States / Louisiana
State rental intelligence

Louisiana rental market data

A source-traced view across 13 metro markets and 64 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

10/13 metros scored64/64 counties with FEMA risk14 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro43.5out of 100 · 10 measured metros
Louisiana identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$187kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,298monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield8.1%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.0%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Louisiana rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,1062026-07 · ▲ 0.6% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index5.8%2026-07 · −0.2 pp in 12 months
Time on market24 days2026-07 · +1 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,507$1,170$833Rental Vacancy Index9.2%6.2%3.1%2017-012021-102026-07LouisianaUnited States
State research brief

Metro rents are outpacing home values while statewide recent-lease rent growth remains only 0.6% and migration is negative, making locality-level demand validation the central Louisiana screen.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Across 10 measured metros with Zillow rent-growth data, median asking-rent growth was 3.9%; across 13 metros with home-value data, median value growth was 1.2%. The packet reports a 2.7 percentage-point spread, with especially large rent-price gaps in Monroe and Lake Charles.

The broader demand evidence is less supportive. Apartment List's separate statewide recent-lease series rose only 0.6%, net migration across 64 parishes was negative by 10,142 people, and median metro job growth was 0.02%. This supports screening for specific rent-value dislocations rather than treating the median as a statewide result. The packet cannot establish achieved property-level rent, operating costs, insurance availability, physical condition or parcel-level hazard exposure.

01

Median metro rent growth of 3.9% versus 1.2% value growth, a reported 2.7-point spread → prioritize metros where achieved leases confirm that rent-value separation

02

Statewide recent-lease rent growth of 0.6%, vacancy down about 0.2 points and time on market up 1.3 days → use separate rent-growth, vacancy and lease-up assumptions rather than one tightening narrative

03

Net migration of negative 10,142 and median metro job growth of 0.02% → require local employer and renter-source evidence before relying on broad demand growth

04

Median resale supply of 3.6 months and 56 days on market, with much slower outliers → stress exit timing and sale-price assumptions by metro

05

Parish climate-loss ratios and effective tax rates vary materially → obtain parcel-specific hazard, insurance and tax inputs before converting gross yield to expected cash flow

01
Price and rent momentum

Rent growth leads values, but a few metros widen the spread

Median asking-rent growth was 3.9% among 10 measured metros, versus 1.2% median home-value growth among 13. Rent growth ranged from 0.7% at the 10th percentile to 17.8% at the 90th, while value growth ranged from negative 4.0% to positive 2.6%. The reported median rent-minus-price spread was 2.7 percentage points.

Monroe illustrates the upside and the need for verification: rent rose 19.1% while value rose 1.2%, a calculated gap of 17.9 percentage points. Its measured value was $167,663, rent was $1,271 and gross yield was 9.1%. Lake Charles showed 17.6% rent growth against 2.8% value growth, a calculated 14.8-point gap, but its gross yield was lower at 7.5%. These are asking-rent and value indicators, not proof of achieved leases or net returns.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

02
Direct state rental dynamics

Recent leases provide a much cooler counter-signal

Apartment List's statewide recent-lease rent increased from $1,099 to $1,106, or 0.6%. Its Vacancy Index declined from 6.0% to 5.8%, a decrease of about 0.2 percentage points, while time on market increased from 23.0 to 24.3 days.

Those measures do not move together cleanly: lower vacancy suggests less unused rental inventory, but the additional 1.3 marketing days point to slightly slower placement. Apartment List rent, its Vacancy Index and its time-on-market series are separate measures with different coverage. They should not be blended with Zillow asking rent, Census vacancy or Redfin home-sale marketing time. The statewide series neither disproves the localized Zillow increases nor confirms that they are broadly achievable.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

03
Employment and household movement

Out-migration and nearly flat median job growth weaken broad demand confirmation

Measured migration across all 64 parishes recorded 102,669 movers in and 112,811 movers out, for net migration of negative 10,142, or negative 2.2 per 1,000 residents. Among 13 measured metros, median year-over-year job growth was only 0.02%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range from negative 1.6% to positive 1.7%.

