ZIP reports / GA / 30064
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 30064, Marietta, GA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 30064?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 30064 is $1,848 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,8482026-06 · up 4.3% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,807ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$92 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,850Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 30064
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,608ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,610HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,688ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,690HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,848ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,850HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,218ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,220HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,647ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,650HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$122,195ACS 2024 5-year · ±$6,287 MOE
Renter share17.0%3,192 renter households
Rent burden 30%+56.5%1,805 observed households
Housing vacancy4.2%826 of 19,597 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 30064Zillow asking-rent index$1,848ACS median gross rent$1,807HUD two-bedroom standard$1,850

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 30064ACS median household income$122,195Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$73,920

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 30064Studio$1,608One bedroom$1,688Two bedrooms$1,848Three bedrooms$2,218Four bedrooms$2,647

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 3006430% or more of income1,805 householdsBelow 30%1,387 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 30064ZIP 30064$1,848Marietta city$1,717Cobb County county$1,752Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta, GA metro$1,854

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 30064; missing months remain gaps$1,912$1,764$1,615$1,4672021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
22.0%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
4.5%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
4.1%114 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%115 of 115 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 30064

The clearest current tension in the five-digit 30064 label, which is both Zillow's ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match, is that its ZIP asking-rent index strengthened while the separate resale record softened. In June 2026, Zillow ZORI is $1,848, a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types rather than a lease quote for a specified home. As wider geographic context only, the Marietta city rent context is $1,717, the Cobb County rent context is $1,752, and the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta, GA metro rent context is $1,854. Thus, the ZIP reading is above the named city and county contexts but just below the named metro context; none of those broader figures replaces the ZIP measure.

The bedroom view should not be read as a set of measured rents. Scaling the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly estimates of $1,608 for a studio, $1,688 for one bedroom, $1,848 for two bedrooms, $2,218 for three bedrooms, and $2,647 for four bedrooms. This preserves local HUD bedroom spacing, but it does not observe a unit-level rent within each bedroom category. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent, so its role here is solely the scaling ladder. The exact match at two bedrooms reflects model construction, not validation from rental transactions.

The ZCTA match does not merge the source definitions: a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the matched ACS 2024 5-year survey, median gross rent was $1,807. ACS measures occupied renter homes over its survey window and includes selected utilities, unlike Zillow's current asking-rent index. Applying the 30% screen arithmetically to ZORI gives $73,920 in annual required income; this is not advice, a prediction, or an applicant qualification rule. The ZCTA median household income of $122,195 sits above that arithmetic benchmark, without establishing any renter household's actual budget, income, or capacity to pay.

Household burden and stock composition make the income screen incomplete. ACS reports 1,805 of 3,192 renter households, or 56.5%, as paying at least 30% of income toward gross rent, a survey measure using its stated rent definition rather than the Zillow index. The same ZCTA survey counts 19,597 housing units and 826 vacant units, a 4.2% vacancy rate. The housing stock is predominantly single-family, with a smaller large-multifamily component. These aggregates describe the statistical area, not the condition, price, utility treatment, availability, or burden of a particular unit; vacancy and burden cannot prove any of those unit-level facts.

The backward-looking Zillow history supports continued rent growth, but not a low-noise reading. Exact same-month changes annualize to 4.35% over one year, 2.93% over three years, and 4.05% over five years. The recent pace therefore confirms the longer upward path rather than breaking from it, although it is only a historical measurement, not a forecast or investment recommendation. Reported history coverage is complete. Monthly rent changes annualize to 4.10% variability, indicating meaningful movement around the trend and reducing confidence that one current ZORI snapshot represents a durable level. Separately, the maximum recorded drawdown was 4.48%, showing the largest observed cumulative retreat in this history.

The transparent history discovery ranks make the contrast more visible without creating a rating or forecast. Among history-eligible ZIPs nationally, lower ranks are higher: momentum ranks 762, stability ranks 2,649, and the balanced measure ranks 1,685. Those rankings are derived from the completed Zillow history, not from surveys, HUD standards, sale records, or property operations. The comparatively stronger momentum placement alongside much weaker stability is consistent with the high-variability category. It is a descriptive sorting aid only and does not establish future rents, property performance, or a transaction outcome.

The direct rolling three-month ZIP resale observation supplies the counterweight. Median sold price was $519,883, down 5.48% year over year, while 221 homes sold with a median 42 days on market. Inventory was 230 homes and months of supply were 3.2; the average sale-to-list ratio was 98.3%. These are for-sale and resale signals, not rental transactions or rental comparables. They challenge any simple reading of the rent increase as uniformly strong housing evidence: asking rent rose in its own index while median resale price fell in its own observation. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price equals a 4.27% cross-source screening ratio only, not evidence of property-level economics.

