ZIP reports / WA / 98121
ZIP rental intelligence · 2026-06

ZIP 98121, Seattle, WA

Asking rent, household capacity, housing stock and local context—kept at their original geographic and measurement scopes.

Direct local rent answer

What does rent cost in ZIP 98121?

The latest Zillow ZORI for ZIP 98121 is $2,661 per month in 2026-06. It is a typical observed asking-rent index across rental types—not an arithmetic average, signed lease or quote for one property.

Zillow asking-rent index$2,6612026-06 · down 1.0% year over year
ACS median gross rent$2,337ACS 2024 5-year survey · ±$96 margin of error
HUD two-bedroom standard$2,501Administrative FMR/SAFMR · not asking rent
Bedroom-level rent benchmarks in ZIP 98121
BedroomsModelled asking-rent lensHUD standardHow to use it
Studio$2,207ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,074HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
1 bedroom$2,283ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,146HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
2 bedrooms$2,661ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$2,501HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
3 bedrooms$3,481ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,272HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.
4 bedrooms$4,093ZORI scaled by the local HUD bedroom ladder$3,847HUD FMR/SAFMR administrative benchmarkCompare with current same-bedroom listings; do not average these two measures.

Bedroom estimates are modelled, not observed rents. Zillow, Census ACS and HUD describe different housing universes and remain separate throughout this report.Zillow pulled 2026-08-08

Median household income$152,019ACS 2024 5-year · ±$14,126 MOE
Renter share77.4%11,055 renter households
Rent burden 30%+33.1%3,657 observed households
Housing vacancy14.4%2,396 of 16,684 units
Six views · one local decision

Read the measures together, without merging them

ZORI tracks observed asking rent, ACS describes occupied renter homes, and HUD publishes an administrative benchmark. The charts preserve those differences and add wider context only where the geography is named.

Three definitions of rent

Useful as a spread, not interchangeable observations.

Three rent measures for ZIP 98121Zillow asking-rent index$2,661ACS median gross rent$2,337HUD two-bedroom standard$2,501

Affordability screen

Annual income implied by 30% of the current ZIP ZORI.

Income screen for ZIP 98121ACS median household income$152,019Income at 30% of ZIP ZORI$106,440

Bedroom ladder

Modelled from ZIP ZORI using the local HUD ladder.

Modelled bedroom rent ladder for ZIP 98121Studio$2,207One bedroom$2,283Two bedrooms$2,661Three bedrooms$3,481Four bedrooms$4,093

Observed renter burden

ACS ZCTA households with computable gross-rent burden.

Observed renter cost burden in ZCTA 9812130% or more of income3,657 householdsBelow 30%7,398 households

ZIP versus wider rent context

Each bar retains its own ZIP, city, county or metro scope.

Asking-rent context for ZIP 98121ZIP 98121$2,661Seattle city$2,224King County county$2,330Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA metro$2,269

Monthly asking-rent history

Direct Zillow ZORI observations over the latest five years. Missing months remain visible gaps.

Five-year direct Zillow asking-rent history for ZIP 98121; missing months remain gaps$2,798$2,623$2,447$2,2712021-062023-122026-06
Five-year change
13.8%exact same-month endpoints
Largest observed drawdown
17.6%peak to a later observed month
Annualized monthly variability
3.7%137 consecutive returns
Monthly coverage
100.0%138 of 138 months
Decision brief

What the evidence says for ZIP 98121

Resale softness and a still-elevated asking index form the central tension in this ZIP. Zillow's June 2026 ZIP ZORI is $2,661 per month, a 1.04% year-over-year decline. ZORI is a typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types, rather than a single-property quote. That level exceeded the Seattle city context of about $2,224, the King County context of $2,330, and the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue metro context of $2,269. These city, county, and metro figures are wider-geography context only; they are not ZIP rental comps. The reading therefore combines a local premium to broad contexts with a modest latest-period retreat.

History makes that retreat more consequential than its size alone. On exact same-month comparisons, the one-year change is the decline cited above, whereas three-year and five-year annualized changes are gains of 2.22% and 2.61%. Recent direction therefore breaks from, rather than confirms, the longer positive path. The available series has 100% coverage. Monthly rent changes had 3.69% annualized variability, which reduces the confidence a reader should place in one current ZORI snapshot; separately, the maximum peak-to-trough drawdown reached 17.58%, documenting a meaningful historical setback. Transparent national discovery ranks were 2,211 for momentum, 2,413 for stability, and 2,641 for the balanced measure, where a lower rank is higher. These are backward-looking measurements, not forecasts or investment recommendations.

