Rent-minus-income gap: +62.0 pp.
Markets where rent growth outpaced household income
A fixed-endpoint comparison of asking-rent growth and nominal household-income growth from 2019 to 2024.
The leading ten, with one metric encoded.
The chart stays intentionally narrow: it shows the ordering metric, while the table and counter-signals keep the rest of the decision visible.
The median of the ten displayed leaders, not a national threshold.
The table preserves the counter-metrics needed before opening a market brief.
Top twenty qualifying market areas.
Each row links to the full metro evidence. Figures retain the units and concepts named in the column headers.
| Rank | Market area | Growth gap | Rent change | Income change | 2024 market rent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Florence, SC | +62.0 pp | 85.4% | 23.4% | $1.2k |
| #2 | Barnstable Town, MA | +56.2 pp | 84.3% | 28.1% | $2.6k |
| #3 | Torrington, CT | +51.4 pp | 68.4% | 17.1% | $1.8k |
| #4 | Binghamton, NY | +40.9 pp | 59.9% | 19.0% | $1.2k |
| #5 | Hinesville, GA | +37.1 pp | 60.1% | 23.0% | $1.6k |
| #6 | Bloomington, IL | +36.8 pp | 54.9% | 18.1% | $1.3k |
| #7 | Norwich, CT | +35.5 pp | 53.4% | 17.8% | $1.8k |
| #8 | Heber, UT | +33.7 pp | 67.6% | 33.9% | $3.1k |
| #9 | Kokomo, IN | +31.8 pp | 54.0% | 22.3% | $938 |
| #10 | Augusta, ME | +31.1 pp | 55.9% | 24.8% | $1.4k |
| #11 | Atlantic City, NJ | +31.1 pp | 63.3% | 32.2% | $1.9k |
| #12 | Naples, FL | +30.8 pp | 60.1% | 29.3% | $2.7k |
| #13 | Johnson City, TN | +28.7 pp | 58.7% | 30.0% | $1.4k |
| #14 | Knoxville, TN | +28.5 pp | 61.1% | 32.6% | $1.7k |
| #15 | State College, PA | +28.5 pp | 51.5% | 23.0% | $1.6k |
| #16 | Lafayette, IN | +27.2 pp | 43.5% | 16.3% | $1.3k |
| #17 | Lawton, OK | +26.7 pp | 43.2% | 16.5% | $1k |
| #18 | South Bend, IN | +26.5 pp | 52.6% | 26.1% | $1.2k |
| #19 | Sebastian, FL | +26.4 pp | 60.7% | 34.3% | $2.1k |
| #20 | Fayetteville, NC | +26.4 pp | 53.8% | 27.5% | $1.4k |
What this order means—and what it does not.
This is a repeatable screening order, not an investment recommendation, forecast or property-level estimate.
Inclusion and ordering rule: Include every current RentMarker metro with direct Zillow ZORI annual averages for 2019 and 2024 plus direct ACS five-year median household income estimates for the 2019 and 2024 vintages. Rank by rent change minus nominal income change, highest first.
How it is calculated
- Cumulative rent change divides the 2024 Zillow ZORI annual average by its 2019 annual average and subtracts one.
- Cumulative nominal income change divides the ACS 2024 five-year median household income estimate by the ACS 2019 five-year estimate and subtracts one.
- Growth gap subtracts income change from rent change; it is a descriptive percentage-point difference, not a renter-specific budget change.
Counter-signals to carry
- Median household income covers all households, not only renters or recent movers.
- A metro with income keeping pace can still have a high current rent burden or unequal gains across households.
- Supply, jobs, migration and unit mix can move differently from this two-endpoint comparison.
Limits before use
- ACS five-year estimates summarize multi-year survey periods and are not synchronized annual income observations.
- Both changes are nominal; inflation is not removed and the result is not real purchasing-power growth.
- ZORI is a market asking-rent index, not the rent paid by the same households represented in ACS.
Named releases behind this ranking.
Release period and pull date remain attached so a later refresh can reproduce a different order honestly.
Move from a market screen to a property test.
Open the market evidence first, then replace market-wide typicals with the candidate property’s actual price, rent and operating assumptions.