Cities / Colorado / El Paso County / Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs cityscape
City housing brief · Incorporated place

Colorado Springs, CO

City evidence stays city-level. County, metro and national records appear separately to explain the wider market without changing the city figures.

City gross yield4.6%ZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs
Direct city rent answer

What does rent cost in Colorado Springs, CO?

The latest city-level Zillow ZORI for Colorado Springs is $1,739 per month in 2026-06. It measures a typical asking-rent market across rental types—not an arithmetic average or an address-level rent estimate.

City Zillow ZORI$1,7392026-06 · up 0.9% year over year
City ACS gross rent$1,648ACS 2024 5-year occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom context$1,735El Paso County administrative standard
How to read the rent answer for Colorado Springs
MeasureCurrent valueGeographyMeasurement boundary
Zillow ZORI$1,739Colorado Springs cityTypical observed asking-rent index; not a unit quote.
Census ACS gross rent$1,648Colorado Springs citySurvey estimate for occupied renter homes, including specified utilities.
HUD 2BR FMR$1,735El Paso CountyAdministrative bedroom standard; wider context, never substituted as city rent.

For a property decision, match bedroom count, condition, utilities, concessions, lease timing and nearby comparable listings. Wider county and metro evidence below stays explicitly labelled.Zillow pulled 2026-07-29

For within-city variation, inspect the published ZIP rental landscape rather than treating one citywide value as uniform.

City market snapshot

Four figures that frame the city

Typical home value
$450k
▼ 1.8% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · 2026-06
Observed market rent
$1,739
▲ 0.9% year over year
Zillow ZORI · 2026-06
Entry affordability
5.3x
home value ÷ household income
Zillow + Census ACS
Population
487,887
▲ 5.0% between ACS vintages
ACS 2024 5-year
Decision brief

What the city-level evidence says

01Decision frame

Colorado Springs’ headline return screen is thin, not a complete cash-flow case. Zillow puts the typical city home value at $450,254 and typical observed market rent at $1,739 monthly; values fell 1.84% while rents rose 0.91% year over year. The resulting 4.63% gross yield precedes all operating and financing costs. Value equals 5.31x median household income, and annual Zillow rent equals 24.60% of income—broad affordability screens, not a tenant budget.

02Housing stock

The city has 211,353 housing units; renters occupy 39.13% of occupied units, and citywide vacancy is 4.18%. ACS reports a $452,600 median owner-reported value and $1,648 median gross rent, which includes selected utilities. These surveyed occupied-housing measures differ in concept and period from Zillow’s typical value and observed market rent; do not average them or read their gap as property-level mispricing.

03City depth

Direct city depth is mixed. ACS reports 54.28% of renter households as cost-burdened, signaling affordability and collections sensitivity rather than achievable rent. Single-family structures represent 68.70% of units and large multifamily 11.57%. ACS vacancy reasons include for-rent, for-sale and seasonal categories; 35.86% of vacant units are for rent, not a count of ready inventory. Population rose 4.95% between overlapping ACS vintages, subject to survey and possible boundary effects, and should not be annualized. Median household income is $84,818; poverty is 9.05% and unemployment 5.57%. These citywide facts cannot establish a property’s tenant pool, lease-up or rent ceiling.

04Wider context

El Paso County Realtor data show 49 median days on market and price reductions on 28.19% of active listings, indicating scope to test seller expectations but not measuring the city alone. The broader Colorado Springs metro had a 0.70% year-over-year job decline and 4,726 authorized housing units, pairing labor softness with a supply pipeline without locating city deliveries. The national Freddie Mac 30-year mortgage rate is 6.58%, a benchmark rather than a borrower quote.

05Limits & next checks

Underwriting is limited by citywide averages, mismatched Zillow and ACS definitions, and county, metro and national denominators. Verify purchase price, unit-specific rent, concessions, occupancy, lease expirations and payment history. Obtain taxes, insurance and hazard terms, utility responsibility, maintenance and capital-needs inspections, management costs, association rules, financing quotes, and closing and exit costs. Compare competing listings and completed leases for the same property type and condition; that is a property-level check, not a neighborhood claim.

