Counties / Tennessee / Knox County

Knox County, TN

FIPS 47093 · population 494,148 · part of Knoxville, TN

$384k
Zillow home value · 2026-06
Direct county rent answer

What does rent cost in Knox County, TN?

The latest county-level Zillow ZORI is $1,768 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

County Zillow ZORI$1,7682026-06 · up 0.2% year over year
County ACS gross rent$1,261ACS 2024 5-year · occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom FMR$1,471FY2026 · administrative standard
HUD Fair Market Rent by bedroom count in Knox County
BedroomsHUD monthly FMRGeographyMeasurement boundary
Studio$1,177Knox County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
1 bedroom$1,184Knox County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
2 bedrooms$1,471Knox County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
3 bedrooms$1,864Knox County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.
4 bedrooms$2,172Knox County, TNHUD administrative benchmark; compare with same-bedroom listings, never treat it as observed asking rent.

Zillow asking rent, ACS gross rent and HUD FMR describe different housing universes. They remain separate and no metro, city or neighboring-county value replaces missing county evidence.Zillow pulled 2026-07-26 · HUD pulled 2026-07-26

The numbers

What this county costs and earns

Everything here joins on the county FIPS code, so each figure comes from the agency that publishes it with no name matching in between.

Zillow home value
$384k
▲ 1.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · direct
Median asking rent
$1,768
▲ 0.2% year over year
Zillow ZORI · direct
Gross yield
5.5%
annual rent ÷ price, before costs
derived: rent × 12 ÷ price ✓
HUD 2-bed standard
$1,471
market rent is 1.20x the standard
HUD Fair Market Rent · direct
Independent price check

Do two methods point the same way?

Zillow estimates a current home value. FHFA tracks repeat mortgage transactions. Their growth rates should be read side by side, not averaged.

Both annual signals move in the same direction
FHFA five-year cumulative+77.0%not annualized · through 2025
0%ZILLOW ZHVI2026-06+1.1%FHFA HPI2025+2.9%
Annual changes use different methods and may use different periods. The comparison checks direction and magnitude; it does not create a blended estimate. Zillow county ZHVI pulled 2026-07-26; FHFA annual county HPI pulled 2026-08-02.
Owner-reported value$321k
Surveyed gross rent$1,261
Rent burden 30%+50.1%
Median year built1985
Housing composition

Who occupies the stock—and what it is

ACS 2024 5-year
8.0%vacant
218,661estimated housing units
Occupied tenure34.8% renter
owner 65.2%renter 34.8%
Structure mix71.4% single-family
Single-family 71.4%20+ units 8.3%Mobile home 3.6%Other 16.7%
ACS estimates describe the standing housing stock and occupied tenure. They do not measure current listings, transaction prices or asking rents.

Survey source: Census ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stock · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30. These values describe different housing universes and are not combined into gross yield.

Annual average covered jobs262,423▲ 0.8% from the prior annual release
Covered establishments16,232annual average reporting locations
Average weekly wage$1,294▲ 3.4% from the prior annual release
Largest private supersectorTrade, transportation, and utilities25.1% of disclosed private covered jobs
Local labor base

Jobs, pay and private-sector concentration

2025
0%COVERED JOBS+0.8%WEEKLY WAGE+3.4%Trade, transportation, and utilities25.1%
Annual QCEW counts cover jobs located at reporting establishments. The industry share uses disclosed private covered employment; it is not a resident-employment measure or a forecast.

Workplace source: BLS QCEW — county employment and wages · annual county employment and wages 2021-2025; latest 2025 vs 2024 · pulled 2026-08-02. QCEW counts covered jobs located in the county, not employed residents or the metro score’s CES/LAUS series.

Resident income

How local income has compounded

BEA per-capita personal income divides all personal income by the county population. It is broader than wages, but it is not household income or a measure of what renters can afford.

