Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 06037 · population 9,808,667 · part of Los Angeles, CA
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $2,808 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $2,079 | Los Angeles County, CA | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $2,328 | Los Angeles County, CA | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $2,903 | Los Angeles County, CA | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $3,681 | Los Angeles County, CA | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $4,098 | Los Angeles County, CA | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 06037. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Los Angeles County presents a high-price, low-yield underwriting tension. Zillow’s June 2026 median home value was $888,426, versus published median asking rent of $2,808 monthly and a supplied gross yield of 3.79% before costs. This warrants caution from cash-flow-focused buyers and investigation by investors depending on appreciation. Zillow’s 0.27% annual price change is a different vintage and method from FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI, which showed 1.70% annual growth. The readings may confirm direction, but cannot be combined into one growth rate or treated as a home value.
Market rent is not HUD FMR: the two-bedroom FMR is $2,903, a payment standard rather than an asking-rent estimate, so it cannot validate achievable rent or gross yield. Property tax adds a 0.68% effective rate and $5,675 median annual bill before insurance, repairs, vacancy or financing. Realtor.com’s MLS evidence shows median listing prices down 6.02%, median marketing time of 51 days, and price reductions on 14.40% of listings. These are asking-market signals, not closed-sale prices or proof of demand.
Demand evidence is mixed. Tax-return households recorded net migration out of the county of 39,112, while the average AGI gap was negative $4,686: outgoing movers had higher average income than incoming movers. This is a county flow, not resident employment. QCEW’s covered-worker average weekly wage was $1,656; its largest disclosed private supersector, education and health services, represented 25.07% of private covered jobs. QCEW counts jobs at county workplaces, not resident employment or unemployment. Realtor active listings were nearly unchanged, leaving visible supply broadly stable. Investor purchase mortgages were 13.71% of 43,089 total purchases: a minority share, not proof investors set the market.
Underwriting remains property-specific: modeled climate loss is 0.39% of building value per year, with earthquake the dominant hazard. Seismic condition, insurance availability, deductibles and retrofit needs are therefore essential checks. Missing operating expenses, financing, vacancy, unit mix, condition, neighborhood rents, closed-sale comparables and renovation needs prevent converting gross yield to net return or testing a specific asset. Next checks are address-level rent and sale comps, a seismic-insurance review, and a full tax-and-operating-cost budget.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
The selected direct-evidence set shows a wide asking-rent screen, not a single county price. In June 2026, Zillow ZORI, the typical observed asking-rent index, runs from $1,966 in ZIP 90006 to $3,294 in ZIP 90025, a $1,328 spread; its median is $2,604. The county Zillow value is $2,808. That county figure is context only and does not replace ZIP-level observation. The practical decision is whether a particular listing's price, unit size, and lease terms fit a household budget relative to this selected range; a ZIP label does not answer that property-level question. Where reported, year-over-year ZORI movement ranges from a 2.34% decline to a 1.52% increase. Those changes describe past index movement, not a forecast.
Zillow, ACS, and HUD should remain separate tests. The ACS 2024 five-year survey places median gross rent across the selected ZCTAs between $1,464 and $2,488; these are survey estimates, not current Zillow asks. Separately, FY2026 HUD two-bedroom FMR is $3,070 in every displayed ZIP, an administrative standard rather than a market asking rent. The packet's Zillow-to-HUD comparison spans 64.0% to 107.3%. Neither the Zillow-ACS gap nor the Zillow-HUD gap measures affordability or a change in a like-for-like unit. Use Zillow to screen contemporaneous asking rents, ACS to contextualize survey-estimated rents, and HUD only where its administrative standard is relevant.
The ACS burden and vacancy measures frame a different trade-off. The ACS rent-burden share at 30% or more ranges from 47.3% to 64.8% in the displayed set, versus 57.7% for the county; a lower displayed burden reading does not itself establish a household's ability to pay a given lease. ACS vacancy ranges from 2.7% to 18.2%, while ACS renter share runs from 68.1% to 96.6%. Vacancy is a survey stock measure, not confirmation that a suitable unit is vacant today, so screen current listings and household budget separately from these area indicators. The two ranges should not be combined into a measure of access or market tightness.