Housing system

Market movement and the stock underneath it

Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI +6.8%ZORI +14.7%
11710695202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Housing stock

Tenure and vacancy

ACS
39.1%RENTER
Owner occupied60.9%
Renter occupied39.1%
Vacant units4.2%

Median structure year 1986

Tenure uses occupied units; vacancy uses all housing units.
Measurement matrix

Two sources, two different questions

SourceHome valueMonthly rent
Zillow market index$450.3K$1.7K
ACS occupied housing$452.6K$1.6K
Zillow measures current market indexes. ACS reports surveyed owner value and gross rent for occupied housing. The rows are context, not interchangeable estimates.
Direct local rental evidence

Recent leases and rental-market liquidity in Colorado Springs, CO

These Apartment List observations match the exact city Census code 0816000. They are kept separate from Zillow asking rent, Census occupied-home rent and wider metro measures.

Direct recent-lease rent history

Monthly overall-rent index; missing observations are not filled from another geography.

$1,570$1,448$1,3252021-082026-07
Recent-lease rent$1,3472026-07 · -2.5% year over year
Rental vacancy8.5%2026-07 · -0.8 percentage points year over year
Time on market33 days2026-07 · +3.0 days year over year
Direct city depth

Households and housing form behind the medians

Median household income$85k

Annual ACS household measure.

Rent-to-income screen24.6%

Annual ZORI divided by ACS median income.

ACS rent burden54.3%

Renters paying at least 30% of household income toward gross rent.

Average household size2.36

People per occupied housing unit.

Single-family stock68.7%

Detached and attached one-unit structures.

Large multifamily stock11.6%

Housing in structures with 20 or more units.

Vacant and for rent35.9%

Share of vacant units listed by ACS as for rent, not a market vacancy rate.

Unemployment5.6%

Share of the civilian labor force.

Poverty9.0%

ACS population for whom poverty status is determined.

These are citywide context measures. They cannot tell you the rent, vacancy, expenses or tenant demand for a particular neighborhood or property.
ZIP rental landscape

How asking rent and renter pressure vary inside Colorado Springs

This view uses 12 direct Zillow ZIP markets matched to Census ZCTAs. It is a selected evidence set, not a neighborhood ranking or an exhaustive city inventory.

Selected ZIP range$1,215$1,957Zillow asking-rent index
Monthly spread$742highest minus lowest selected ZIP
Observed burden range43.3%57.9%ACS renter households paying 30%+
Renter households covered66,235across the selected ZCTAs
01 · ASKING RENT LADDERDirect ZIP ZORI
Horizontal bars compare Zillow asking-rent indexes across the selected direct-evidence ZIP set.80920$1,95780924$1,90480903$1,76580906$1,67580904$1,60780907$1,56080910$1,53780905$1,53280918$1,53180916$1,44180917$1,38580909$1,215
02 · PRESSURE MATRIXRent × observed burden
Each point is one selected ZIP and ZCTA match. Horizontal position is Zillow asking rent and vertical position is the ACS renter cost-burden share.60.4%55.5%50.6%45.7%40.8%809188090680904809038090580924809098091080916809078091780920Zillow asking-rent index →ACS burden share →
03 · BENCHMARK GAPZORI vs HUD 2BR
Bars show the percentage difference between the Zillow blended asking-rent index and the local HUD two-bedroom standard. Their housing universes differ.80907+109.1%80903+109.0%80904+105.0%80905+99.5%80910+96.7%80920+91.0%80917+89.4%80906+89.1%80916+87.3%80918+85.5%80909+81.0%80924+79.3%
WHAT THE LOCAL DISTRIBUTION SAYS

The selected ZIP evidence is a bounded within-city view, not a complete inventory: 12 of 16 eligible ZIP/ZCTA matches are shown, covering 66,235 renter households. In the June 2026 Zillow ZORI series, typical observed asking rent ranges from $1,215 to $1,957, with a $1,548.50 median and a $742 spread. That breadth makes the decision less about finding a single city rent than matching a budget to live listings and availability. 80909 anchors the lower index reading, while 80920 anchors the upper one; neither alone establishes the choices available to every renter. For a renter screening locations, the useful question is how much monthly flexibility is needed before unit size, lease terms, and move timing narrow the actual options.

