Counties / Connecticut / Naugatuck Valley Planning Region

Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT

FIPS 09140 · population 454,969 · outside every metro area

$318k
ACS owner-reported value · ACS 2024 5-year
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT?

Zillow does not publish a county rent index here. The direct county answer is therefore the Census ACS median gross rent of $1,330 per month in ACS 2024 5-year. It describes occupied renter homes and is not current asking rent.

County Zillow ZORIn/aNot published for this county
County ACS gross rent$1,330ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,788FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Naugatuck Valley Planning Region
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,246Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,445Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,788Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$2,210Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,864Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CTHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.ACS pulled 2026-07-30 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

ACS owner-reported value
$318k
survey estimate; not a current listing or sale price
Census ACS · surveyed
ACS median gross rent
$1,330
occupied-unit survey; not current asking rent
Census ACS · surveyed
Gross yield
n/a
gross yield cannot be computed without measured market rent
requires both measured price and measured rent
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,788
the Section 8 payment standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

One annual series is unavailable
FHFA five-year cumulative+64.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVIperiod n/an/aFHFA HPI2025+6.4%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$318k
Surveyed gross rent$1,330
Rent burden 30%+53.5%
Median year built1969
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
6.5%vacant
192,551estimated housing units
Occupied tenure31.4% renter
owner 68.5%renter 31.4%
Structure mix66.6% single-family
Single-family 66.6%20+ units 6.4%Mobile home 0.8%Other 26.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs159,707▼ 0.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments13,674annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,401▲ 1.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorEducation and health services26.3% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.3%WEEKLY WAGE+1.7%Education and health services26.3%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Naugatuck Valley Planning RegionFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI18,75073.4% burdened30–50% HAMFI11,08574.2% burdened50–80% HAMFI12,09534.4% burdened80–100% HAMFI5,6806.3% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI11,0352.2% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

The central tension in Naugatuck Valley Planning Region is strong historical index appreciation against softer later MLS asking-price evidence. Cash-flow buyers should investigate only with property-level rents and expenses; buyers relying on continued price momentum should be cautious. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI increased 6.41% year over year and 64.87% cumulatively over five years. That index tracks repeat transactions, not a home value, and must not be averaged with the separate Realtor.com observation.

02Housing economics

In Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS market evidence, median listing price fell 2.31% year over year, and 11.03% of listings had price reductions. These are asking-price and seller-concession signals, not closed-sale evidence; active listings measure only visible supply. Market rent is not published, so gross yield cannot be computed. HUD Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not market or asking rent. ACS owner-occupied values and occupied-unit gross rents are separate survey contexts, not current asking measures, and cannot be paired into yield. The 1.88% effective property-tax rate is a carrying cost that must be applied at the parcel level.

03Demand & competition

Buyer competition is visible but qualified: the 130.76% pending-to-active ratio compares pending listings with active listings and is not proof of buyer demand by itself. Investors accounted for 396 of 4,776 purchases, or 8.29%, so non-owner participation is present but not the whole buyer base. Net migration was positive, yet arriving movers’ average AGI was $4,025 lower than departing movers’. The annual QCEW workplace record shows covered employment down 0.25%; it is neither resident employment nor an unemployment measure. Education and health services is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the county’s entire economy.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the modeled annual climate-loss ratio equals 0.17% of building value; it is not a parcel-level loss estimate. The supplied ACS vacancy, tenure, rent-burden, and housing-stock measures are descriptive survey estimates, not forecasts. Parcel-level flood maps, elevation, insurance quotes, property condition and capital needs, current rent rolls, closed-sale comparables, and debt terms are not published in the record. That absence prevents a defensible parcel NOI, debt-service coverage, flood-adjusted carrying-cost, or exit-price conclusion.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, CT

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,377$2,614Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$1,237highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range35.8%65.9%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered47,185across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.06410$2,61406484$2,55706418$2,03106770$2,00506401$1,88306483$1,78106010$1,67906705$1,60706708$1,59206704$1,52106710$1,41506706$1,377
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.68.4%59.6%50.9%42.1%33.3%060100670406705067080677006484067060640106710064180648306410Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.06410+155.6%06484+143.0%06418+113.6%06770+112.1%06401+105.3%06483+99.6%06705+89.9%06010+89.3%06708+89.0%06704+85.1%06710+79.1%06706+77.0%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches assigned to Naugatuck Valley Planning Region, Zillow’s June ZORI—the typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,377 to $2,614. That is a $1,237 spread around a $1,730 median, making a single local rent figure a weak search guide. The practical decision is whether a household’s budget can accommodate the upper observed-rent tier, or whether it should prioritize lower-index ZIPs while testing availability and lease terms unit by unit. These matches cover 47,185 renter households, enough to show meaningful variation but not to stand in for all rental choices.

