ZIP reports / TN / 37421
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 37421, Chattanooga, TN

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 37421?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 37421 is $1,488 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,4882026-06 · up 1.3% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,405ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$44 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,830Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 37421
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,293ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,590HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,350ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,660HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,488ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,830HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,854ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,280HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$1,984ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,440HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$82,517ACS 2024 5-year · ±$3,937 MOE
Renter share39.8%8,875 renter households
Rent burden 30%+41.0%3,639 observed households
Housing vacancy7.4%1,785 of 24,063 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 37421Zillow asking-rent index$1,488ACS median gross rent$1,405HUD two-bedroom standard$1,830

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 37421ACS median household income$82,517Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$59,520

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 37421Studio$1,293One bedroom$1,350Two bedrooms$1,488Three bedrooms$1,854Four bedrooms$1,984

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 3742130% or more of income3,639 householdsBelow 30%5,236 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 37421ZIP 37421$1,488Chattanooga city$1,505Hamilton County county$1,528Chattanooga, TN-GA metro$1,519

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 37421; missing months remain gaps$1,542$1,426$1,310$1,1932021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
20.8%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
2.5%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.9%99 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
99.0%101 of 102 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 37421

At June 2026, the $1,488 Zillow Observed Rent Index for five-digit label 37421 is the current rental snapshot. That label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. The supplied Redfin median sold price is $374,415. Annualizing ZIP ZORI and dividing it by that sale-price median produces a 4.77% cross-source screening ratio. It places a monthly asking-rent index beside a for-sale median, not a unit-level operating result. The immediate tension is directional: resale price rose 1.50% year over year while ZORI gained 1.25%. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, not a lease-transaction series or a measured rent for an individual dwelling.

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation describes the for-sale market, not rental transactions. It recorded 222 homes sold and a median marketing time of 42 days. There were 557 active listings, up 16.18% from a year earlier, while inventory stood at 347 homes, up 21.00%. Months of supply measured 4.7. Sale-to-list signals were also below a uniformly competitive reading: the average sale-to-list ratio was 98.30%, 18.07% of sales closed above list, and 25.93% went off market within two weeks. The combination of a higher resale-price median with more listed supply challenges any simplistic interpretation of the positive rent reading as evidence of a uniformly tightening housing market. These are resale-liquidity signals only and do not provide rental comparables.

The rent history points to steady but cooler growth than the more distant path. Exact same-month annualized ZORI change was 1.25% over one year, 1.21% over three years, and 3.86% over five years. The latest direction therefore broadly confirms the recent three-year pattern, yet it breaks from the faster pace embedded in the five-year record. Coverage reached 99.02% of available monthly history. Monthly rent changes translate to 2.89% annualized variability, so one current index reading carries some month-to-month noise rather than precision equivalent to a fixed contract rent. The largest observed peak-to-trough decline was 2.46%, a separate indication that past ZORI movement was not uninterrupted. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 1,886 for momentum, 1,416 for stability, and 1,902 for the balanced measure, where lower rank is higher. These are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

Source definitions explain why the rent benchmarks should not be merged. In the matched Census ZCTA, ACS 2024 five-year median gross rent was $1,405. ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, whereas ZORI is an asking-rent index. The supplied local current fiscal-year HUD FMR/SAFMR two-bedroom standard is $1,830; HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. For wider asking-rent context, the Chattanooga city scope is $1,504.99, the Hamilton County scope is $1,528, and the Chattanooga, TN-GA metro scope is $1,519. Those city, county, and metro figures are context only, not replacements for the direct ZIP rental observation.

The bedroom ladder is a modelling exercise, not a bedroom-rent survey. It scales the ZIP ZORI using the supplied local HUD ladder to produce modelled monthly estimates of $1,293 for a studio, $1,350 for one bedroom, $1,488 for two bedrooms, $1,854 for three bedrooms, and $1,984 for four bedrooms. Because the shape comes from HUD standards while the base comes from Zillow ZORI, these figures are modelled estimates rather than measured bedroom rents. They help keep bedroom comparisons internally consistent across the supplied sources, but they cannot establish the advertised price, condition, utilities, lease terms, or availability of a particular unit.

Income and burden data provide a separate affordability screen. The matched ZCTA’s median household income is $82,517. Applying the arithmetic 30% screen to current ZORI produces required annual income of $59,520 and an asking-rent-to-income screen of 21.64%. This is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant qualification rule, and area-wide median household income is not a renter-specific income distribution. ACS estimates that 3,639 of 8,875 renter households had gross-rent burdens at or above thirty percent, equal to 41.00%. That burden statistic is useful evidence of survey-reported household pressure, but it does not prove affordability, payment history, or burden for a particular household or dwelling.

