Counties / Tennessee / Dickson County

Dickson County, TN

FIPS 47043 · population 55,983 · part of Nashville, TN

$366k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$366k
▲ 2.2% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,716
▲ 3.4% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.6%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,730
market rent is 0.99x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+56.5%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+2.2%FHFA HPI2025+1.7%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-07-28.
Owner-reported value$306k
Surveyed gross rent$1,015
Rent burden 30%+32.7%
Median year built1988
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.0%vacant
23,657estimated housing units
Occupied tenure19.7% renter
owner 80.3%renter 19.7%
Structure mix80.2% single-family
Single-family 80.2%20+ units 0.9%Mobile home 11.3%Other 7.5%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs18,824▼ 0.3% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments1,336annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,026▲ 3.1% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities21.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS−0.3%WEEKLY WAGE+3.1%Trade, transportation, and utilities21.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-07-31. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Dickson County’s underwriting tension is that a reported gross yield can support initial screening while the visible resale market and flood exposure require conservative property-level work. Zillow’s 2026-06 county median home value was $366,270, up 2.19%, alongside a $1,716 median asking rent and a 5.62% gross yield. Buyers relying on rapid resale or a thin expense cushion merit the most caution. FHFA’s separately dated 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 1.72% annually; it confirms the same broad direction but is an index, not a home value, and cannot be blended with Zillow’s observation.

02Housing economics

The rent is a measured monthly market asking rent, whereas HUD’s two-bedroom FMR is a payment standard, not evidence of achievable asking rent and not a substitute for the stated yield. The reported yield is gross annual market rent before vacancy, management, repairs, insurance and taxes. An effective property-tax rate of 0.47% belongs in acquisition underwriting, but the record lacks assessed value, insurance cost, utility responsibility, operating expense, lease-up, vacancy and collections data. Consequently, it does not establish net income, debt coverage or a property-specific carrying-cost margin.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com’s 2026-06 MLS evidence shows 298 active listings, a 50-day median marketing time, 21.3% of listings reduced, and a 38.15% pending-to-active ratio. These are visible asking-market supply, marketing-time and seller-concession measures—not closed-sale prices or independent proof of buyer demand. Tax-return migration was net positive, and average AGI for movers in exceeded that for movers out, a favorable household-composition signal; it does not identify renters, owners or neighborhood destinations. The investor mortgage share was 5.07% of purchases, a limited observed nonoccupant-financed slice that excludes unobserved cash activity.

04Risk & next checks

Labor evidence is also bounded: 2025 QCEW annual covered employment at county workplaces edged down while average weekly wage rose, and Trade, transportation, and utilities was the largest disclosed private supersector. It is neither resident employment nor an unemployment measure. Inland flood is the dominant hazard; the modeled annual building-value loss ratio is 0.12%, a county-level screen rather than an asset loss estimate. Next checks are lease comps and concessions, closed sales, insurance quotes and deductibles, elevation and flood-zone history, tax assessment, and property-level expenses; without them, neither resale liquidity nor net yield can be underwritten.

Cities & communities

Where people live within Dickson County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Dickson city16.4KWhite Bluff town4.1KCharlotte town2.2KBurns town1.9KVanleer town666Slayden town189
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

6 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Dickson cityIncorporated place
    16,424
  2. 02
    White Bluff townIncorporated place
    4,080
  3. 03
    Charlotte townIncorporated place
    2,164
  4. 04
    Burns townIncorporated place
    1,884
  5. 05
    Vanleer townIncorporated place
    666
  6. 06
    Slayden townIncorporated place
    189

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.122% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.47%

$1,431 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+376

1,849 in · 1,473 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$21,860

$73,753 arriving · $51,893 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors5.1%

43 of 848 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings298▲ 25.0% year over year
Median days on market50▲ 8.1% year over year
Listings price-reduced21.3%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 2.8% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Nashville, TN

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Dickson County55,983$366k$1,7165.6%inland flooding
Davidson County715,388$435k$1,8245.0%inland flooding
Rutherford County360,646$420k$1,7244.9%inland flooding
Williamson County260,351$931k$2,1772.8%inland flooding
Sumner County204,424$448k$1,6694.5%inland flooding
Wilson County158,805$508k$1,8804.4%inland flooding
Maury County107,791$406k$1,6885.0%inland flooding
Robertson County75,539$374k$1,6615.3%inland flooding
Cheatham County41,829$400k$1,6535.0%inland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Lease-level vacancy, concessions, collections and operating costs are not published, so the reported gross yield may not translate into adequate net income.
  2. MLS listing measures may not match closed-sale values or actual resale liquidity for a specific property.
  3. County-level flood loss modeling may understate a property's insurance, elevation, drainage or deductible exposure.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Does the record establish net operating income or debt coverage?

No. It reports gross yield before expenses and does not publish vacancy, operating costs, insurance, collections or financing terms.

Can the Realtor.com metrics be used as closed-sale comparables?

No. They are MLS listing-market measures of asking prices, active supply, marketing time, reductions and pending activity.

What physical risk requires property-level review?

Inland flood is the dominant hazard, and the supplied climate figure is a county-level modeled building-value loss ratio rather than an asset-specific loss estimate.