Geography and coverage limit extrapolation. The displayed 12 ZIP/ZCTA matches are an ordered selection from 233 eligible direct-ZORI matches and represent 234,579 renter households, not a countywide inventory. ACS evidence is tabulated for Census ZCTAs, whose mapped areas only approximate postal delivery ZIP coverage. Display assignment follows the largest HUD residential-address county share; that share is 100.0% for every shown match, but the crosswalk method does not turn ZIPs into county boundaries. Before acting on any property, verify live advertised rent, bedroom count, fees, lease term, move-in date, availability, and the relevant administrative standard for the same bedroom count.
233 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90046 | $2,792 | $2,194 | $3,070 | 47.8% | 10.8% | $112k | 100.0% |
| 90250 → | $2,146 | $1,783 | $3,070 | 56.9% | 4.3% | $86k | 100.0% |
| 90034 | $2,729 | $2,222 | $3,070 | 47.3% | 9.7% | $109k | 100.0% |
| 90026 | $2,739 | $1,929 | $3,070 | 47.6% | 7.3% | $110k | 100.0% |
| 90004 | $2,331 | $1,831 | $3,070 | 58.8% | 8.0% | $93k | 100.0% |
| 90201 | $2,210 | $1,658 | $3,070 | 58.2% | 2.7% | $88k | 100.0% |
| 90044 → | $2,355 | $1,477 | $3,070 | 64.8% | 5.7% | $94k | 100.0% |
| 90019 | $2,710 | $1,795 | $3,070 | 52.2% | 8.9% | $108k | 100.0% |
| 90028 | $2,602 | $1,899 | $3,070 | 55.4% | 18.2% | $104k | 100.0% |
| 90011 → | $2,606 | $1,542 | $3,070 | 60.9% | 4.3% | $104k | 100.0% |
| 90025 | $3,294 | $2,488 | $3,070 | 51.6% | 9.2% | $132k | 100.0% |
| 90006 | $1,966 | $1,464 | $3,070 | 56.9% | 9.7% | $79k | 100.0% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 90049 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,983 | ▲ 0.4% | 42.4% | 37,122 |
| ZIP 90291 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,976 | ▼ 0.1% | 49.9% | 26,324 |
| ZIP 90016 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,399 | ▲ 1.5% | 56.7% | 46,457 |
| ZIP 90293 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,390 | ▼ 1.7% | 46.8% | 12,655 |
| ZIP 90048 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,368 | ▼ 0.1% | 56.0% | 21,476 |
| ZIP 91344 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,332 | ▲ 5.9% | 57.0% | 52,890 |
| ZIP 90024 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,295 | ▲ 1.8% | 66.6% | 51,675 |
| ZIP 90025 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,294 | ▲ 0.2% | 51.6% | 46,508 |
| ZIP 91354 rental reportLos Angeles County | Santa Clarita, CA | $3,267 | ▼ 1.7% | 54.4% | 33,957 |
| ZIP 90036 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,097 | ▲ 1.4% | 53.2% | 39,278 |
| ZIP 90065 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,021 | ▼ 0.5% | 51.1% | 44,658 |
| ZIP 90066 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,019 | ▲ 1.2% | 41.2% | 56,740 |
| ZIP 90045 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $3,017 | ▼ 1.3% | 54.6% | 41,786 |
| ZIP 91367 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,965 | ▼ 0.9% | 52.2% | 45,889 |
| ZIP 90815 rental reportLos Angeles County | Long Beach, CA | $2,951 | ▲ 3.1% | 45.8% | 43,023 |
| ZIP 91101 rental reportLos Angeles County | Pasadena, CA | $2,901 | ▼ 2.6% | 47.6% | 21,165 |
| ZIP 90046 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,792 | ▲ 1.1% | 47.8% | 48,296 |
| ZIP 91104 rental reportLos Angeles County | Pasadena, CA | $2,772 | ▲ 0.8% | 47.5% | 35,937 |
| ZIP 90026 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,739 | ▲ 1.4% | 47.6% | 62,692 |
| ZIP 90034 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,729 | ▲ 1.3% | 47.3% | 57,075 |
| ZIP 90019 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,710 | ▲ 1.1% | 52.2% | 59,548 |
| ZIP 90042 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,686 | ▲ 2.0% | 49.9% | 56,835 |
| ZIP 91601 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,665 | ▼ 0.3% | 60.5% | 36,992 |