There are local counterweights: job growth was 2.6% in Ruston, 1.8% in Opelousas and 1.3% in Lake Charles. That dispersion makes metro-level employers and renter sources more relevant than the state aggregate. The migration and employment series cover different populations and periods, and neither establishes that additional workers or movers became renters in a particular property class.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

04
Supply and resale conditions

Typical resale conditions are workable, but the slow tail is severe

Across 13 measured metros, the median resale market had 3.6 months of supply, 56 days on market, price drops on 29.0% of listings and a 97.2% sale-to-list ratio. The 10th-to-90th percentile ranges were 2.8 to 5.1 months of supply and 28 to 94.8 days on market, showing that a statewide exit assumption would hide meaningful dispersion.

Morgan City sat well beyond those upper ranges at 8.5 months of supply and 169 days on market; its sale-to-list ratio was 85.9%. Opelousas had 4.7 months of supply, 99 days on market, price drops on 36.0% of listings and a 95.6% sale-to-list ratio. These Redfin figures describe home-resale liquidity, not rental listing time, but they are relevant to exit timing and sale-price stress.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

05
Housing stock and tenant conditions

Structural vacancy coexists with heavy renter cost burdens

Across 64 parishes, the median ACS housing vacancy rate was 17.2%, with a 10th-to-90th percentile range of 10.2% to 24.8%. The median renter share was 26.7%. At the same time, a median 54.2% of renters were burdened by housing costs, with the parish distribution ranging from 40.3% to 66.3% at the 10th and 90th percentiles.

Claiborne Parish combined a 24.3% vacancy rate with a 31.2% renter share and a 74.9% rent-burden rate; its median housing year was 1974. Tensas Parish had 43.5% vacancy, but only a 25.8% renter share and a 76.9% single-family share. ACS vacancy covers the wider housing stock and is not the Apartment List Vacancy Index, so it does not measure immediately leasable rental units. High rent burden may also indicate limited capacity for further increases, while median year built does not establish property condition or repair needs.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock

06
Physical risk and property tax

Hazard and tax burdens require parish and parcel separation

FEMA assigns inland flood as the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for 38 parishes, hurricane for 25 and coastal flood for 1. These counts do not overlap. A leading label identifies the highest-ranked hazard at parish level; it does not mean every parcel has that exposure or that other hazards are absent.

Across 64 parishes, the median FEMA climate-loss ratio was 0.18%, and the 90th percentile was 0.48%. Cameron Parish measured 0.66%, with a 0.46% effective property-tax rate; St. Charles Parish measured 0.56% and 0.59%, respectively. The median parish property-tax rate was 0.44%, while Orleans Parish was 0.83% with a $2,606 median tax. These figures establish geographic dispersion, not parcel flood status, insurance premiums, deductibles or insurability.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Louisiana

The distribution uses 13 current published ZIP reports across 4 cities and 4 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,093$1,899full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income19.7%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 1.6%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered81,956across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.70124$1,89970118$1,75170115$1,74370817$1,65670119$1,59370808$1,57970605$1,40970506$1,39670508$1,38670806$1,32870503$1,31070816$1,093
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.69.3%60.9%52.5%44.0%35.6%701197050670816708087080670508701187011570605705037081770124Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.5.8%4.6%3.5%2.4%1.2%701197050670816708087080670508701187011570605705037081770124Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Among Louisiana’s 13 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, Zillow ZORI—an observed asking-rent index—ranges from $1,093 in 70816 to $1,899 in 70124, a $806 spread around a $1,507 median. The decision question is therefore not whether any figure represents Louisiana, but which reported rent level can be evaluated alongside household finances, historical movement, and an administrative benchmark. This is a distribution of current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, not every ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property in the state. It is a measured report universe rather than a statewide rental-supply census, so reported dispersion should not be generalized to unreported places or units. The range is best used as a comparative screen, not a household-specific quote or inventory.

