Counties / Texas / Navarro County

Navarro County, TX

FIPS 48349 · population 54,711 · part of Corsicana, TX

$233k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Navarro County, TX?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,241 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,2412026-06 · up 4.0% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,076ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,055FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Navarro County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$775Navarro County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$863Navarro County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,055Navarro County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,467Navarro County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,552Navarro County, TXHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$233k
▲ 0.9% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,241
▲ 4.0% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.4%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,055
market rent is 1.18x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+64.0%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+0.9%FHFA HPI2025−0.2%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$173k
Surveyed gross rent$1,076
Rent burden 30%+46.3%
Median year built1983
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
14.2%vacant
22,191estimated housing units
Occupied tenure30.6% renter
owner 69.4%renter 30.6%
Structure mix69.8% single-family
Single-family 69.8%20+ units 2.4%Mobile home 18.6%Other 9.2%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs16,804▲ 2.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,019annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$989▲ 2.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities25.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+2.1%WEEKLY WAGE+2.4%Trade, transportation, and utilities25.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Navarro CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$25k$50k196919972024$3k$49k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Navarro CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI1,22056.1% burdened30–50% HAMFI1,18565.0% burdened50–80% HAMFI1,11564.1% burdened80–100% HAMFI45013.3% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI1,8356.0% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Navarro County presents a cash-flow-versus-price-confirmation tension. In Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation, median home value was $233,251, up 0.89%, while median asking rent was $1,241 per month, up 3.96%; the supplied gross yield is 6.38% before costs. That makes the county worth closer work for operators testing income but requires caution from buyers relying on appreciation. FHFA’s 2025 annual repeat-transaction HPI fell 0.22%, challenging Zillow’s direction. The HPI is not a home value, and its distinct vintage and method cannot be averaged with Zillow.

02Housing economics

The rent/yield case rests on measured market asking rent, not HUD. HUD’s $1,055 FMR is a payment standard rather than an asking-rent estimate, so it must not substitute for market rent or yield. The record’s rent-to-FMR comparison is above that standard, but does not establish achievable rent. The effective property-tax rate is 1.20%, which must be underwritten separately because the reported yield is gross before taxes and other costs.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s MLS listing market has 236 active listings, unchanged median marketing time, and 18.60% of listings reduced. These are visible asking-side supply and seller-concession evidence, not closed sales or independent proof of buyer demand; the pending-to-active ratio is only a current listing-conversion measure. Annual QCEW reports 16,804 covered jobs at county workplaces, up 2.08%, not resident employment or unemployment. Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Net migration was 276 tax-return households, and incoming movers’ average income exceeded outgoing movers’ by $5,671. The record reports 52 investor purchases among 613 total purchases, a reported 8.48% investor share.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard. The modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.09%, a county-level model rather than parcel exposure or insurance cost. Together with property tax and operating costs, it tempers the gross-yield reading but does not quantify any property’s loss. Closed-sale prices, unit-level rents and vacancy, operating expenses, flood-zone determinations, insurance quotes, and financing terms are not published. Those omissions prevent confirmation of exit values, net operating income, parcel-specific hazard carrying costs, and leverage sensitivity.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Navarro County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Corsicana city25.5KKerens city1.8KDawson town1.3KRice city1.2KFrost city968Retreat town707Blooming Grove town658Angus city475
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

19 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Corsicana cityIncorporated place
    25,511
  2. 02
    Kerens cityIncorporated place
    1,778
  3. 03
    Dawson townIncorporated place
    1,322
  4. 04
    Rice cityIncorporated place
    1,241
  5. 05
    Frost cityIncorporated place
    968
  6. 06
    Retreat townIncorporated place
    707
  7. 07
    Blooming Grove townIncorporated place
    658
  8. 08
    Angus cityIncorporated place
    475
  9. 09
    Oak Valley townIncorporated place
    364
  10. 10
    Richland townIncorporated place
    353
  11. 11
    Mildred townIncorporated place
    312
  12. 12
    Eureka cityIncorporated place
    310
Show 7 more places
  1. 13
    Navarro townIncorporated place
    288
  2. 14
    Barry cityIncorporated place
    236
  3. 15
    Streetman townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    220
  4. 16
    Goodlow cityIncorporated place
    211
  5. 17
    Emhouse townIncorporated place
    142
  6. 18
    Powell townIncorporated place
    104
  7. 19
    Mustang townIncorporated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.091% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.20%

$2,075 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+276

1,580 in · 1,304 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$5,671

$61,425 arriving · $55,754 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors8.5%

52 of 613 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings236▼ 4.1% year over year
Median days on market69▲ 0.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced18.6%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 4.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Asking-side listing softness may not match closed-sale pricing or resale liquidity.
  2. Property-specific inland-flood exposure and insurance costs could reduce economics beyond the county model.
  3. Countywide workplace, migration, and investor data may not describe tenant or buyer depth for the subject neighborhood.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Can gross yield be calculated from market rent in this record?

Yes. A market asking rent and a reported gross yield are published; the yield is before taxes and other costs.

Do Zillow and FHFA establish the same appreciation period?

No. Their supplied observation labels differ, and FHFA is a repeat-transaction index rather than a home-value estimate.

What buyer-competition evidence is available?

The record reports MLS active listings, price reductions, a pending-to-active measure, net migration, and investor purchase participation; none alone proves buyer demand.