ZIP reports / CO / 80909
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 80909, Colorado Springs, CO

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 80909?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 80909 is $1,215 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$1,2152026-06 · up 0.7% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,296ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$56 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,500Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 80909
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$834ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,030HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,029ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,270HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$1,215ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,500HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$1,693ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,090HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$1,920ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,370HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$64,035ACS 2024 5-year · ±$3,240 MOE
Renter share46.0%7,412 renter households
Rent burden 30%+56.8%4,207 observed households
Housing vacancy4.9%836 of 16,952 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 80909Zillow asking-rent index$1,215ACS median gross rent$1,296HUD two-bedroom standard$1,500

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 80909ACS median household income$64,035Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$48,600

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 80909Studio$834One bedroom$1,029Two bedrooms$1,215Three bedrooms$1,693Four bedrooms$1,920

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8090930% or more of income4,207 householdsBelow 30%3,205 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 80909ZIP 80909$1,215Colorado Springs city$1,739El Paso County county$1,777Colorado Springs, CO metro$1,779

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 80909; missing months remain gaps$1,251$1,176$1,101$1,0252021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
15.0%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.7%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.6%77 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%78 of 78 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 80909

The five-digit label 80909 is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match. A ZCTA is a statistical area, however, and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Zillow ZORI for June 2026 is $1,215, representing a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types rather than a quote for one available home. That level is the current rent signal, while the 3.84% annualized-ZORI-to-sale-price figure is only a cross-source screening ratio. It is not a measure of property operating economics or a return, because the rent index and resale-price series observe different markets.

The local bedroom ladder translates the ZIP-wide ZORI into modelled monthly estimates of $834 for a studio, $1,029 for one bedroom, $1,215 for two bedrooms, $1,693 for three bedrooms, and $1,920 for four bedrooms. These are modelled estimates, not measured bedroom rents: they scale the all-types ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder. The corresponding HUD two-bedroom standard is $1,500 in FY2026. HUD FMR or SAFMR figures are administrative, bedroom-specific standards rather than asking rents, so neither the HUD standard nor the modelled ladder should be substituted for a current advertised rent on a particular unit.

The historical path points to stable but slowing asking-rent growth rather than an acceleration. Exact same-month changes were 0.68% over one year, 1.09% annualized over three years, and 2.84% annualized over five years. Thus, the recent direction breaks from the stronger longer path by decelerating, even though it remains positive. The series has 78 observations with full coverage. Its annualized variability from monthly returns was 2.57%, meaning a single current index reading deserves measured confidence rather than treatment as a fixed market clearing price. Separately, the maximum drawdown was 1.68%, the largest decline seen in this observed history. The transparent national discovery ranks place stability at 834 and momentum at 2,074 among history-eligible ZIPs, where a lower rank is higher; they are backward-looking discovery tools, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The ACS 2024 five-year ZCTA survey reports median gross rent of $1,296 with a $56 margin of error. This is a survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, making it a different evidence universe from Zillow asking rent; it cannot establish that current listings include the same utilities or lease terms. The arithmetic 30% required-income screen is $48,600, and ZIP asking rent equals 22.8% of the ZCTA median household income on that simple annualized comparison. This is arithmetic, not advice or an applicant qualification rule. Within the survey, 4,207 of 7,412 renter households, or 56.8%, were burdened at 30% or more of income. That burden statistic describes surveyed households in aggregate and is not proof that any particular renter or unit is burdened.

The ZCTA housing-stock evidence adds a separate supply-and-occupancy lens. ACS records 836 vacant housing units, a 4.9% vacancy rate, including 430 units classified as vacant for rent. The structure mix includes 10,835 single-family units and 2,626 units in large multifamily structures, so neither a single-property type nor the modelled bedroom ladder represents the full stock. Vacancy classification does not confirm that a specific unit is available now, competitively priced, habitable, or offered without concessions. It also cannot show whether a vacancy is suitable for a household seeking a particular bedroom count or lease duration.

Wider-area rent context is materially higher: the City of Colorado Springs asking-rent context is $1,739, El Paso County context is $1,777, and the Colorado Springs, CO metro context is $1,779. Each is a city, county, or metro comparison rather than a ZIP rental comp, so the gap should not be read as a quality, amenity, or causal judgment. The ZCTA renter share and vacancy rate are both above their corresponding City of Colorado Springs and El Paso County context measures, while the city and county ACS median gross-rent measures are higher than the ZCTA survey result. These cross-scope contrasts frame 80909 as distinct from its wider geographies without replacing ZIP-level evidence.

Redfin supplies direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale evidence, not rental transactions. Its median sold price was $379,914, down 1.96% year over year, with 128 homes sold and a median 38 days on market. Inventory stood at 137 homes, months of supply were 3.2, and the average sale-to-list ratio was 99.24%; 25.83% of sales closed above list. These are resale liquidity, pricing, and negotiation signals only. The combination of a lower resale median price and increased inventory challenges any simple reading of broad strengthening from positive current rent and a modest positive one-year ZORI change. At the same time, recorded sales and near-list pricing show that the resale observation is not equivalent to an absence of transactions.

