States / Alabama
State rental intelligence

Alabama rental market data

A source-traced view across 21 metro markets and 67 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

19/21 metros scored67/67 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro47.0out of 100 · 19 measured metros
Alabama identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$212kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,352monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield7.3%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.0%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Alabama rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$9932026-07 · ▲ 0.0% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index7.3%2026-07 · −1.6 pp in 12 months
Time on market30 days2026-07 · +2 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,526$1,092$657Rental Vacancy Index10.5%6.6%2.6%2017-012021-102026-07AlabamaUnited States
State research brief

A 1.6-percentage-point fall in Alabama's measured apartment vacancy came with flat recent-lease rent and two extra days on market.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Apartment List's July 2026 state series does not show clear rent pricing power. Recent-lease rent held at $993, while the Vacancy Index fell from 8.9% to 7.3% and time on market increased from 27.7 to 29.7 days. Because rent, vacancy and marketing time are separate measures with different coverage, lower measured vacancy alone cannot establish faster leasing or stronger rents.

The counter-signal comes from separate Zillow metro data: median rent growth was 3.2% among 19 measured metros, versus 1.9% median home-value growth across 21. That supports targeted screening, particularly where rent growth exceeded value growth, but the state case remains uneven. Median metro employment was nearly flat, permitting was concentrated in a few markets, and county housing and liquidity conditions varied widely. The packet cannot establish property-level occupancy, net operating income, unit condition, insurance cost or future performance.

01

Apartment List rent was flat while its Vacancy Index fell 1.6 percentage points and time on market rose 2 days → do not assume lower measured vacancy has created state rent pricing power

02

Median Zillow metro rent growth was 3.2% versus 1.9% home-value growth → prioritize local rent-to-entry-cost screening while verifying achievable leases

03

Auburn and Daphne had 15.6 and 14.3 permits per 1,000 residents → test each target against the permitted pipeline rather than using statewide supply assumptions

04

Median metro employment growth was 0.01%, but Daphne and Auburn grew 2.3% and 1.8% → base demand underwriting on the specific labor market

05

County median rent burden was 46.0% and broad vacancy reached 27.3% at the 90th percentile → stress-test affordability and occupancy locally

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Lower vacancy did not create state rent growth

Alabama's Apartment List recent-lease rent was $993 in July 2026, unchanged from a year earlier. Over the same comparison, the separate Vacancy Index declined from 8.9% to 7.3%, a 1.6-percentage-point drop, while time on market increased by 2 days to 29.7 days. The three series therefore do not move together: measured vacancy tightened, but rent did not rise and listings did not lease faster.

Flat state rent was still a counter-signal to the 1.1% national decline in the same rent series. Alabama's vacancy rate was about 0.1 percentage point above the national measure, while its time on market was 0.3 day shorter. That is relative resilience, not evidence of positive state rent growth or a result that can be assigned to a particular county or property type.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Rent gains outran value gains in Ozark and Enterprise

In the separate Zillow series, median rent growth among 19 measured metros was 3.2%, while median home-value growth across 21 metros was 1.9%. The supplied difference was 1.2 percentage points. Rent growth ranged from 1.3% at the 10th percentile to 4.9% at the 90th, while value growth ranged from a 0.9% decline to a 4.3% increase. These are distributions across measured metros, not a result for every Alabama locality.

Ozark had 6.5% rent growth, 1.7% value growth and a 10.1% gross-yield screen. Enterprise combined 5.0% rent growth with a 1.5% value decline and a 9.0% gross yield. Those combinations merit closer cash-flow screening, but Zillow rent and value indexes do not establish an achievable lease, operating expenses, capital needs or net return.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Supply and resale conditions

Heavy permitting coexists with slow resale pockets

Permit intensity had a measured-metro median of 2.5 units per 1,000 residents and a 90th-percentile level of 8.1. Auburn registered 15.6 permits per 1,000 residents and Daphne 14.3, both above that benchmark; Huntsville was at 8.1. Current resale conditions were not identical: Auburn had 3.1 months of supply and a 38-day median market time, compared with 4.4 months and 64 days in Daphne and 3.9 months and 61 days in Huntsville.

