ZIP reports / CA / 94123
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 94123, San Francisco, CA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 94123?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 94123 is $4,858 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$4,8582026-06 · up 26.7% year over year
ACS median gross rent$3,289ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$124 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$3,604Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 94123
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$3,350ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,485HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$4,013ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,977HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$4,858ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,604HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$6,206ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,604HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$6,432ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$4,772HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$218,603ACS 2024 5-year · ±$13,532 MOE
Renter share69.6%8,769 renter households
Rent burden 30%+26.9%2,356 observed households
Housing vacancy16.7%2,524 of 15,129 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 94123Zillow asking-rent index$4,858ACS median gross rent$3,289HUD two-bedroom standard$3,604

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 94123ACS median household income$218,603Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$194,320

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 94123Studio$3,350One bedroom$4,013Two bedrooms$4,858Three bedrooms$6,206Four bedrooms$6,432

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9412330% or more of income2,356 householdsBelow 30%6,413 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 94123ZIP 94123$4,858San Francisco city$4,401San Francisco County county$4,401San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA metro$3,301

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 94123; missing months remain gaps$5,108$4,345$3,582$2,8192021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
58.3%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
12.7%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.6%121 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%122 of 122 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 94123

At the current endpoint, Zillow’s ZIP-level ZORI places 94123 at $4,858 per month, following a 26.7% exact same-month one-year rise. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a lease-level survey or a bedroom-specific quote. The three-year exact same-month annualized change is 11.8%, while the five-year exact same-month annualized change is 9.6%. The latest increase therefore confirms the longer upward path and is materially faster than either longer-window measurement; it does not represent a break below that path. These are backward-looking rent measurements, however, not a forecast, investment recommendation, or assertion about the rent of any particular available home.

The history is complete across 122 monthly observations, supporting a continuous view of the ZIP index rather than an inference from isolated dates. Annualized monthly-return variability is 3.6%, which means a single current ZORI reading deserves moderate caution even though the long-run direction has been positive: asking-rent movements have not been perfectly smooth. Separately, the historical maximum drawdown reached 12.7%, showing that prior declines were meaningful before the current acceleration. Transparent national discovery ranks among history-eligible ZIPs were 4th for momentum, 2,292nd for stability, and 540th for the balanced measure; lower ranks are stronger. Those labels summarize past measurements only, and the sharp contrast between momentum and stability reinforces the need not to overread one rent snapshot.

The matched Census ZCTA supplies a different evidence universe. A ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP, even though the five-digit label matches the Zillow market identifier here. In the ACS 2024 five-year survey, occupied renter homes had median gross rent of $3,289, which includes selected utilities and is 1.48 times lower than the current Zillow asking-rent index. ACS median household income was $218,603. Applying the 30% required-income screen to current annualized ZORI produces $194,320; that arithmetic screen is not advice and is not an applicant qualification rule. The corresponding asking-rent-to-income screen is 26.7%. Among surveyed renter households, 2,356, or 26.9%, reported spending at least 30% of income on rent, a population statistic that cannot establish the burden for a particular unit or household.

The bedroom figures should be read as modelled estimates, not measured bedroom rents. Scaling ZIP ZORI with the local HUD ladder produces estimated monthly amounts of $3,350 for a studio, $4,013 for one bedroom, $4,858 for two bedrooms, $6,206 for three bedrooms, and $6,432 for four bedrooms. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent; the local HUD two-bedroom standard is $3,604. The model therefore uses the HUD bedroom relationship to distribute a blended asking-rent index across unit sizes. It does not show that listings at each bedroom count transact, advertise, include utilities, or are available at those modelled amounts.

Housing-stock measures add a separate view of availability and tenure. The ZCTA counted 15,129 housing units, with a 16.7% vacancy rate. Of the vacant stock, 362 units were classified as for rent and 611 as seasonal, so the overall vacancy figure should not be treated as a direct count of immediately rentable homes. Renters occupied a 69.6% share of occupied homes, making renter occupancy the dominant tenure category in the survey area. These ACS counts describe surveyed housing status over the five-year period, not live listings, lease concessions, building condition, or the vacancy status of a specific address. They consequently provide background for the rent and burden screens but do not resolve current unit-level supply.

For wider context only, the San Francisco city context shows a 39.6% renter burden share at or above the 30% threshold, San Francisco County context has a $3,604 two-bedroom HUD standard, and the San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA metro context reports a $3,301 asking-rent index. Each is a city, county, or metro comparison rather than a substitute for ZIP evidence. The ZIP’s current asking-rent index exceeds the metro context figure, while its surveyed burden share is below the city-context share. That combination is compatible with the ZIP’s substantially higher ACS median household income, but it does not identify who occupies a given rental, what income a prospective renter has, or why these geographic measures differ.

