Laconia, NH
Laconia merits investigation by investors who can tolerate resale softness and water-hazard exposure, but income-focused buyers needing strong immediate yield should avoid it.
Why this market scores where it does
Written from the figures on this page and then checked against them: every number below had to appear in the source record or recompute from two that did, or the text was rewritten.
Laconia merits investigation by investors who can tolerate resale softness and water-hazard exposure, but income-focused buyers needing strong immediate yield should avoid it. Median value is $520,202 against $2,003 asking rent, producing a 4.62% gross yield; that spread leaves limited room before operating costs.
The opportunity is rent momentum and a still-manageable tenant burden: asking rent rose 11.25%, while rent equals 25.91% of median household income. Employment rose 0.7%, and tax filings show net migration of 189 households. These signals support further diligence on tenant demand, although they do not establish property-level occupancy or rent durability.
The main counterweight is buyer leverage and incoming supply. Listings show 6 months of supply, a 45-day median market time, and price reductions on 22.99% of homes; permits ran at 6.62 per thousand residents. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with an annual climate loss ratio of 0.1395%, so insurance terms and site-level exposure require verification.
Frequently Asked Investor Questions
How affordable is the current asking rent to local households?
Is household migration positive or negative?
How much investor activity is recorded?
Investor Quick Takeaways
Computed from the current Zillow rent and home-value medians.
Zillow ZORI rent growth trend over trailing 12 months.
Originated investment purchase share (CFPB HMDA).
Annualized loss ratio evaluated for flood & hurricane risk.
Test the market, then test the deal
Keep Laconia as the starting point or move into a more specific property and rent check.
The current market in eight signals
Fast-moving Redfin conditions sit beside the slower fundamentals so a buyer can separate today's negotiating climate from the long-run investment case.
What each component measures
Weights are published, not hidden, and the arithmetic is shown. Five components, each measured as a national percentile across all tracked metros.
| Signal | Score | Weight | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Job growth | 72 | 30% | 21.60 |
| Rent trend | 97 | 25% | 24.25 |
| Affordability | 41 | 15% | 6.15 |
| Supply pressure | 5 | 15% | 0.75 |
| Climate risk | 52 | 15% | 7.80 |
| Published score | 61 | ||
Employment rose 0.7% -> the job backdrop is positive but modest.
Asking rent rose 11.25% while gross yield was 4.62% -> rent momentum is strong, but the starting income return is limited relative to price.
Rent equals 25.91% of median income versus a 5.61 price-to-income ratio -> renting appears more accessible than buying for the median household.
Permits ran at 6.62 per thousand residents and inventory stood at 6 months -> underwriting should not assume scarce supply.
An annual climate loss ratio of 0.1395% with inland flood as the dominant hazard -> insurance terms and parcel-level flood exposure are important diligence items.
What this market costs and what it earns
Every derived ratio below recomputes from the same source record used by the article and score.
What is being built, and for whom
Permits are the 12-to-24 month early warning. The total matters less than the mix: apartments compete with a rental the day they open.
Demand, and the competition for it
Tax filings say how many households moved and what they earn; mortgage disclosures say how many local purchases went to someone who will not live there. Moves between counties inside this metro are netted out of both flow figures.
What would make this a bad buy
Generated from the same figures with the instruction to argue against the score, and published unedited. A page that only agrees with itself is an advertisement.
Three ways the case breaks
- A 4.62% gross yield excludes operating costs and leaves a limited starting income cushion.
- Six months of supply and price reductions on 22.99% of homes indicate current seller pressure.
- Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the annual climate loss ratio is 0.1395%, leaving property-specific loss and insurance exposure to verify.
Move from the metro average to local evidence
County pages carry tax, migration, listing and hazard records. City pages appear only where direct city price, rent and Census evidence pass the publication gate.
No city in this metro has passed the current city evidence gate.
Metros that behave like Laconia
Nearest neighbours on price level, income, yield and job growth — not on geography. Every market page gets a different peer set, which is the point.
| Metro | Score | Price | Rent | Yield | Job Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laconia, NH (Target) | 61 | $520k | $2,003 | 4.6% | ▲ 0.7% |
| Mount Vernon, WA | 53 | $590k | $2,143 | 4.4% | ▲ 0.5% |
| Shelton, WA | 54 | $457k | $1,911 | 5.0% | ▲ 1.0% |
| Oak Harbor, WA | 59 | $647k | $2,052 | 3.8% | ▲ 0.8% |
| Easton, MD | 41 | $498k | $2,310 | 5.6% | ▲ 0.7% |
Where every figure came from
“Checked nightly” means every source is re-pulled and re-verified each night. It does not mean every source moves nightly — the release column tells you how fresh each number can possibly be.
| Dataset Source | Method | Release Period | Pulled Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Census ACS 5-year — household income | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-26 |
| Census ACS 5-year — population | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS CES — payroll employment | direct | CES SM current | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS LAUS — resident employment | direct | LAUS current | 2026-07-26 |
| BLS QCEW — county employment and wages | direct | annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 | 2026-07-31 |
| OMB/BLS delineation — metro geography | direct | OMB July 2023 delineation | 2026-07-30 |
| Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units | direct | BPS through 2026 | 2026-07-26 |
| Census ACS 5-year — city population, households and housing | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-29 |
| Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-30 |
| Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-30 |
| FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios | modelled | NRI counties (FEMA ArcGIS) | 2026-07-26 |
| FHFA House Price Index — annual county appreciation | direct | annual county HPI 2025 | 2026-07-28 |
| HMDA / CFPB — purchases by occupancy type | direct | HMDA 2024 purchase originations | 2026-07-26 |
| HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard | direct | FY2026 FMR | 2026-07-26 |
| HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallback | direct | ZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 | 2026-07-26 |
| IRS SOI — county migration and mover income | direct | SOI migration 2022-2023 | 2026-07-26 |
| Freddie Mac PMMS — mortgage rates | direct | week of 2026-07-23 | 2026-07-27 |
| Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax | direct | ACS 2024 5-year | 2026-07-27 |
| Realtor.com Economic Research — county listing inventory | direct | county inventory 2026-06 | 2026-07-28 |
| Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts | direct | metro tracker through 2026-05-01 | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rents | direct | county ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI — metro home values | direct | Metro_zhvi_uc_sfrcondo_tier_0.33_0.67_sm_sa_month.csv | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZHVI — city home values | direct | zillow_zhvi_city.csv | 2026-07-29 |
| Zillow ZORI — metro market rents | direct | Metro_zori_uc_sfrcondomfr_sm_sa_month.csv | 2026-07-26 |
| Zillow ZORI — city market rents | direct | zillow_zori_city.csv | 2026-07-29 |
| Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rents | direct | ZORI ZIP 2026-06 | 2026-07-26 |