ZIP reports / CA / 90025
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 90025, Los Angeles, CA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 90025?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 90025 is $3,294 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$3,2942026-06 · up 0.2% year over year
ACS median gross rent$2,488ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$94 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$3,070Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 90025
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$2,555ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,380HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$2,723ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,537HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$3,294ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,070HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$4,332ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,037HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$5,014ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,672HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$103,894ACS 2024 5-year · ±$7,781 MOE
Renter share75.9%17,857 renter households
Rent burden 30%+51.6%9,208 observed households
Housing vacancy9.2%2,374 of 25,903 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 90025Zillow asking-rent index$3,294ACS median gross rent$2,488HUD two-bedroom standard$3,070

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 90025ACS median household income$103,894Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$131,760

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 90025Studio$2,555One bedroom$2,723Two bedrooms$3,294Three bedrooms$4,332Four bedrooms$5,014

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9002530% or more of income9,208 householdsBelow 30%8,649 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 90025ZIP 90025$3,294Los Angeles city$2,773Los Angeles County county$2,808Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro$2,927

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 90025; missing months remain gaps$3,404$3,164$2,924$2,6842021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
19.0%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
7.6%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.0%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 90025

At 90025, the immediate tension is between a current $3,294 ZIP Zillow Observed Rent Index and a $2,488 matched ACS median gross rent, a 32.4% difference across non-interchangeable rent measures. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, whereas the ACS figure reflects occupied renter homes. The ACS median household income is $103,894, while annualizing the current asking-rent index produces a $131,760 income screen at 30% of income. That screen is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant qualification rule. It frames the gap between the ZIP asking-rent benchmark and the survey household-income benchmark without establishing what any individual household can pay.

The backward-looking rent path has slowed materially relative to its longer record. Exact same-month annualized change was 0.2% over one-year, 0.9% over three-year, and 3.5% over five-year periods. Thus, the latest direction remains marginally positive but breaks from the faster five-year growth path rather than confirming it. Annualized monthly-return variability was limited to 2.0%, supporting somewhat more confidence in the stability of one current rent snapshot than a highly erratic history would. Still, the observed series experienced a 7.6% maximum drawdown. Coverage was 100% across 138 observations and 137 consecutive returns. Transparent national discovery ranks were 2,263 for momentum, 136 for stability, and 1,348 for the balanced measure, with lower ranks representing higher placement among history-eligible ZIPs. These are historical measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The bedroom ladder translates the all-type ZIP index into modelled monthly estimates rather than measured bedroom rents. The resulting local estimates are $2,555 for a studio, $2,723 for one bedroom, $3,294 for two bedrooms, $4,332 for three bedrooms, and $5,014 for four bedrooms. They scale ZIP ZORI through the local HUD ladder; they are not observed listings, lease records, or bedroom-specific market medians. The local HUD two-bedroom standard is $3,070, making the ZIP asking-rent index 7.3% higher than that HUD benchmark. HUD Fair Market Rent or Small Area Fair Market Rent is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not an asking-rent measure, so the comparison should be read as a standardized reference rather than a rent comp.

The matched ACS five-year survey describes a renter-heavy housing base, not a current listing inventory. Of 25,903 housing units, 75.9% are renter occupied; the structure mix includes 3,061 single-family units and 7,127 units in large multifamily structures. The ACS vacancy rate is 9.2%, including 1,389 vacant units classified for rent, but neither figure establishes availability, condition, price, or suitability for a particular unit. ACS also reports 9,208 renter households with housing-cost burdens of 30% or more, equal to 51.6% of renter households. Its median gross rent includes selected utilities, which helps explain why it should not be treated as a substitute for a current asking-rent index or as proof of the terms attached to an advertised apartment.

Wider geography places the ZIP's asking-rent benchmark above several broader reference points: the Los Angeles city context Zillow rent is $2,773, the Los Angeles County context rent is $2,808, and the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA metro context rent is $2,927. Those are city, county, and metro context values, respectively, rather than direct ZIP comparables. Each is below the ZIP index, but the difference does not identify the type, size, utility treatment, or lease terms responsible. The ZIP's higher renter share and reported burden also should not be extrapolated to the city, county, or metro because each geography covers a wider and different housing universe. Context can calibrate scale; it cannot replace ZIP-level rental evidence.

Redfin's direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation presents a separate for-sale tension. Median sold price was $996,025, down 20.3% year over year, with 74 homes sold and a median 45 days on market. Inventory stood at 134 homes, up 12.9%, while months of supply were 5.5. Sale-to-list signals were close to list overall at 99.66%, although 34.8% of sales closed above list. This is resale liquidity and pricing evidence, not rental transactions or rental comps. The annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is a 3.97% cross-source screening ratio only, not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. Flat recent asking-rent growth alongside lower sold prices and higher inventory challenges any simple alignment between the rent snapshot and resale conditions.

