ZIP reports / CO / 80904
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 80904, Colorado Springs, CO

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 80904?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 80904 is $1,607 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,6072026-06 · up 3.2% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,474ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$50 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,530Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 80904
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,103ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,050HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,355ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,290HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,607ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,530HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,237ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,130HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$2,542ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,420HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$69,814ACS 2024 5-year · ±$5,152 MOE
Renter share43.7%4,781 renter households
Rent burden 30%+57.9%2,766 observed households
Housing vacancy5.6%652 of 11,602 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 80904Zillow asking-rent index$1,607ACS median gross rent$1,474HUD two-bedroom standard$1,530

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 80904ACS median household income$69,814Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$64,280

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 80904Studio$1,103One bedroom$1,355Two bedrooms$1,607Three bedrooms$2,237Four bedrooms$2,542

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8090430% or more of income2,766 householdsBelow 30%2,015 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 80904ZIP 80904$1,607Colorado Springs city$1,739El Paso County county$1,777Colorado Springs, CO metro$1,779

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 80904; missing months remain gaps$1,647$1,532$1,417$1,3022021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
19.7%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
3.6%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.4%121 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%122 of 122 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 80904

The dominant 80904 tension is not a single rent level but a split between a rising asking-rent reading and a softer direct resale reading. The five-digit label is both Zillow’s ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match. A ZCTA is a statistical area, however, and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Zillow, ACS, HUD, and Redfin therefore do not form one interchangeable market series: their timing, covered populations, and purposes differ. The evidence supports a cross-source comparison, not a claim that one movement caused another. That distinction matters here because the rent/history picture is positive while the direct for-sale indicators supply a counterweight.

Zillow’s ZIP-level ZORI is $1,607 at the reported endpoint, higher than the same month a year earlier. It is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a survey of occupied homes. By contrast, matched Census ZCTA ACS median gross rent is $1,474, making the ZORI reading 9.0% higher; ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. For wider context, the Colorado Springs city-context rent was $1,739, the El Paso County context rent was $1,777, and the Colorado Springs, CO metro-context rent was $1,779. Those city, county, and metro measures are context only, not substitutes for the ZIP observation.

The direct Zillow ZIP history is mixed rather than uniform. Exact same-month annualized change was 3.2% over one year, 2.2% over three years, and 3.7% over five years. The latest pace confirms the longer positive direction relative to the three-year path, but it remains below the five-year pace, so it does not show an unbroken acceleration. Coverage is 100% across 122 monthly observations. The 3.4% annualized monthly-return variability shows that a one-month reading has moved around its historical path and tempers confidence in a single current snapshot; separately, the -3.6% maximum drawdown identifies the largest peak-to-trough retreat. The transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs are 1,140 for momentum and 2,112 for stability, where lower ranks are higher. These are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

Bedroom figures require a separate, explicitly modelled step. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard, not asking rent, and the local HUD ladder is used only to scale ZIP ZORI. The resulting modelled monthly estimates are $1,103 for a studio, $1,355 for one bedroom, $1,607 for two bedrooms, $2,237 for three bedrooms, and $2,542 for four bedrooms. They are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents or rental comparables. The two-bedroom model anchor sits 5.0% above the local HUD two-bedroom standard of $1,530. This ladder describes relative bedroom scaling; it does not establish what any available unit is asking.

The affordability screen creates a different tension: annual income of $64,280 is the arithmetic amount needed to place the ZIP ZORI at 30% of income, compared with ACS ZCTA median household income of $69,814. The corresponding asking-rent-to-income screen is 27.6%. It is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant qualification rule, and it does not describe a leaseholder’s actual resources. In the ACS renter-household survey universe, 2,766 households reported paying at least that threshold, representing 57.9% of renter households. That aggregate burden measure is not proof that a particular home is unaffordable, that a renter faces burden at a particular unit, or that advertised rent includes the same costs as ACS gross rent.

Housing stock adds context without proving current unit availability. Within the ACS ZCTA stock, 7,887 units are single-family and 1,168 are in larger multifamily structures; renters account for 43.7% of occupied units. Its 652 vacant units translate to a 5.6% vacancy rate, of which 221 are identified as vacant for rent. In broader comparisons, Colorado Springs city context and El Paso County context have lower overall vacancy rates than this ZCTA, whereas the Colorado Springs, CO metro context has a higher apartment vacancy rate. Because the metro measure is apartments and the ZCTA measure spans housing units, they are not like-for-like. Neither vacancy rate nor renter share confirms a vacancy, rent, or lease term for a particular property.