Do not turn the rent measures into a single ranking. In 06706, Zillow’s June index is $1,377 against a $1,788 HUD two-bedroom FMR, or 77.0% of that administrative standard; in 06410, the $2,614 index is 155.6% of its $1,680 FMR. FMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard, not an asking-rent quote, and Zillow’s index is not a promised unit price. Separately, ACS five-year ZCTA median gross rent, a survey estimate, ranges from $1,128 to $1,741 among the shown areas. Where annual ZORI change is reported, 06770 is up 7.6% and 06704 is down 1.7%; unavailable readings preclude a complete ZIP-by-ZIP trend comparison.

Burden and vacancy add different signals rather than confirming a deal. The county ACS five-year estimate puts 53.5% of renter households at 30% or more of income spent on gross rent; the shown ZCTA estimates span 35.8% to 65.9%. At 06710, that upper-end burden estimate coincides with the largest shown vacancy rate, 13.7%. Conversely, 06483 has the lowest vacancy rate, 2.6%, while its burden estimate is 44.6%. Vacancy is a survey measure, not a listing count, so neither pattern proves that a particular price point is available or affordable to a specific household. Use the pairings to set search priorities: lower observed rent may still coexist with high burden, and any vacancy reading needs property-level availability checks.

Geography constrains the reading. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, and ZIPs can cross county lines. Display assignment uses each ZIP’s largest HUD residential-address county share; the selected set contains 12 of 13 eligible direct-ZORI matches and is explicitly not an exhaustive county inventory. Before acting on any pattern, verify the property’s precise address and county assignment, advertised rent and included utilities, bedroom count, deposits and recurring fees, lease length, income or program rules, current availability, and whether the listing terms match the household’s budget. Those checks are necessary because index, survey, and administrative measures describe different constructs rather than a specific vacant unit.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

13 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
06010$1,679$1,342$1,88051.1%7.1%$67k100.0%
06704$1,521$1,258$1,78854.6%7.1%$61k100.0%
06705$1,607$1,261$1,78856.2%8.6%$64k100.0%
06708$1,592$1,313$1,78848.6%7.9%$64k100.0%
06770$2,005$1,369$1,78838.8%3.8%$80k100.0%
06484$2,557$1,741$1,78850.7%4.9%$102k99.8%
06706$1,377$1,269$1,78844.6%8.3%$55k100.0%
06401$1,883$1,476$1,78837.7%9.0%$75k99.9%
06710$1,415$1,128$1,78865.9%13.7%$57k100.0%
06418$2,031$1,452$1,78852.6%5.2%$81k100.0%
06483$1,781$1,608$1,78844.6%2.6%$71k100.0%
06410$2,614$1,386$1,68035.8%4.3%$105k99.7%
READ BEFORE USING

Census county and ZCTA figures are ACS five-year survey estimates, while ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs. They are not contemporaneous listing data or exact delivery-ZIP boundaries.

ZIPs can cross county lines, and display assignment uses the county with the largest HUD residential-address share. The selected direct-evidence set is not exhaustive, so every property requires address, availability, rent, and lease-term verification.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Naugatuck Valley Planning Region

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Waterbury city114.9KBristol city61.5KShelton city41.9KNaugatuck borough31.8KAnsonia city19KDerby city12.5KOakville CDP9.3KCheshire Village CDP6.2K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

14 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Waterbury cityIncorporated place
    114,869
  2. 02
    Bristol cityIncorporated place
    61,462
  3. 03
    Shelton cityIncorporated place
    41,889
  4. 04
    Naugatuck boroughIncorporated place
    31,800
  5. 05
    Ansonia cityIncorporated place
    19,033
  6. 06
    Derby cityIncorporated place
    12,487
  7. 07
    Oakville CDPCensus-designated place
    9,276
  8. 08
    Cheshire Village CDPCensus-designated place
    6,172
  9. 09
    Terryville CDPCensus-designated place
    5,461
  10. 10
    Heritage Village CDPCensus-designated place
    4,968
  11. 11
    Watertown CDPCensus-designated place
    3,897
  12. 12
    Bethlehem Village CDPCensus-designated place
    2,195
Show 2 more places
  1. 13
    Thomaston CDPCensus-designated place
    1,988
  2. 14
    Woodbury Center CDPCensus-designated place
    1,606

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.168% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.88%

$5,983 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+315

11,370 in · 11,055 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$4,025

$65,896 arriving · $69,921 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.3%

396 of 4,776 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings675▲ 1.5% year over year
Median days on market32▼ 19.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced11.0%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 2.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

No rent index is published for this county.Zillow’s county rent series does not cover every county, and estimating one from a neighbouring county would be a guess wearing a number’s clothes. Everything above is measured here; no wider market is mapped for it either.
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Current market rent, rent-roll, and operating-cost gaps could overturn the cash-flow thesis once property evidence is available.
  2. Inland-flood exposure could require insurance and capital spending beyond the county-level modeled loss signal.
  3. MLS asking-price softness, lower incoming mover income, and falling covered workplace employment may not support a durable buyer-competition thesis.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from this record?

No. Market rent is not published, and HUD Fair Market Rent cannot substitute for it.

Does the record show investor participation?

Yes. It reports investor purchases as a share of total purchases.

What is the dominant climate hazard?

Inland flood; the record supplies a county-level modeled building-loss ratio.