ZIP reports / SC / 29209
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 29209, Columbia, SC

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 29209?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 29209 is $1,536 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,5362026-06 · up 2.4% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,326ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$88 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,276Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 29209
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,242ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,032HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,401ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,164HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,536ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,276HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,954ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,623HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,300ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,911HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$58,772ACS 2024 5-year · ±$6,129 MOE
Renter share41.3%6,291 renter households
Rent burden 30%+51.4%3,233 observed households
Housing vacancy8.7%1,455 of 16,684 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 29209Zillow asking-rent index$1,536ACS median gross rent$1,326HUD two-bedroom standard$1,276

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 29209ACS median household income$58,772Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$61,440

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 29209Studio$1,242One bedroom$1,401Two bedrooms$1,536Three bedrooms$1,954Four bedrooms$2,300

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 2920930% or more of income3,233 householdsBelow 30%3,058 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 29209ZIP 29209$1,536Columbia city$1,478Richland County county$1,502Columbia, SC metro$1,555

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 29209; missing months remain gaps$1,604$1,423$1,241$1,0602021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
35.9%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
2.5%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.9%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 29209

Current affordability is the central tension in 29209. For June 2026, Zillow’s Observed Rent Index, or ZORI, is $1,536 per month: a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a lease quote for a specified home. This five-digit label is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Applying the 30% required-income screen yields $61,440 annually, versus $58,772 median household income in the ACS match, placing the index at 31.4% of that median. The screen is arithmetic, not affordability advice or an applicant qualification rule, but it places the current snapshot in an income context.

Source differences are material here. The ACS 2024 five-year survey reports a $1,326 median gross rent for occupied renter homes in the matched ZCTA, and that measure includes selected utilities. The current ZORI is 15.8% above that ACS median, yet it is not a competing quote: ACS records survey responses from occupied renter households over five years, whereas ZORI tracks typical observed asking rents across blended rental types. Nor should the gap be assigned a cause from these data. Gross rent, an asking-rent index, and any one available unit therefore answer different questions, with their timing and included costs limiting direct substitution.

The backward-looking rent record shows an upward path whose pace has cooled. At the stated endpoint, exact same-month annualized ZORI changes were 2.37% over one year, 3.84% over three years, and 6.32% over five years. Thus the recent positive direction confirms the longer rise, while its slower pace breaks from the earlier growth rate rather than extending it. The series has 100% coverage across 138 monthly observations. Monthly changes yielded 2.87% annualized variability, which supports somewhat more confidence that the current index is not an isolated, highly erratic reading. Separately, the historical maximum drawdown was a 2.53% decline, evidence that even this generally rising record had pullbacks. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 980 for momentum, 1,380 for stability, and 942 for the balanced measure, where lower rank is higher. These are measurements of prior observations, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The bedroom view is deliberately modelled rather than measured. Scaling ZIP ZORI by the local HUD ladder gives modelled monthly estimates of $1,242 for a studio, $1,401 for one bedroom, $1,536 for two bedrooms, $1,954 for three bedrooms, and $2,300 for four bedrooms. They are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents, and cannot identify a particular listing. The local HUD two-bedroom figure is $1,276 in FY2026. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent; it supplies the relative ladder used in the calculation rather than a claim that local landlords ask those standard amounts.

Stock and household composition add a separate constraint to broad ZIP screens. The ACS ZCTA counts 16,684 housing units, including 11,855 single-family units and 1,310 units in large multifamily structures. Its overall vacancy rate is 8.7%. Renter-occupied homes number 6,291, or 41.3% of occupied units. Of the renter households captured by the survey, 3,23351.4%—report spending 30% or more of income on rent. This burden statistic describes surveyed households, not the payment terms of a particular unit or household. Likewise, the area-level vacancy rate is a unit-status measure, not proof that any specific property is offered, available, or priced at the ZORI.

Broader geographies position the ZIP but do not replace its direct data. For wider context only, the City of Columbia citywide context rent is about $1,478, the Richland County countywide context rent is $1,502, and the Columbia, SC metro context rent is $1,555. The ZIP asking index therefore falls above the city and county context readings and below the metro reading. These city, county, and metro values cover wider scopes and cannot turn an ACS ZCTA median, a HUD standard, or a ZIP asking-rent index into the same market measure. The gaps are comparative context, not proof of a location-specific rent premium or discount.

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation belongs wholly to the for-sale universe. It shows a $249,944 median sold price, up 7.32% year over year, alongside 139 homes sold and a 39-day median marketing time. For-sale inventory is 173 homes, months of supply are 3.8, and the average sale-to-list ratio is 97.6%. Those are resale signals, not rental transactions, rental comps, or property economics. The price-change figure is larger than the current decelerated ZORI growth pace, creating a cross-source tension against a simple reading of the rent-and-income screen, while supply and the below-list signal prevent treating price growth alone as a uniform heat indicator. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is 7.37%, a cross-source screening ratio only, not a property-level return measure.

