Which local occupation groups can carry current asking rent?
Across major occupation groups, where does one published median annual wage place current metro asking rent at or below 30 percent?
A metro-wide household income can conceal the labor mix behind rental demand. This study keeps each BLS major occupation group separate, then asks how many group medians clear one transparent rent-to-wage rule.
- Direct metros
- 378 exact BLS metropolitan code matches
- Broad wage support
- 9 at least 75% of major groups clear the screen
- Median group support
- 36.4% unweighted across included metros
- Median rent / wage
- 34.8% annual rent divided by annual median wage
One metro rent can sit very differently against its local wage distribution
The exact BLS–RentMarker intersection contains 378 metropolitan areas with at least 20 published major-group annual median wages. Across the median metro, 36.4% of those groups place annualized asking rent at or below 30% of one annual median wage. Only 9 metros clear that screen for at least three quarters of their published major groups.
Weirton, WV has the lowest median rent-to-wage share in this ordering at 18.5%; 86.4% of its published major groups clear the screen. That does not make it a universal affordability winner: the screen uses one occupational wage and omits household structure, taxes, utilities and unit choice.
OEWS describes wage-and-salary jobs, not households. The self-employed are outside its scope, and a modeled occupational median is not a pay offer.
BLS combines six survey panels over three years and may suppress employment or wage fields. Zillow ZORI is a separately dated asking-rent measure, so both periods stay visible rather than being presented as synchronized. Use the occupation explorer to hold one major group constant across metros or inspect the largest published groups inside one labor market.
How broadly do major occupations support current asking rent?
Farther right means more major groups clear the 30% one-wage screen; lower means a smaller median rent-to-wage share.
The first 24 rows, with a path to the underlying market
| Rank | Metro | Groups with wages | Groups at ≤30% | Support share | Median rent / wage | Largest group | Largest-group wage | Open |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weirton, WVBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 19 | 86.4% | 18.5% | Transportation and Material Moving Occupations | $44,290 | Compare occupations |
| 2 | Mansfield, OHBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 16 | 72.7% | 21.1% | Production Occupations | $43,850 | Compare occupations |
| 3 | Kokomo, INBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 21 | 15 | 71.4% | 21.2% | Production Occupations | $75,930 | Compare occupations |
| 4 | Johnstown, PABLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 18 | 81.8% | 21.8% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $40,950 | Compare occupations |
| 5 | Sheboygan, WIBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 16 | 72.7% | 22.1% | Production Occupations | $51,850 | Compare occupations |
| 6 | Waterloo, IABLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 17 | 77.3% | 22.5% | Production Occupations | $50,030 | Compare occupations |
| 7 | Decatur, ILBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 17 | 77.3% | 22.5% | Production Occupations | $57,700 | Compare occupations |
| 8 | Wheeling, WVBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 16 | 72.7% | 22.8% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $39,530 | Compare occupations |
| 9 | Ames, IABLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 17 | 77.3% | 23.1% | Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations | $30,020 | Compare occupations |
| 10 | Grand Forks, NDBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 15 | 68.2% | 23.2% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $47,630 | Compare occupations |
| 11 | Oshkosh, WIBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 15 | 68.2% | 23.6% | Production Occupations | $57,000 | Compare occupations |
| 12 | Terre Haute, INBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 17 | 77.3% | 23.7% | Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations | $27,680 | Compare occupations |
| 13 | Muncie, INBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 20 | 14 | 70.0% | 23.8% | Food Preparation and Serving Related Occupations | $28,110 | Compare occupations |
| 14 | Green Bay, WIBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 15 | 68.2% | 24.0% | Production Occupations | $48,010 | Compare occupations |
| 15 | Davenport, IABLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 17 | 77.3% | 24.1% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $45,110 | Compare occupations |
| 16 | Cape Girardeau, MOBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 16 | 72.7% | 24.1% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $39,440 | Compare occupations |
| 17 | Wausau, WIBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 16 | 72.7% | 24.2% | Production Occupations | $48,330 | Compare occupations |
| 18 | Fond du Lac, WIBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 14 | 63.6% | 24.3% | Production Occupations | $51,200 | Compare occupations |
| 19 | Battle Creek, MIBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 15 | 68.2% | 24.3% | Production Occupations | $48,500 | Compare occupations |
| 20 | Saginaw, MIBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 14 | 63.6% | 24.4% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $42,350 | Compare occupations |
| 21 | Elmira, NYBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 21 | 14 | 66.7% | 24.5% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $45,120 | Compare occupations |
| 22 | Longview, WABLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 14 | 63.6% | 24.9% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $53,990 | Compare occupations |
| 23 | Jackson, MIBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 21 | 14 | 66.7% | 25.2% | Production Occupations | $46,570 | Compare occupations |
| 24 | Fargo, NDBLS 2025-05 · rent 2026-06-30 | 22 | 17 | 77.3% | 25.3% | Office and Administrative Support Occupations | $47,490 | Compare occupations |
The visible table is intentionally limited for reading. The CSV contains every row that passes the printed inclusion rule.
Inclusion first, interpretation second.
Include every current metropolitan statistical area whose exact OMB 23-01 CBSA code has a direct May 2025 OEWS all-occupations record, at least 20 major groups with published annual median wages and a current Zillow ZORI value. Micropolitan and OEWS nonmetropolitan areas do not enter.
Methodology version: v10Method
- Annualized asking rent is current monthly Zillow ZORI multiplied by 12; each occupation-group ratio divides that amount by the group's direct OEWS annual median wage.
- A group clears the descriptive support rule when annualized rent is at or below 30 percent of its median annual wage. The published group count remains the denominator; suppressed wages stay out rather than being estimated.
- Markets are ordered by the median rent-to-wage ratio across their available major groups. Employment counts, jobs per 1,000 and location quotients remain separate direct context, and no score is created.
Counter-signals
- One worker's median wage is not household income: renters may have multiple earners, part-time work, transfers, debt or other resources and obligations.
- A strong wage ratio for a small occupation does not describe the typical local worker; the largest employment group and its published share remain visible.
- Current asking rent and May 2025 occupational wages have different reference periods, so the ratio is a named cross-source screen rather than a synchronized affordability estimate.
Limitations
- OEWS covers wage-and-salary workers in nonfarm establishments and excludes the self-employed, most agriculture, private households and unpaid family workers.
- May 2025 estimates combine six survey panels collected over three years and use model-based estimation; employment counts are rounded and some employment or wage values are suppressed.
- ZORI describes a typical metro asking rent across available units, not the rent paid by workers in a particular occupation, household type, bedroom count or neighborhood.
Every input release used by this study
Release and retrieval dates stay visible so a reader can tell whether two measures describe the same moment.