Counties / Alabama / Lee County

Lee County, AL

FIPS 01081 · population 181,134 · part of Auburn, AL

$354k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Lee County, AL?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,728 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,7282026-06 · up 4.6% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,058ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,181FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Lee County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$847Lee County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,077Lee County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,181Lee County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,494Lee County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,699Lee County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$354k
▲ 4.4% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,728
▲ 4.6% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.9%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,181
market rent is 1.46x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+50.2%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.4%FHFA HPI2025+4.7%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$262k
Surveyed gross rent$1,058
Rent burden 30%+57.3%
Median year built1997
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
12.8%vacant
79,619estimated housing units
Occupied tenure33.7% renter
owner 66.3%renter 33.7%
Structure mix62.5% single-family
Single-family 62.5%20+ units 7.3%Mobile home 14.3%Other 15.9%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs68,275▲ 2.4% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments4,651annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,076▲ 4.8% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities24.9% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+2.4%WEEKLY WAGE+4.8%Trade, transportation, and utilities24.9%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Lee CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$30k$60k196919972024$3k$51k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Lee CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI8,94570.6% burdened30–50% HAMFI3,85071.6% burdened50–80% HAMFI4,04537.6% burdened80–100% HAMFI1,75510.8% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI4,0601.2% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Lee County, AL

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 01081. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,125$995$8652021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,1252026-07 · +5.4% year over year
Rental vacancyn/an/a
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Lee County’s decision tension is measurable income against a listing market showing more seller accommodation and an inland-flood cost screen. Investors able to verify property-level insurance and rent durability should investigate; buyers whose thesis depends on easy resale or untested flood costs should be cautious. In Zillow’s county 2026-06 observation, the $354,342 median home value and $1,728 monthly median asking rent produce the reported 5.85% gross yield before operating, financing, vacancy, tax and insurance costs.

02Housing economics

Zillow’s price and rent changes were 4.39% and 4.62%, respectively. Separately, FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 4.73% annually and 50.23% cumulatively over five years; it is an index rather than a home value, so it corroborates direction but cannot be averaged with Zillow’s differently timed, methodologically distinct change. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate and cannot replace the supplied market rent. The 0.48% effective property-tax rate is a carrying-cost input, with assessment and insurance still unprovided.

03Demand & competition

MLS listing-market evidence at 2026-06 points to a more negotiable acquisition setting: 975 active listings were 27.04% higher year over year, median marketing time was 56 days, 23.38% had price reductions, and the pending-to-active ratio was 15.33%. These are visible-supply, marketing-time, seller-concession and pending-listing measures, not closed-sale values or standalone proof of buyer demand. Net inward migration and higher inbound AGI add a limited demand-quality signal, while investor purchases remain a minority of total purchases. QCEW records annual covered jobs at county workplaces—not resident employment or unemployment—and identifies Trade, transportation, and utilities as the largest disclosed private supersector, not the county’s whole economy; its jobs and average covered wage increased.

04Risk & next checks

Risk is property-specific. The modeled annual building-value loss ratio reflects inland flood and is not an insurance quote; flood zone, elevation, history, deductible, coverage and premium require address-level confirmation. The record lacks operating expenses, vacancy, lease-up performance, insurance premiums, debt terms, sale prices and neighborhood rent dispersion. Those gaps prevent net-yield conclusions, realistic flood-cost tests and confirmation that MLS supply converts into transactions; verify taxes and assessments alongside them.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Lee County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Auburn city80.6KPhenix City city*38.5KOpelika city32.8KSmiths Station city5.5KNotasulga town*1.1KWaverly town*315Loachapoka town223
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Auburn cityIncorporated place
    80,594
  2. 02
    Phenix City cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    38,499
  3. 03
    Opelika cityIncorporated place
    32,820
  4. 04
    Smiths Station cityIncorporated place
    5,496
  5. 05
    Notasulga townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    1,050
  6. 06
    Waverly townIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    315
  7. 07
    Loachapoka townIncorporated place
    223

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.104% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.48%

$1,252 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+165

5,251 in · 5,086 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$12,026

$69,177 arriving · $57,151 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors10.1%

265 of 2,615 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings975▲ 27.0% year over year
Median days on market56▲ 11.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced23.4%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 3.1% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Auburn, AL

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Lee County181,134$354k$1,7285.9%inland flooding
Macon County18,691$139kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Address-level flood conditions or insurance costs could erase the pre-cost income case.
  2. Listing supply and seller concessions may make an exit less liquid than the gross-yield screen implies.
  3. Unpublished vacancy, expenses, debt, sale-price and neighborhood-rent data may materially change net yield and valuation.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is market rent published and can gross yield be screened?

Yes. Median asking rent is published, and the record reports a gross yield before operating and financing costs.

Is HUD two-bedroom FMR a market asking-rent estimate?

No. It is a payment standard and should not be substituted for market rent.

What hazard needs property-level diligence?

Inland flood. The modeled loss measure is not an insurance quote, so flood exposure and coverage require address-level review.