Counties / Connecticut / Naugatuck Valley Planning Region

Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT

FIPS 09140 · population 454,969 · outside every metro area

$318k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$318k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$1,330
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,788
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulative+64.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVIperiod n/an/aFHFA HPI2025+6.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$318k
Surveyed gross rent$1,330
Rent burden 30%+53.5%
Median year built1969
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
6.5%vacant
192,551estimated housing units
Occupied tenure31.4% renter
owner 68.5%renter 31.4%
Structure mix66.6% single-family
Single-family 66.6%20+ units 6.4%Mobile home 0.8%Other 26.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs159,707▼ 0.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments13,674annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,401▲ 1.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services26.3% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.3%WEEKLY WAGE+1.7%Education and health services26.3%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

The central tension in Naugatuck Valley Planning Region is strong historical index appreciation against softer later MLS asking-price evidence. Cash-flow buyers should investigate only with property-level rents and expenses; buyers relying on continued price momentum should be cautious. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI increased 6.41% year over year and 64.87% cumulatively over five years. That index tracks repeat transactions, not a home value, and must not be averaged with the separate Realtor.com observation.

02Housing economics

In Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS market evidence, median listing price fell 2.31% year over year, and 11.03% of listings had price reductions. These are asking-price and seller-concession signals, not closed-sale evidence; active listings measure only visible supply. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not market or asking rent. ACS owner-occupied values and occupied-unit gross rents are separate survey contexts, not current asking measures, and cannot be paired into yield. The 1.88% effective property-tax rate is a carrying cost that must be applied at the parcel level.

03Demand & competition

Buyer competition is visible but qualified: the 130.76% pending-to-active ratio compares pending listings with active listings and is not proof of buyer demand by itself. Investors accounted for 396 of 4,776 purchases, or 8.29%, so non-owner participation is present but not the whole buyer base. Net migration was positive, yet arriving movers’ average AGI was $4,025 lower than departing movers’. The annual QCEW workplace record shows covered employment down 0.25%; it is neither resident employment nor an unemployment measure. Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the county’s entire economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual climate-loss ratio equals 0.17% of building value; it is not a parcel-level loss estimate. The supplied ACS vacancy, tenure, rent-burden, and housing-stock measures are descriptive survey estimates, not forecasts. Parcel-level flood maps, elevation, insurance quotes, property condition and capital needs, current rent rolls, closed-sale comparables, and debt terms are not published in the record. That absence prevents a defensible parcel NOI, debt-service coverage, flood-adjusted carrying-cost, or exit-price conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Naugatuck Valley Planning Region

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Waterbury city114.9KBristol city61.5KShelton city41.9KNaugatuck borough31.8KAnsonia city19KDerby city12.5KOakville CDP9.3KCheshire Village CDP6.2K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

14 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Waterbury cityIncorporated place
    114,869
  2. 02
    Bristol cityIncorporated place
    61,462
  3. 03
    Shelton cityIncorporated place
    41,889
  4. 04
    Naugatuck boroughIncorporated place
    31,800
  5. 05
    Ansonia cityIncorporated place
    19,033
  6. 06
    Derby cityIncorporated place
    12,487
  7. 07
    Oakville CDPCensus-designated place
    9,276
  8. 08
    Cheshire Village CDPCensus-designated place
    6,172
  9. 09
    Terryville CDPCensus-designated place
    5,461
  10. 10
    Heritage Village CDPCensus-designated place
    4,968
  11. 11
    Watertown CDPCensus-designated place
    3,897
  12. 12
    Bethlehem Village CDPCensus-designated place
    2,195
Show 2 more places
  1. 13
    Thomaston CDPCensus-designated place
    1,988
  2. 14
    Woodbury Center CDPCensus-designated place
    1,606

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.168% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.88%

$5,983 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+315

11,370 in · 11,055 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$4,025

$65,896 arriving · $69,921 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.3%

396 of 4,776 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings675▲ 1.5% year over year
Median days on market32▼ 19.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced11.0%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Current market rent, rent-roll, and operating-cost gaps could overturn the cash-flow thesis once property evidence is available.
  2. Inland-flood exposure could require insurance and capital spending beyond the county-level modeled loss signal.
  3. MLS asking-price softness, lower incoming mover income, and falling covered workplace employment may not support a durable buyer-competition thesis.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent cannot substitute for it.

Does the record show investor participation?

Yes. It reports investor purchases as a share of total purchases.

What is the dominant climate hazard?

Inland flood; the record supplies a county-level modeled building-loss ratio.