Counties / Tennessee / Hamilton County

Hamilton County, TN

FIPS 47065 · population 376,192 · part of Chattanooga, TN

$358k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Hamilton County, TN?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,528 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,5282026-06 · up 1.6% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,253ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,390FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Hamilton County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,211Hamilton County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,263Hamilton County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,390Hamilton County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,734Hamilton County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$1,853Hamilton County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$358k
▼ 0.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,528
▲ 1.6% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.1%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,390
market rent is 1.10x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+63.3%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.6%FHFA HPI2025+1.8%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$313k
Surveyed gross rent$1,253
Rent burden 30%+45.2%
Median year built1982
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.2%vacant
168,013estimated housing units
Occupied tenure36.1% renter
owner 63.9%renter 36.1%
Structure mix72.0% single-family
Single-family 72.0%20+ units 9.6%Mobile home 3.1%Other 15.3%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs219,675▼ 0.7% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments12,618annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,332▲ 5.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities21.7% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.7%WEEKLY WAGE+5.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities21.7%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Hamilton CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$35k$70k196919972024$4k$69k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Hamilton CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI10,14076.3% burdened30–50% HAMFI7,77581.9% burdened50–80% HAMFI10,84050.0% burdened80–100% HAMFI5,88022.1% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI18,0903.7% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Hamilton County, TN

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 47065. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,241$1,165$1,0892021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,2092026-07 · +1.3% year over year
Rental vacancy6.7%2026-07 · -0.3 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Hamilton County has a split county-level screen: Zillow’s 2026-06 series reports a $357,820 median home value, down 0.60% year over year, while median asking rent was $1,528 per month, up 1.56%, with a reported 5.12% gross yield before costs. The tension merits property-level review by income-focused buyers; underwriting that depends on rapid appreciation or tight supply warrants caution.

02Housing economics

The published market rent is a measured asking-rent figure, whereas HUD’s $1,390 two-bedroom Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The reported yield therefore cannot be replaced with an FMR-based yield. A 0.62% effective property-tax rate and $1,925 median annual tax add a carrying-cost check; neither median necessarily describes the same property, and gross yield excludes expenses not published here.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence points to looser visible listing conditions, not completed-sale outcomes: median listing price was down 4.56%, active listings were up 32.27%, median marketing time was 58 days, and 23.87% of listings had price reductions. Tax-return migration was net inbound and incoming movers had higher average AGI than outgoing movers, but this is not renter demand. The reported investor share was 12.16% of 5,031 purchases, indicating buyer participation rather than proof of investor control or cash-buyer activity.

04Risk & next checks

FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 1.76% and its five-year cumulative change was 63.32%; those index readings neither value homes in dollars nor share Zillow’s value methodology or observation period, so they should not be averaged. QCEW annual data show declining covered employment at county workplaces while average weekly wage increased; Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with a modeled annual building-value loss ratio of 0.15%. Parcel flood zone, insurance, mitigation, operating expenses, vacancy, property condition, neighborhood rent, and closed-sale evidence are not published; their absence prevents net-yield, hazard-cost, and exit-value underwriting.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Hamilton County, TN

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,317$2,047Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$730highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range34.1%50.3%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered46,079across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.37363$2,04737406$1,68837404$1,67737343$1,59037405$1,53637421$1,48837411$1,43237402$1,41937379$1,41837415$1,38537416$1,32837412$1,317
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.52.8%47.5%42.2%36.9%31.6%374213741537405373433736337412374113740637404374023741637379Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.37406+140.7%37404+129.0%37379+112.5%37363+109.5%37411+106.9%37343+101.3%37416+97.6%37412+94.7%37402+93.4%37405+89.3%37415+87.7%37421+81.3%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Across the selected direct-evidence set, Zillow’s typical observed asking-rent index runs from $1,317 to $2,047, a $730 spread, with a $1,460 median. The county-level Zillow reading is $1,528 and its reported annual change is 1.56%. The decision is not to presume one local rent level but to determine whether an available unit can be secured near the lower portion of this observed range or whether the household must accommodate the upper end. ZORI is an index, rather than a quote for a specified unit, so bedroom count, lease terms, fees, and condition require listing-level confirmation. The spread frames a budget search; it does not establish any property’s rent.

The three measures answer distinct questions and should be read in parallel, never rolled into a composite price. In 37406, the reported ZORI is $1,688 after a 9.89% annual increase; its HUD two-bedroom FMR is $1,200, making ZORI 140.7% of that standard. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, while FMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard; a particular offered unit need not equal either figure. ACS five-year median gross-rent estimates, survey estimates rather than current asking rents, span $615 to $1,630 among the selected ZCTAs. They offer household-cost context for their survey period, but should not be used to quote availability or be mathematically combined with ZORI or FMR.

Burden and vacancy furnish distinct screening signals. County ACS estimates that 45.23% of renters devote 30% or more of income to gross rent; the selected-area estimates extend from 34.1% to 50.3%. Separately, treating ZORI as a one-third-of-gross-income screen produces annual income thresholds from $52,680 to $81,880. That arithmetic does not measure a particular household’s income, unit size, concessions, or total lease cost. ACS five-year vacancy estimates range from 4.9% to 20.6%, versus 8.23% countywide. A higher estimated vacancy rate does not establish lower asking rent or affordability. Use burden estimates to understand reported cost pressure and vacancy only as a separate availability context, then test both against current property terms.