Redfin provides direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale evidence, not rental transactions or rental comparables. In that for-sale universe, median sold price was $3,319,250, up 6.8% year over year; 73 homes sold with median marketing time of 13 days. Redfin recorded 97 active listings and reported inventory of 14 homes, alongside 0.6 months of supply. Sale-to-list signals were strong: the average sale-to-list ratio was 114.4%, and 71.9% of sold homes went above list. The annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is a 1.76% cross-source screening ratio only, not a cap rate, property yield, net return, or expected return. The resale evidence challenges a rent-only reading: rapid asking-rent growth coexists with a very high resale price base and tight reported resale supply.

Several limits remain material. Zillow is an asking-rent index, ACS is a multiyear survey of occupied renter homes with selected utilities, HUD is a bedroom-specific administrative standard, and Redfin describes completed ZIP resale activity. None directly measures the achievable rent, expense structure, lease-up pace, condition, or legal status of an individual property. A property-level review would need to verify bedroom count, lease term, utility treatment, asking and executed comparable rents, building condition, vacancy timing, list-price history, sale status, and the correspondence between the delivery address and the ZCTA-based evidence. The central unresolved question is whether a specific unit’s observed terms actually resemble the blended ZIP rent index and the modelled HUD-scaled bedroom estimate.

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Rent acceleration exceeds the longer history

Current ZIP ZORI is $4,858 and the exact same-month one-year change is 26.7%, well above the 11.8% three-year and 9.6% five-year annualized changes. The direction remains consistent with the longer historical path, but the recent pace is unusually faster. Historical measures are backward-looking and do not establish future rent growth.

A current asking-rent reading has limited precision

The history has complete monthly coverage, yet annualized monthly-return variability of 3.6% and a prior 12.7% maximum drawdown show that the index has experienced meaningful movement. Strong momentum does not equal strong stability: the momentum discovery rank is 4th, while the stability rank is 2,292nd among history-eligible ZIPs.

Survey rent, asking rent, and HUD standards answer different questions

ACS median gross rent of $3,289 reflects occupied renter homes over a five-year survey period and includes selected utilities. Zillow ZORI is a blended current asking-rent index. HUD’s bedroom-specific standard supports a modelled bedroom ladder, but it is an administrative FMR/SAFMR benchmark rather than an observed asking-rent series.

Resale conditions are strong but are not rental economics

Redfin’s direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale data show high sold prices, short marketing time, low months of supply, and frequent above-list sales. Those are for-sale liquidity signals, not rental transactions. The 1.76% annualized-rent-to-sold-price screen is useful only for cross-source comparison and cannot represent operating income, expenses, financing, or return.

  • The ZORI figure is a blended asking-rent index across rental types, so it may not match the rent, utility treatment, condition, lease term, or availability of a particular studio, apartment, condominium, or house.
  • Historical momentum is strong, but measured variability and the prior maximum drawdown show that rents have moved unevenly. A single current reading should not be treated as a stable baseline or projected forward.
  • ACS burden, income, tenure, and vacancy figures come from a matched ZCTA five-year survey. They describe surveyed households and housing status, not current applicant finances, live vacancies, or a delivery ZIP boundary.
  • Redfin resale indicators concern completed for-sale activity during a rolling three-month period. High sale-to-list results and limited supply do not prove rental demand, unit-level pricing power, expenses, or property-level economics.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 94123

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$3,319,250+6.8% year over year
Homes sold73rolling three-month observation
Median days on market13 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply0.6resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 94123Active listings97Inventory14Pending sales72Homes sold73

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

14 observed inventory · -68.2% year over year.

Price realization

114.4% average sale-to-list ratio · 71.9% sold above original list.

Early absorption

64.0% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 13 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

San Francisco County listing conditions

647 active Realtor.com listings · 57 median days on market · 5.8% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

3.3% reported apartment vacancy · 20 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 94123. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

Why does Zillow rent exceed the ACS median gross rent?

The two values come from different universes and periods. Zillow ZORI is a current ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey measure for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. The gap does not prove that every current listing is above every occupied household’s rent.

Are the bedroom rents observed market rents?

No. The studio through four-bedroom figures are modelled estimates created by scaling the blended ZIP ZORI with the local HUD bedroom ladder. HUD FMR/SAFMR is an administrative bedroom-specific standard, not a collection of local asking rents. The estimates should therefore be checked against actual comparable listings and executed leases where available.

What does the 30% required-income figure mean?

It is an arithmetic affordability screen: annualized current ZORI divided by 30% produces the income amount shown. It is not financial advice, an applicant qualification standard, or a statement that a household can or cannot afford a particular rental. Actual household budgets, utilities, lease terms, and non-rent obligations are outside this calculation.

How should the Redfin rent-to-price screening ratio be interpreted?

It is simply annualized ZIP ZORI divided by Redfin’s median ZIP sold price, combining two distinct sources for a high-level screen. It is not a cap rate, property yield, net return, expected return, or valuation conclusion. Individual property economics require verified rent, expenses, taxes, insurance, maintenance, financing, and transaction-specific evidence.