Other markets showed slower resale liquidity. Talladega recorded 91 days on market and 5.7 months of supply, Dothan 78 days and 4.4 months, and Albertville 71 days and 6.0 months. Permits are not completions and do not identify rental tenure or unit mix, while Redfin resale time is not rental listing time. Screening should therefore treat the permitted pipeline and current resale liquidity as separate local tests.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Employment and household movement

Broad demand is muted despite Daphne and Auburn job gains

Measured metro employment growth had a median of just 0.01%, with a range from a 0.6% decline at the 10th percentile to 1.4% growth at the 90th. IRS movement data across 67 counties showed net in-migration of 6,212 people, or 1.22 per 1,000 residents. These figures provide only modest broad demand support, and the migration series covers 2022-2023 rather than the period of the current rent measures.

Daphne and Auburn are genuine local counter-signals: measured employment grew 2.3% and 1.8%, respectively. Their gross-yield screens were 5.4% and 5.9%, however, below the higher yields identified in Ozark and Enterprise. The packet therefore presents a trade-off between stronger measured job momentum and higher gross entry yield rather than one statewide demand profile.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

County stock is single-family-heavy, with stress concentrated locally

Across 67 county distributions, the median ACS renter share was 24.9%, the median single-family share was 68.5%, and the median large-multifamily share was only 1.2%. The median broad housing-vacancy rate was 15.8%, reaching 27.3% at the 90th percentile. These ACS vacancy figures cover housing stock generally and must not be treated as the Apartment List rental Vacancy Index.

Affordability and vacancy stress are localized. The median share of renters spending at least 30% of income on rent was 46.0%, rising to 55.2% at the 90th percentile. Coosa County had a 63.5% rent-burden share and a 27.1% broad vacancy rate, while Conecuh County's broad vacancy rate was 31.5%. These measures are useful flags for tenant affordability and stock diligence, but they do not reveal unit-level availability, condition or collectible rent.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

Tax and leading-hazard screens point to different counties

FEMA assigns inland flood as the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label in 61 counties and hurricane in 6. Baldwin County, Escambia County and Covington County had measured climate-loss ratios of 0.45%, 0.42% and 0.38%, respectively, all above the county 90th-percentile level of 0.25%. Their effective property-tax rates were 0.30%, 0.39% and 0.26%, so measured physical risk and tax burden did not rank these counties identically.

Jefferson County illustrates the other side of that separation: its effective property-tax rate was 0.59% and median tax was $1,409, while its climate-loss ratio was 0.15%. Property-level screening should evaluate tax and physical risk independently. A county's leading-hazard label is not parcel-level exposure, and a FEMA loss ratio does not establish an insurance quote or future loss.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Alabama

The distribution uses 15 current published ZIP reports across 10 cities and 7 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,080$1,835full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income25.3%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 1.7%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered85,429across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.36830$1,83535242$1,57935801$1,44836117$1,43036116$1,41335810$1,41036608$1,35335244$1,34235758$1,31836109$1,28435215$1,27635205$1,080
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.56.5%49.7%42.8%35.9%29.0%368303611636117352153660835205352423575835244358103610935801Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.5.5%4.4%3.2%2.1%1.0%368303611636117352153660835205352423575835244358103610935801Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Alabama’s statewide distribution is a lens of 15 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, not a census of every delivery ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property. In the June 2026 Zillow ZORI release, the observed asking-rent index spans $1,080 to $1,835, a $755 range around a $1,353 median. That dispersion makes the practical question less about a single statewide rent and more about which local asking-rent level fits a household’s income screen, search area, and tolerance for recent movement. Auburn 36830 supplies the upper endpoint and Birmingham 35205 the lower one, useful contrasts rather than definitions of uniform citywide markets. ZORI is an observed asking-rent index, so these figures describe market-level asking-rent evidence rather than the contractual rent of a named unit.