| ZIP 90017 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,653 | ▼ 0.1% | 63.6% | 30,172 |
| ZIP 91303 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,619 | ▼ 0.6% | 54.8% | 29,805 |
| ZIP 90011 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,606 | ▼ 2.0% | 60.9% | 100,113 |
| ZIP 90028 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,602 | ▲ 0.5% | 55.4% | 32,883 |
| ZIP 90731 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,566 | ▲ 0.3% | 54.8% | 61,944 |
| ZIP 90027 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,557 | ▲ 0.9% | 49.3% | 46,558 |
| ZIP 91321 rental reportLos Angeles County | Santa Clarita, CA | $2,523 | ▲ 4.1% | 68.3% | 31,989 |
| ZIP 90012 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,513 | ▲ 0.5% | 54.3% | 37,336 |
| ZIP 90802 rental reportLos Angeles County | Long Beach, CA | $2,505 | ▲ 1.2% | 57.3% | 40,434 |
| ZIP 91406 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,465 | ▲ 3.8% | 59.2% | 51,953 |
| ZIP 91405 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,411 | ▲ 0.9% | 64.1% | 56,033 |
| ZIP 90018 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,408 | ▲ 0.4% | 57.2% | 48,745 |
| ZIP 91206 rental reportLos Angeles County | Glendale, CA | $2,404 | ▼ 0.6% | 57.3% | 31,961 |
| ZIP 90044 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,355 | ▼ 0.1% | 64.8% | 94,830 |
| ZIP 91335 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,355 | ▼ 0.7% | 62.1% | 74,526 |
| ZIP 90005 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,332 | ▲ 0.1% | 61.9% | 39,142 |
| ZIP 90004 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,331 | ▼ 2.3% | 58.8% | 58,484 |
| ZIP 91304 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,283 | ▼ 0.2% | 62.2% | 52,474 |
| ZIP 91325 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,259 | ▲ 1.3% | 64.8% | 35,062 |
| ZIP 90008 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,220 | ▼ 1.5% | 59.1% | 33,252 |
| ZIP 91605 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,189 | ▼ 0.4% | 63.2% | 49,868 |
| ZIP 90029 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,183 | ▼ 0.4% | 56.2% | 33,303 |
| ZIP 90033 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,169 | ▼ 4.3% | 52.6% | 45,647 |
| ZIP 90807 rental reportLos Angeles County | Long Beach, CA | $2,155 | ▲ 6.3% | 53.1% | 33,101 |
| ZIP 90805 rental reportLos Angeles County | Long Beach, CA | $2,149 | ▲ 0.2% | 55.2% | 92,402 |
| ZIP 90250 rental reportLos Angeles County | Hawthorne, CA | $2,146 | ▲ 1.5% | 56.9% | 93,826 |
| ZIP 91402 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $2,117 | ▼ 1.3% | 65.5% | 65,754 |
| ZIP 90006 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $1,966 | ▼ 1.2% | 56.9% | 55,527 |
| ZIP 90020 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $1,921 | ▼ 1.4% | 57.9% | 38,994 |
| ZIP 90813 rental reportLos Angeles County | Long Beach, CA | $1,841 | ▲ 0.9% | 59.0% | 51,241 |
| ZIP 90057 rental reportLos Angeles County | Los Angeles, CA | $1,770 | ▼ 2.0% | 59.7% | 46,629 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.392% of building value expected lost per year
$5,675 median annual bill
120,704 in · 159,816 out
$89,076 arriving · $93,762 leaving
5,906 of 43,089 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles County | 9,808,667 | $888k | $2,808 | 3.8% | earthquake |
| Orange County | 3,165,820 | $1195k | $3,186 | 3.2% | inland flooding |
No. It is a HUD two-bedroom payment standard; the record separately publishes median asking rent as the market measure.
It represents covered jobs located at county workplaces and covered-worker wages, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast.
It measures purchase mortgages to non-occupants as a share of purchase mortgages; it does not establish investor control of the entire market.