The five-digit label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. That distinction matters because Zillow supplies the ZIP-level observed asking-rent index, ACS supplies the matched ZCTA five-year survey of occupied renter homes, and HUD supplies an administrative bedroom ladder. Redfin, in turn, supplies direct ZIP resale evidence from a rolling three-month observation. None of those universes measures every advertised unit, signed lease, utility package, or property condition at the same moment. The figures are most useful when read as separate benchmarks that may point in different directions rather than merged into one asserted market rent.

A property-level interpretation would still require checks absent from these data: the live advertised price and date, bedroom count, floor plan, utility inclusion, furnishing status, concessions, lease duration, availability timing, and whether the unit belongs to the relevant ZIP geography. A sale comparison would additionally need property type, condition, sale date, list-price changes, and transaction-specific financing or expense information. The rent-history series cannot establish future movement, and the resale record cannot establish a property's operating economics. The unresolved property-level question is whether a specific unit's terms resemble the modelled bedroom estimate, the current asking-rent index, neither, or a different rental universe altogether.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current rent benchmark exceeds survey gross rent

The ZIP Zillow asking-rent index is materially above the matched ACS median gross rent, but the figures describe different universes. ZORI captures a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types, while ACS reflects occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The income screen is useful arithmetic for comparing annualized asking rent with median household income, not a qualification test.

Recent rent movement is nearly flat after stronger longer growth

One-year rent history was almost unchanged, while the three-year and five-year annualized measures remained positive. That pattern indicates a recent slowdown rather than continuation of the faster longer-run growth rate. Low monthly variability supports greater confidence in the current reading, but the historical maximum drawdown shows that even a stable series has experienced meaningful declines.

Renter concentration and burden coexist with reported vacancy

ACS portrays a predominantly renter-occupied housing base with substantial large-multifamily stock. More than half of renter households report housing-cost burdens at or above the standard threshold, while the survey also reports vacant-for-rent units. These statistics do not establish the availability, rent, utility treatment, or affordability of any specific apartment.

Resale evidence challenges a simple rent-price narrative

Direct Redfin ZIP resale data show a lower median sold price year over year, higher inventory, and several months of supply, despite asking rents remaining slightly positive over the latest year. Sale-to-list evidence remains near list overall, with some transactions above list. The annualized-rent-to-sold-price figure is only a cross-source screening ratio and cannot establish property economics.

  • The asking-rent index, ACS gross-rent survey, HUD bedroom standard, and Redfin resale record each cover different populations and timing conventions, so combining them as interchangeable unit-level evidence would overstate precision.
  • Recent rent growth is much slower than the longer historical measure, and the prior maximum drawdown means a stable-looking current snapshot should not be treated as proof of a persistent direction.
  • Reported vacancy and renter burden are area-level survey statistics; they do not demonstrate that a particular vacant unit is available, affordable, correctly classified, or comparable with a prospective rental.
  • The resale screening ratio omits operating expenses, taxes, financing, repairs, vacancy, transaction costs, and property-specific characteristics, making it unsuitable for conclusions about net returns or property yield.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 90025

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$996,025-20.3% year over year
Homes sold74rolling three-month observation
Median days on market45 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply5.5resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 90025Active listings238Inventory134Pending sales78Homes sold74

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

134 observed inventory · +12.9% year over year.

Price realization

99.7% average sale-to-list ratio · 34.8% sold above original list.

Early absorption

35.9% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 45 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Los Angeles County listing conditions

14,689 active Realtor.com listings · 51 median days on market · 14.4% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

5.4% reported apartment vacancy · 30 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 90025. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why is the ACS median gross rent lower than the Zillow asking-rent index?

The measures use different evidence universes. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types, while ACS median gross rent comes from a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. Existing tenants, survey timing, housing mix, and utility treatment can all differ from current advertised asking rents.

Are the bedroom figures observed rents for studio through four-bedroom units?

No. They are modelled monthly ZIP estimates created by scaling the all-type ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. They provide a consistent size-based orientation, but they are not measured bedroom rents, active-listing medians, executed lease prices, or evidence of the terms for an individual unit.

What does the rent-history record say about confidence in the current rent reading?

The complete history and low monthly variability make the current index more interpretable than a sparse or highly erratic series. However, the one-year change is much weaker than the three-year and five-year measures, and the past drawdown confirms that stable growth classifications do not eliminate historical downside.

What can the Redfin data establish, and what can it not establish?

Redfin establishes direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale conditions, including sold price, transaction count, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list signals. It does not measure rental transactions, lease terms, property operating expenses, or landlord cash flow. Its rent-to-price calculation is a cross-source screen rather than a return measure.