Per-capita personal income19692024
Per-capita personal income history for Knox CountyA line chart of annual BEA per-capita personal income from 1969 through 2024.$0k$40k$80k196919972024$3k$73k
Nominal annual dollars; not adjusted for inflation. A rising line can reflect wage, business-income, transfer-income and investment-income changes together.
Renter affordability

Who carries the heaviest rent burden

HUD CHAS separates renter households by income relative to local HAMFI. Moderate burden means housing costs above 30% through 50% of income; severe burden means more than 50%.

Share of renter households in each income band2018-2022
Renter cost burden by HAMFI income band in Knox CountyFive horizontal bars show moderate and severe housing cost burden shares among renter households in each HUD income band.0%25%50%75%100%At or below 30% HAMFI16,42567.9% burdened30–50% HAMFI11,50076.1% burdened50–80% HAMFI14,60049.8% burdened80–100% HAMFI7,54016.3% burdenedAbove 100% HAMFI18,2254.1% burdened
Moderate: >30% to 50%Severe: >50%
Each percentage uses HUD’s published subtotal for that income band. For disclosure, HUD keeps 0 as 0, publishes 1–7 households as 4 and rounds 8 or more to the nearest 5. Independently rounded categories can differ from their displayed sum and are not forced into a percentage.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Knox County, TN

These Apartment List observations match the exact county Census code 47093. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,304$1,181$1,0572021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,1872026-07 · -3.0% year over year
Rental vacancy6.1%2026-07 · +0.4 percentage points year over year
Time on marketn/an/a
County brief

What the local evidence says

01Decision frame

Knox County is a current-income-versus-durability screen for buyers who can validate unit economics and flood exposure, rather than a broad price-growth call. Zillow's 2026-06 county observation reports a $383,827 median home value and $1,768 monthly median asking rent, producing the supplied 5.53% gross yield before operating costs. This is measured market asking rent; the yield is not net income and cannot establish cash flow without financing, insurance, repairs, vacancy, and property-specific expenses.

02Housing economics

HUD's two-bedroom FMR is $1,471 and is a payment standard, not an asking-rent estimate; it must not replace the Zillow rent in underwriting. The effective property-tax rate is 0.43%, a recurring carrying-cost input against the stated gross yield, although parcel variation is not shown. FHFA's 2025 repeat-transaction HPI rose 2.95% in its annual reading. It supports positive indexed appreciation under a different method and vintage, but it is neither a dollar home value nor a rate to average with Zillow's observation.

03Demand & competition

Realtor.com's MLS listing-market evidence shows 1,679 active listings and 22.78% with price reductions. Those are visible supply and seller-concession signals, not closed-sale prices or independent proof of buyer demand. Net tax-return migration was 1,518 households, while average income of inbound movers exceeded outbound movers by $5,486; that composition is supportive context but does not identify renter demand or neighborhood location. Investor purchases were 657 of 6,720 total purchases, a 9.78% share: a defined competing buyer cohort, not proof of investor dominance. QCEW describes covered jobs at county workplaces and covered-worker wages, not resident employment, tenant income, or a forecast.

04Risk & next checks

Modeled annual climate loss equals 0.11% of building value, and inland flood is the dominant hazard; this is a modeled loss ratio, not a parcel flood determination or a dollar loss. Cautious buyers should obtain parcel flood zone, elevation, insurance quotes, and loss history. Rent roll, vacancy, turnover, operating expenses, financing terms, and closed-sale comparables are not published here; their absence prevents a net-yield, debt-coverage, sale-value, or property-specific flood-cost conclusion.

County ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Knox County, TN

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. Each ZIP is assigned by its largest HUD residential county share; this is not an exhaustive county inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,228$2,062Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$834highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range34.5%56.2%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered56,764across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.37932$2,06237920$1,89037922$1,77737921$1,76837917$1,74637931$1,69837923$1,67337909$1,65237918$1,63237919$1,59937914$1,58737912$1,228
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.58.7%52.0%45.3%38.6%32.0%379203791937917379183792337912379213790937931379143793237922Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.37920+142.1%37914+119.3%37921+115.6%37918+113.3%37909+112.4%37932+108.0%37917+107.1%37923+100.8%37919+94.6%37931+92.3%37912+89.0%37922+85.0%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

