Counties / Vermont / Rutland County

Rutland County, VT

FIPS 50021 · population 60,425 · part of Rutland, VT

$320k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$320k
▲ 3.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,466
n/a year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.5%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,345
market rent is 1.09x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+66.6%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+3.8%FHFA HPI2025+0.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$229k
Surveyed gross rent$1,000
Rent burden 30%+50.2%
Median year built1969
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
25.5%vacant
33,991estimated housing units
Occupied tenure24.9% renter
owner 75.1%renter 24.9%
Structure mix70.1% single-family
Single-family 70.1%20+ units 3.5%Mobile home 5.6%Other 20.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs25,304▼ 0.0% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments2,727annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,180▲ 4.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities23.4% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.0%WEEKLY WAGE+4.4%Trade, transportation, and utilities23.4%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Rutland County’s underwriting tension is a rising Zillow value signal against essentially flat repeat-sale appreciation. Zillow’s June 2026 median home value was $320,156, up 3.78% year over year; FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.02%. The HPI is an index, not a dollar home value, and the differently dated, differently constructed series cannot be averaged. Buyers relying on recent appreciation should investigate recent closed comps and condition-adjusted values; income-focused buyers should first test costs against verified rent.

02Housing economics

Median asking market rent was $1,466 per month and the supplied gross yield was 5.49% before costs. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR of $1,345 is a payment standard, not a market-rent estimate, so it must not replace measured asking rent. The effective property-tax rate was 1.81%, creating a direct carrying-cost screen alongside the price/rent relationship. Insurance, financing, vacancy, utilities, maintenance, and capital expenditure data are not published; net yield, debt service coverage, and cash flow therefore cannot be calculated.

03Demand & competition

Demand evidence is not uniformly strong. QCEW’s annual covered employment at county workplaces declined slightly; it is neither resident employment nor an unemployment measure. Realtor.com’s active MLS inventory was 15.42% higher year over year, visible supply rather than closed-sale evidence. Tax-return migration was positive by 131 households, and average inbound mover AGI exceeded outbound AGI by $8,170, a better income mix signal than headcount alone. Investor mortgages were 69 of 512 purchases, or 13.48%; that identifies participation in financed purchases, not competition for a particular asset type.

04Risk & next checks

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and modeled annual building-value loss is 0.10%; the model is a loss ratio, not a property-specific insurance quote. Flood-zone status, elevation, insurance availability, and renewal terms need asset-level review. The county record also lacks closed-sale prices, unit-level rents, lease-up, eviction, delinquency, school, zoning, and property-condition evidence. Those gaps prevent a conclusion on achievable rent, resale liquidity, operating costs, and whether the county signals apply to the chosen submarket.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Rutland County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Rutland city15.7KFair Haven CDP2.5KWest Rutland CDP2.1KBrandon CDP1.9KProctor CDP1.6KCastleton CDP1.1KPoultney village1KPittsford CDP891
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

20 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Rutland cityIncorporated place
    15,712
  2. 02
    Fair Haven CDPCensus-designated place
    2,537
  3. 03
    West Rutland CDPCensus-designated place
    2,125
  4. 04
    Brandon CDPCensus-designated place
    1,927
  5. 05
    Proctor CDPCensus-designated place
    1,586
  6. 06
    Castleton CDPCensus-designated place
    1,052
  7. 07
    Poultney villageIncorporated place
    1,033
  8. 08
    Pittsford CDPCensus-designated place
    891
  9. 09
    Castleton Four Corners CDPCensus-designated place
    732
  10. 10
    Wallingford CDPCensus-designated place
    643
  11. 11
    Killington Village CDPCensus-designated place
    506
  12. 12
    West Pawlet CDPCensus-designated place
    368
Show 8 more places
  1. 13
    Pawlet CDPCensus-designated place
    330
  2. 14
    Wells CDPCensus-designated place
    308
  3. 15
    North Clarendon CDPCensus-designated place
    297
  4. 16
    Benson CDPCensus-designated place
    193
  5. 17
    Middletown Springs CDPCensus-designated place
    181
  6. 18
    East Poultney CDPCensus-designated place
    176
  7. 19
    Danby CDPCensus-designated place
    172
  8. 20
    Chittenden CDPCensus-designated place
    93

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.097% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.81%

$4,154 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+131

1,334 in · 1,203 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$8,170

$66,363 arriving · $58,193 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors13.5%

69 of 512 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings232▲ 15.4% year over year
Median days on market46▼ 19.2% year over year
Listings price-reduced12.4%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 1.7% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Countywide median asking rent may not match the target property’s achievable rent or operating profile.
  2. Asset-level flood exposure and insurance terms could exceed the county modeled loss indicator.
  3. County-level listing, migration, and valuation data do not establish closed-sale liquidity for a specific submarket.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is HUD Fair Market Rent the county’s market-rent measure?

No. It is a two-bedroom payment standard; the record separately reports median asking market rent.

Does the FHFA HPI represent a county home value?

No. It is a repeat-transaction appreciation index, not a dollar home value.

What does the investor measure capture?

It captures purchase mortgages to non-occupants, not competition for every property type or cash purchases.