Direct recent-lease rent history
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
FIPS 47065 · population 376,192 · part of Chattanooga, TN
The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,528 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.
| Bedrooms | HUD monthly FMR | Geography | Measurement boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,211 | Hamilton County, TN | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 1 bedroom | $1,263 | Hamilton County, TN | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 2 bedrooms | $1,390 | Hamilton County, TN | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 3 bedrooms | $1,734 | Hamilton County, TN | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
| 4 bedrooms | $1,853 | Hamilton County, TN | HUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent. |
Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26
Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.
Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.
Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.
Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.
BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.
HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.
These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 47065. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.
Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.
Hamilton County has a split county-level screen: Zillow’s 2026-06 series reports a $357,820 median home value, down 0.60% year over year, while median asking rent was $1,528 per month, up 1.56%, with a reported 5.12% gross yield before costs. The tension merits property-level review by income-focused buyers; underwriting that depends on rapid appreciation or tight supply warrants caution.
The published market rent is a measured asking-rent figure, whereas HUD’s $1,390 two-bedroom Fair Market Rent is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate. The reported yield therefore cannot be replaced with an FMR-based yield. A 0.62% effective property-tax rate and $1,925 median annual tax add a carrying-cost check; neither median necessarily describes the same property, and gross yield excludes expenses not published here.
Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence points to looser visible listing conditions, not completed-sale outcomes: median listing price was down 4.56%, active listings were up 32.27%, median marketing time was 58 days, and 23.87% of listings had price reductions. Tax-return migration was net inbound and incoming movers had higher average AGI than outgoing movers, but this is not renter demand. The reported investor share was 12.16% of 5,031 purchases, indicating buyer participation rather than proof of investor control or cash-buyer activity.
FHFA’s annual 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 1.76% and its five-year cumulative change was 63.32%; those index readings neither value homes in dollars nor share Zillow’s value methodology or observation period, so they should not be averaged. QCEW annual data show declining covered employment at county workplaces while average weekly wage increased; Trade, transportation, and utilities is the largest disclosed private supersector, not the whole economy. Inland flood is the dominant hazard, with a modeled annual building-value loss ratio of 0.15%. Parcel flood zone, insurance, mitigation, operating expenses, vacancy, property condition, neighborhood rent, and closed-sale evidence are not published; their absence prevents net-yield, hazard-cost, and exit-value underwriting.
This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.
Across the selected direct-evidence set, Zillow’s typical observed asking-rent index runs from $1,317 to $2,047, a $730 spread, with a $1,460 median. The county-level Zillow reading is $1,528 and its reported annual change is 1.56%. The decision is not to presume one local rent level but to determine whether an available unit can be secured near the lower portion of this observed range or whether the household must accommodate the upper end. ZORI is an index, rather than a quote for a specified unit, so bedroom count, lease terms, fees, and condition require listing-level confirmation. The spread frames a budget search; it does not establish any property’s rent.
The three measures answer distinct questions and should be read in parallel, never rolled into a composite price. In 37406, the reported ZORI is $1,688 after a 9.89% annual increase; its HUD two-bedroom FMR is $1,200, making ZORI 140.7% of that standard. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, while FMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard; a particular offered unit need not equal either figure. ACS five-year median gross-rent estimates, survey estimates rather than current asking rents, span $615 to $1,630 among the selected ZCTAs. They offer household-cost context for their survey period, but should not be used to quote availability or be mathematically combined with ZORI or FMR.
Burden and vacancy furnish distinct screening signals. County ACS estimates that 45.23% of renters devote 30% or more of income to gross rent; the selected-area estimates extend from 34.1% to 50.3%. Separately, treating ZORI as a one-third-of-gross-income screen produces annual income thresholds from $52,680 to $81,880. That arithmetic does not measure a particular household’s income, unit size, concessions, or total lease cost. ACS five-year vacancy estimates range from 4.9% to 20.6%, versus 8.23% countywide. A higher estimated vacancy rate does not establish lower asking rent or affordability. Use burden estimates to understand reported cost pressure and vacancy only as a separate availability context, then test both against current property terms.