Across the 12 selected direct-evidence ZIP/ZCTA matches assigned to Knox County, Zillow’s June 2026 ZORI—the typical observed asking-rent index—runs from $1,228 in 37912 to $2,062 in 37932. The selected-set median is $1,685.50, producing an $834 spread; the county-level ZORI is $1,768. This is a materially dispersed search market rather than a single price point. The decision question is therefore not which label is “best,” but whether a household’s actual bedroom need, monthly budget, and lease terms can be matched to current listings around the relevant part of this range. Index movement and ZIP-level figures should guide initial comparison, not substitute for a unit quote.

Keep the three rent measures in separate roles. The ACS 2024 five-year survey reports median gross rent from $1,108 to $1,805 among these ZCTAs; it is survey evidence, not Zillow’s June asking-rent index. FY 2026 HUD Fair Market Rent is a two-bedroom administrative standard, with values from $1,330 to $2,090, rather than an asking-rent observation. The ratio is useful only as a side-by-side screen: ZORI is 142% of HUD’s two-bedroom standard in 37920 but 85% in 37922. Those contrasts identify where the two systems diverge; they do not convert one measure into another or state what a particular home will rent for.

ACS burden and vacancy estimates describe another set of trade-offs, not live listing conditions. The share of renter households spending at least 30% of income on rent ranges from 34.5% to 56.2% across the shown ZCTAs. Their vacancy estimates span 4.5% to 12.1%, while renter shares run from 15.5% to 52.9%. A lower vacancy estimate signals less estimated vacant stock in the ACS data, but it cannot confirm that an appropriately sized unit is available today. Likewise, a larger burden share indicates more renters above the stated threshold, not that any applicant will be burdened at the same rate. Read the measures together as historical context: affordability pressure, tenure mix, and vacancy are distinct dimensions, and the reported ranges do not establish why they differ.

Coverage and geography constrain how far these comparisons travel. The display includes 12 of 15 eligible direct-ZORI matches and covers 56,764 renter households under the selection rule, so it is not a complete county or property inventory. ACS geography here is ZCTA, which is statistical geography rather than USPS delivery ZIP geography. Separately, the HUD–USPS crosswalk assigns each display ZIP to its largest county residential-address share; those shares range from 97.1% to 100%. Before acting, verify the live asking rent, bedroom count, utility and recurring fees, concessions, deposit, lease length, income screening, availability date, and the property’s actual address. Match those itemized terms to the household’s own income and expected move timing rather than treating an index, a survey estimate, or an administrative standard as a quoted lease.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

15 ZIP profiles passed the county gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screenHUD county share
37920$1,890$1,157$1,33052.5%10.5%$76k99.4%
37919$1,599$1,350$1,69056.2%9.3%$64k100.0%
37917$1,746$1,127$1,63039.2%12.1%$70k100.0%
37918$1,632$1,131$1,44043.3%7.3%$65k100.0%
37923$1,673$1,371$1,66048.3%8.2%$67k100.0%
37912$1,228$1,128$1,38047.4%8.6%$49k100.0%
37921$1,768$1,233$1,53049.0%10.2%$71k100.0%
37909$1,652$1,204$1,47048.0%4.5%$66k100.0%
37931$1,698$1,542$1,84034.8%6.2%$68k97.1%
37914$1,587$1,108$1,33041.3%9.0%$63k100.0%
37932$2,062$1,590$1,91034.5%7.5%$82k100.0%
37922$1,777$1,805$2,09043.5%5.2%$71k99.8%
READ BEFORE USING

The direct-evidence display contains 12 of 15 eligible matches and is ordered under the stated selection rule; it is not an exhaustive inventory of Knox County ZIPs, ZCTAs, rental properties, or currently marketed units.

