Cities / Idaho / Canyon County / Nampa
Nampa cityscape
City housing brief · Incorporated place

Nampa, ID

City evidence stays city-level. County, metro and national records appear separately to explain the wider market without changing the city figures.

City gross yield4.7%ZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVI · before costs
Direct city rent answer

What does rent cost in Nampa, ID?

The latest city-level Zillow ZORI for Nampa is $1,626 per month in 2026-06. It measures a typical asking-rent market across rental types—not an arithmetic average or an address-level rent estimate.

City Zillow ZORI$1,6262026-06 · up 3.5% year over year
City ACS gross rent$1,420ACS 2024 5-year occupied-renter survey
HUD two-bedroom context$1,655Canyon County administrative standard
How to read the rent answer for Nampa
MeasureCurrent valueGeographyMeasurement boundary
Zillow ZORI$1,626Nampa cityTypical observed asking-rent index; not a unit quote.
Census ACS gross rent$1,420Nampa citySurvey estimate for occupied renter homes, including specified utilities.
HUD 2BR FMR$1,655Canyon CountyAdministrative bedroom standard; wider context, never substituted as city rent.

For a property decision, match bedroom count, condition, utilities, concessions, lease timing and nearby comparable listings. Wider county and metro evidence below stays explicitly labelled.Zillow pulled 2026-07-29

City market snapshot

Four figures that frame the city

Typical home value
$419k
▲ 0.6% year over year
Zillow ZHVI · 2026-06
Observed market rent
$1,626
▲ 3.5% year over year
Zillow ZORI · 2026-06
Entry affordability
5.6x
home value ÷ household income
Zillow + Census ACS
Population
110,319
▲ 17.4% between ACS vintages
ACS 2024 5-year
Decision brief

What the city-level evidence says

01Decision frame

For Nampa, Zillow's current ZHVI typical home value is $418,847 and ZORI typical observed market rent is $1,626 a month. This implies a 4.66% gross yield before every operating and financing cost. ZHVI increased 0.65% year over year, while ZORI increased 3.46%; that divergence is relevant to top-line screening but does not establish future rent or value movement. The ZHVI equals 5.64x ACS median household income, a citywide purchase-price screen rather than buyer-specific affordability.

02Housing stock

Nampa has 40,529 housing units; 29.78% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the citywide housing-unit vacancy rate is 3.44%. These are tenure and stock measures, not evidence that a particular unit will be available or lease promptly. ACS reports a $370,800 median value for surveyed owner-occupied homes and $1,420 median gross rent for occupied rentals, including contract rent plus selected utilities. Those ACS measures differ in concept and period from Zillow's typical value and observed market rent, so they should remain separate.

03City depth

ACS shows a 50.07% rent-burden share; single-family structures comprise 79.01% of housing units, versus 2.54% in large multifamily structures. Of vacant units, 33.76% are classified as for rent, but vacancy reasons and structure shares do not measure investable inventory. Population was 17.42% higher across overlapping ACS vintages, with possible boundary effects and no annualized interpretation. Median household income is $74,279, while poverty is 11.49% and unemployment is 3.13%; these describe demand constraints, not causes or property-level tenant performance.

04Wider context

In Canyon County, county listings show a median 38 days on market and a 16.04% price-reduced share, useful for negotiating context but not Nampa-only liquidity. The Boise City metro has 1.7 months of supply, a 36.44% price-drop share, 1.01% job growth and a permit total of 9,910; metro market, labor and pipeline evidence still cannot be assigned directly to the city. The national Freddie Mac rate for a thirty-year mortgage is 6.66%, a financing backdrop rather than a borrower quote or city return assumption.

05Limits & next checks

The main limitations are that Zillow and ACS are citywide aggregates, county, metro and national contexts use different denominators, and gross yield omits taxes, insurance, maintenance, capital spending, management, utilities, vacancy and financing. Before underwriting a property, verify its achievable rent and concessions, lease and payment history, occupancy, condition and major systems; obtain insurance and loan quotes; review title, zoning, HOA rules and utility responsibility; and calculate property-specific operating expenses, reserves, net operating income and cash flow under vacancy and repair stress.

Housing system

Market movement and the stock underneath it

Five-year path

Price and rent, rebased to 100

ZHVI +3.1%ZORI +23.7%
12410995202120222023202420252026
Each series starts at 100 so their direction can be compared without pretending that a home value and a monthly rent share the same unit.
Housing stock

Tenure and vacancy

ACS
29.8%RENTER
Owner occupied70.2%
Renter occupied29.8%
Vacant units3.4%

Median structure year 2000

Tenure uses occupied units; vacancy uses all housing units.
Measurement matrix

Two sources, two different questions

SourceHome valueMonthly rent
Zillow market index$418.8K$1.6K
ACS occupied housing$370.8K$1.4K
Zillow measures current market indexes. ACS reports surveyed owner value and gross rent for occupied housing. The rows are context, not interchangeable estimates.
Direct city depth

Households and housing form behind the medians

Median household income$74k

Annual ACS household measure.

Rent-to-income screen26.3%

Annual ZORI divided by ACS median income.

ACS rent burden50.1%

Renters paying at least 30% of household income toward gross rent.

Average household size2.76

People per occupied housing unit.

Single-family stock79.0%

Detached and attached one-unit structures.

Large multifamily stock2.5%

Housing in structures with 20 or more units.

Vacant and for rent33.8%

Share of vacant units listed by ACS as for rent, not a market vacancy rate.

Unemployment3.1%

Share of the civilian labor force.

