Cities / Colorado / Mesa County / Grand Junction
Grand Junction cityscape
City housing brief · Incorporated place

Grand Junction, CO

City evidence stays city-level. County, metro and national records appear separately to explain the wider market without changing the city figures.

City gross yield4.9%ZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs
City market snapshot

Four figures that frame the city

Typical home value
$429k
▲ 2.1% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · 2026-06
Observed market rent
$1,768
▲ 3.8% year over year
Zillow ZORI · 2026-06
Entry affordability
6.1x
home value ÷ household income
Zillow + Census ACS
Population
68,142
▲ 9.8% between ACS vintages
ACS 2024 5-year
Decision brief

What the city-level evidence says

01Decision frame

In Grand Junction, Zillow’s current typical home value is $429,488, up 2.1% year over year, while typical observed market rent is $1,768 a month, up 3.8%. That produces a 4.9% gross yield before vacancy, management, maintenance, insurance, taxes, utilities and financing. The value equals 6.13x ACS median household income, and annual Zillow rent equals 30.3% of that income. The frame is therefore a before-cost income metric paired with citywide affordability pressure, not a property-level return estimate.

02Housing stock

The city’s ACS housing stock contains 31,367 units, with a 4.6% vacancy rate; renters occupy 36.5% of occupied units. ACS reports a $389,800 median value for owner-occupied housing and $1,142 median gross rent for occupied rentals. Those surveyed measures cover occupied housing, and gross rent includes selected utilities. They differ in definition and period from Zillow’s typical value and observed market rent, so neither pair should be averaged or treated as a direct spread.

03City depth

City depth is mixed: 47.2% of renters are cost-burdened, while single-family structures make up 70.4% of units and large multifamily structures 10.1%. Among vacant units, ACS identifies 528 for rent, with seasonal use another reported reason, but these reasons do not measure investable or currently available inventory. The population estimate increased 9.8% between overlapping ACS five-year vintages; it is not an annual rate and may reflect boundary changes. Median household income is $70,080, with poverty at 11.8% and unemployment at 4.8%. These are descriptive demand constraints, not causes or lease-up evidence.

04Wider context

At the county scope, Mesa County shows a 57-day median listing period and price reductions on 23.7% of active listings, which can inform negotiation expectations but does not measure city liquidity. The broader Grand Junction metro has a 0.2% year-over-year job decline and 2.9 months of supply; metro labor softness and sale inventory deserve stress testing without being assigned to the city. The national 30-year mortgage rate is 6.58%, a financing benchmark rather than a Grand Junction borrowing quote.

05Limits & next checks

Underwriting remains limited by citywide, county, metro and national aggregates, the mismatch between Zillow and ACS measures, and gross yield’s omission of operating and financing costs. Before acting, verify the property’s attainable rent and concessions, taxes, insurance and hazard pricing, utility responsibility, condition and capital needs, management and maintenance costs, title and zoning, comparable leases and sales, and a vacancy allowance. Recalculate cash flow under the actual loan terms and inspect the asset; city vacancy cannot predict its lease-up.

Housing system

Market movement and the stock underneath it

Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI +28.8%ZORI +37.2%
13711695202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Housing stock

Tenure and vacancy

ACS
36.5%RENTER
Owner occupied63.5%
Renter occupied36.5%
Vacant units4.6%

Median structure year 1988

Tenure uses occupied units; vacancy uses all housing units.
Measurement matrix

Two sources, two different questions

SourceHome valueMonthly rent
Zillow market index$429.5K$1.8K
ACS occupied housing$389.8K$1.1K
Zillow measures current market indexes. ACS reports surveyed owner value and gross rent for occupied housing. The rows are context, not interchangeable estimates.
Direct city depth

Households and housing form behind the medians

Median household income$70k

Annual ACS household measure.

Rent-to-income screen30.3%

Annual ZORI divided by ACS median income.

ACS rent burden47.2%

Renters paying at least 30% of household income toward gross rent.

Average household size2.15

People per occupied housing unit.

Single-family stock70.4%

Detached and attached one-unit structures.

Large multifamily stock10.1%

Housing in structures with 20 or more units.

