ZIP reports / CO / 80204
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 80204, Denver, CO

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 80204?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 80204 is $1,990 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,9902026-06 · up 0.2% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,811ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$56 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,089Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 80204
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,565ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,643HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,671ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,754HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,990ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,089HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,604ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,734HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,905ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,049HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$84,829ACS 2024 5-year · ±$9,076 MOE
Renter share62.8%10,853 renter households
Rent burden 30%+47.0%5,102 observed households
Housing vacancy9.1%1,728 of 19,011 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 80204Zillow asking-rent index$1,990ACS median gross rent$1,811HUD two-bedroom standard$2,089

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 80204ACS median household income$84,829Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$79,600

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 80204Studio$1,565One bedroom$1,671Two bedrooms$1,990Three bedrooms$2,604Four bedrooms$2,905

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8020430% or more of income5,102 householdsBelow 30%5,751 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 80204ZIP 80204$1,990Denver city$1,877Denver County county$1,889Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO metro$1,930

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 80204; missing months remain gaps$2,101$1,985$1,870$1,7542021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
10.2%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
3.5%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.6%122 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%123 of 123 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 80204

Rent and resale signals diverge at the stated endpoints. At Zillow's June 2026 endpoint, ZIP ZORI is $1,990 per month, after a 0.23% year-over-year rise. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a transaction rent for a uniform unit. The direct Redfin rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation is strictly for-sale evidence, not rental transactions. Its median sold price is $595,460, down 3.53% year over year. It reports 136 homes sold, 31 median days on market, 395 active listings, 216 homes in inventory, 125 pending sales, and 4.8 months of supply. Sellers averaged 98.93% of list; 11.37% of sales were above list and 42.2% went off market within two weeks. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by that median sold price equals 4.01%, only a cross-source screening ratio rather than a property-level performance measure.

Same-month history gives this slight uptick a longer frame. Direct Zillow ZIP ZORI changes were +0.23% annualized over one year, -0.83% annualized over three years, and +1.97% annualized over five years. Thus, the latest annual increase contrasts with the negative medium-term comparison: recent direction breaks from the longer three-year path, while the five-year comparison still records net growth from its earlier base. Those are exact same-month backward-looking measurements, not a prediction or investment recommendation. The one-year result is especially important here because it establishes stabilization only over the most recent interval; it does not erase the broader negative three-year result.

History coverage is 100%, indicating full recorded coverage in this series. Its monthly return series has 2.58% annualized variability, showing that month-to-month rent-index movement was not fixed even when longer endpoints appear calm. Separately, the largest peak-to-trough decline was 3.46%, defining the deepest observed retreat in the recorded path. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs put stability at 847, momentum at 2,439, and the balanced measure at 2,021; a lower rank is higher. The stability placement is stronger than the momentum placement, but these remain discovery tools based on recorded history. Full coverage supports confidence in the record's completeness, while variability still limits the confidence appropriate for one current asking-rent snapshot.

Source definitions prevent false comparisons. The five-digit 80204 label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match. A ZCTA is a statistical area; it is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the matched ACS 2024 five-year survey, median gross rent is $1,811 for occupied renter homes; this survey measure includes selected utilities and describes accumulated survey responses rather than current advertisements. It is 9.9% below the ZIP asking-rent index, a difference that is informative but not an apples-to-apples gap. The same ZCTA survey reports median household income of $84,829, a household measure with survey uncertainty, not a renter applicant's verified income.

Bedroom detail comes from a model rather than observed bedroom rents. Scaling ZIP ZORI with the supplied local HUD ladder produces modelled monthly ZIP estimates of $1,565 for a studio, $1,990 for two bedrooms, and $2,905 for four bedrooms; intervening bedroom estimates follow that same local scaling. HUD's two-bedroom standard is $2,089, leaving the modelled two-bedroom figure 4.7% lower. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent, and the estimates inherit both ZORI and that standard's relative ladder. Accordingly, this calculation should not be substituted for a unit-level rent comp or treated as a measured bedroom price.

An affordability arithmetic screen is also mixed. Applying a 30% rent-to-income share to the current monthly ZORI requires $79,600 in annual income; against the ZCTA median household income, the same ratio is 28.2%. This is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. In ACS burden data, 5,102 of 10,853 renter households, or 47.0%, report spending at least that share of income on rent. This survey aggregate cannot prove burden for any particular lease. For wider context only, the city of Denver asking-rent context is about $1,877, the Denver County asking-rent context is $1,889, and the Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO metro asking-rent context is $1,930; all are below the ZIP index.

