Counties / Alabama / Jefferson County

Jefferson County, AL

FIPS 01073 · population 667,755 · part of Birmingham, AL

$220k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Jefferson County, AL?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,399 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,3992026-06 · up 1.1% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,193ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,266FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Jefferson County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,024Jefferson County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,155Jefferson County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,266Jefferson County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,583Jefferson County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,801Jefferson County, ALHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$220k
▲ 1.3% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,399
▲ 1.1% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
7.6%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,266
market rent is 1.10x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+38.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.3%FHFA HPI2025+2.2%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$240k
Surveyed gross rent$1,193
Rent burden 30%+53.5%
Median year built1975
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
13.2%vacant
310,789estimated housing units
Occupied tenure36.1% renter
owner 63.9%renter 36.1%
Structure mix71.3% single-family
Single-family 71.3%20+ units 8.0%Mobile home 3.0%Other 17.6%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs369,132▲ 0.6% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments23,750annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,443▲ 4.9% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities24.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.6%WEEKLY WAGE+4.9%Trade, transportation, and utilities24.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Jefferson CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$40k$80k196919972024$3k$75k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Jefferson CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI26,57574.6% burdened30–50% HAMFI17,51074.9% burdened50–80% HAMFI19,75543.3% burdened80–100% HAMFI9,59016.9% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI22,0104.4% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Jefferson County, AL

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 01073. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,226$1,181$1,1362021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,1822026-07 · -1.6% year over year
Rental vacancy7.2%2026-07 · -3.6 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Jefferson County presents a cash-flow-versus-demand tension. In Zillow’s 2026-06 county record, the median home value was $219,533, up 1.32%, while median asking rent was $1,399 per month, up 1.14%; the supplied gross yield is 7.65% before operating costs. That warrants investigation by an income-focused underwriter, but buyers relying on appreciation or expanding demand should be cautious: this is a gross screen, not a net return. The county evidence also does not establish that Jefferson County represents the Birmingham metro.

02Housing economics

Keep market rent separate from HUD: the $1,266 two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The 0.59% effective property-tax rate belongs in carrying costs. FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI change was 2.21%, an appreciation index rather than a home value. Its vintage and method differ from Zillow’s, so it may confirm direction but must not be averaged with that observation. Insurance, vacancy, repairs, management, and financing costs are absent; gross yield therefore cannot establish net return.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is mixed rather than one-directional. Net migration was -1,041, while the calculated average-income difference between out-movers and in-movers favored out-movers by $6,260, a combination that merits tenant-demand scrutiny. QCEW reports employment growth, but its covered-job measure is not resident employment. Realtor.com MLS evidence shows median listing price down 2.87%, active listings up 8.48%, and 17.05% of listings with price reductions; these indicate visible supply and seller concessions, not closed-sale pricing or buyer demand by themselves. The investor count is 1,054 against 7,700 total purchases, yielding the supplied 13.69% share, so competition exists but is not the whole purchase pool.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual climate-loss ratio is 0.15% of building value. That model is not a property-level loss estimate or an insurance quote. Before underwriting, verify flood zone, elevation, drainage, coverage, deductible, exclusions, condition, vacancy, operating expenses, and closed-sale and rent comps. The absent insurance and property-level hazard evidence prevents a net-yield, resale, or flood-cost conclusion. QCEW also names Trade, transportation, and utilities as the largest disclosed private supersector, not the county’s whole economy; no resident labor, household balance sheet, or property-level operating record is supplied.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Jefferson County, AL

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,075$1,875Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$800highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range43.2%58.5%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered58,298across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.35243$1,87535209$1,63235211$1,39635235$1,39135216$1,35935244$1,34235215$1,27635214$1,27435020$1,15635217$1,13435205$1,08035206$1,075
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.61.0%55.9%50.9%45.8%40.7%352153521135209352053521635244350203524335206352353521735214Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.35211+121.4%35214+115.8%35020+111.2%35243+110.9%35217+109.0%35209+103.3%35235+102.3%35215+101.3%35206+93.5%35244+86.0%35216+85.5%35205+77.1%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

For the 12 selected direct-ZORI ZIPs in June 2026, Zillow’s typical observed asking-rent index ranges from $1,075 to $1,875: an $800 spread around a $1,309 median. The selected-set median sits below Jefferson County’s $1,399 Zillow ZORI; the county index was up 1.1% year over year. This distribution makes the practical question less about identifying a single countywide rent and more about deciding whether a prospective unit’s current ask belongs near the lower, middle, or upper part of the observed range, then testing its affordability and lease terms. The figures describe a selected direct-evidence set rather than a full inventory, so they should anchor initial price screening, not establish a universal local price.