Census ZCTAs are statistical areas rather than USPS delivery ZIPs, and HUD–USPS crosswalk assignment uses the county with the largest residential-address share. Consequently, ZIP-level comparisons can include geography that is not perfectly coterminous with county or delivery-ZIP boundaries.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS 5-year — county housing value, tenure and stockACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30Census ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD Fair Market Rents — Section 8 standardFY2026 FMR · pulled 2026-07-26HUD-USPS ZIP-to-county residential-address crosswalkHUD-USPS 2026Q1 · pulled 2026-08-09Zillow ZHVI and ZORI — county values and rentscounty ZHVI/ZORI 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Cities & communities

Where people live within Knox County

Census-recognized incorporated places and CDPs that intersect this county. The list does not pretend to include every neighborhood or informal community.

Population scale

Largest Census places

ACS 2024 5-year
Knoxville city195.2KFarragut town*24.6KPowell CDP13.7KHalls CDP10.3KKarns CDP4.1KMascot CDP3.3KJohn Sevier CDP1.2K
Bars use total place population, not a county-share estimate. An asterisk marks a place that crosses a county line.
Official directory

7 Census places

Population
  1. 01
    Knoxville cityIncorporated place
    195,185
  2. 02
    Farragut townIncorporated place · spans 2 counties
    24,634
  3. 03
    Powell CDPCensus-designated place
    13,739
  4. 04
    Halls CDPCensus-designated place
    10,272
  5. 05
    Karns CDPCensus-designated place
    4,115
  6. 06
    Mascot CDPCensus-designated place
    3,277
  7. 07
    John Sevier CDPCensus-designated place
    1,177

Population is the total place-wide ACS estimate, not an allocated county share. A place crossing a county line is labelled explicitly. Source: Census ACS 5-year — cities and communities · ACS 2024 5-year · pulled 2026-07-30.

Risk, demand and competition

The three things a price does not tell you

01
Risk & carrying costFEMA NRI + Census ACS
Dominant hazardinland flooding

0.112% of building value expected lost per year

Effective property tax0.43%

$1,367 median annual bill

02
DemandIRS SOI household flows
Net migration+1,518

14,608 in · 13,090 out

Arriving vs leaving income+$5,486

$72,182 arriving · $66,696 leaving

03
CompetitionHMDA financed purchases
Purchases by investors9.8%

657 of 6,720 mortgages

investorother financed
Current listing pressure

What sellers and visible supply are doing

Realtor.com® Economic Research · county inventory 2026-06 · pulled 2026-07-28
Active listings1,679▲ 5.5% year over year
Median days on market52▲ 8.9% year over year
Listings price-reduced22.8%seller-concession signal
Median listing pricen/a▲ 2.3% year over year

Listing price is an asking price, not a closed sale. Quality-flagged county rows are withheld instead of displayed.

Same metro

The other counties in Knoxville, TN

A metro is an average of these. Which side of a county line a property sits on can change the tax bill, the hazard profile and the tenant pool.

CountyPopulationPriceRentYieldHazard
Knox County494,148$384k$1,7685.5%inland flooding
Blount County139,333$399k$1,8685.6%inland flooding
Anderson County79,153$320k$1,6446.2%inland flooding
Loudon County58,580$455k$1,7774.7%inland flooding
Roane County55,208$304k$1,3625.4%inland flooding
Campbell County39,761$248kn/an/ainland flooding
Grainger County24,266$286kn/an/ainland flooding
Morgan County21,361$221kn/an/ainland flooding
Union County20,431$299kn/an/ainland flooding
Bear case

What can break the county thesis

  1. Parcel-specific inland-flood insurance or mitigation costs could overwhelm gross yield.
  2. Unpublished operating, vacancy, and financing data could turn a gross-yield screen into weak net cash flow.
  3. MLS concessions and visible supply could make resale liquidity weaker than county value indicators suggest.
Underwriting questions

Before pricing a property

Does the record distinguish market rent from HUD FMR?

Yes. It provides median asking market rent separately and identifies HUD FMR as a payment standard rather than an asking-rent estimate.

Does the record quantify investor participation?

Yes. It provides investor purchases, total purchases, and the resulting investor share.

Can this record establish property-level flood cost or net cash flow?

No. It lacks parcel flood details, insurance quotes, operating expenses, vacancy, financing terms, and rent-roll evidence.