Coverage and crosswalk rules limit the claim. This targeted comparison contains 12 of 15 eligible direct-ZORI ZIP/ZCTA matches, covering 46,079 renter households, rather than a complete county inventory. For display, each ZIP is assigned to Hamilton County using its largest HUD residential-address share; shown shares run from 96.1% to 100.0%, so a displayed ZIP can still include addresses outside the county. The ACS areas are Census ZCTAs—statistical tabulation geographies whose boundaries do not precisely track the postal ZIP service footprint in Hamilton County. Before selecting a property, verify advertised rent, actual availability, bedroom count, lease length, utilities, parking, deposits, income rules, and the exact address; apply a HUD two-bedroom standard only when it fits the relevant administrative program or decision.
15 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.
| ZIP / ZCTA | Zillow asking rent | ACS gross rent | HUD 2BR | Burden 30%+ | Vacancy | Income screen | HUD county share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37421 | $1,488 | $1,405 | $1,830 | 41.0% | 7.4% | $60k | 100.0% |
| 37415 | $1,385 | $1,332 | $1,580 | 49.0% | 5.9% | $55k | 100.0% |
| 37405 | $1,536 | $1,438 | $1,720 | 34.1% | 12.0% | $61k | 96.1% |
| 37343 | $1,590 | $1,358 | $1,570 | 43.9% | 4.9% | $64k | 100.0% |
| 37363 | $2,047 | $1,630 | $1,870 | 43.5% | 5.9% | $82k | 100.0% |
| 37412 | $1,317 | $1,154 | $1,390 | 37.9% | 8.1% | $53k | 100.0% |
| 37411 | $1,432 | $1,072 | $1,340 | 49.2% | 6.8% | $57k | 100.0% |
| 37406 | $1,688 | $982 | $1,200 | 50.3% | 12.1% | $68k | 100.0% |
| 37404 | $1,677 | $1,094 | $1,300 | 42.6% | 16.8% | $67k | 100.0% |
| 37402 | $1,419 | $615 | $1,520 | 47.8% | 20.6% | $57k | 100.0% |
| 37416 | $1,328 | $1,119 | $1,360 | 35.7% | 5.9% | $53k | 100.0% |
| 37379 | $1,418 | $1,004 | $1,260 | 37.2% | 7.3% | $57k | 96.9% |
Open a five-digit report for asking rent, affordability, rent history and resale liquidity. Each row keeps its ZIP/ZCTA measurement scope.
| ZIP report | City label | Zillow rent | 1Y change | ACS burden 30%+ | Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZIP 37421 rental reportHamilton County | Chattanooga, TN | $1,488 | ▲ 1.3% | 41.0% | 52,985 |
Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS burden and population describe the Census ZCTA; missing observations remain n/a.
Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.
Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.
0.148% of building value expected lost per year
$1,925 median annual bill
10,765 in · 8,913 out
$76,172 arriving · $68,576 leaving
612 of 5,031 mortgages
Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.
A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.
| County | Population | Price | Rent | Yield | Hazard |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamilton County | 376,192 | $358k | $1,528 | 5.1% | inland flooding |
| Walker County | 68,762 | $246k | $1,362 | 6.6% | inland flooding |
| Catoosa County | 68,634 | $296k | $1,486 | 6.0% | inland flooding |
| Marion County | 29,250 | $267k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
| Sequatchie County | 16,809 | $293k | $1,200 | 4.9% | inland flooding |
| Dade County | 16,165 | $258k | n/a | n/a | inland flooding |
It is median asking rent; the separately published two-bedroom HUD FMR is a payment standard.
Annual covered jobs located at county workplaces; it is not resident employment or unemployment.
Trade, transportation, and utilities; this disclosure does not represent the entire county economy.