ZIP reports / AZ / 85041
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 85041, Phoenix, AZ

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 85041?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 85041 is $2,207 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$2,2072026-06 · up 0.7% year over year
ACS median gross rent$1,739ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$89 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$1,670Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 85041
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,744ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,320HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$1,903ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,440HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$2,207ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$1,670HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$2,947ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,230HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$3,264ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,470HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$75,301ACS 2024 5-year · ±$5,201 MOE
Renter share27.5%5,318 renter households
Rent burden 30%+41.8%2,223 observed households
Housing vacancy3.9%779 of 20,095 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 85041Zillow asking-rent index$2,207ACS median gross rent$1,739HUD two-bedroom standard$1,670

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 85041ACS median household income$75,301Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$88,280

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 85041Studio$1,744One bedroom$1,903Two bedrooms$2,207Three bedrooms$2,947Four bedrooms$3,264

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 8504130% or more of income2,223 householdsBelow 30%3,095 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 85041ZIP 85041$2,207Phoenix city$1,569Maricopa County county$1,729Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro$1,733

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 85041; missing months remain gaps$2,273$2,114$1,955$1,7972021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
19.2%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
1.5%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
2.2%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 85041

Resale pricing and rent momentum point in different directions in ZIP 85041. Zillow’s June 2026 ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, was $2,207 per month and rose 0.65% year over year. By contrast, the direct rolling-three-month Redfin ZIP resale observation reported a $384,913 median sold price, up 1.56%, alongside 134 homes sold, 48 median days on market, 161 homes of inventory, and 3.7 months of supply. The average sale-to-list result was 98.83%, while 23.87% of homes sold above list. Annualized ZORI divided by the median sold price produces a 6.88% cross-source screening ratio only; it is not a cap rate, property yield, net return, or expected return. The resale evidence supports modest price firmness but challenges a reading of rapidly expanding current asking rents.

The 85041 label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. That distinction matters because the ACS 2024 five-year survey describes occupied renter homes in the matched ZCTA, whereas ZORI describes asking rents in Zillow’s ZIP market. ACS median gross rent was $1,739 and includes selected utilities, making it a different measure from the asking-rent index. The gap between the two measures should not be treated as a rent increase for a particular property, lease, or renter household; it instead signals that the current asking-rent snapshot and the survey-based occupied-home median belong to different evidence universes.

The longer ZORI record describes stable growth, but its recent pace is slower than its extended path. Exact same-month annualized change was 0.65% over one year, 0.78% over three years, and 3.57% over five years. Thus, the latest direction remains positive but does not confirm the stronger five-year growth rate. Monthly rent changes showed 2.24% annualized variability, which suggests limited historical movement around the trend and supports moderate confidence in a single current index reading. Separately, the largest historical decline was 1.50%, a shallow backward-looking drawdown rather than a forecast of future downside. History coverage was 100%; the transparent discovery ranks were 2,148 for momentum, 337 for stability, and 1,384 for the balanced measure. These are retrospective discovery measures, not investment recommendations.

In wider-context rent comparisons, Phoenix city context was $1,569 per month, Maricopa County context was $1,729, and Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ metro context was $1,733; each is a broader-geography reference rather than a substitute for ZIP 85041 evidence. The ZIP’s $2,207 asking-rent index sits above all three context figures, while the Zillow index’s blended rental-type construction prevents a direct statement about any one bedroom count or building type. These comparisons frame relative level, not the availability, quality, utility package, or lease terms of a specific rental.

Bedroom figures are best used as a transparent scale rather than as observed bedroom rents. Applying the local HUD ladder to ZIP ZORI produces modelled monthly estimates of $1,744 for a studio, $1,903 for one bedroom, $2,207 for two bedrooms, $2,947 for three bedrooms, and $3,264 for four bedrooms. These are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent; the FY 2026 two-bedroom HUD standard is the ladder reference, and the ZIP asking-rent index is 32.16% above it. That spread does not establish whether a particular advertised two-bedroom will be above or below either benchmark.

The 30% required-income screen is arithmetic, not advice and not an applicant qualification rule. Paying the ZIP’s current asking-rent index at that share of income implies $88,280 in annual household income, compared with an ACS median household income of $75,301. On that simple comparison, asking rent equals 35.17% of the area median household income. ACS also estimates that 41.80% of occupied renter households paid 30% or more of income toward gross rent. Because that burden measure is a five-year survey statistic for occupied renter homes and gross rent includes selected utilities, it cannot prove affordability, burden, utility costs, or eligibility for any particular unit or household.

The matched Census ZCTA contained 20,095 housing units, with a 3.88% overall vacancy rate. Its stock was predominantly single-family: 17,175 units were single-family, compared with 661 units in large multifamily structures. Renter-occupied households represented 27.53% of occupied homes, which helps explain why an area-level asking-rent index should not be read as a complete description of the local housing stock. Overall vacancy is not a direct count of available rentals, and the structure mix does not establish property condition, leasing competition, tenant demand, or the experience of a specific renter.

The practical limitation is that each source answers a different question. ZORI is a current ZIP asking-rent index; ACS is a survey of occupied homes; HUD is an administrative standard; and Redfin is direct ZIP resale evidence rather than rental transactions or property economics. The resale figures do show measurable sales activity and marketing conditions, but they cannot validate rental income, operating costs, lease renewal outcomes, or a property-level return. Property-level review should separately verify the advertised bedroom count, asking rent, utility responsibility, concessions, lease duration, availability date, condition, comparable active listings, recent closed sales, list prices, and marketing time. No source in this packet supplies a forecast.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Current asking rent is positive but slow-moving

ZIP 85041’s current Zillow asking-rent index increased over the latest year, yet the increase is materially slower than the recorded five-year pace. The historical pattern is therefore one of stable growth with deceleration rather than a fresh acceleration. Modest variability and a shallow historical drawdown make the current index useful as a benchmark, while still leaving property-level rents unobserved.

Survey rent, asking rent, and HUD standards are not interchangeable

The ACS median gross-rent figure measures occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, while Zillow ZORI summarizes typical asking rents across rental types. HUD’s bedroom-specific FMR/SAFMR ladder is an administrative standard. The modelled bedroom estimates scale ZORI through that HUD ladder, so they provide a consistent framework but are not measured rents for studio through four-bedroom listings.

Resale conditions create a cross-market tension

The direct ZIP resale observation shows a rising median sold price, completed transactions, active marketing time, finite inventory, and sale-to-list outcomes below full list on average. That evidence is for-sale-market evidence only. It supports price firmness while the rent history shows muted recent growth, making the annualized-rent-to-price figure useful solely as a cross-source screen rather than a property return measure.

Affordability pressure and stock composition require separate interpretation

The arithmetic income screen places current ZIP asking rent above the area median-income benchmark at a 30% share. ACS also reports a substantial share of renter households paying at least 30% of income toward gross rent. However, those are area-level measures, not findings about an individual unit. The ZCTA’s predominantly single-family stock and low overall vacancy rate do not independently establish rental availability or lease conditions.

  • The current asking-rent index exceeds the ACS gross-rent median, but the measures cover different populations and utility treatments. Treating their difference as a direct market rent change would overstate what the packet establishes.
  • Recent rent growth remains positive but trails the longer historical rate. A reader relying only on the current month could miss that the observed trend has slowed, despite relatively low recorded variability.
  • Redfin resale statistics concern sold homes and listing-market conditions, not rental transactions, operating costs, tenant demand, or property cash flow. The rent-to-price screen cannot be converted into a cap rate or expected return.
  • Overall ZCTA vacancy and housing-stock counts cannot identify which units are rentable, available, comparable in condition, or offered with similar utilities and concessions. Property-level evidence remains necessary before interpreting local availability.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 85041

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$384,913+1.6% year over year
Homes sold134rolling three-month observation
Median days on market48 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply3.7resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 85041Active listings322Inventory161Pending sales152Homes sold134

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

161 observed inventory · -2.9% year over year.

Price realization

98.8% average sale-to-list ratio · 23.9% sold above original list.

Early absorption

34.9% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 48 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Maricopa County listing conditions

16,056 active Realtor.com listings · 64 median days on market · 28.9% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ resale supply

3.5 months of supply · 61 median days on market · 32.9% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

8.1% reported apartment vacancy · 33 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 85041. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What does the Zillow rent number represent?

The Zillow figure is a ZIP-level ZORI measure: a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. It is not a surveyed median for occupied households, a bedroom-specific rent comp, a lease quote, or evidence that every available property in the ZIP is offered at that amount.

How should the bedroom estimates be used?

The studio through four-bedroom figures are modelled estimates created by scaling ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. They are useful for a consistent size-based screen, but they are not measured rents, advertised rents, or verified market comparables for specific bedroom categories.

Does the resale information show rental profitability?

No. Redfin provides a direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation covering sold prices, sales, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list signals. Annualized asking rent divided by median sold price is only a cross-source screening ratio and excludes expenses, financing, vacancies, taxes, insurance, and property-specific rent.

What should be checked for an individual property?

A property-level review should verify the advertised rent, actual bedroom count, utility responsibility, concessions, lease term, availability date, unit condition, and competing listings. For a sale comparison, it should also verify recent closed sales, list prices, days on market, and whether the selected properties are genuinely comparable.