States / Tennessee
State rental intelligence

Tennessee rental market data

A source-traced view across 23 metro markets and 95 counties. State figures below are labelled medians and totals—not a made-up statewide investment score.

16/23 metros scored95/95 counties with FEMA risk15 sources used in this analysis
Median scored metro38.0out of 100 · 16 measured metros
Tennessee identity diorama showing regional landscape, cities, housing, and infrastructure
Median metro home value$294kmedian across published metro values
Median metro rent$1,455monthly · published metro values
Median gross yield5.6%annual rent ÷ price · before costs
Median job trend▲ 0.2%trailing 12-month metro employment
Direct monthly rental evidence

Tennessee rent market dynamics

Apartment List measures recent leases, rental vacancy and listing time separately. These figures do not replace Zillow, Census or Realtor measures elsewhere on this page.

Recent-lease rent$1,1442026-07 · ▼ 1.8% year over year
Rental Vacancy Index7.9%2026-07 · +0.1 pp in 12 months
Time on market30 days2026-07 · +2 days in 12 months
US recent-lease rent$1,3882026-07 · ▼ 1.1% year over year
Rent and rental vacancy through timesolid state series · dashed national series · no interpolation across missing observations
Recent-lease rent$1,511$1,155$799Rental Vacancy Index8.9%5.9%2.8%2017-012021-102026-07TennesseeUnited States
State research brief

Recent-lease rents fell 1.8% statewide as vacancy and marketing time rose, even while the median Zillow rent across 16 measured metros increased 1.4% and Sevierville’s climbed 11.9%.

Updated 2026-08-08 · evidence current to the releases listed below.

Apartment List’s Tennessee recent-lease rent fell from $1,165 to $1,144 year over year. In its separate state series, rental vacancy increased from 7.7% to 7.9%, while time on market rose from 28.3 to 30 days. Together, these measures support a softer statewide leasing screen, but they have different coverage and should not be combined into a single market score.

The counter-signal is geographic: median Zillow rent growth was 1.4% across 16 measured metros, positive net migration reached 24,542 across 95 counties, and several named metros posted much faster rent growth. Screening therefore needs to move from the state series to local rent, supply, employment and resale evidence. The packet cannot establish property-level occupancy, achievable rent, operating costs or insurance, and Zillow county rent covers only 48 of 95 counties, with year-over-year rent available for 30.

01

Apartment List recent-lease rent fell 1.8%, while its separate vacancy and time-on-market series rose → begin screening with restrained rent-growth and lease-up assumptions

02

Median Zillow rent growth was 1.4% across 16 metros, with Sevierville at 11.9% → replace the state signal with local rent comps before rejecting or accepting a market

03

Sevierville had 15.43 permits per 1,000 residents and 11.3 months of resale supply → test the local pipeline and exit case alongside its strong rent growth

04

Net migration was 24,542, but median metro job growth was only 0.2% → verify current employer and renter-income support rather than relying on migration alone

05

Gross yields ranged from 4.9% to 6.9% across the central 80% of measured metros, while Jackson reached 8.3% → compare opportunities on net expenses and tenant affordability, not gross yield alone

01
Direct state rental dynamics

Recent leases weakened as Tennessee vacancy edged higher

Apartment List’s July 2026 recent-lease rent was $1,144, down 1.8% from $1,165 a year earlier. Its separate Vacancy Index rose by 0.13 percentage point to 7.9%, and its separate time-on-market measure increased 1.7 days to 30 days.

The rent decline was 0.7 percentage point more negative than the supplied national measure, and Tennessee vacancy was 0.7 percentage point higher; current time on market was the same at 30 days. These comparisons support conservative initial assumptions for rent growth and lease-up, but they do not show which Tennessee metros or property types account for the statewide movement.

Evidence: Apartment List Rent Estimates — recent-lease rent index · Apartment List Time on Market — listing liquidity · Apartment List Vacancy Index — rental vacancy

02
Price and rent momentum

Sevierville leads a wide metro rent-value split

Across 16 metros with measured Zillow rent growth, the median was 1.4%, with the 10th-to-90th-percentile range running from 0.3% to 6.2%. Home values increased by a median 1.9% across 23 metros, leaving measured median rent growth 0.4 percentage point behind price growth.