Housing stock supplies another boundary on interpretation. The ZCTA contained 24,063 housing units, with 22,278 occupied and 1,785 vacant, for a 7.42% vacancy rate. Renter occupancy represented 39.84% of occupied homes. The vacancy count encompasses units classified for rent, for sale, and seasonal use, so it should not be read as a count of currently rentable units at ZORI or at the modelled bedroom estimates. Likewise, the stock total includes different structure types and ownership arrangements. These ACS figures describe aggregate housing conditions in the statistical area rather than a live inventory feed for an individual address.

The evidence supports a source-labeled snapshot rather than a property-level conclusion. A property-level interpretation would require checks of the current advertised rent, exact bedroom count, utility charges, lease length, concessions, availability date, building type, interior condition, and precise address. A purchase-context comparison would also require sale-date, condition, and list-history checks that the ZIP median cannot supply. The observed tension remains important: rent growth has stayed positive and relatively stable in the recent history, while resale prices also increased but inventory expanded. Neither pattern establishes causation, future direction, or economics for a particular property. The separate Zillow, ACS, HUD, and Redfin universes should remain separate when reading that tension.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent and resale are directionally positive but not interchangeable

Current ZORI and the direct ZIP resale median both increased year over year, but they describe different markets. The annualized rent-to-price figure is only a cross-source screening ratio because it combines Zillow asking-rent data with Redfin sale-price data. Higher resale inventory alongside a higher sale-price median adds a meaningful counterweight to a simple tight-market interpretation.

Recent rent growth matches the medium-term pace

The one-year and three-year same-month annualized ZORI changes are nearly aligned, while the five-year pace is materially faster. That pattern identifies recent stabilization relative to the longer historical path. High coverage supports the historical read, but the observed variability and drawdown mean the current index remains a time-specific snapshot rather than a fixed rent guarantee.

ACS, HUD, and ZORI answer different rent questions

ACS median gross rent reflects occupied renter homes and selected utilities, HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom standard, and ZORI tracks a blended typical asking-rent index. The bedroom figures are modelled by scaling ZORI with the local HUD ladder. Their usefulness is comparative consistency, not evidence of measured rents by bedroom count.

Aggregate availability does not identify an available unit

The ZCTA has a measurable vacancy rate and a substantial renter share, but vacancy categories include more than rental vacancies. ACS burden data are similarly aggregate household estimates. Neither measure identifies a currently available apartment, the rent on that unit, the utility structure, or whether a specific household would face rent burden.

  • ZORI blends rental types into a typical asking-rent index, so it cannot establish the contract rent, concessions, utility treatment, condition, or availability for a particular apartment or house.
  • ACS estimates apply to the matched ZCTA statistical area over a five-year survey period and include selected utilities in gross rent. They are not current listing data and do not match USPS delivery geography exactly.
  • The bedroom ladder is modelled from ZIP ZORI and HUD standards, while the 30% income screen is arithmetic. Neither establishes a measured bedroom rent, tenant qualification outcome, or household-specific affordability result.
  • Redfin is a rolling three-month ZIP resale observation. Its price, inventory, marketing-time, and sale-to-list measures do not describe rental transactions, and the cross-source screening ratio cannot establish property-level economics.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 37421

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$374,415+1.5% year over year
Homes sold222rolling three-month observation
Median days on market42 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply4.7resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 37421Active listings557Inventory347Pending sales219Homes sold222

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

347 observed inventory · +21.0% year over year.

Price realization

98.3% average sale-to-list ratio · 18.1% sold above original list.

Early absorption

25.9% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 42 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Hamilton County listing conditions

2,003 active Realtor.com listings · 58 median days on market · 23.9% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Chattanooga, TN-GA resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

6.6% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 37421. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What geography does 37421 represent in this report?

The label is used as Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and is matched to a Census ZCTA for ACS data. A ZCTA is a Census statistical area designed for tabulation; it is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Zillow and ACS therefore remain related but source-distinct geographic evidence universes.

Why is ACS median gross rent lower than Zillow ZORI?

The measures are built differently. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, while ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The difference does not prove that a currently advertised unit is mispriced or that either source is incorrect.

Are the bedroom estimates observed rents for studios through four-bedroom homes?

No. They are modelled monthly estimates created by scaling the ZIP-level ZORI with the supplied local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. The modelled figures provide a consistent relative ladder but do not replace actual bedroom-specific rental listings or signed leases.

How should the resale data be related to the rental data?

Redfin provides direct ZIP for-sale evidence, including sold-price, inventory, marketing-time, and sale-to-list signals. Zillow provides an asking-rent index. Dividing annualized ZORI by the median sold price creates only a cross-source screen. It does not convert resale observations into rental transactions or identify economics for any particular property.