Redfin provides a direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation, a for-sale market record rather than rental transactions. Median sold price was $487,140, down 5.6% year over year, with 106 homes sold and a median 48 days on market. Inventory was 156 homes and months of supply stood at 4.5. Average sale-to-list was 97.9%; 11.7% of sales closed above list. The annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is a 4.0% cross-source screening ratio only, not a cap rate, net return, expected return, or property yield. Falling resale price and the listed resale conditions challenge any simple reading of positive asking-rent history and the income arithmetic screen as uniformly firm market evidence.

Several limits remain decisive. ZORI is a blended ZIP asking-rent index, ACS summarizes surveyed occupied renter homes, HUD provides an administrative standard, and Redfin records ZIP resales; matching labels do not make their unit mix, cost definition, or timing interchangeable. A property-level review would need the live advertised rent, exact bedroom count, included utilities, concessions, lease term, actual availability, and address-specific sale and listing records. It would also need to distinguish a modelled bedroom estimate from a measured comparable. The aggregate ACS vacancy and burden statistics cannot answer those property questions. The unresolved question is whether a specific available unit’s rent and terms align with the blended ZIP index while its associated resale evidence remains consistent with the observed ZIP sales record.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent path remains positive but not uniformly accelerating

The latest exact same-month rent increase of 3.2% is faster than the three-year 2.2% annualized result but slower than the five-year 3.7% result. The full monthly history is useful evidence, although observed variability and the historical drawdown mean the current ZIP index should not be read as a fixed trajectory.

Bedroom ladder is a scaling model

HUD-relative scaling produces the supplied studio, one-, two-, three-, and four-bedroom figures from the ZIP ZORI, with the two-bedroom estimate matching the index. The method makes the ladder internally transparent, but neither the HUD standards nor the outputs are measured asking rents for a bedroom category. Direct unit listings remain a separate evidence universe.

Income arithmetic needs burden context

The 30% income calculation places the annual amount needed for the ZIP ZORI below ACS median household income, while the ACS burden estimate says most renter households are at or above that threshold. These results address different constructs: a simple arithmetic screen versus retrospective survey responses for occupied renter homes.

For-sale signals counter the rent screen

Direct ZIP resale evidence records a falling median sale price, 4.5 months of supply, and sale-to-list outcomes below full list on average. It is not evidence of rental transactions. Its contrast with positive rent history is the principal cross-source tension, and the annualized rent-to-price figure remains only a screening ratio.

  • The Zillow ZIP label and Census ZCTA match are not the same geographic construct: a ZCTA is statistical rather than a USPS delivery ZIP, so geographic alignment has limits.
  • The HUD-scaled bedroom figures apply a relative administrative ladder to a blended index. They omit observed unit-level rents, utility packages, concessions, lease terms, condition, and currently available inventory.
  • ACS vacancy and burden results are aggregate five-year survey estimates for the ZCTA. They cannot demonstrate that a particular unit is vacant, affordable, burdened, or comparable to the index.
  • Redfin’s rolling ZIP resale observation and the ZORI-to-price calculation use different market universes. The packet does not provide property-specific rent collections, operating costs, transaction terms, or a purchased home’s economics.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 80904

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$487,140-5.6% year over year
Homes sold106rolling three-month observation
Median days on market48 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply4.5resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 80904Active listings292Inventory156Pending sales127Homes sold106

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

156 observed inventory · +4.6% year over year.

Price realization

97.9% average sale-to-list ratio · 11.7% sold above original list.

Early absorption

29.0% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 48 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

El Paso County listing conditions

3,633 active Realtor.com listings · 49 median days on market · 28.2% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Colorado Springs, CO resale supply

n/a · n/a · 35.0% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.4% reported apartment vacancy · 34 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 80904. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What does the current Zillow rent figure measure?

The $1,607 figure is ZIP-level Zillow ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. It is not an ACS gross-rent median, a utility-inclusive survey response, a HUD FMR/SAFMR standard, or an observed rent for one specified bedroom count.

Why are the bedroom amounts not direct rental comps?

They are modelled monthly estimates created by scaling the ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, while ZORI is blended across types. The calculation produces relative estimates, not measurements of advertised or signed rents for a particular unit type.

What does the 30% screen establish?

It annualizes the ZIP ZORI and divides by 30% to calculate $64,280 of annual income. Comparing that number with ACS median household income yields a 27.6% arithmetic screen. It is neither advice nor an applicant qualification rule and cannot determine an individual household’s affordability.

Why are the Redfin signals not a rental forecast?

Redfin directly observes rolling-three-month ZIP resales, including sale price, time on market, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes. Those are for-sale results, not rental transactions. Their difference from Zillow rent history is a contemporaneous cross-source tension, not a causal relationship, forecast, or property-level conclusion.