Sevierville was the sharpest exception: rent rose 11.9% while home value fell 1.3%, a calculated 13.2-percentage-point spread. Its $409,653 value and $1,698 monthly rent produced a supplied gross yield of 5.0%, so rapid rent growth did not translate into an unusually high headline yield. Greeneville and Kingsport also had rent growth of 6.4% and 6.0%, respectively, ahead of value growth of 3.3% and 1.2%. These are local signals rather than evidence that the statewide recent-lease decline is wrong.

Evidence: Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

03
Supply and resale conditions

Sevierville requires a supply screen, while Union City flags exit friction

Sevierville recorded 1,538 permitted units, or 15.43 per 1,000 residents. That rate is a calculated 3.6 times the measured-metro median of 4.28. It also had 11.3 months of resale supply versus a 4.2-month median. Marketing time was 67 days, a calculated 4.5 days above the median, while its 29.3% price-drop share was close to the 29.7% median.

Permits are not completed rental units, and Redfin resale measures do not establish rental absorption, but the combination makes pipeline and exit analysis important before relying on Sevierville’s rent surge. A different liquidity concern appears in Union City: 133 median days on market, 6.2 months of supply and a 92.1% sale-to-list ratio. That evidence points to resale friction even though its price-drop share was 23.4%.

Evidence: Census Building Permits Survey — permitted units · Redfin Data Center — inventory, days on market, and price cuts

04
Employment and household movement

Positive migration is offset by nearly flat metro job growth

IRS data covering 95 counties recorded 221,190 movers in and 196,648 movers out, for net migration of 24,542, or 3.5 per 1,000 residents. Aggregate mover income also had a reported positive gap of $897,198. This is a demand-supportive counter-signal to the weaker current rental series.

Employment was less forceful. Year-over-year job growth had a median of 0.2% across 23 metros, with the 10th-to-90th-percentile range running from a 0.7% decline to a 0.9% increase. McMinnville and Kingsport each posted about 1.2% growth, while Knoxville posted 0.9%. Because the migration figures cover 2022-2023 and the job figures are more current, the packet supports checking present local employers and renter incomes rather than treating earlier inflows as current leasing demand.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — population · BLS CES — payroll employment · BLS LAUS — resident employment · IRS SOI — county migration and mover income

05
Entry cost and affordability

Jackson’s 8.3% gross yield comes with above-median rent pressure

The median supplied gross yield across 23 metros was 5.6%, with a 10th-to-90th-percentile range of 4.9% to 6.9%. Jackson stood above that range at 8.3%, based on a $210,372 value and $1,455 monthly rent. Its rent-to-income measure was 28.5%, above the measured-metro median of 26.0%.

Union City paired a lower $168,371 value and $1,021 rent with a 7.3% gross yield and a lower 22.4% rent-to-income measure. Memphis posted a 6.9% gross yield and 25.9% rent-to-income measure. These figures distinguish entry-cost and tenant-affordability screens, but gross yield is not net operating income: the packet does not deduct vacancy, repairs, management, taxes, insurance or financing.

Evidence: Census ACS 5-year — household income and gross rent · HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standard · Zillow ZHVI — metro home values · Zillow ZORI — metro market rents

06
Physical risk and property tax

County hazard-loss and tax screens vary well beyond measured medians

FEMA assigns inland flood as the mutually exclusive leading-hazard label for 79 counties and earthquake for 16, a calculated total of 95. These are county-level leading-hazard classifications, not findings that every parcel is exposed to that hazard.

Measured county expected-loss ratios had a median of 0.16% and a 10th-to-90th-percentile range of 0.12% to 0.23%. Lake County was higher at 0.39%, alongside a 0.67% effective property-tax rate and $653 median tax. Effective tax rates across counties ranged from 0.37% at the 10th percentile to 0.59% at the 90th, while Shelby County registered 0.98% and a $2,429 median tax. Property-level hazard, insurance and assessed-tax review remains necessary because county measures cannot price a specific acquisition.