Affordability screening and renter burden answer different questions. Across the distribution, asking-rent-to-income ratios run from 13.5% to 33.0%, with a 25.3% median; this is a current ZORI asking-rent index compared with ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median household income. The ACS burden measure, instead, estimates the share of renter households spending at least 30% of income on gross rent: 31.5% to 54.0%, with a 49.3% median. It therefore brings in a survey-estimated household rent-and-income relationship, not an asking-price screen. Madison 35758 sits at the low index-to-income end but still has a 34.3% burden estimate, while Huntsville 35810 sits at the high end and has a 49.3% burden estimate. Neither metric says what a particular household will pay or whether it will qualify.

Momentum is not volatility. In the direct monthly ZORI series, one-year change runs from -3.8% to 7.1%, while annualized volatility reaches 4.5% across the published distribution. Montgomery 36116 combines the 7.1% upper-end growth reading with 2.6% volatility, whereas Hoover 35244 has a 1.4% one-year decline and the 4.5% volatility high. The contrast is decision-relevant: a growth rate describes net direction over the comparison year, while volatility measures the scale of monthly movement through the available history. A cooler latest year therefore does not by itself mean a smoother series, and strong recent growth does not by itself establish a persistent trajectory. These are historical index measures, not forecasts or explanations for why rents moved.

HUD supplies a separate reference point, not a substitute rent quote. Asking-rent-to-HUD two-bedroom ratios range from 77.1% to 168.7%, with a 109.1% median, comparing the ZORI asking-rent index with the applicable HUD two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR figure. A ratio above or below that benchmark does not show that a property is expensive, inexpensive, eligible, or comparable: the measures differ in purpose and bedroom standard. The benchmark is an administrative standard, while a listing can differ in bedroom count, utilities, lease terms, concessions, availability, and condition. Use it only as a standardized contextual comparison. It cannot identify a unit’s rent or establish affordability for a particular household, and no ZIP-level measure here can support conclusions about an individual property.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 15 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
36830Auburn$1,835▲ 3.7%31.4%49.9%2.8%▲ 168.7%
36116Montgomery$1,413▲ 7.1%30.7%51.7%2.6%▲ 135.9%
36117Montgomery$1,430▲ 2.6%23.0%43.4%2.1%▲ 110.0%
35215Center Point$1,276▲ 2.8%29.0%50.7%2.0%▲ 101.3%
36608Mobile$1,353▲ 4.3%26.6%48.8%3.7%▲ 109.1%
35205Birmingham$1,080▲ 1.0%25.3%49.8%2.8%▲ 77.1%
35242Birmingham$1,579▼ 0.3%16.2%49.9%3.2%▲ 87.7%
35758Madison$1,318▲ 0.9%13.5%34.3%2.7%▲ 100.6%
35244Hoover$1,342▼ 1.4%14.2%43.6%4.5%▲ 86.0%
35810Huntsville$1,410▲ 1.2%33.0%49.3%3.0%▲ 107.6%
36109Montgomery$1,284▼ 0.5%26.0%54.0%2.5%▲ 124.7%
35801Huntsville$1,448▼ 3.8%16.5%31.5%4.1%▲ 110.5%
READ BEFORE USING

ZORI is an observed asking-rent index rather than transaction-level lease data. A ZIP-level index cannot identify the asking rent, concessions, utilities, bedroom count, availability, or condition of a particular unit, and its release-period reading should not be treated as a guaranteed quote.