Do not combine the three rent measures into one price. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index, whereas the ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA median gross-rent readings describe surveyed renters under a different rent concept. Within the selected records, ACS medians run from $1,247 to $2,187, a pattern that need not match June listings. HUD’s FY 2026 two-bedroom FMR/SAFMR is instead an administrative standard. The ZORI-to-HUD comparison ranges from 79.3% to 109.1%. Those differences flag where a standard and market index diverge, not a bedroom-adjusted bargain or a valuation.

Affordability and availability present distinct, not automatically offsetting, signals. In ACS estimates, the 30%-or-more burden share spans 43.3% to 57.9%, while vacancy spans 1.0% to 9.0%. The city ACS figures are 54.3% burden and 4.2% vacancy, useful benchmarks rather than outcomes for a particular unit. 80917 pairs the lowest vacancy with a 55.2% burden share, so low recorded vacancy does not establish lower household strain. At the other end, 80903 has the highest vacancy and a 54.4% burden share. Renters can use the figures to prioritize application timing and income-fit screening, but should not assume vacancy causes, or cures, cost pressure.

These figures have material coverage and definition limits. Census ZCTAs are statistical areas, not USPS delivery ZIPs, and the selected direct-evidence set—ordered using report availability and renter-household scale—is not an exhaustive within-city inventory. Timeframes and rent concepts also differ, so a ZORI index, ACS survey estimate, and HUD administrative standard should remain separate in any comparison. At the property level, verify the advertised rent, bedroom count, utilities, fees, deposit, lease length, availability date, and whether the unit is still offered. Rework the payment against the household’s documented income and actual recurring charges before treating a ZIP-level figure as a budgeting result.

Selected ZIP evidence

Keep each source universe visible

16 ZIP profiles passed the city gate; the 12 with the most renter households are shown.

ZIP / ZCTAZillow asking rentACS gross rentHUD 2BRBurden 30%+VacancyIncome screen
80918$1,531$1,648$1,79049.2%3.7%$61k
80906$1,675$1,722$1,88055.2%6.4%$67k
80904$1,607$1,474$1,53057.9%5.6%$64k
80903$1,765$1,247$1,62054.4%9.0%$71k
80905$1,532$1,467$1,54054.6%5.5%$61k
80924$1,904$2,187$2,40057.2%2.2%$76k
80909$1,215$1,296$1,50056.8%4.9%$49k
80910$1,537$1,361$1,59051.2%4.8%$61k
80916$1,441$1,620$1,65054.6%3.9%$58k
80907$1,560$1,505$1,43052.5%4.0%$62k
80917$1,385$1,528$1,55055.2%1.0%$55k
80920$1,957$2,061$2,15043.3%3.2%$78k
READ BEFORE USING

Census ZCTA estimates are statistical-area measures, not USPS delivery ZIP results, and they summarize a five-year survey period. Boundary differences, sampling uncertainty, and historical pooling mean they cannot identify conditions for an individual building, block, or current listing.

The displayed ZIP set is selected from eligible direct-evidence matches, with published reports prioritized and renter households used in ordering; it is not exhaustive. Zillow timing, ACS timing, and HUD administrative standards differ, so confirm the listing’s current terms directly with the property.

SOURCE LEDGERCensus ACS five-year — ZCTA housing and incomeACS 2024 5-year ZCTA · pulled 2026-08-08HUD USPS crosswalk and Small Area FMRs — ZIP rent fallbackZIP-CBSA 2025Q4 + SAFMR FY2026 · pulled 2026-07-26Zillow ZORI — ZIP market rentsZORI ZIP 2026-06 · pulled 2026-08-08
Curated city comparisons

Colorado Springs in direct city-to-city decisions

Each comparison keeps both records inside city limits and opens only when the pair differs materially on multiple decision signals.