Evidence: FEMA National Risk Index — hazard loss ratios · Census ACS 5-year — effective property tax

State ZIP rental intelligence

How direct rental evidence varies inside Tennessee

The distribution uses 24 current published ZIP reports across 12 cities and 8 counties. Twelve measured counter-signals are shown below; this is not a statewide neighborhood ranking.

Published ZIP rent range$1,075$2,417full direct-ZORI report cohort
Median rent / income23.9%annual asking rent ÷ ACS household income
Median one-year growth▲ 1.1%exact direct Zillow endpoints
Renter households covered197,209across published ZCTA matches
01 · RENT DISPERSIONRepresentative direct ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare direct Zillow asking-rent indexes for the twelve representative published ZIP reports.37064$2,41737174$2,02838135$1,81537128$1,73437923$1,67338401$1,58237130$1,56338125$1,50237043$1,43937042$1,39438127$1,08538115$1,075
02 · AFFORDABILITY PRESSURERent / income × observed burden
Horizontal position is annual Zillow asking rent divided by ACS median household income. Vertical position is the ACS share of renter households paying thirty percent or more.59.8%53.8%47.9%42.0%36.0%370423811537130371283812738401381253704337064379233717438135Annual asking rent / ACS household income →ACS renter burden share →
03 · PATH QUALITYOne-year growth × variability
Each point compares exact one-year Zillow asking-rent growth with annualized variability from the direct monthly series.5.5%4.3%3.1%1.9%0.6%370423811537130371283812738401381253704337064379233717438135Exact one-year Zillow rent growth →Annualized monthly variability →
WHAT THE STATE DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Within the 24 current published direct-evidence ZIP reports, June 2026 Zillow ZORI, an observed asking-rent index, has a median current rent of $1,572.50 and ranges from $1,075 to $2,417—a $1,342 spread. The endpoints in Memphis and Franklin make the practical question location-specific: is the budget fit evaluated against the relevant ZIP report rather than a statewide midpoint? This is a distribution of reports with direct Zillow evidence, not a census of every Tennessee ZIP, neighborhood, or rental property; a listed level is a market index rather than an advertised unit availability. It provides a common comparison set for checking whether a target budget lies near the reported middle or an endpoint.

Affordability and burden point to related but noninterchangeable questions. ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA estimates, which describe statistical areas rather than identical USPS delivery ZIPs, put the mechanically calculated asking-rent-to-median-income range at 18.1%35.3%, with a 23.9% median. The corresponding 30% income screen requires $43,000$96,680 annually. That is a current asking-rent and median-income comparison, whereas the ACS renter-burden measure is the share of renter households paying 30% or more of gross rent: 38.5%57.3%, with a 47.8% median. Thus a ZIP's screen can look manageable while a sizeable surveyed renter share remains burdened, without making one metric a substitute for the other.

Rent momentum comes only from direct monthly Zillow series and should be read separately from monthly movement variability. The one-year annualized change runs from -2.3% to 5.4%, with a 1.1% median: the reported decline is in Spring Hill, while the highest gain is in Bartlett. Those endpoints coexist with published histories labeled cooling, stable growth, mixed, high variability, and accelerating, rather than a uniform pattern. Annualized volatility spans 1.6%4.5%, median 2.8%; accordingly, a recent gain or decline does not by itself establish how uneven the path was. Use the growth and volatility readings as retrospective descriptions, not a forecast or explanation of future rents.

HUD adds a different comparison, not a confirmation of the Zillow level. In the displayed reports, its two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard ranges from $1,190 to $2,150, while Zillow asking rent divided by that benchmark ranges from 79.0% to 119.8%, median 99.7%. The ratio is useful for aligning a market-wide asking-rent index with an administrative bedroom standard, but it does not mean the index describes a two-bedroom lease or that HUD is a market quote. At property level, bedroom count, unit-specific terms, timing, and actual availability can differ from both measures; verify a given listing and any program's applicable rule directly. Neither series captures a specific property's concession, fee schedule, or lease duration.