Tenure and vacancy set a separate structural context. Of the housing stock, 7,931 units are single-family and 8,135 are in large multifamily structures, indicating a mixed inventory by these broad structural categories. The ZCTA vacancy rate is 9.1%. This is a survey-category rate, not evidence that a particular building has an available apartment, a particular condition, or a concession. Renting is the majority tenure: renters account for 62.8% of occupied homes. That renter orientation, together with the burden result, describes area-level composition and reported household experience, not the price or availability of a specific unit.

Neither series identifies a specific home, landlord, lease, or sale comp. A property-level review would need the unit's advertised rent by bedroom, included utilities, lease start and term, concessions, actual availability, condition, and occupancy status; those details determine whether an advertised unit resembles the blended ZORI. For a resale comparison, the relevant checks are property type, condition, sale date, list-price history, and whether nearby closed sales match the subject rather than the broad ZIP median. The central tension remains clear: recent asking-rent stabilization and area-level income arithmetic coexist with a lower ZIP resale price and sub-list average sales signal. That resale evidence challenges any attempt to read rent history and the affordability screen as a single market condition.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent stabilization conflicts with resale softness

ZIP ZORI's small latest-year increase contrasts with the negative three-year annualized change and with Redfin's lower median sold price. The evidence does not establish a link between rental and resale activity: the former is a blended asking-rent index, while the latter is a rolling resale observation. It shows why a rent-only reading would be incomplete.

The bedroom schedule is a model, not a comp

Bedroom figures are generated by scaling the ZIP rent index with HUD's local bedroom ladder. That makes the schedule useful for consistently framing size differences, but it does not observe leases or advertisements for a studio, one-bedroom, or larger unit. HUD standards are administrative and cannot substitute for subject-property rental evidence.

Area arithmetic masks heterogeneous burden

Area-level arithmetic and reported burden answer different questions. The income screen compares the ZIP asking-rent index with a ZCTA median household-income statistic; it does not identify a household's income or qualifications. The burden share instead summarizes surveyed renter households reporting a threshold rent share. Neither measure establishes affordability, payment stress, or lease terms for a particular available unit.

History is complete but one-point precision remains limited

Complete historical coverage means the past ZORI series has no reported missing portion, which supports interpretation of its stated history measures. Yet its variability and peak-to-trough decline show that asking-rent snapshots moved over time. The discovery ranks are relative among eligible ZIPs, have no supplied percentile denominator, and remain descriptive rather than predictive.

  • The ZIP market label and matched ZCTA do not share the same operational definition as a USPS delivery ZIP, creating geographic-boundary risk when matching a subject address to these area statistics.
  • ZORI is blended across rental types, while bedroom figures are modelled from an administrative HUD ladder; unusual unit size, utilities, concessions, condition, or lease timing can make a property materially unlike either measure.
  • ACS vacancy, tenure, income, and burden measures are multi-year survey aggregates with sampling uncertainty. They cannot establish current availability, rent burden, household income, or lease outcomes for a particular apartment.
  • Redfin resale figures use a rolling ZIP for-sale window. Sale price, marketing time, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes may not match the subject property type, condition, transaction timing, or rental market.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 80204

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$595,460-3.5% year over year
Homes sold136rolling three-month observation
Median days on market31 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply4.8resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 80204Active listings395Inventory216Pending sales125Homes sold136

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

216 observed inventory · -4.0% year over year.

Price realization

98.9% average sale-to-list ratio · 11.4% sold above original list.

Early absorption

42.2% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 31 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Denver County listing conditions

3,346 active Realtor.com listings · 51 median days on market · 30.0% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO resale supply

2.9 months of supply · 21 median days on market · 41.8% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.3% reported apartment vacancy · 33 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 80204. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why should Zillow ZORI not be treated as the ACS median gross rent?

ZORI is a current ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS is a matched ZCTA five-year survey of occupied renter homes, and median gross rent includes selected utilities. Their time frames, geographies, populations, and rent definitions differ, so the comparison is contextual rather than a unit-for-unit measure.

What does the history say about the most recent rent direction?

The positive one-year same-month change contrasts with the negative three-year annualized measure, while the five-year measure remains positive. This records a recent directional break from the medium-term endpoint path, not a prediction. Full historical coverage improves confidence that the series is complete, but monthly variability means one current index level remains only one observation.

Are the bedroom figures observed rents for available units?

No. They are modelled monthly ZIP estimates produced by scaling the blended ZIP ZORI with the supplied local HUD bedroom ladder. They are neither observed listings nor signed leases. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, so this combined calculation cannot replace subject-property rent evidence, including utilities, concessions, and lease terms.

How should Redfin's resale data be used alongside rent data?

It should remain a direct rolling ZIP for-sale observation. Its price, activity, marketing, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list signals inform the resale universe, not rental transactions. Dividing annualized ZORI by median sold price creates only a cross-source screen. It does not establish property-level rental economics or demonstrate that sales conditions caused rent movement.