Poverty11.5%

ACS population for whom poverty status is determined.

These are citywide context measures. They cannot tell you the rent, vacancy, expenses or tenant demand for a particular neighborhood or property.
Curated city comparisons

Nampa in direct city-to-city decisions

Each comparison keeps both records inside city limits and opens only when the pair differs materially on multiple decision signals.

Browse all city comparisons →
Economic peer

Nampa, ID vs Concord, NC

Cross-region growth-city peers of nearly equal population scale with material differences in yield, affordability, housing stock and local-demand evidence.

gross yieldbuyer affordabilityhousing stocklocal demand risk
Concord home value
$387k
Concord gross yield
5.6%
Regional alternative

Nampa, ID vs Greeley, CO

Fast-growing Interior West alternatives of nearly equal population scale with different renter-pressure, housing-stock and local-demand records.

renter pressurehousing stocklocal demand risk
Greeley home value
$423k
Greeley gross yield
4.2%
Closest market alternatives

Three useful contrasts, not a synthetic winner

The peer set broadens the decision without mixing geographies. Price, rent and housing characteristics remain city-level for every place.

Comparable market profile

Entry price, rent and gross yield

Nampa, IDIdaho Falls, IDCoeur d'Alene, IDGreeley, CO
Typical home valueZillow ZHVINampa$418.8KIdaho Falls$398.7KCoeur d'Alene$611.4KGreeley$423.2KObserved market rentZillow ZORI / monthNampa$1.6KIdaho Falls$1.4KCoeur d'Alene$1.8KGreeley$1.5KGross yieldZORI × 12 ÷ ZHVINampa4.7%Idaho Falls4.2%Coeur d'Alene3.5%Greeley4.2%
Bars begin at zero within each measure. Gross yield is a screening ratio before financing, taxes, insurance, vacancy, maintenance or management costs.
Same state01

Idaho Falls, ID

Compared with Nampa, typical home value is $20k lower, monthly rent is $244 lower, and gross yield is 0.5 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
42.2%
Renter share
35.8%
One-unit stock
70.1%
20+ unit stock
5.2%
Same state02

Coeur d'Alene, ID

Compared with Nampa, typical home value is $193k higher, monthly rent is $180 higher, and gross yield is 1.1 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
56.6%
Renter share
40.5%
One-unit stock
70.4%
20+ unit stock
8.1%
Closest data profile03

Greeley, CO

Compared with Nampa, typical home value is $4k higher, monthly rent is $152 lower, and gross yield is 0.5 percentage points lower.

Rent burden 30%+
59.9%
Renter share
39.1%
One-unit stock
63.4%
20+ unit stock
9.1%

These are analytical alternatives, not recommendations. The structural measures come from Census ACS; price and rent use the Zillow releases shown on each card and in the source ledger below.

Wider market context

What surrounds the city without being mistaken for it

The layers below answer different questions. County records describe listing, migration, financing and hazard conditions around the city; metro records describe jobs, supply and permits; the mortgage rate is national.

Same measure, wider boundary

City marker against intersecting counties

CityCounty range
Typical home value$420.7K$420.7K$418.8KObserved market rent$1.7K$1.7K$1.6K
Both levels use Zillow indexes, but the county records cover land and housing outside the city. The comparison supplies context; it does not replace the city value.
Same Zillow index families

City limits versus the linked metro

NampaMetro
Observed market rentMetro $1.9KCity $1.6K · -13.2%Typical home valueMetro $497.2KCity $418.8K · -15.8%Gross yieldMetro 4.5%City 4.7% · +3.1%
Zillow ZORI and ZHVI use the same release month at both boundaries. Gross yield is rent × 12 ÷ home value; the metro contains the city and is context, not a substitute.

Search all direct city–metro gaps in the interactive atlas.

COUNTY LAYER

The intersecting county

This boundary extends beyond the city and is shown only as context.

2026-06
Active listings
802
Listing DOM
38 days
FHFA one-year
▲ 1.4%
Net migration
1,854
Investor share
5.5%
Effective property tax
0.52%
Top hazard
inland flooding
Expected loss ratio
0.08%
METRO LAYER

Boise City, ID

Open metro analysis →
Job growth▲ 1.0%12m to 2026-06
Permitted units9,9102026 YTD through M06
Permits / 1,00012.2broader metro population
Months of supply1.72026-05-01
Median DOM29 daysRedfin metro tracker
Price drops36.4%Redfin metro tracker
Wider-context figures are not inputs to the city gross yield and are never used to fill a missing city price, rent or ACS measure.
What can break the thesis

Three checks before using the city averages

  1. 01

    The city gross yield is before all operating and financing costs, so net returns could differ materially.

  2. 02

    City poverty and unemployment describe demand constraints but do not establish tenant-level payment risk.

  3. 03

    County, metro and national indicators use different geographies and denominators, so combining them into a city estimate would be misleading.

Questions answered

Quick reading guide

Does the Zillow gross yield equal a cap rate?

No. The city Zillow gross yield annualizes typical observed rent against typical value before operating costs; a cap rate requires property-specific net operating income and price.

Does the city vacancy rate show that a rental will lease quickly?

No. City vacancy is housing-stock context; verify subject-property availability, competition, condition, achievable rent and concessions.

How should the broader indicators be used?

Treat county listing measures for Canyon County, metro market and labor measures for Boise City, and the national Freddie Mac rate as context only; do not blend them into a Nampa city estimate.

Sources and geography

What belongs to this city page

Census recognizes this as Nampa city. The place intersects Canyon County.