Browse all city comparisons →
Closest market alternatives

Three useful contrasts, not a synthetic winner

The peer set broadens the decision without mixing geographies. Price, rent and housing characteristics remain city-level for every place.

Comparable market profile

Entry price, rent and gross yield

Colorado Springs, COAurora, CODenver, CORaleigh, NC
Typical home valueZillow ZHVIColorado Springs$450.3KAurora$462.4KDenver$539KRaleigh$436.1KObserved market rentZillow ZORI / monthColorado Springs$1.7KAurora$1.8KDenver$1.9KRaleigh$1.6KGross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVIColorado Springs4.6%Aurora4.6%Denver4.2%Raleigh4.3%
Bars begin at zero within each measure. Gross yield is a screening ratio before financing, taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance or management costs.
Same state01

Aurora, CO

Compared with Colorado Springs, typical home value is $12k higher, monthly rent is $20 higher, and gross yield is 0.1 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
60.3%
Renter share
37.6%
One-unit stock
64.4%
20+ unit stock
12.9%
Same state02

Denver, CO

Compared with Colorado Springs, typical home value is $89k higher, monthly rent is $138 higher, and gross yield is 0.5 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
47.6%
Renter share
51.2%
One-unit stock
49.3%
20+ unit stock
32.3%
Closest data profile03

Raleigh, NC

Compared with Colorado Springs, typical home value is $14k lower, monthly rent is $160 lower, and gross yield is 0.3 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
52.1%
Renter share
49.3%
One-unit stock
58.1%
20+ unit stock
17.6%

These are analytical alternatives, not recommendations. The structural measures come from Census ACS; price and rent use the Zillow releases shown on each card and in the source ledger below.

Wider market context

What surrounds the city without being mistaken for it

The layers below answer different questions. County records describe listing, migration, financing and hazard conditions around the city; metro records describe jobs, supply and permits; the mortgage rate is national.

Same measure, wider boundary

City marker against intersecting counties

CityCounty range
Typical home value$455.7K$455.7K$450.3KObserved market rent$1.8K$1.8K$1.7K
Both levels use Zillow indexes, but the county records cover land and housing outside the city. The comparison supplies context; it does not replace the city value.
Same Zillow index families

City limits versus the linked metro

Colorado SpringsMetro
Observed market rentMetro $1.8KCity $1.7K · -2.2%Typical home valueMetro $457.1KCity $450.3K · -1.5%Gross yieldMetro 4.7%City 4.6% · -0.8%
Zillow ZORI and ZHVI use the same release month at both boundaries. Gross yield is rent × 12 ÷ home value; the metro contains the city and is context, not a substitute.

Search all direct city–metro gaps in the interactive atlas.

COUNTY LAYER

The intersecting county

This boundary extends beyond the city and is shown only as context.

2026-06
Active listings
3,633
Listing DOM
49 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 0.5%
Net migration
782
Investor share
5.4%
Effective property tax
0.41%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.16%
METRO LAYER

Colorado Springs, CO

Open metro analysis →
Job growth▼ 0.7%12m to 2026-06
Permitted units4,7262026 YTD through M06
Permits / 1,0006.2broader metro population
Months of supplyn/a2026-05-01
Median DOMn/aRedfin metro tracker
Price drops35.0%Redfin metro tracker
Wider-context figures are not inputs to the city gross yield and are never used to fill a missing city price, rent or ACS measure.
What can break the thesis

Three checks before using the city averages

  1. 01

    Gross yield excludes operating expenses, vacancy losses and financing costs

  2. 02

    Citywide vacancy and ACS vacancy-reason shares do not establish subject-property availability or lease-up

  3. 03

    County, metro and national measures have different geographies and denominators

Questions answered

Quick reading guide

Is the headline yield a net return?

No. It is annual Zillow observed rent divided by Zillow typical home value before every operating and financing cost.

Can El Paso County listing data be treated as Colorado Springs data?

No. It is county context and may not match conditions within the city.

What evidence matters next?

Subject-property rent support, leases, expenses, condition, insurance, taxes and financing terms.

Sources and geography

What belongs to this city page

Census recognizes this as Colorado Springs city. The place intersects El Paso County.