Coverage and crosswalk rules limit the claim. This targeted comparison contains 12 of 15 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches, covering 46,079 renter households, rather than a complete county inventory. For display, each ZIP is assigned to Hamilton County using its largest HUD residential-address share; shown shares run from 96.1% to 100.0%, so a displayed ZIP can still include addresses outside the county. The ACS areas are Census ZCTAs—statistical tabulation geographies whose boundaries do not precisely track the postal ZIP service footprint in Hamilton County. Before selecting a property, verify advertised rent, actual availability, bedroom count, lease length, utilities, parking, deposits, income rules, and the exact address; apply a HUD two-bedroom standard only when it fits the relevant administrative program or decision.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

15 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
37421$1,488$1,405$1,83041.0%7.4%$60k100.0%
37415$1,385$1,332$1,58049.0%5.9%$55k100.0%
37405$1,536$1,438$1,72034.1%12.0%$61k96.1%
37343$1,590$1,358$1,57043.9%4.9%$64k100.0%
37363$2,047$1,630$1,87043.5%5.9%$82k100.0%
37412$1,317$1,154$1,39037.9%8.1%$53k100.0%
37411$1,432$1,072$1,34049.2%6.8%$57k100.0%
37406$1,688$982$1,20050.3%12.1%$68k100.0%
37404$1,677$1,094$1,30042.6%16.8%$67k100.0%
37402$1,419$615$1,52047.8%20.6%$57k100.0%
37416$1,328$1,119$1,36035.7%5.9%$53k100.0%
37379$1,418$1,004$1,26037.2%7.3%$57k96.9%
READ BEFORE USING

The selected comparison includes 12 of 15 eligible direct-ZORI matches and is ordered using renter-household coverage, not intended to enumerate every ZIP, rental unit, or local subarea in Hamilton County. Absence from this set is not a rent or availability finding.

ZIP placement uses the county holding the greatest HUD residential-address share, yet ZIP delivery areas can cross county borders. ACS results instead attach to Census ZCTAs, which are survey tabulation areas with only an approximate relationship to postal ZIP delivery geography.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Hamilton County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Chattanooga city185.8KEast Ridge city22.1KSoddy-Daisy city13.2KMiddle Valley CDP12.2KRed Bank city12KCollegedale city11.3KSignal Mountain town8.9KHarrison CDP8K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

19 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Chattanooga cityIncorporated place
    185,783
  2. 02
    East Ridge cityIncorporated place
    22,070
  3. 03
    Soddy-Daisy cityIncorporated place
    13,231
  4. 04
    Middle Valley CDPCensus-designated place
    12,187
  5. 05
    Red Bank cityIncorporated place
    12,010
  6. 06
    Collegedale cityIncorporated place
    11,330
  7. 07
    Signal Mountain townIncorporated place
    8,860
  8. 08
    Harrison CDPCensus-designated place
    8,011
  9. 09
    Apison CDPCensus-designated place
    4,271
  10. 10
    Sale Creek CDPCensus-designated place
    2,955
  11. 11
    Falling Water CDPCensus-designated place
    2,315
  12. 12
    Lakesite cityIncorporated place
    2,168
Show 7 more places
  1. 13
    Lookout Mountain townIncorporated place
    2,111
  2. 14
    Fairmount CDPCensus-designated place
    2,110
  3. 15
    Walden townIncorporated place
    1,845
  4. 16
    Mowbray Mountain CDPCensus-designated place
    1,721
  5. 17
    Flat Top Mountain CDPCensus-designated place
    1,004
  6. 18
    Ridgeside cityIncorporated place
    879
  7. 19
    Ooltewah CDPCensus-designated place
    578

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.148% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.61%

$1,925 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+1,852

10,765 in · 8,913 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$7,596

$76,172 arriving · $68,576 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors12.2%

612 of 5,031 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings2,003▲ 32.3% year over year
Median days on market58▲ 10.5% year over year
Listings price-reduced23.9%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 4.6% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Chattanooga, TN

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Hamilton County376,192$358k$1,5285.1%inland flooding
Walker County68,762$246k$1,3626.6%inland flooding
Catoosa County68,634$296k$1,4866.0%inland flooding
Marion County29,250$267kn/an/ainland flooding
Sequatchie County16,809$293k$1,2004.9%inland flooding
Dade County16,165$258kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Unpublished flood insurance and mitigation costs could erode the reported pre-cost yield.
  2. Visible MLS softening may not predict pricing or liquidity for the target property segment.
  3. County-level migration, workplace employment, and investor data may not describe a specific neighborhood.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent an asking-rent measure or a HUD payment standard?

It is median asking rent; the separately published two-bedroom HUD FMR is a payment standard.

What does the QCEW employment series measure?

Annual covered jobs located at county workplaces; it is not resident employment or unemployment.

Which private supersector is the largest disclosed?

Trade, transportation, and utilities; this disclosure does not represent the entire county economy.