Affordability and renter burden answer different questions. The asking-rent-to-income measure compares the current ZORI level with area median household income, while burden is the share of renter households spending 30% or more of income on gross rent; neither is a substitute for the other. Across the reports, asking rent to income ranges from 16.6% to 36.0%, with a 19.7% median; the ACS burden share runs from 38.1% to 66.8%. In 70119, the $1,593 asking-rent level calls for $63,720 annual income under the 30% rule, above the $53,143 area median. 70817 nevertheless has the highest burden share despite a lower asking-rent-to-income reading. These ACS values are five-year ZCTA estimates, an area-level context rather than the finances or lease payments of every renter.

Momentum and volatility likewise come from the direct monthly Zillow series, not ACS or HUD. The 1-year growth result ranges from a 1.2% decline in 70503 to a 27.5% increase in 70605, versus a 1.6% median across the reports. The Lake Charles report also records the maximum annualized volatility, 4.8%, and a 15.9% maximum drawdown. That pairing places the latest increase in a high-variability context rather than presenting it as a smooth rent path. The Lafayette report is classified cooling after its decline, a useful counter-signal to its positive longer-window growth. These historical index measures describe past movement and do not determine future rents.

HUD’s two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom standard, not an observed asking rent or a measure of what a household pays. In these reports, the ZORI-to-HUD comparison ranges from 90.8% in 70816 to 146.9% in 70506, with a 131.1% median. The difference is useful for putting unlike rent measures beside each other, but it is not an affordability verdict and should not be used to recast the HUD standard as a listing price. Neither the ZORI index nor HUD benchmark identifies a particular available property; individual units can differ by bedroom configuration, unit characteristics, timing, and lease terms.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 13 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
70119New Orleans$1,593▲ 1.0%36.0%56.2%2.4%▲ 119.7%
70506Lafayette$1,396▲ 1.4%29.2%43.8%2.2%▲ 146.9%
70816Baton Rouge$1,093▲ 2.0%19.5%45.5%2.7%▲ 90.8%
70808Baton Rouge$1,579▲ 3.0%27.3%53.9%3.4%▲ 131.1%
70806Baton Rouge$1,328▲ 5.6%28.6%54.3%2.8%▲ 110.3%
70508Lafayette$1,386▲ 0.7%19.3%48.2%2.4%▲ 145.9%
70118New Orleans$1,751▲ 4.3%33.0%55.8%2.3%▲ 131.6%
70115New Orleans$1,743▲ 1.6%23.2%46.8%2.3%▲ 131.0%
70605Lake Charles$1,409▲ 27.5%19.7%48.3%4.8%▲ 115.8%
70503Lafayette$1,310▼ 1.2%16.6%39.7%3.3%▲ 137.9%
70817Baton Rouge$1,656▲ 4.6%19.4%66.8%2.8%▲ 137.5%
70124New Orleans$1,899▼ 0.0%18.8%38.1%2.9%▲ 142.7%
READ BEFORE USING

ACS housing, income, vacancy, and renter-burden figures are five-year estimates for Census ZCTAs. ZCTAs are statistical areas, not identical to USPS delivery ZIPs, and those estimates describe area aggregates rather than individual households, properties, or leases.

The statewide distribution includes only ZIP reports with current published direct Zillow evidence. It does not enumerate every state ZIP, neighborhood, listing, or rental property, and the ZORI index, ACS estimates, and HUD administrative benchmark should not be treated as interchangeable measures.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Louisiana

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-4.0%1.2%2.6%Asking-rent change0.7%3.9%17.8%Rent minus price2.7%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-1.6%0.0%1.7%Net migration / 1k-2.2Net household movement-10,142
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k1.82.95.2Months of supply2.8×3.6×5.1×Days on market28 days56 days95 daysListings with cuts22.9%29.0%32.6%
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution10 scored metros · median 43.5
10–19320–39340–59360–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
44%28/64Rent100%64/64Climate100%64/64Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Opelousas10.2%Morgan City9.8%Monroe9.1%Shreveport8.8%Houma8.3%DeRidder8.3%Lafayette8.1%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Louisiana