Representative direct evidence

Twelve useful contrasts, every one traceable

The statewide summaries use all 24 qualifying reports. The table preserves measured extremes in rent, affordability, burden, momentum, volatility and the HUD benchmark gap.

ZIP reportPlaceZillow rent1Y growthRent / incomeBurden 30%+VariabilityHUD 2BR gap
37042Clarksville$1,394▲ 2.6%23.8%44.0%1.6%▲ 103.6%
38115Memphis$1,075▼ 0.9%28.3%57.3%2.8%▲ 79.0%
37130Murfreesboro$1,563▲ 1.3%29.9%53.5%2.9%▲ 106.3%
37128Murfreesboro$1,734▲ 2.3%22.2%50.7%2.3%▲ 96.3%
38127Memphis$1,085▼ 0.3%35.3%50.2%2.5%▲ 91.2%
38401Columbia$1,582▲ 0.3%27.7%45.3%3.0%▲ 119.8%
38125Memphis$1,502▲ 0.6%20.9%38.5%2.8%▲ 96.9%
37043Clarksville$1,439▲ 0.6%18.1%39.8%2.7%▲ 99.9%
37064Franklin$2,417▲ 3.0%22.7%50.7%3.1%▲ 112.4%
37923Knoxville$1,673▲ 0.7%27.2%48.3%4.5%▲ 100.8%
37174Spring Hill$2,028▼ 2.3%23.1%40.8%2.4%▲ 98.9%
38135Bartlett$1,815▲ 5.4%22.4%41.8%3.1%▲ 99.7%
READ BEFORE USING

Zillow ZORI is an observed asking-rent index, not a transaction series or a quote for a currently vacant dwelling. The state distribution includes only current published direct-evidence ZIP reports and excludes unreported ZIPs, neighborhoods, and individual properties.

ACS values are 2024 five-year survey estimates assigned to Census ZCTAs, which are statistical areas rather than identical USPS delivery ZIPs. Their income, gross-rent, vacancy, and burden measures therefore differ in geography, timing, and construction from the monthly Zillow series.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Evidence selected for Tennessee

The ranges behind the analysis

Each row keeps its own unit and shows the measured 10th percentile, median and 90th percentile. A single-value row is labelled directly.

Price and rent momentumAre home values and asking rents moving together or separating?
10th pct.median90th pct.Home-value change-0.4%1.9%6.7%Asking-rent change0.3%1.4%6.2%Rent minus price-0.4%
Supply and resale conditionsWhat do permits, inventory, marketing time and price cuts say about pressure?
10th pct.median90th pct.Permits / 1k1.54.39.0Months of supply3.2×4.2×6.0×Days on market47 days63 days86 daysListings with cuts23.6%29.7%32.9%
Employment and household movementDo jobs, household movement and mover income point in the same direction?
10th pct.median90th pct.Job change-0.7%0.2%0.9%Net migration / 1k3.5Net household movement24,542
Shape of the state

Distribution before conclusion

A statewide median can hide a wide spread. These SVG charts render at build time and carry no chart library or browser-side data request.

Metro score distribution16 scored metros · median 38.0
00–191020–39340–59360–79080–100
County evidence coverageEvery gap stays visible as missing—not estimated
51%48/95Rent100%95/95Climate100%95/95Migration
Highest measured metro gross yieldsscreening metric only · before expenses and financing
Jackson8.3%Union City7.3%Memphis6.9%Kingsport6.6%Cookeville6.2%Johnson City6.2%Lewisburg6.0%
Metro leaderboard

Markets touching Tennessee

Multi-state CBSAs appear in every member state. Score is still a metro score; no value is reweighted into a statewide ranking.