The 98121 label is both a Zillow ZIP market identifier and a Census ZCTA match; a ZCTA is a statistical area and is not identical to a USPS delivery ZIP. In the ACS five-year survey, median gross rent was $2,337 for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities, making the current ZORI level 13.9% higher. That gap reflects distinct source universes rather than a contradiction or a direct lease comparison. ACS also reports median household income of $152,019. Dividing annualized ZORI by that income produces a 21.0% asking-rent-to-income screen, while using the monthly ZORI in the stated 30% screen produces required annual income of $106,440. This required-income calculation is arithmetic only, neither affordability advice nor an applicant qualification rule.

Bedroom figures should be used only as a structured translation of the ZIP index. Scaling ZIP ZORI through the local HUD ladder yields modelled monthly estimates of $2,207 for a studio, $2,283 for one bedroom, $2,661 for two bedrooms, $3,481 for three bedrooms, and $4,093 for four bedrooms. These are modelled estimates, never measured bedroom rents, and cannot establish a candidate unit's asking price. The local HUD FMR/SAFMR ladder is an administrative, bedroom-specific standard rather than asking rent; its FY2026 two-bedroom standard is $2,501. Its role here is to set relative bedroom scaling, not to serve as an observed rental comparable or a landlord pricing measure.

Stock data add a marketwide availability lens without identifying any unit's condition or terms. The ACS ZCTA reports 16,684 housing units, with renters representing 77.4% of occupied homes and an overall vacancy rate of 14.4%. The structure mix is overwhelmingly large multifamily rather than single-family. Vacancy categories include homes classified as for rent, but this survey-based measure is not a live leasing inventory. Nor does vacancy prove that a particular apartment is available, comparable, affordable, or offered at the ZORI level. This renter-heavy, multifamily stock profile is useful context for interpreting an index blended across rental types, not evidence about a specific building.

Observed burden describes a different affordability reality from the mechanical income screen. In the ACS renter-home universe, 33.1% were in the high-burden group based on gross rent and the stated income-share threshold. That ZIP share is below the separately reported Seattle city context share and King County context share, each of which retains a wider geographic scope. The lower burden share does not demonstrate that a given listing is affordable to a given household, just as the ZORI calculation does not pair actual applicant income with a particular unit. Together, the measures show why historical household spending and a present asking-rent screen must remain separate.

The Redfin block is a direct rolling-three-month ZIP resale observation, not rental transaction evidence. At the stated endpoint, its median sold price was $579,869, down 9.4% year over year, with 52 homes sold, a median marketing time of 39 days, inventory of 158 homes, and 9.1 months of supply. The average sale-to-list result was 97.82%, while 9.81% of sales closed above list. These are for-sale liquidity and pricing signals only. The resale price decline agrees in direction with the current rental retreat, yet it creates a tension with the longer positive rent history and the current ZIP asking-rent premium to broader contexts. Annualized ZIP ZORI divided by median sold price is a 5.51% cross-source screening ratio only; it does not measure property economics.

Every source has a different unit, timing, and construction limit. For a candidate rental, verify the quoted asking rent date, rental type, bedroom configuration, utility responsibility, concessions, fees, lease terms, and actual availability before comparing it with ZORI, ACS, or HUD figures. For a resale comparison, verify address-level sale price, list price, marketing chronology, property type, and whether the sale belongs in the reported rolling observation. Neither a ZIP index, a ZCTA survey statistic, a HUD standard, nor a ZIP resale median can supply those property-specific facts. Does the specific property's documentation match the definition of the measure being used for comparison?

Decision signals

What deserves a closer property-level check

Recent rent direction breaks from the longer record

At $2,661, ZIP ZORI fell 1.04% from a year earlier, while exact same-month annualized changes over three and five years remained positive. The near-term result therefore breaks from the longer path. Complete historical coverage supports the record's completeness, but measured variability and drawdown keep the current index from functioning as a definitive stand-alone trend signal.

Affordability screens answer different questions

ZORI and ACS rent provide divergent but valid reference points. The current ZIP ZORI exceeds ACS median gross rent, yet ACS covers occupied renter homes over five years and includes selected utilities. The required-income screen is a direct calculation from current ZORI, while burden reflects survey household outcomes. Neither measure certifies the affordability of an individual rental.

Renter-heavy multifamily stock is context, not unit evidence

The matched ZCTA has a renter-heavy occupied base, housing stock concentrated in large multifamily structures, and a material overall vacancy rate. These characteristics help describe the survey area's housing composition and vacant stock. They do not show that a particular rental is currently available, similarly configured, priced at the index level, or affordable to a specific household.

