Counties / Tennessee / Rutherford County

Rutherford County, TN

FIPS 47149 · population 360,646 · part of Nashville, TN

$420k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$420k
▼ 0.5% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,724
▲ 1.6% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
4.9%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,730
market rent is 1.00x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

The annual signals disagree
FHFA five-year cumulative+58.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06−0.5%FHFA HPI2025+0.0%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$383k
Surveyed gross rent$1,502
Rent burden 30%+52.0%
Median year built2001
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
6.8%vacant
138,929estimated housing units
Occupied tenure35.2% renter
owner 64.8%renter 35.2%
Structure mix74.5% single-family
Single-family 74.5%20+ units 7.3%Mobile home 2.4%Other 15.8%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs147,661▼ 1.1% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments8,212annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,274▲ 4.0% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities28.8% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−1.1%WEEKLY WAGE+4.0%Trade, transportation, and utilities28.8%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Rutherford County presents an underwriting tension: a measurable rent stream and modest gross yield sit beside a loosening visible listing market and inland-flood exposure. It merits investigation by operators able to verify property-level flood and operating costs; buyers reliant on quick resale or thin reserves should be cautious. Zillow’s county and Realtor inventory observations are labeled 2026-06, whereas FHFA and QCEW annual records are labeled 2025; these are not one common interval.

02Housing economics

Zillow’s median home value is $420,064, down 0.53% year over year. Published median asking rent is $1,724 monthly; at that pairing, reported gross yield is 4.92% before costs. This is measured market rent. HUD two-bedroom FMR is instead a payment standard and cannot be used as an asking-rent estimate or substituted in yield. The 0.48% effective property-tax rate adds a known recurring carrying-cost input, but insurance, HOA, maintenance, and financing costs are not published, preventing a net-yield conclusion.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com MLS evidence shows active listings increased 9.23%, median marketing time reached 50 days, and 19.49% of listings had price reductions. Those are asking-market supply, marketing-time, and concession signals, not closed-sale prices or proof of buyer demand. Net tax-return migration was 1,075 households, and in-movers reported higher average income than out-movers; this identifies an income difference among movers but does not show household tenure or housing demand by segment. Non-occupant purchase mortgages represented 7.29% of 5,408 reported purchases, indicating participation without a dominant buyer share.

04Risk & next checks

FHFA’s repeat-transaction HPI rose 0.02% over its annual measure; it is an appreciation index, not a home value, and its direction is not merged with Zillow’s later value change. QCEW annual average covered workplace employment fell 1.13%; this is neither resident employment nor unemployment. Modeled annual building-value loss is 0.14%, consistent with inland flood as the dominant hazard, but it does not replace parcel flood-zone, elevation, insurance, and claims review. Missing closed-sale comps, submarket vacancy, insurance quotes, and property-level condition prevent a resale, occupancy, or net-cash-flow conclusion.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Rutherford County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Murfreesboro city161.4KSmyrna town*56.7KLa Vergne city40.2KChristiana CDP4.8KRockvale CDP1.6KEagleville city*999Walterhill CDP113
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Murfreesboro cityIncorporated place
    161,445
  2. 02
    Smyrna townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    56,692
  3. 03
    La Vergne cityIncorporated place
    40,243
  4. 04
    Christiana CDPCensus-designated place
    4,777
  5. 05
    Rockvale CDPCensus-designated place
    1,611
  6. 06
    Eagleville cityIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    999
  7. 07
    Walterhill CDPCensus-designated place
    113

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.135% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.48%

$1,839 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+1,075

12,650 in · 11,575 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$4,454

$61,323 arriving · $56,869 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors7.3%

394 of 5,408 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,491▲ 9.2% year over year
Median days on market50▲ 5.3% year over year
Listings price-reduced19.5%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▼ 0.6% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Nashville, TN

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Rutherford County360,646$420k$1,7244.9%inland flooding
Davidson County715,388$435k$1,8245.0%inland flooding
Williamson County260,351$931k$2,1772.8%inland flooding
Sumner County204,424$448k$1,6694.5%inland flooding
Wilson County158,805$508k$1,8804.4%inland flooding
Maury County107,791$406k$1,6885.0%inland flooding
Robertson County75,539$374k$1,6615.3%inland flooding
Dickson County55,983$366k$1,7165.6%inland flooding
Cheatham County41,829$400k$1,6535.0%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Parcel-level flood exposure, insurance cost, or prior claims may exceed the county modeled-loss measure.
  2. Unpublished operating costs and financing terms may eliminate the apparent gross-yield cushion.
  3. MLS listing slack may persist and weaken resale pricing or liquidity.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Is the published rent a market-rent measure or HUD FMR?

The record publishes median market asking rent; HUD two-bedroom FMR is separately identified as a payment standard.

Do the available price measures show a single current appreciation trend?

No. Zillow’s county home-value change is negative, while FHFA’s annual repeat-transaction HPI change is slightly positive at a distinct source period and under a different method.

Is investor participation the dominant source of buyer competition?

No. Non-occupant purchase mortgages are a minority of reported purchases in the supplied record.