#MetroScorePriceRentYieldJobs
1Kingsport, TN69$249k$1,3626.6%▲ 1.2%
2Greeneville, TN65$256k$1,1635.5%▲ 0.1%
3Dyersburg, TN64$177k$7405.0%▲ 0.3%
4Sevierville, TN52$410k$1,6985.0%▲ 0.2%
5Athens, TN46$266k$1,1155.0%▲ 0.4%
6Knoxville, TN42$370k$1,7565.7%▲ 0.9%
7Nashville, TN39$458k$1,8104.8%▲ 0.6%
8Tullahoma, TN39$321k$1,4945.6%▲ 0.3%
9Clarksville, TN37$294k$1,3365.5%▲ 0.2%
10Johnson City, TN36$287k$1,4746.2%▼ 0.3%
11Morristown, TN35$304k$1,5156.0%▼ 1.1%
12Jackson, TN34$210k$1,4558.3%▼ 0.2%

Showing the top 12 scored metros of 23. Unscored metros remain discoverable through the national rankings.

Below the metro line

Largest counties in Tennessee

County figures join on the five-digit FIPS code. The table uses measured local values and prints “n/a” wherever a publisher has no record.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Shelby County, TN919,173$222k$1,3897.5%inland flooding
Davidson County, TN715,388$435k$1,8245.0%inland flooding
Knox County, TN494,148$384k$1,7685.5%inland flooding
Hamilton County, TN376,192$358k$1,5285.1%inland flooding
Rutherford County, TN360,646$420k$1,7244.9%inland flooding
Williamson County, TN260,351$931k$2,1772.8%inland flooding
Montgomery County, TN234,153$323k$1,3755.1%inland flooding
Sumner County, TN204,424$448k$1,6694.5%inland flooding
Sullivan County, TN160,624$264k$1,3436.1%inland flooding
Wilson County, TN158,805$508k$1,8804.4%inland flooding
Blount County, TN139,333$399k$1,8685.6%inland flooding
Washington County, TN136,261$313k$1,5475.9%inland flooding
County yield sample48/95counties have the rent needed to compute yield
Statewide net migration+24,542IRS tax-return households summed across counties
Median investor share7.5%among counties with HMDA purchase records
Bear case

What can break the thesis

  1. Apartment List measures recent leases at state level, while Zillow measures metro or county rents with different coverage; their opposing movements do not establish how the same properties performed.
  2. Geographic rent evidence is incomplete: metro year-over-year rent covers 16 of 23 metros, county rent covers 48 of 95 counties, and county rent growth covers 30.
  3. The positive migration and mover-income figures cover 2022-2023, so they may not describe demand at the time of the 2026 rent, vacancy and listing measures.
  4. Supplied gross yields omit vacancy, repairs, management, taxes, insurance, financing and unit condition, any of which can overturn the headline ranking.
  5. FEMA leading-hazard labels and expected-loss ratios are county-level screens, not parcel exposure or insurance quotes; measured county tax rates likewise do not determine a specific property’s bill.
Investor questions

Before underwriting a property

Does the packet show that Tennessee rental conditions are weakening?

It shows softness in three separate Apartment List state series: recent-lease rent fell 1.8%, vacancy rose 0.13 percentage point to 7.9%, and time on market increased 1.7 days to 30. It does not establish weakening in every metro or property type.

Is Sevierville’s rent growth enough to support an acquisition case?

Not by itself. Zillow rent rose 11.9% while value fell 1.3%, but the supplied gross yield was 5.0%. Sevierville also had 11.3 months of resale supply and 15.43 permits per 1,000 residents, so local pipeline, achievable rent and exit liquidity need separate verification.

Do migration and employment point to durable rental demand?

They are mixed. Net migration was positive at 24,542, or 3.5 per 1,000 residents, and aggregate mover income had a positive gap. Median metro job growth was only 0.2%, however, and the migration data are older than the current rental measures.

Which named markets offer the strongest headline yield and affordability combination?

Jackson had the highest supplied gross yield at 8.3%, but its 28.5% rent-to-income measure exceeded the 26.0% metro median. Union City combined a 7.3% gross yield with a lower 22.4% rent-to-income measure, although separate resale evidence showed substantial exit friction there.

Can the county hazard and tax data determine property-level costs?

No. They identify county-level leading hazards, expected-loss ratios and effective tax distributions. They do not provide parcel exposure, an insurance quote, an assessed value or the tax bill for a specific acquisition.