Resale evidence confirms short-term softness but remains separate

The direct ZIP resale observation shows a lower median sold price than a year earlier, substantial months of supply, and sale-to-list results below parity on average. That direction agrees with the latest asking-rent decline, creating a cross-market softness signal. It does not convert resale statistics into rental comps, and the ZORI-to-price figure remains only a cross-source screening ratio.

  • The current Zillow value is an index blended across rental types. It cannot verify a particular unit's rent, concessions, utilities, availability, bedroom classification, or lease terms.
  • ACS ZCTA figures are five-year survey estimates rather than a current feed of active listings. Sampling uncertainty, population scope, and selected-utility treatment limit direct comparison with current asking-rent observations.
  • The HUD ladder uses administrative bedroom standards. Scaling ZORI with it organizes bedroom estimates, but does not verify the actual size, configuration, condition, rent, or utility charges of a property.
  • Redfin evidence is limited to a rolling ZIP resale window. It may reflect a different timing and property mix from a specific listing and cannot become a rental transaction comparison.
Direct ZIP resale evidence

For-sale liquidity inside ZIP 98121

Redfin reports these as a rolling three-month ZIP observation through 2026-06-30. They describe the for-sale market, not rental vacancy or the rent of a particular property.

Median sale price$579,869-9.4% year over year
Homes sold52rolling three-month observation
Median days on market39 daysfor-sale listing absorption
Months of supply9.1resale inventory relative to sales pace

Activity and available supply

Direct ZIP counts remain separate because each describes a different stage of the resale funnel.

Direct resale activity for ZIP 98121Active listings244Inventory158Pending sales57Homes sold52

Counter-signals before underwriting

A price alone does not reveal how quickly buyers are absorbing available homes.

Inventory direction

158 observed inventory · +19.7% year over year.

Price realization

97.8% average sale-to-list ratio · 9.8% sold above original list.

Early absorption

22.9% went off market within two weeks; compare this with 39 median days on market.

Measurement boundary

Small ZIP samples can move sharply. This rolling period smooths monthly noise but does not replace current address-level sale and rent comparables.

Redfin Data Center · updated 2026-07-03 · exact five-digit ZIP key. Implausible source values are withheld as n/a rather than repaired or inherited from a broader geography.

Wider market evidence

Listing and rental liquidity around the ZIP

These measures are not ZIP observations. They are labelled county or metro context so they can challenge the local story without being copied into it.

King County listing conditions

6,913 active Realtor.com listings · 37 median days on market · 20.2% price-reduced share · 2026-06.

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA resale supply

n/a · n/a · n/a listings with price drops · Redfin 2026-05-01.

Apartment List metro liquidity

6.0% reported apartment vacancy · 31 days on market. These are direct metro observations and do not describe a particular ZIP unit.

Property-level next step

Compare live same-bedroom listings, concessions, utilities, condition and days listed inside ZIP 98121. The report frames the market; it does not replace a rent roll, lease review or address-level comparable set.

Questions this report can answer

Scope-aware answers

What is the difference between Zillow ZORI, ACS rent, and HUD FMR/SAFMR?

Zillow ZORI is a ZIP-level typical observed asking-rent index blended across rental types. ACS median gross rent is a five-year survey estimate for occupied renter homes and includes selected utilities. HUD FMR/SAFMR is a bedroom-specific administrative standard. Scope, timing, populations, and utility treatment differ, so the figures cannot be substituted for one another.

Why are the bedroom rent figures modelled rather than measured?

The estimates begin with ZIP ZORI and apply the local HUD bedroom ladder as a scaling pattern. They are calculated estimates for studio through four-bedroom configurations, not observed rents for actual units. A property's rent can differ because the model does not identify its condition, lease terms, utility responsibility, concessions, or current availability.

How should the historical rent record be interpreted?

The history uses exact same-month annualized changes and complete observed coverage, documenting a past path rather than a projection. The latest annual decline breaks from positive longer-period changes. Variability and the maximum drawdown show that monthly index movements have not been uniform, so one current rent index reading deserves measured confidence.

What does the Redfin block say about the relationship between resale and rent?

Redfin provides a rolling-three-month direct ZIP resale observation, including sale price, transaction count, marketing time, inventory, supply, and sale-to-list measures. These are evidence about the for-sale market and liquidity, not rental transactions. Dividing annualized ZORI by median sold price is only a cross-source screen and does not calculate the economics of a property.