ZIP reports / TN / 38104
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 38104, Memphis, TN

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 38104?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 38104 is $1,273 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,2732026-06 · down 0.8% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,112ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$56 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,470Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 38104
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,057ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,220HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,152ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,330HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,273ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,470HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,680ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,940HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$1,957ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,260HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$58,117ACS 2024 5-year · ±$5,362 MOE
Renter share62.0%7,975 renter households
Rent burden 30%+49.7%3,966 observed households
Housing vacancy10.6%1,529 of 14,392 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 38104Zillow asking-rent index$1,273ACS median gross rent$1,112HUD two-bedroom standard$1,470

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 38104ACS median household income$58,117Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$50,920

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 38104Studio$1,057One bedroom$1,152Two bedrooms$1,273Three bedrooms$1,680Four bedrooms$1,957

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 3810430% or more of income3,966 householdsBelow 30%4,009 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 38104ZIP 38104$1,273Memphis city$1,280Shelby County county$1,389Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro$1,435

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 38104; missing months remain gaps$1,374$1,284$1,194$1,1042021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
12.0%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
6.2%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.7%125 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%126 of 126 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 38104

Resale weakness is 38104's clearest cross-market tension. At the stated June endpoint, the direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation reports a $284,936 median sold price, 14.9% below a year earlier. Its 8.0 months of supply, 46 median days on market, and 97.7% average sale-to-list ratio describe the for-sale market, not rental transactions. Against that backdrop, the June ZIP ZORI is $1,273 per month. Annualizing that asking-rent index and dividing it by the resale median produces a 5.36% cross-source screening ratio only. It is not a cap rate, net return, expected return, property yield, or evidence about any property's economics. The contrast between soft resale signals and the present asking-rent snapshot is the report's central tension.

The rent record makes that tension more nuanced rather than resolving it. In the direct Zillow ZIP ZORI history through June 2026, exact same-month change is -0.76% over one year, -0.03% annualized over three years, and +2.28% annualized over five years. Recent easing therefore aligns with the near-flat short and middle path but breaks from the longer positive path. Coverage is complete across 126 monthly observations. The supplied high-variability classification is consistent with 3.67% annualized monthly-return volatility and a -6.22% maximum drawdown, so a single latest index level merits less confidence than the fully observed trend. Transparent national discovery ranks are 2,557 for momentum, 2,387 for stability, and 2,771 for balanced performance; a lower numerical rank is higher. These backward-looking measures are neither forecasts nor investment recommendations.

Definitions explain why the rent measures do not match. That five-digit label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. By contrast, the ACS 2024 five-year survey reports a $1,112 median gross rent for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities; it is 14.5% below the current asking-rent index. In a third universe, the local HUD FY2026 two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR standard is $1,470, placing the current ZORI 13.4% below it. HUD is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent.

A bedroom lens is available, but it is deliberately modelled rather than observed. The studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom, three-bedroom, and four-bedroom modelled monthly ZIP estimates are $1,057, $1,152, $1,273, $1,680, and $1,957. These modelled estimates scale ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder. They are never measured bedroom rents, active-listing averages, or evidence that a unit at any size is available at those amounts. The ladder is most useful for preserving a consistent relationship among bedroom sizes while keeping the broad ZORI index separate from actual unit-specific terms.

The income screen gives a different, arithmetic view of the asking-rent level. At a 30% income share, supporting the current monthly ZORI requires $50,920 in annual income. The ACS ZCTA median household income is $58,117, making the asking-rent-to-income calculation 26.3%. This is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant qualification rule. Separately, the ACS burden result shows 3,966 of 7,975 renter households, or 49.7%, allocating at least 30% of income to gross rent. That survey burden describes occupied renter households in aggregate; it does not establish what a particular unit costs, whether its utilities are included, or what any applicant can afford.

The ACS ZCTA housing base contains 14,392 units, and its reported vacancy rate is 10.6%. Renters make up most occupied households, but aggregate vacancy does not establish a vacant comparable unit or a particular property's leasing conditions. For wider context only, the Memphis city asking-rent context is about $1,280, the Shelby County asking-rent context is $1,389, and the Memphis, TN-MS-AR metro asking-rent context is $1,435; these city, county, and metro values are broader contexts, not ZIP observations. All three wider asking-rent contexts sit above the ZIP index, but they cannot replace ZIP-level evidence or explain the source differences between ZORI, ACS gross rent, and HUD standards.

Resale liquidity remains a separate evidence stream. Within the direct ZIP resale observation, 74 homes sold, while inventory measured 195 homes and was 24.7% higher than a year earlier. The reported supply level indicates more available resale inventory relative to the current sales pace, and it is higher than the metro context's supply measure. Along with the lower median sold price and below-list average sale signal, this is a less-tight for-sale liquidity picture than a simple rent-to-price screen might imply. It challenges a mechanical positive reading of the asking-rent level, the historical rent path, or the income arithmetic. It does not establish a future rental change, rental vacancy outcome, or a relationship for a particular property.