Limits matter most where a reader tries to bridge these datasets. ZORI blends rental types and does not identify the rent, bedroom, utilities, condition, concessions, or availability of a specific home. ACS is a ZCTA survey with sampling uncertainty; HUD is a standard; and Redfin's rolling resale measures report completed for-sale activity, not rental cash flows or property economics. Property-level interpretation would require checking the actual advertised rent and lease term, bedroom count and usable condition, utility charges and concessions, current availability, and relevant closed-sale and list details for the same property type. Those checks can test whether a unit resembles an aggregate measure, but cannot convert area vacancy, rent burden, or a screening ratio into evidence about that unit.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent growth persists, but the path is not smooth

The one-year same-month rent change exceeds the three-year annualized pace and is close to the five-year pace, so recent direction broadly confirms the established upward history. That confirmation is qualified by the high-variability designation, a meaningful monthly fluctuation measure, and a documented drawdown. These observations are historical descriptions, not a rent forecast, investment thesis, or operational conclusion.

The rent sources are adjacent, not interchangeable

Current Zillow ZORI, ACS median gross rent, and HUD FMR/SAFMR answer different questions. ZORI tracks typical observed asking rent across rental types; ACS is a multi-year survey of occupied renter homes that includes selected utilities; HUD is a bedroom-specific administrative standard. Their close levels do not make them interchangeable, and the bedroom series remains a model based on the HUD ladder rather than a set of observed rents.

Area affordability signals point in different directions

The income screen looks moderate when current ZIP asking rent is compared with the ZCTA median household income, while the ACS burden measure reports that a majority of renter households cross its gross-rent threshold. The signals use different denominators, concepts, and populations. Neither establishes the finances of a particular household, the price of an available unit, or qualification under any housing program.

Resale movement challenges a simple rent-strength reading

ZIP resale evidence diverges from the asking-rent history: the latest median sold-price change is negative while the rent index's latest same-month change is positive. Sales volume, marketing time, supply, and sale-to-list measures describe direct for-sale activity only. The annualized-rent-to-price calculation is consequently just a cross-source screen; it neither supplies property operating data nor resolves the disagreement between rental and resale signals.

  • The source geography mismatch is material: Zillow uses a ZIP market identifier, whereas ACS uses a ZCTA statistical area that does not exactly equal a USPS delivery ZIP, so boundaries and populations can differ.
  • The high-variability rent history contains both changing monthly returns and a recorded drawdown. A current index level may therefore be less representative of nearby historical periods than a stable-looking trend suggests.
  • Redfin statistics represent completed resale activity within a rolling ZIP observation, not lease negotiations or rental transactions. Combining its median sale price with ZORI omits financing, expenses, taxes, and property-specific conditions.
  • Survey vacancy, renter share, and rent burden are area aggregates subject to ACS sampling uncertainty and differing geographies. They cannot verify whether an advertised unit is vacant, affordable, comparable, or actually available.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 30064

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$519,883-5.5% year over year
Homes sold221rolling three-month observation
Median days on market42 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.2resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 30064Active listings521Inventory230Pending sales225Homes sold221

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

230 observed inventory · +1.4% year over year.

Price realization

98.3% average sale-to-list ratio · 15.8% sold above original list.

Early absorption

31.4% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 42 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Cobb County listing conditions

2,908 active Realtor.com listings · 44 median days on market · 24.1% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Alpharetta, GA resale supply

3.7 months of supply · 43 median days on market · 32.6% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

7.5% reported apartment vacancy · 32 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 30064. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why are ZORI and ACS median gross rent close but not interchangeable?

ZORI is a current ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a matched ZCTA five-year survey statistic for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. Different geography, timing, sampled population, rent definition, and utility treatment mean similarity in level does not make either measure a substitute for the other.

Are the bedroom estimates observed rents for studio through four-bedroom homes?

No. Each bedroom figure is a modelled ZIP estimate generated by scaling the current ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. The ladder is an administrative FMR/SAFMR standard, not asking-rent evidence. The model does not observe listings, signed leases, condition, utility treatment, or transaction rents for homes within individual bedroom categories.

Does the required-income screen determine affordability or applicant eligibility?

No. It is arithmetic: annualized index rent divided by the stated share threshold. It is included to make the monthly rent level comparable with an income benchmark, not to give advice, forecast a household budget, judge applicant eligibility, or establish qualification. The separate ACS burden measure is a survey aggregate and likewise cannot identify one household's circumstances.

How should the direct resale figures be read alongside rent history?

The Redfin observation is a rolling three-month ZIP for-sale record, so its prices, days, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list measures describe resale liquidity rather than rental transactions. Its price decline conflicts with the current positive asking-rent change, creating a factual tension. The annualized-rent-to-sale-price quotient is only a cross-source screening ratio and cannot resolve that tension or measure property economics.