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Monroe, LA78$168k$1,2719.1%▲ 1.1%
2Lake Charles, LA67$204k$1,2687.5%▲ 1.3%
3Ruston, LA67$227k$1,4027.4%▲ 2.6%
4Shreveport, LA49$186k$1,3588.8%▲ 0.0%
5Alexandria, LA47$174k$1,1287.8%▼ 0.1%
6Baton Rouge, LA40$250k$1,4036.7%▼ 0.0%
7Houma, LA38$187k$1,2988.3%▼ 0.4%
8Lafayette, LA32$204k$1,3708.1%▲ 0.4%
9Hammond, LA24$226k$1,4027.4%▼ 1.8%
10New Orleans, LA16$265k$1,6177.3%▼ 0.9%

Showing the top 10 scored metros of 13. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Louisiana

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
East Baton Rouge Parish, LA452,938$236k$1,3867.0%inland flooding
Jefferson Parish, LA430,920$276k$1,5256.6%hurricane
Orleans Parish, LA371,853$248k$1,6648.1%hurricane
St. Tammany Parish, LA272,421$288k$1,5446.4%hurricane
Lafayette Parish, LA247,997$239k$1,3826.9%hurricane
Caddo Parish, LA230,004$153k$1,1459.0%inland flooding
Calcasieu Parish, LA207,088$203k$1,2687.5%hurricane
Ouachita Parish, LA158,480$181k$1,2988.6%inland flooding
Livingston Parish, LA148,115$256k$1,4676.9%inland flooding
Tangipahoa Parish, LA136,738$226k$1,4027.4%hurricane
Ascension Parish, LA130,314$310k$1,8267.1%hurricane
Bossier Parish, LA129,789$246k$1,4977.3%inland flooding
County yield sample28/64counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration−10,142IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share9.2%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Rent-growth coverage is incomplete: 10 metros have measured rent growth, and only 28 parishes have county rent observations, so uncovered localities may not follow the reported distributions.
  2. The packet does not provide lease counts or unit-mix detail behind the largest metro rent increases, leaving their breadth and repeatability unestablished.
  3. Migration, employment, Zillow rent and Apartment List rent measure different populations, periods and concepts; their association does not establish causation.
  4. Gross yields exclude vacancies, management, maintenance, capital work, financing, taxes and insurance, and the packet contains no property-level expense history.
  5. Redfin marketing time measures homes for sale, ACS vacancy covers the broad housing stock, and FEMA labels are parish-level; none directly establishes rental lease-up or parcel exposure.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Are rents rising faster than home values across Louisiana?

Among the measured metros, median Zillow rent growth was 3.9% and median value growth was 1.2%, with a reported 2.7-point spread. Rent growth covers only 10 metros, however, and the largest gaps are concentrated in specific markets.

Does the direct rental data confirm a strongly tightening market?

Not clearly. Apartment List recent-lease rent rose 0.6% and vacancy declined to 5.8%, but time on market increased to 24.3 days. The three series are separate and should not be combined into one indicator.

Is household and employment demand supportive?

The broad evidence is weak: migration was negative by 10,142 people and median metro job growth was 0.02%. Ruston, Opelousas and Lake Charles recorded positive job growth, so demand screening needs to be local.

How much resale-liquidity risk is visible?

The median measured metro had 3.6 months of supply and 56 days on market, but Morgan City reached 8.5 months and 169 days. Exit assumptions therefore should not be based on the state distribution's midpoint alone.

Can the FEMA hazard labels be used to price a property directly?

No. They are mutually exclusive parish-level leading-hazard labels, not parcel exposure findings. The packet also lacks flood-zone detail, insurance quotes, deductibles and property-specific mitigation information.