The three datasets answer distinct questions and should remain separate. In ZIP 35211, the direct Zillow index was $1,396 while the HUD two-bedroom standard was $1,150; in ZIP 35205, the corresponding figures were $1,080 and $1,400. The contrast is not a premium-or-discount measure: ZORI tracks a typical observed asking rent, whereas HUD FMR/SAFMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard. ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross rents for those areas were $1,030 and $1,084, respectively. Those survey estimates reflect occupied-unit gross rent and have different timing and coverage, so they cannot be combined with Zillow or HUD into one ranking. Use Zillow for asking-rent context, HUD for applicable standard checks, and ACS for historical survey context.

Affordability stress does not line up mechanically with the selected ZORI range. ACS ZCTA estimates put renter households spending 30% or more of income on rent between 43.2% and 58.5%, compared with 53.5% countywide. ZIP 35206 combines a 56.5% burden estimate with an 18.6% vacancy rate, while ZIP 35244 records a 3.8% vacancy rate. These are not conflicting signals: burden concerns surveyed renter household finances, while vacancy describes the housing stock rather than a real-time count of rentable units. A lower observed asking index or a higher vacancy estimate therefore does not itself resolve tenant affordability or confirm that a suitable unit is available. Screen both the household payment constraint and property-specific availability without treating either measure as the cause of the other.

Coverage and geography require a final check before acting. The display contains 12 of 26 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches and covers 58,298 renter households; it is not a countywide list. For Jefferson County, ACS values are reported for Census-defined ZCTAs, whose boundaries and identifiers do not perfectly track the USPS ZIP used for mail delivery. County assignment instead follows the largest HUD residential-address share, which matters for cross-county ZIPs: 35244’s assigned share is 55.1%. Verify the complete property address and county, actual bedroom count, current listing rent, all fees and utility treatment, lease duration, move-in date, and unit availability. For any HUD use, confirm the relevant bedroom-specific standard and eligibility rather than applying the displayed comparison mechanically.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

26 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
35215$1,276$1,148$1,26050.7%14.3%$51k100.0%
35211$1,396$1,030$1,15057.1%18.2%$56k100.0%
35209$1,632$1,318$1,58055.2%13.4%$65k100.0%
35205$1,080$1,084$1,40049.8%17.9%$43k100.0%
35216$1,359$1,373$1,59050.0%10.1%$54k98.1%
35244$1,342$1,472$1,56043.6%3.8%$54k55.1%
35020$1,156$904$1,04046.7%16.9%$46k100.0%
35243$1,875$1,683$1,69043.2%13.4%$75k99.3%
35206$1,075$1,024$1,15056.5%18.6%$43k100.0%
35235$1,391$1,404$1,36058.5%10.9%$56k100.0%
35217$1,134$933$1,04044.9%16.5%$45k100.0%
35214$1,274$1,068$1,10053.0%12.7%$51k100.0%
READ BEFORE USING

ACS ZCTA estimates in this Jefferson County module attach to Census ZCTA geographies, while a postal ZIP describes delivery routing; the two footprints can differ, so ZIP-labelled ACS figures should not be assumed to map exactly to a USPS delivery area.