Limits matter because each series answers a different question: Zillow captures blended asking rents, ACS summarizes surveyed occupied households, HUD sets an administrative standard, and Redfin records resale activity. ACS sampling margins of error, modelled bedroom scaling, historical variability, and the rolling resale window all constrain precision. Property-level checks need to identify the actual bedroom count, advertised versus executed rent, included utilities, lease term, availability date, unit condition, listing status, and any relevant sale record before applying a ZIP-level screen. Neither the ZCTA vacancy figure nor the renter-burden share proves conditions at a specific address. The useful closing question is whether the exact unit's verified asking terms and utility treatment align with the modelled bedroom relationship without treating broader resale evidence as a rental comp.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Resale stress and asking-rent stability conflict

The ZIP resale window carries weaker price, supply, marketing-time, and sale-to-list signals than a tight for-sale market would show, while the latest asking-rent index has declined only modestly. Those observations cannot be merged into a causal story because Redfin records sales and Zillow records blended asking rents. The annualized rent-to-price figure is useful only as a cross-source screen.

Historical rent path is flat to down near term

Full historical coverage makes the stated rent path observable, but the high-variability classification and maximum drawdown make any single monthly reading a limited anchor. Near-term decline and multiyear flatness are backward-looking descriptions, while the longer positive annualized change is also historical. The discovery ranks are comparative navigation tools, not grades of a dwelling, forecasts, or investment signals.

Income arithmetic differs from renter burden

The arithmetic screen compares a monthly asking-rent index with area median household income, whereas the burden measure reports surveyed renter households allocating at least the stated income share to gross rent. The first does not qualify applicants; the second does not establish what an individual unit costs or what any household will pay. Utility treatment and survey scope further limit direct comparison.

Source definitions control valid comparisons

Zillow ZORI, ACS gross rent, HUD FMR or SAFMR, and Redfin resale data answer different questions. Zillow is blended asking rent, ACS is occupied-renter survey data with selected utilities, HUD is an administrative bedroom standard, and Redfin is direct for-sale evidence. The matched ZCTA is a statistical geography, not the same thing as a USPS delivery ZIP.

  • The modelled bedroom ladder uses area HUD relationships to scale a blended ZIP asking-rent index. It cannot establish the rent, utility package, condition, availability, or lease terms of an individual apartment or house.
  • The ACS ZCTA survey summarizes occupied renter households over a multiyear period and has sampling uncertainty. Its gross-rent and burden results should not be treated as contemporaneous listings or household-level outcomes.
  • The high-variability rent history, including past drawdown, means the latest index can be sensitive to timing. Complete historical coverage improves observation continuity but does not transform backward-looking changes into forecasts.
  • Redfin resale figures cover a rolling ZIP sales window rather than rental deals. Changes in price, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes cannot prove a change in rents, vacancy, or economics for a specific property.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 38104

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$284,936-14.9% year over year
Homes sold74rolling three-month observation
Median days on market46 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply8.0resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 38104Active listings298Inventory195Pending sales84Homes sold74

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

195 observed inventory · +24.7% year over year.

Price realization

97.7% average sale-to-list ratio · 11.1% sold above original list.

Early absorption

25.0% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 46 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Shelby County listing conditions

n/a active Realtor.com listings · n/a · n/a price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Memphis, TN-MS-AR resale supply

4.0 months of supply · 37 median days on market · 30.8% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.3% reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 38104. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why is ZORI above ACS median gross rent here?

ZORI is a current ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year ZCTA survey statistic for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. Asking terms, occupied homes, time periods, geography definitions, and utility treatment differ, so the gap is descriptive rather than an error or a direct unit comparison.

Are the bedroom figures observed rents?

No. The studio through four-bedroom figures are modelled monthly ZIP estimates created by scaling current ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD FMR or SAFMR itself is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent. Neither set of bedroom figures substitutes for an active listing, lease, or executed rent for a particular unit.

What does the months-of-supply reading mean?

In the direct rolling resale window, months of supply relates homes available for sale to the pace of sales, so the stated level indicates more available resale inventory relative to that sales pace than the metro context. It is a for-sale liquidity signal. It does not measure apartment vacancy, rental availability, tenant demand, or a property's rental cash flow.

Does the 30% calculation determine affordability?

No. Dividing the ZIP asking-rent index into the stated annual income threshold is an arithmetic screen using median household income. It is not financial advice, an applicant qualification rule, or a prediction of household spending. The ACS burden share separately describes surveyed renter households, and it cannot establish affordability, cost, or payment behavior for one household or one unit.