No supplied series resolves unit-level economics or availability. ZORI does not disclose a unit’s condition, floor area, furnished status, concessions, included utilities, lease term, or extra charges; ACS cannot price a current listing, HUD does not set an asking rent, and Redfin does not describe rental transactions. Concrete property-level checks are the actual advertised rent and availability date, bedroom count, included utilities and fees, lease and concession terms, condition and size, and like-for-like available or signed rental evidence. If a resale comparison is relevant, the individual property’s sale record, list history, and physical characteristics also require separate verification. The remaining question is whether those unit facts align with this ZIP-level screen rather than merely resembling it.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current asking screen exceeds the median-income benchmark

At $1,536, the June 2026 ZIP ZORI is a typical blended asking-rent index. The arithmetic 30% screen converts that rent to $61,440 in annual income, above the matched ACS ZCTA median household income of $58,772. This comparison flags a broad affordability tension, but it neither tests an applicant nor establishes what any available unit costs after utilities, concessions, or fees.

The historical direction remains positive, but it has decelerated

Exact same-month history confirms a positive rent direction, but the one-year annualized change is slower than the three-year and five-year readings. Full coverage, contained variability, and a limited historical pullback improve the interpretability of the current index, not its predictive power. The national discovery ranks order history-eligible ZIPs transparently; they do not grade a future outcome or suitability.

Bedroom figures show a scale, not observed segment rents

Scaling the ZIP index with the local HUD ladder produces the stated studio-through-four-bedroom amounts. This is a modelled allocation of one blended asking-rent index, not a bedroom survey. The HUD FMR/SAFMR inputs are administrative standards, so the estimates give a transparent relative scale but cannot determine a unit’s advertised rent, included utilities, lease terms, or availability.

Resale price strength is offset by non-rental market signals

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month resale evidence reports a rising median sold price, completed sales, marketing time, inventory, supply, and an average sale-to-list result below full list price. It is useful as a separate for-sale liquidity snapshot. It cannot validate a rental comp or define individual property economics, even when compared with the annualized ZORI-to-price screening ratio.

  • ZORI, ACS gross rent, HUD standards, and Redfin sales cover different populations, timing, costs, and transaction types; combining them without source labels can create a false sense of unit-level precision.
  • The matched ZCTA is a statistical geography rather than a USPS delivery ZIP, and the ACS five-year survey has sampling uncertainty; its medians and burden shares may not describe every household or lease.
  • Complete historical coverage does not eliminate timing risk: prior growth, variability, and drawdown describe the index through the endpoint only, while the recent pace is slower than the longer lookbacks.
  • ZIP vacancy and burden data cannot establish whether a specific unit is available, affordable, or occupied; Redfin inventory and sale-to-list results also remain resale measures rather than rental comparables.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 29209

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$249,944+7.3% year over year
Homes sold139rolling three-month observation
Median days on market39 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.8resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 29209Active listings347Inventory173Pending sales175Homes sold139

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

173 observed inventory · +50.5% year over year.

Price realization

97.6% average sale-to-list ratio · 16.3% sold above original list.

Early absorption

26.8% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 39 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Richland County listing conditions

1,511 active Realtor.com listings · 41 median days on market · 21.1% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Columbia, SC resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

6.1% reported apartment vacancy · 19 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 29209. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why do ZORI and ACS median gross rent differ?

They are intentionally different evidence universes. ZORI is a current ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS is a matched ZCTA five-year survey of occupied renter homes, and median gross rent includes selected utilities. A ZCTA is statistical, not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. A gap is descriptive and does not establish a cause.

Are the bedroom estimates observed rents for 29209?

No. The studio-through-four-bedroom amounts are modelled monthly estimates created by scaling the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative standard rather than asking rent. Consequently, the ladder communicates relative bedroom scale but cannot replace a current listing, executed lease, or bedroom-specific rental comp.

Does the 30% income screen qualify a household for a rental?

No. The required-income calculation divides annualized ZORI by 30%. It is a uniform arithmetic screen intended to contextualize median household income and aggregate rent burden. It is not affordability advice, a credit standard, a tenant-screening criterion, or a determination that a particular household can or cannot rent a particular home.

How should the Redfin resale block be read alongside rents?

Redfin reports a direct rolling-three-month ZIP for-sale observation: price, transactions, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list behavior. None are rental transactions or rental comparables. The annualized ZORI-to-sale-price figure is only a cross-source screening ratio. It should not be treated as property-level economics because it does not contain a particular property’s operating costs, financing, condition, or lease terms.