Counties / Texas / Webb County

Webb County, TX

FIPS 48479 · population 269,294 · part of Laredo, TX

$218k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$218k
▲ 2.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,331
▼ 0.7% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
7.3%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,161
market rent is 1.15x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+41.8%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.8%FHFA HPI2025+2.5%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$190k
Surveyed gross rent$1,027
Rent burden 30%+55.1%
Median year built1997
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
7.7%vacant
88,176estimated housing units
Occupied tenure35.3% renter
owner 64.7%renter 35.3%
Structure mix70.7% single-family
Single-family 70.7%20+ units 7.2%Mobile home 8.1%Other 14.0%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs108,882▲ 1.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments5,973annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$916▲ 2.7% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities40.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+1.3%WEEKLY WAGE+2.7%Trade, transportation, and utilities40.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Webb County presents a decision tension: the supplied Zillow county measures pair a $217,973 median home value with $1,331 monthly median asking rent and a 7.33% gross yield, while rent has softened. Buyers able to validate unit-level rent, property-tax, and flood costs warrant further investigation; those requiring stable rent growth or a turnkey net-yield case warrant caution. The rent is measured market asking rent. HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate, and is not used to calculate yield.

02Housing economics

At Zillow’s 2026-06 county observation, the home-value measure increased while market asking rent fell 0.69% year over year. FHFA’s 2025 repeat-transaction HPI increased 2.50% annually; it confirms positive price-index direction but is neither a dollar home value nor the same observation window as Zillow, and the measures should not be averaged. An effective property-tax rate of 1.80% makes carrying-cost verification material; insurance, maintenance, financing, and operating expenses are not published, preventing a net-yield conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS snapshot is listing-market evidence, not closed sales: 64 median days on market and 13.68% of listings with price reductions indicate marketing time and seller concessions, but cannot alone establish buyer demand. Tax-return moves show net migration of -1,175 households, although inbound movers’ average AGI exceeds outbound movers’. Investor purchase mortgages were 129 of 2,046 purchase mortgages, or 6.30%, indicating non-owner competition is present but not dominant.

04Risk & next checks

Dominant inland-flood exposure aligns with modeled annual climate loss of 0.08% of building value; it is a model, not a parcel-level loss estimate. Request flood-zone and elevation data, claims history, insurance premiums and deductibles, property-tax bills, lease comps, and transaction-level sale comps. Those gaps prevent net-cash-flow, insurance, and resale underwriting. QCEW describes annual covered employment at county workplaces, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast, so it cannot settle local tenant-demand questions.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Webb County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Laredo city257.6KRio Bravo city4.5KEl Cenizo city2.1KLos Altos CDP1.1KPueblo Nuevo CDP511Ranchos Penitas West CDP395Ranchitos East CDP282Bruni CDP278
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

40 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Laredo cityIncorporated place
    257,619
  2. 02
    Rio Bravo cityIncorporated place
    4,491
  3. 03
    El Cenizo cityIncorporated place
    2,122
  4. 04
    Los Altos CDPCensus-designated place
    1,082
  5. 05
    Pueblo Nuevo CDPCensus-designated place
    511
  6. 06
    Ranchos Penitas West CDPCensus-designated place
    395
  7. 07
    Ranchitos East CDPCensus-designated place
    282
  8. 08
    Bruni CDPCensus-designated place
    278
  9. 09
    San Carlos II CDPCensus-designated place
    259
  10. 10
    Ranchitos Las Lomas CDPCensus-designated place
    192
  11. 11
    Los Fresnos CDPCensus-designated place
    177
  12. 12
    Tanquecitos South Acres II CDPCensus-designated place
    168
Show 28 more places
  1. 13
    Tanquecitos South Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    167
  2. 14
    La Presa CDPCensus-designated place
    163
  3. 15
    Aguilares CDPCensus-designated place
    119
  4. 16
    Oilton CDPCensus-designated place
    101
  5. 17
    Mirando City CDPCensus-designated place
    92
  6. 18
    Botines CDPCensus-designated place
    69
  7. 19
    Four Points CDPCensus-designated place
    63
  8. 20
    Colorado Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    51
  9. 21
    Los Arcos CDPCensus-designated place
    51
  10. 22
    Los Centenarios CDPCensus-designated place
    41
  11. 23
    Bonanza Hills CDPCensus-designated place
    28
  12. 24
    La Moca Ranch CDPCensus-designated place
    26
  13. 25
    Sunset Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    11
  14. 26
    Hillside Acres CDPCensus-designated place
    6
  15. 27
    La Coma CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  16. 28
    Laredo Ranchettes CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  17. 29
    Laredo Ranchettes West CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  18. 30
    Las Haciendas CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  19. 31
    Las Pilas CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  20. 32
    Los Corralitos CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  21. 33
    Los Huisaches CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  22. 34
    Los Minerales CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  23. 35
    Los Nopalitos CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  24. 36
    Los Veteranos I CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  25. 37
    Los Veteranos II CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  26. 38
    Pueblo East CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  27. 39
    San Carlos I CDPCensus-designated place
    0
  28. 40
    Valle Verde CDPCensus-designated place
    0

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.077% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax1.80%

$3,421 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration-1,175

2,182 in · 3,357 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$413

$53,687 arriving · $53,274 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors6.3%

129 of 2,046 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings567▲ 0.0% year over year
Median days on market64▲ 6.7% year over year
Listings price-reduced13.7%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 0.4% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Market asking-rent softness and unreported operating costs could erase apparent gross economics.
  2. Inland-flood exposure and unavailable parcel insurance terms could increase carrying costs.
  3. Net out-migration and seller concessions could weaken tenant or resale depth.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the reported rent a HUD payment standard?

No. The record identifies it as median asking market rent; HUD FMR is a separate payment standard.

Does the record support a net-yield conclusion?

No. It publishes gross yield but lacks insurance, maintenance, financing, and other operating costs.

What does the QCEW evidence measure?

Annual covered employment at workplaces in the county, not resident employment, unemployment, or a forecast.