Vacant and for rent36.9%

Share of vacant units listed by ACS as for rent, not a market vacancy rate.

Unemployment4.8%

Share of the civilian labor force.

Poverty11.8%

ACS population for whom poverty status is determined.

These are citywide context measures. They cannot tell you the rent, vacancy, expenses or tenant demand for a particular neighborhood or property.
Closest market alternatives

Three useful contrasts, not a synthetic winner

The peer set broadens the decision without mixing geographies. Price, rent and housing characteristics remain city-level for every place.

Comparable market profile

Entry price, rent and gross yield

Grand Junction, COLoveland, COGreeley, COSpring, TX
Typical home valueZillow ZHVIGrand Junction$429.5KLoveland$504.3KGreeley$423.2KSpring$368.2KObserved market rentZillow ZORI / monthGrand Junction$1.8KLoveland$1.9KGreeley$1.5KSpring$1.8KGross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVIGrand Junction4.9%Loveland4.4%Greeley4.2%Spring5.7%
Bars begin at zero within each measure. Gross yield is a screening ratio before financing, taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance or management costs.
Same state01

Loveland, CO

Compared with Grand Junction, typical home value is $75k higher, monthly rent is $92 higher, and gross yield is 0.5 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
54.3%
Renter share
37.8%
One-unit stock
74.2%
20+ unit stock
8.0%
Same state02

Greeley, CO

Compared with Grand Junction, typical home value is $6k lower, monthly rent is $293 lower, and gross yield is 0.8 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
59.9%
Renter share
39.1%
One-unit stock
63.4%
20+ unit stock
9.1%
Closest data profile03

Spring, TX

Compared with Grand Junction, typical home value is $61k lower, monthly rent is $17 lower, and gross yield is 0.8 percentage points higher.

Rent burden 30%+
39.1%
Renter share
25.6%
One-unit stock
88.3%
20+ unit stock
4.4%

These are analytical alternatives, not recommendations. The structural measures come from Census ACS; price and rent use the Zillow releases shown on each card and in the source ledger below.

Wider market context

What surrounds the city without being mistaken for it

The layers below answer different questions. County records describe listing, migration, financing and hazard conditions around the city; metro records describe jobs, supply and permits; the mortgage rate is national.

Same measure, wider boundary

City marker against intersecting counties

CityCounty range
Typical home value$438.4K$438.4K$429.5KObserved market rent$1.8K$1.8K$1.8K
Both levels use Zillow indexes, but the county records cover land and housing outside the city. The comparison supplies context; it does not replace the city value.
COUNTY LAYER

The intersecting county

This boundary extends beyond the city and is shown only as context.

2026-06
Active listings
815
Listing DOM
57 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 3.2%
Net migration
827
Investor share
5.9%
Effective property tax
0.38%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.09%
METRO LAYER

Grand Junction, CO

Open metro analysis →
Job growth▼ 0.2%12m to 2026-06
Permitted units9082026 YTD through M06
Permits / 1,0005.7broader metro population
Months of supply2.92026-05-01
Median DOM29 daysRedfin metro tracker
Price drops35.0%Redfin metro tracker
Wider-context figures are not inputs to the city gross yield and are never used to fill a missing city price, rent or ACS measure.
What can break the thesis

Three checks before using the city averages

  1. 01

    Gross yield omits every operating cost and financing, so net cash flow could differ materially

  2. 02

    City ACS vacancy reasons do not measure available investment inventory or property lease-up

  3. 03

    The national mortgage rate is only a benchmark; actual debt terms can change coverage and cash flow

Questions answered

Quick reading guide

Can Zillow and ACS housing measures be combined?

No. Zillow describes a typical city home value and typical observed market rent; ACS describes surveyed occupied housing, and ACS gross rent includes selected utilities. Their definitions and periods differ.

Does city vacancy indicate easy lease-up?

No. ACS city vacancy and vacancy reasons describe citywide housing stock; they do not show whether a specific unit is available or will lease quickly.

How should wider-area data be used?

The county measures for Mesa County, the Grand Junction metro measures and the national mortgage rate provide context only; none measures a specific city property.

Sources and geography

What belongs to this city page

Census recognizes this as Grand Junction city. The place intersects Mesa County.