ZIP reports / SC / 29650
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 29650, Greer, SC

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 29650?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 29650 is $1,729 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,7292026-06 · up 2.6% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,444ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$85 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,256Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 29650
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,506ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,094HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,553ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,128HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,729ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,256HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,155ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,566HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,610ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,896HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$94,522ACS 2024 5-year · ±$7,173 MOE
Renter share22.9%3,764 renter households
Rent burden 30%+35.9%1,352 observed households
Housing vacancy5.2%909 of 17,378 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 29650Zillow asking-rent index$1,729ACS median gross rent$1,444HUD two-bedroom standard$1,256

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 29650ACS median household income$94,522Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$69,160

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 29650Studio$1,506One bedroom$1,553Two bedrooms$1,729Three bedrooms$2,155Four bedrooms$2,610

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 2965030% or more of income1,352 householdsBelow 30%2,412 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 29650ZIP 29650$1,729Greer city$1,702Greenville County county$1,603Greenville-Anderson, SC metro$1,570

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 29650; missing months remain gaps$1,781$1,624$1,467$1,3102021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
27.0%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.1%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.2%101 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%102 of 102 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 29650

At $1,729 per month, ZIP 29650’s current Zillow ZORI rose 2.7% from the same month a year earlier. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a record of executed leases, utility-inclusive rents, or rents for one specified bedroom count. The five-digit label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP, so the rental index and Census survey evidence should be read as linked but distinct geographic evidence universes.

The backward-looking Zillow ZIP history describes stable positive movement rather than a recent reversal. Exact same-month changes were 2.7% over one year, 2.9% annualized over three years, and 4.9% annualized over five years. The latest pace is slower than the longer paths, but it remains positive and therefore confirms, rather than breaks from, the broader growth pattern. Monthly change variability annualized to 2.2%, while the worst historical peak-to-trough decline was 1.1%. A continuous record with 100% coverage across 102 observations supports more confidence in the current snapshot than a sparse series would, although it remains nonforecast evidence. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 1,093 for momentum, 257 for stability, and 356 for the balanced measure; these are backward-looking discovery measures, not investment recommendations.

The bedroom ladder should not be mistaken for measured bedroom rents. Modelled ZIP estimates scale the current ZORI through the local HUD ladder, producing $1,506 for a studio, $1,553 for one bedroom, $1,729 for two bedrooms, $2,155 for three bedrooms, and $2,610 for four bedrooms. The two-bedroom estimate aligns with the blended ZORI because it is the ladder’s anchor, not because all two-bedroom listings transact at that amount. HUD’s two-bedroom $1,256 FMR/SAFMR standard is an administrative, bedroom-specific benchmark used in the scaling process; it is not asking rent, a lease comp, or proof of price for a particular home.

ACS offers a different affordability lens. In the matched Census ZCTA five-year survey, median gross rent was $1,444 among occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, placing current Zillow asking rent 19.7% above that survey median. Annualizing the ZIP asking-rent index produces a $69,160 income screen at 30% of income, compared with a $94,522 ZCTA median household income. That comparison is arithmetic only, not advice or an applicant qualification rule, and household income is not evidence about any renter’s finances. ACS also reported that 35.9% of renter households, or 1,352 of 3,764, spent at least 30% of income on rent; it establishes area-level survey burden, not the burden of a particular available unit.

Housing composition adds context without establishing unit-level availability. The ZCTA contained 17,378 housing units, of which 16,469 were occupied and 909 were vacant, implying a 5.2% total vacancy rate. Renter-occupied homes represented 22.9% of occupied units, and 317 vacant units were classified as for rent. The stock was weighted toward 14,099 single-family units, alongside 844 units in larger multifamily structures. These counts describe survey-era housing and vacancy categories, not live leasing supply, physical condition, concessions, tenant turnover, or the rent readiness of any individual property. Vacancy and burden data therefore cannot prove the availability or affordability of a specific rental.

Wider-area comparisons show that the ZIP’s current rent index is above surrounding context measures: the Greer city context rent was $1,702, the Greenville County context rent was $1,603, and the Greenville-Anderson, SC metro context rent was $1,570. Those city, county, and metro values are wider-area context only and are not substitutes for the direct ZIP index. The metro context rent-to-income measure was 26.4%, above the ZIP’s asking-rent-to-income arithmetic screen, but the scope and inputs differ. The pattern is useful for framing the ZIP’s relative rent level, not for treating any broader geography as a rental comparable.

The direct rolling-three-month Redfin ZIP resale record creates the report’s clearest tension. Median sold price was $431,403, up 18.2% year over year, while the asking-rent index increased only 2.7%. The for-sale observation recorded 144 homes sold, a median 53 days on market, 183 homes of inventory, and 3.9 months of supply. Average sale-to-list was 98.6%, and 17.2% of sales closed above list price. These are resale liquidity and pricing signals, not rental transactions or property operating economics. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price equals a 4.81% cross-source screening ratio only; it is not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. Faster resale-price growth challenges any simple reading that steady asking-rent history alone describes the broader housing-price picture.

