The Minneapolis-to-Phoenix decision pairs apparent rent parity with a more demanding destination ownership and risk screen. In the IRS SOI 2022–2023 release, 1,574 tax-return households moved from Minneapolis to Phoenix. That corridor represented 3.16% of Minneapolis outbound returns and 1.67% of Phoenix inbound returns. IRS flow means tax-return households. It does not identify renters, every mover or future demand. The count documents a filing-household corridor, not a renter-demand forecast.
For the household, Zillow ZORI at 2026-06-30 put Minneapolis at $1,727 a month and Phoenix at $1,733, a difference of $6. The near tie in this market-rent observation is not the whole housing-cost picture. HUD’s FY2026 two-bedroom Fair Market Rent standard is $130 higher in Phoenix; that is an administrative standard, not a Zillow market-rent observation. ACS 2024 five-year median household income is also lower in Phoenix. A mover should compare the exact unit, insurance, utilities, commuting and taxes rather than treat the headline rent gap as a complete budget.
For rental-property underwriting, Phoenix’s ZHVI at 2026-06-30—a metro Zillow home-value benchmark—was $51,328 higher than Minneapolis’s, while the gross-yield screen was 4.65% there versus 5.24% in Minneapolis. FEMA’s NRI counties release also places Phoenix at the higher modeled climate/hazard loss ratio. These are mixed market-level conditions, not a return projection or property valuation. The next underwriting question is whether property-specific rent, taxes, insurance, maintenance, concessions and capital work still show an acceptable cash-flow margin at the actual contract price.

