ▲ 3.9% | 44.7% | 26,947 |
| ZIP 89135 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $2,404 | ▲ 3.6% | 41.9% | 32,524 |
| ZIP 89134 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $2,282 | ▲ 2.3% | 46.8% | 24,091 |
| ZIP 89044 rental reportClark County | Henderson, NV | $2,199 | ▲ 3.5% | 45.6% | 30,818 |
| ZIP 89178 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $2,090 | ▲ 0.1% | 52.3% | 44,165 |
| ZIP 89012 rental reportClark County | Henderson, NV | $2,076 | ▲ 0.4% | 44.9% | 38,339 |
| ZIP 89031 rental reportClark County | North Las Vegas, NV | $2,064 | ▲ 0.6% | 54.3% | 77,305 |
| ZIP 89141 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $2,062 | ▲ 0.5% | 44.7% | 43,469 |
| ZIP 89166 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $2,026 | ▼ 0.4% | 46.0% | 32,118 |
| ZIP 89081 rental reportClark County | North Las Vegas, NV | $1,994 | ▲ 0.6% | 58.2% | 41,408 |
| ZIP 89052 rental reportClark County | Henderson, NV | $1,973 | ▲ 1.5% | 55.9% | 60,888 |
| ZIP 89139 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,960 | ▲ 0.7% | 49.9% | 45,410 |
| ZIP 89131 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,942 | ▼ 2.1% | 45.5% | 50,731 |
| ZIP 89084 rental reportClark County | North Las Vegas, NV | $1,938 | ▲ 0.8% | 51.9% | 39,759 |
| ZIP 89011 rental reportClark County | Henderson, NV | $1,924 | ▼ 0.6% | 53.6% | 37,538 |
| ZIP 89148 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,901 | ▼ 0.0% | 49.3% | 64,426 |
| ZIP 89015 rental reportClark County | Henderson, NV | $1,896 | ▲ 3.9% | 54.9% | 44,704 |
| ZIP 89129 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,852 | ▲ 1.9% | 53.6% | 53,435 |
| ZIP 89113 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,841 | ▲ 0.6% | 50.3% | 38,094 |
| ZIP 89130 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,832 | ▼ 0.1% | 57.0% | 36,603 |
| ZIP 89149 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,823 | ▼ 0.7% | 54.1% | 45,202 |
| ZIP 89123 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,805 | ▲ 2.1% | 55.8% | 58,205 |
| ZIP 89183 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,792 | ▲ 1.9% | 50.9% | 42,996 |
| ZIP 89147 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,747 | ▲ 0.6% | 54.0% | 55,969 |
| ZIP 89032 rental reportClark County | North Las Vegas, NV | $1,728 | ▼ 0.8% | 57.9% | 49,473 |
| ZIP 89074 rental reportClark County | Henderson, NV | $1,719 | ▲ 0.9% | 52.7% | 52,388 |
| ZIP 89128 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,688 | ▲ 2.6% | 58.5% | 40,040 |
| ZIP 89117 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,620 | ▼ 0.4% | 57.5% | 58,082 |
| ZIP 89122 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,607 | ▼ 2.8% | 53.2% | 53,724 |
| ZIP 89142 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,600 | ▲ 1.9% | 54.5% | 35,179 |
| ZIP 89146 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,598 | ▼ 0.4% | 55.9% | 22,150 |
| ZIP 89014 rental reportClark County | Henderson, NV | $1,468 | ▼ 2.6% | 57.7% | 42,439 |
| ZIP 89103 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,434 | ▲ 0.3% | 56.7% | 49,041 |
| ZIP 89115 rental reportClark County | North Las Vegas, NV | $1,416 | ▲ 0.8% | 61.2% | 67,542 |
| ZIP 89110 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,400 | ▲ 1.1% | 62.0% | 69,107 |
| ZIP 89108 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,397 | ▼ 1.4% | 57.5% | 72,814 |
| ZIP 89121 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,389 | ▼ 1.3% | 57.7% | 68,406 |
| ZIP 89119 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,366 | ▲ 0.2% | 57.1% | 50,196 |
| ZIP 89169 rental reportClark County | Las Vegas, NV | $1,306 | ▼ 1.5% | 57.9% | 22,171 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.120% of building value expected lost per year
$2,057 median annual bill
51,754 in · 44,738 out
$83,844 arriving · $70,788 leaving
3,686 of 30,759 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
No. It is a HUD payment standard and is not a measure of market asking rent.
Annual average covered jobs at workplaces in Clark County, not resident employment or unemployment.
Inland flood; the supplied climate-loss measure is a countywide modeled screen rather than a property-specific estimate.