Decision limits matter because the datasets do not describe the same homes, timing, or transaction types. ZORI is an index, ACS is a survey of occupied renters, HUD is an administrative standard, and Redfin is a resale observation. Before treating a listing or sale as comparable, check the property address against the applicable ZIP and ZCTA boundary, unit bedroom count, advertised versus effective rent, included utilities, lease term, concessions, condition, availability date, listing history, and sale record. Verify whether the property facts align with the all-types index and whether resale records describe a genuinely comparable structure. The central unresolved question is whether the specific unit's lease and physical details support comparison with these aggregate signals at all.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current asking-rent signal is below wider-area context

ZIP 80909 Zillow ZORI is $1,215 in June 2026, while the City of Colorado Springs, El Paso County, and Colorado Springs metro asking-rent context figures are all higher. This comparison is useful for scope, but the wider values are not ZIP-level rental comps. ZORI is a blended asking-rent index across rental types, not a listing-level quote.

Recent rent growth has decelerated from the longer history

The one-year same-month ZORI change was positive at 0.68%, but it trailed the three-year annualized 1.09% rate and the five-year annualized 2.84% rate. That pattern indicates slowing measured growth rather than a continuation of the longer-run pace. Full historical coverage improves traceability, while monthly variability still limits confidence in one index observation.

Survey affordability indicators require household-level caution

The ACS ZCTA median gross-rent measure differs from Zillow because it covers occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The 30% income screen is arithmetic only, while the burden share summarizes surveyed renter households rather than applicants or available units. A high aggregate burden share cannot establish affordability, hardship, or lease terms for a particular home.

Resale evidence complicates the rent snapshot

Redfin resale data show a year-over-year decline in the ZIP median sold price alongside greater inventory, even as Zillow asking rent remained modestly positive over one year. This is a cross-universe tension, not proof that either market causes the other. Recorded sales, marketing time, supply, and sale-to-list measures describe for-sale liquidity rather than rental demand or landlord economics.

  • Zillow asking-rent index, ACS gross rent, HUD bedroom standards, and Redfin resale records have different populations, timing, and definitions, so apparent agreement or disagreement cannot be treated as direct property-level confirmation.
  • The modelled bedroom figures inherit the ZIP-wide ZORI and local HUD ladder assumptions. They do not measure advertised rents by bedroom, unit condition, building type, lease term, utilities, or concession structure.
  • The burden and vacancy measures are aggregate ZCTA survey classifications. They cannot prove that a particular available unit is affordable, vacant today, suitable for a household, or subject to the same rent conditions.
  • The resale price screen uses annualized asking rent divided by median sold price across separate sources. It excludes operating costs, financing, taxes, insurance, repairs, turnover, and property-specific rent, so it cannot represent realized economics.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 80909

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$379,914-2.0% year over year
Homes sold128rolling three-month observation
Median days on market38 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.2resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 80909Active listings268Inventory137Pending sales131Homes sold128

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

137 observed inventory · +11.0% year over year.

Price realization

99.2% average sale-to-list ratio · 25.8% sold above original list.

Early absorption

42.5% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 38 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

El Paso County listing conditions

3,633 active Realtor.com listings · 49 median days on market · 28.2% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Colorado Springs, CO resale supply

n/a · n/a · 35.0% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.4% reported apartment vacancy · 34 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 80909. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why is Zillow ZORI different from ACS median gross rent?

Zillow ZORI is a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey estimate for occupied renter households in the matched Census ZCTA and includes selected utilities. The measures therefore differ in unit population, timing, utility treatment, and methodology, even when their dollar values are close.

Are the bedroom rent estimates observed rents for available units?

No. The studio through four-bedroom figures are modelled monthly ZIP estimates created by scaling the all-types Zillow ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. They are not measured asking rents, lease transactions, or advertised rents for any bedroom class. A listing should be checked for its actual bedroom count, utilities, concessions, and lease terms.

What does the rent history say about current direction?

The history shows positive same-month growth over one year, three years, and five years, but the one-year pace is lower than both longer annualized measures. That is a measured deceleration relative to the longer path. The complete observation coverage supports inspection of the record, while monthly-return variability means one current ZORI value should not be overinterpreted.

Does the annualized rent-to-sale-price screen establish a property return?

No. It is annualized ZIP ZORI divided by Redfin's ZIP median sold price, making it a cross-source screening ratio only. It does not use actual property rent, operating expenses, taxes, insurance, financing, vacancy loss, repairs, turnover, or transaction costs. Redfin's figure also reflects resale transactions, not rental property performance.