ACS 2024 five-year values are survey estimates for ZCTAs, which are statistical areas rather than identical USPS delivery ZIPs. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom standard; neither source should be substituted for present asking rents, and report coverage omits unreported locations.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Alabama

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-0.9%1.9%4.3%Asking-rent change1.3%3.1%4.9%Rent minus price1.2%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k1.12.58.1Months of supply3.2×3.9×5.7×Days on market36 days61 days72 daysListings with cuts20.1%23.9%29.4%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.5%0.0%1.4%Net migration / 1k1.2Net household movement6,212
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution19 scored metros · median 47.0
00–19420–391240–59360–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
43%29/67Rent100%67/67Climate100%67/67Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Ozark10.1%Enterprise9.0%Talladega8.5%Mobile8.1%Scottsboro8.0%Tuscaloosa8.0%Montgomery8.0%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Alabama

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Auburn, AL63$354k$1,7285.9%▲ 1.8%
2Enterprise, AL61$188k$1,4009.0%▲ 1.1%
3Ozark, AL61$165k$1,38310.1%▲ 0.2%
4Decatur, AL57$237k$1,1615.9%▲ 1.0%
5LaGrange, GA56$206k$1,3527.9%▲ 1.4%
6Florence, AL55$219k$1,1226.1%▲ 0.0%
7Daphne, AL53$376k$1,7025.4%▲ 2.3%
8Anniston, AL52$173k$1,0227.1%▼ 0.5%
9Huntsville, AL51$318k$1,3815.2%▲ 1.0%
10Columbus, GA47$212k$1,2957.3%▼ 0.2%
11Gadsden, AL46$189k$1,1377.2%▼ 0.1%
12Tuscaloosa, AL46$222k$1,4808.0%▼ 0.4%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 21. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Alabama

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Jefferson County, AL667,755$220k$1,3997.6%inland flooding
Mobile County, AL412,590$199k$1,3358.1%hurricane
Madison County, AL405,718$316k$1,3715.2%inland flooding
Baldwin County, AL246,989$376k$1,7025.4%hurricane
Tuscaloosa County, AL237,552$230k$1,4707.7%inland flooding
Shelby County, AL230,211$362k$1,7285.7%inland flooding
Montgomery County, AL226,718$167k$1,3649.8%inland flooding
Lee County, AL181,134$354k$1,7285.9%inland flooding
Morgan County, AL124,471$238k$1,1495.8%inland flooding
Calhoun County, AL116,090$173k$1,0227.1%inland flooding
Limestone County, AL111,233$324k$1,5405.7%inland flooding
Houston County, AL108,140$204k$1,2297.2%inland flooding
County yield sample29/67counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+6,212IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share7.4%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Apartment List's state rent, Vacancy Index and time-on-market series have different coverage, so their divergence cannot identify which counties or property types tightened.
  2. Permit counts do not reveal completions, rental tenure, bedroom mix or delivery timing and therefore cannot establish future rental competition.
  3. Zillow county rent data cover 29 of 67 counties, Realtor.com listing conditions cover 54, and the packet contains no county Realtor.com listing-price observations.
  4. Gross yield excludes vacancy, repairs, management, financing, taxes, insurance and capital expenditure, so the highest gross screen may not produce the highest net return.
  5. FEMA leading-hazard labels are county classifications rather than parcel exposure, and measured loss ratios are not insurance premiums.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Does the lower Apartment List Vacancy Index support immediate rent increases?

Not by itself. The index fell from 8.9% to 7.3%, but recent-lease rent stayed at $993 and time on market increased from 27.7 to 29.7 days. Property-level lease and occupancy evidence is still required.

Which measured metros show the clearest rent-over-value momentum?

Ozark combined 6.5% rent growth with 1.7% value growth and a 10.1% gross yield. Enterprise had 5.0% rent growth, a 1.5% value decline and a 9.0% gross yield. These are gross screens, not net-return estimates.

Where is permitting most concentrated?

Auburn had 15.6 permitted units per 1,000 residents, Daphne 14.3 and Huntsville 8.1, compared with a measured-metro median of 2.5. Permits do not establish completed rental supply.

Do employment and migration support a broad Alabama demand thesis?

Only weakly. Median measured metro employment growth was 0.01%, and net migration was 6,212 people, or 1.22 per 1,000 residents. Daphne and Auburn were stronger local exceptions at 2.3% and 1.8% job growth.

Can the county hazard labels be used to price insurance?

No. They identify each county's single leading hazard, with inland flood leading in 61 counties and hurricane in 6. They do not measure parcel exposure, building resilience, coverage terms or premiums.