Only the chosen 12 of 26 eligible matches are shown, and assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address share. Cross-county ZIPs and incomplete direct-evidence coverage mean this selected set cannot represent every county location or listing.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Jefferson County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Birmingham city*198.2KHoover city*92.6KVestavia Hills city*38.6KHomewood city27.8KTrussville city*26.7KBessemer city25.4KMountain Brook city22KHelena city*21.8K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

48 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Birmingham cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    198,173
  2. 02
    Hoover cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    92,642
  3. 03
    Vestavia Hills cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    38,616
  4. 04
    Homewood cityIncorporated place
    27,829
  5. 05
    Trussville cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    26,673
  6. 06
    Bessemer cityIncorporated place
    25,400
  7. 07
    Mountain Brook cityIncorporated place
    22,029
  8. 08
    Helena cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    21,769
  9. 09
    Gardendale cityIncorporated place
    16,534
  10. 10
    Hueytown cityIncorporated place
    16,414
  11. 11
    Center Point cityIncorporated place
    15,914
  12. 12
    Irondale cityIncorporated place
    13,464
Show 36 more places
  1. 13
    McCalla CDPCensus-designated place
    13,253
  2. 14
    Leeds cityIncorporated place · spans 3 counties
    12,028
  3. 15
    Clay cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    10,273
  4. 16
    Forestdale CDPCensus-designated place
    9,742
  5. 17
    Fairfield cityIncorporated place
    9,728
  6. 18
    Pleasant Grove cityIncorporated place
    9,442
  7. 19
    Fultondale cityIncorporated place
    9,384
  8. 20
    Pinson cityIncorporated place
    7,832
  9. 21
    Grayson Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    6,077
  10. 22
    Tarrant cityIncorporated place
    5,925
  11. 23
    Midfield cityIncorporated place
    5,045
  12. 24
    Argo cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    4,479
  13. 25
    Kimberly cityIncorporated place
    4,439
  14. 26
    Adamsville cityIncorporated place
    4,266
  15. 27
    Lake View cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    4,063
  16. 28
    Mount Olive CDP (Jefferson County)Census place
    3,567
  17. 29
    Warrior cityIncorporated place
    3,207
  18. 30
    Brighton cityIncorporated place
    3,079
  19. 31
    Morris cityIncorporated place
    2,673
  20. 32
    Graysville cityIncorporated place
    2,509
  21. 33
    Sumiton cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    2,459
  22. 34
    Lipscomb cityIncorporated place
    2,214
  23. 35
    Concord CDPCensus-designated place
    1,913
  24. 36
    Brookside townIncorporated place
    1,603
  25. 37
    Sylvan Springs townIncorporated place
    1,490
  26. 38
    Rock Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    1,103
  27. 39
    Minor CDPCensus-designated place
    762
  28. 40
    Edgewater CDPCensus-designated place
    670
  29. 41
    McDonald Chapel CDPCensus-designated place
    651
  30. 42
    Mulga townIncorporated place
    602
  31. 43
    West Jefferson townIncorporated place
    581
  32. 44
    Trafford townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    493
  33. 45
    County Line townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    358
  34. 46
    Maytown townIncorporated place
    314
  35. 47
    North Johns townIncorporated place
    129
  36. 48
    Cardiff townIncorporated place
    125

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.146% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.59%

$1,409 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-1,041

13,148 in · 14,189 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$6,260

$66,572 arriving · $72,832 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors13.7%

1,054 of 7,700 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings2,475▲ 8.5% year over year
Median days on market57▲ 9.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced17.1%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.9% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Birmingham, AL

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Jefferson County667,755$220k$1,3997.6%inland flooding
Shelby County230,211$362k$1,7285.7%inland flooding
St. Clair County94,166$278k$1,6477.1%inland flooding
Walker County64,841$129k$1,16210.8%inland flooding
Blount County59,518$235k$1,5077.7%inland flooding
Chilton County45,992$225k$1,4787.9%inland flooding
Bibb County22,130$220kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Property-specific flood exposure, insurance terms, or repairs could exceed the modeled county-level loss ratio.
  2. Vacancy, repairs, management, financing, taxes, and other unpublished costs could erode the gross yield.
  3. Out-migration and softer listing-market signals could weaken leasing or resale while investor participation limits acquisition access.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent a HUD payment standard?

No. It is median asking market rent; HUD FMR is a separate two-bedroom payment standard.

Does FHFA provide a county home value?

No. FHFA provides a repeat-transaction home-price appreciation index, not a dollar home value.

What does QCEW measure?

It measures annual average covered jobs and establishments located at county workplaces, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast.