ZIP reports / CA / 93906
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 93906, Salinas, CA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 93906?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 93906 is $2,437 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$2,4372026-06 · up 5.9% year over year
ACS median gross rent$2,151ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$61 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,684Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 93906
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$1,973ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,173HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$2,027ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,232HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$2,437ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,684HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$3,290ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,623HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$3,582ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,945HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$97,555ACS 2024 5-year · ±$4,511 MOE
Renter share45.7%8,147 renter households
Rent burden 30%+53.6%4,369 observed households
Housing vacancy2.7%499 of 18,341 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 93906Zillow asking-rent index$2,437ACS median gross rent$2,151HUD two-bedroom standard$2,684

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 93906ACS median household income$97,555Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$97,480

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 93906Studio$1,973One bedroom$2,027Two bedrooms$2,437Three bedrooms$3,290Four bedrooms$3,582

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9390630% or more of income4,369 householdsBelow 30%3,778 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 93906ZIP 93906$2,437Salinas city$2,498Monterey County county$2,906Salinas, CA metro$2,906

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 93906; missing months remain gaps$2,515$2,276$2,036$1,7962021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
30.0%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
4.7%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.6%101 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%102 of 102 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 93906

ZIP 93906’s immediate rental tension is that Zillow’s June 2026 ZORI stands at $2,437 per month, up 5.9% from a year earlier, while the area’s household-income screen appears much tighter when viewed alongside renter burden. This ZIP label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a matched Census ZCTA label. A ZCTA is a statistical area used by the Census and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. Zillow ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a quote for a specific available unit, lease term, bedroom count, or utility package.

The backward-looking ZORI path is consistently positive rather than a recent break from the longer trajectory: exact same-month change was 5.9% over one year, 5.9% annualized over three years, and 5.4% annualized over five years. That alignment supports a description of persistent past rent-index growth, not a forecast. Monthly changes had 3.6% annualized variability, which reduces confidence in interpreting one current ZORI reading as a precisely stable market-clearing figure. Separately, the largest historical peak-to-trough decline was 4.7%, showing that the longer rise still included declines. History coverage is 100%. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 175 for momentum, 2,360 for stability, and 778 for the balanced measure; lower ranks are stronger discovery positions, not investment ratings.

Wider rent context is lower in Salinas city context, where Zillow rent is $2,498, than in Monterey County context and Salinas, CA metro context, where each is $2,906; those city, county, and metro figures are comparison geographies rather than ZIP substitutes. The matched Census ZCTA ACS 2024 five-year survey reports median gross rent of $2,151, making the current asking-rent index 13.3% higher. These figures answer different questions: ACS is a five-year survey of occupied renter homes and median gross rent includes selected utilities, while ZORI tracks typical observed asking rents. The difference cannot establish that any current listing is priced above an occupied household’s rent, because timing, unit mix, and included costs differ.

The bedroom ladder is a modelling device anchored to ZIP ZORI and scaled by the local HUD ladder. Its modelled monthly ZIP estimates are $1,973 for a studio, $2,027 for one bedroom, $2,437 for two bedrooms, $3,290 for three bedrooms, and $3,582 for four bedrooms. They are not measured bedroom rents. HUD’s FY2026 two-bedroom standard is $2,684, so the ZIP’s modelled two-bedroom estimate equals 90.8% of that standard. HUD FMR or SAFMR values are administrative, bedroom-specific standards rather than asking-rent observations; their role here is to shape the relative bedroom ladder, not to serve as rental comparables or evidence of a particular unit’s contract rent.

The arithmetic income screen is close to the ZCTA’s reported household-income midpoint. Paying the ZORI amount at a 30% rent-to-income share requires $97,480 in annual income, compared with ZCTA median household income of $97,555; the index therefore represents 30.0% of that median income. This is an arithmetic screen only, not affordability advice and not an applicant qualification rule. The ACS burden measure adds a different distributional signal: 4,369 of 8,147 renter households, or 53.6%, reported spending at least 30% of income on rent. That result concerns surveyed occupied renter households, may include different rents and utilities than ZORI, and cannot prove a burden outcome for a particular household or apartment.

The matched ZCTA housing inventory recorded 18,341 housing units, of which 17,842 were occupied and 499 were vacant, for a 2.7% vacancy rate in the ACS five-year survey. Structure mix was led by 11,514 single-family units, while buildings with larger multifamily counts accounted for 1,715 units. These stock and vacancy readings describe surveyed housing conditions across the statistical area, not a live availability feed for rentals. In particular, they do not demonstrate that a specific home can be rented, that a vacant unit is rentable now, or that vacancy explains the current asking-rent index. Current listing availability and physical condition remain unobserved in this packet.

For-sale evidence presents a separate and somewhat sharper market signal. Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation shows a $710,839 median sold price, up 10.2% year over year, with 73 homes sold and a median 12 days on market. Reported inventory was 25 homes, months of supply were 1.0, and the average sale-to-list result was 99.95%. These are resale-market measures, not rental transactions or rental comps. The sale-price increase exceeds the rent-index change already reported, which challenges any attempt to treat the rent-to-income screen as a complete property-market assessment. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is 4.1%, but that is only a cross-source screening ratio and does not describe property-level economics.

The evidence supports careful separation rather than a single conclusion: a rising historical asking-rent index, substantial ACS renter burden, a relatively low surveyed vacancy rate, and fast ZIP resale indicators each cover different populations, periods, and transaction types. ZORI does not identify actual rents paid; ACS does not provide current listings; HUD does not measure asking rents; and Redfin does not describe rental activity. Concrete property-level checks would need the current advertised rent, bedroom count, utility inclusions, lease term, concessions, unit availability, and the listing’s condition, while a resale review would need the actual property’s sale and listing details. The unresolved question is whether a specific unit’s current terms resemble any of these ZIP-level indicators closely enough to be decision-relevant?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Past rent growth remained aligned across horizons

The latest annual ZORI increase closely matches the annualized three-year and five-year changes, so recent direction confirms rather than reverses the longer measured path. However, the high-variability history category matters: monthly movement was not perfectly smooth, and the historical drawdown shows that an upward multi-year path did include setbacks. These are backward-looking index measurements, not projections.

The apparent income match conflicts with broad renter burden

The 30% required-income calculation is almost equal to reported ZCTA median household income, but more than half of surveyed renter households reported rent burdens of at least 30%. The figures are not contradictory because the screen uses current ZORI and household-income median arithmetic, whereas ACS burden reflects occupied renter households, their incomes, and gross rents over a five-year survey period.

Resale conditions look faster than the rent-index change

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale measures show a higher year-over-year median sold-price change than the current ZORI increase, along with short marketing time and limited months of supply. That confirms activity in the for-sale universe but does not establish rental demand, landlord economics, or a relationship between a particular home’s sale price and its achievable rent.

Bedroom figures are scaled estimates, not observed rents

The studio-through-four-bedroom amounts use ZIP ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder. This provides a consistent modelled range for comparing unit sizes, but it is not evidence that currently advertised or signed rents equal those amounts. HUD standards are administrative benchmarks, and the underlying ZORI is a blended asking-rent index across rental types.

  • A current ZORI reading is a blended asking-rent index, so it can differ materially from a specific listing because of unit size, utility treatment, lease duration, concessions, condition, and actual availability.
  • The matched Census ZCTA is a statistical area rather than an identical USPS delivery ZIP, and its five-year occupied-household survey measures may not align precisely with the ZIP’s current asking-rent index.
  • Renter burden and vacancy are area-level survey measures. Neither establishes a particular tenant’s budget, a particular unit’s occupancy status, or whether a vacant home is currently rentable.
  • The annualized rent-to-price figure combines Zillow asking-rent indexing with Redfin resale pricing. It is only a screening ratio and cannot substitute for property-specific purchase, operating, financing, or lease information.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 93906

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$710,839+10.2% year over year
Homes sold73rolling three-month observation
Median days on market12 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply1.0resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 93906Active listings95Inventory25Pending sales77Homes sold73

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

25 observed inventory · -25.1% year over year.

Price realization

100.0% average sale-to-list ratio · 53.6% sold above original list.

Early absorption

55.9% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 12 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

Monterey County listing conditions

564 active Realtor.com listings · 53 median days on market · 16.1% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Salinas, CA resale supply

2.4 months of supply · 25 median days on market · 29.2% listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

n/a reported apartment vacancy · n/a. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 93906. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What does the current Zillow rent figure represent?

It represents Zillow’s ZIP-level ZORI, a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. It is useful for tracking the direction and broad level of asking rents, but it is not a signed lease rent, a specific listing quote, a bedroom-specific observation, or a statement about included utilities.

Why are the ACS, HUD, and Zillow rent figures different?

They arise from separate evidence universes. Zillow ZORI is an asking-rent index. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. HUD FMR or SAFMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard. Differences among them do not prove that any source is wrong or describe a particular available unit.

Does the 30% income screen show whether an applicant can qualify?

No. The screen simply divides annualized ZIP ZORI by income to show the income amount associated with a 30% rent share. It is arithmetic rather than advice, underwriting, or an applicant qualification rule. Actual qualification can depend on lease terms, household income documentation, debt, deposits, utility obligations, and other unreported factors.

How should the ZIP resale data be used alongside rent data?

Redfin’s rolling-three-month ZIP metrics should be read only as direct for-sale and resale evidence, including pricing, sales pace, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list outcomes. They are not rental transactions. Combining annualized ZORI with median sold price creates only a cross-source screening ratio, while property-level analysis would require actual unit, listing, and transaction details.