Counties / Arkansas / Pulaski County

Pulaski County, AR

FIPS 05119 · population 399,818 · part of Little Rock, AR

$213k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$213k
▲ 4.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,198
▲ 2.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
6.8%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,147
market rent is 1.04x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+38.9%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+4.1%FHFA HPI2025+1.1%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$215k
Surveyed gross rent$1,080
Rent burden 30%+47.9%
Median year built1981
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
10.9%vacant
193,408estimated housing units
Occupied tenure43.0% renter
owner 57.0%renter 43.0%
Structure mix65.8% single-family
Single-family 65.8%20+ units 9.8%Mobile home 4.9%Other 19.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs262,695▲ 0.4% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments14,715annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,263▲ 3.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities27.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.4%WEEKLY WAGE+3.4%Trade, transportation, and utilities27.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Pulaski County presents a qualified income case, not a clean growth case. The Zillow 2026-06 observation puts the median home value at $212,861; price growth was 4.07%. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 1.10%, a different vintage and measure, not a dollar valuation. This gap requires reconciliation, not averaging. County-level appreciation evidence therefore merits caution for anyone underwriting growth or using Pulaski as a Little Rock metro proxy.

02Housing economics

Median asking market rent is $1,198 per month, and the supplied gross yield is 6.75% before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is $1,147, a payment standard rather than asking-rent evidence; the supplied ratio calculates to a 4.40% market-rent premium. Rent grew more slowly than the cited home-value measure. The 0.77% effective property-tax rate is a recurring cost that reduces NOI. Missing property-level vacancy, insurance, repairs, management, and financing prevent a net-return conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Demand and competition are mixed. Tax-return flows show more households leaving than arriving, while average AGI was higher among out-movers; that is a demand caution but not a renter-turnover measure. QCEW covered jobs and wages increased, but this workplace evidence is not resident employment; Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Realtor.com shows active listings up 5.18% and 20.49% price-reduced listings: visible supply and concessions, not closed-sale demand. The record counts 975 investor purchases among 4,625 total purchases, indicating material nonoccupant competition without proving price-setting power.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard; modeled annual building loss is 0.20%. Obtain parcel flood-zone, elevation, claims, drainage, and insurance evidence before applying that county average to a property. The record lacks lease-level rent comps, vacancy, operating expenses, capital needs, financing terms, closed-sale data, and resident labor measures. Those gaps allow the supplied gross yield to be reported, but not achievable rent, NOI, cash-on-cash return, or resale liquidity to be validated. Next checks should focus on the property file, flood and insurance underwriting, and comparable leases and sales.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Pulaski County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Little Rock city203.4KNorth Little Rock city64.5KSherwood city33.1KJacksonville city29.2KMaumelle city19.4KGibson CDP4.2KLandmark CDP3.9KAlexander city*3.6K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

18 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Little Rock cityIncorporated place
    203,436
  2. 02
    North Little Rock cityIncorporated place
    64,538
  3. 03
    Sherwood cityIncorporated place
    33,070
  4. 04
    Jacksonville cityIncorporated place
    29,221
  5. 05
    Maumelle cityIncorporated place
    19,373
  6. 06
    Gibson CDPCensus-designated place
    4,167
  7. 07
    Landmark CDPCensus-designated place
    3,948
  8. 08
    Alexander cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    3,587
  9. 09
    Wrightsville cityIncorporated place
    1,484
  10. 10
    Roland CDPCensus-designated place
    1,147
  11. 11
    McAlmont CDPCensus-designated place
    1,088
  12. 12
    Sweet Home CDPCensus-designated place
    939
Show 6 more places
  1. 13
    Cammack Village cityIncorporated place
    797
  2. 14
    Natural Steps CDPCensus-designated place
    683
  3. 15
    Woodson CDPCensus-designated place
    619
  4. 16
    College Station CDPCensus-designated place
    258
  5. 17
    Scott CDPCensus-designated place · spans 2 counties
    46
  6. 18
    Hensley CDPCensus-designated place
    26

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.198% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.77%

$1,642 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-279

10,000 in · 10,279 out

Arriving vs leaving income−$7,854

$53,946 arriving · $61,800 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors21.1%

975 of 4,625 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,462▲ 5.2% year over year
Median days on market52▲ 4.0% year over year
Listings price-reduced20.5%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 0.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Little Rock, AR

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Pulaski County399,818$213k$1,1986.8%inland flooding
Faulkner County127,717$259k$1,4086.5%inland flooding
Saline County127,479$257k$1,5477.2%inland flooding
Lonoke County75,272$232k$1,3827.1%inland flooding
Grant County18,242$222kn/an/ainland flooding
Perry County10,101$188kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Asking-rent evidence and missing operating costs could make the gross yield materially overstate net returns.
  2. Out-migration and higher average income among out-movers could weaken tenant or resale demand.
  3. Inland-flood exposure and absent property-level insurance and mitigation evidence could make county averages non-transferable.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Does the record distinguish market rent from HUD FMR?

Yes. Market rent is published as median asking rent, while HUD FMR is a two-bedroom payment standard and not an asking-rent estimate.

What does the migration evidence show?

More households moved out than in, and average AGI was higher among out-movers.

What is the dominant hazard and what property-level evidence is missing?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard. The record does not publish parcel-level flood, insurance, claims, elevation, drainage, or mitigation evidence.