The evidence has meaningful limits: ZORI is blended asking-rent evidence, ACS is a survey of occupied renter homes, HUD is an administrative standard, and Redfin is a resale observation. None establishes lease terms, unit condition, utility responsibility, concessions, listing freshness, financing, or operating costs for a particular property. A property-level review would need current listings matched by bedroom count, lease duration, included utilities, concessions, occupancy status, and recent direct sale or listing records with aligned dates. The key unresolved question is whether a specific available unit’s live terms resemble the modelled ladder and current asking-rent index rather than merely the broader ZIP indicators.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent history remains positive but has moderated

The recent Zillow asking-rent gain remains positive, while the annualized three-year and five-year paths were stronger. That relationship supports a stable-growth reading rather than a break in direction. Complete historical coverage, low monthly variability, and a limited drawdown make the current index more interpretable than a single isolated month, but none of these measures forecast future rents.

The observed asking-rent index exceeds the ACS renter survey median

Zillow ZORI and ACS median gross rent answer different questions. ZORI represents a blended typical asking-rent index, while ACS reflects occupied renter homes over a five-year survey period and includes selected utilities. The difference between them may reflect source design, timing, rental mix, and utility treatment; it should not be read as a direct change in rents for the same homes.

Resale pricing is moving faster than the rent index

Redfin’s direct ZIP resale observation shows a substantially faster year-over-year median sale-price increase than the ZIP asking-rent index. At the same time, the resale record includes completed sales, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list evidence rather than rental transactions. This creates a cross-market tension: stable rent growth does not by itself summarize current resale pricing conditions.

Housing counts provide context, not live availability

The ZCTA stock is predominantly single-family, with a smaller large-multifamily component and a measured total vacancy count. Units classified as vacant for rent provide useful area context, yet they do not identify current listings, unit condition, rent concessions, or lease terms. Similarly, renter burden is a survey measure of households, not proof that a particular unit is affordable.

  • The ACS ZCTA survey is a five-year estimate for occupied renter homes, includes selected utilities in gross rent, and is not geographically identical to a USPS delivery ZIP or a current listing sample.
  • Zillow ZORI is a blended typical asking-rent index across rental types. It does not establish the rent, bedroom count, utility treatment, condition, concession package, or lease outcome for any specific available home.
  • The bedroom figures are modelled by scaling ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder. HUD FMR or SAFMR is an administrative standard, not observed asking rent or a verified bedroom-level rental comparable.
  • Redfin resale figures cover a rolling three-month ZIP for-sale observation. They do not provide rental comps, ownership costs, property-level income, financing terms, or evidence of a future rent or sale outcome.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 29650

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$431,403+18.2% year over year
Homes sold144rolling three-month observation
Median days on market53 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.9resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 29650Active listings348Inventory183Pending sales152Homes sold144

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

183 observed inventory · +19.5% year over year.

Price realization

98.6% average sale-to-list ratio · 17.2% sold above original list.

Early absorption

46.7% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 53 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Greenville County listing conditions

2,316 active Realtor.com listings · 53 median days on market · 22.3% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Greenville-Anderson, SC resale supply

3.8 months of supply · 62 median days on market · 31.0% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

6.9% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 29650. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does the report use Zillow ZORI instead of treating it as a lease-rate average?

Zillow ZORI is defined here as a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. It is useful for tracking ZIP-level asking-rent direction, but it is not a database of signed leases or a direct observation of a specified property, bedroom count, utility package, or concession arrangement.

Are the bedroom estimates evidence of actual studio through four-bedroom rents?

No. The bedroom figures are modelled estimates created by applying the local HUD bedroom ladder to the ZIP’s blended Zillow asking-rent index. They organize the current index into a bedroom-shaped pattern, but they are not measured rents, listing medians, lease results, or HUD payment requirements for a particular property.

What does the Redfin evidence add to the rental picture?

Redfin adds a direct ZIP-level for-sale and resale view, including sold prices, sales volume, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes. It highlights that resale price movement differs from asking-rent movement, but it cannot be converted into rental performance, property income, operating economics, or a prediction about either market.

Can the income screen, renter burden, or vacancy data determine whether a unit is affordable or available?

No. The income screen is simply annualized asking rent divided by the stated thirty-percent threshold. ACS renter burden is an area-level survey statistic, and vacancy categories are housing-stock classifications. Neither identifies a household’s finances, a landlord’s criteria, an active unit’s condition, or the live terms of a lease.